Is Anna Khait antagonizing the Deep State and risking being suicided??

[dwai]

Evidence of the granny panties?

yeah this forum isn't for conspiracy theories

[NickyPipes]

Evidence of the granny panties?

Also, in Brandon's defense, everyone looks like they have a double chin when photographed from below like that, unelss they're really skinny.

In the photo on the previous page you can see the crease of a very large underpant that covers her full buttox. I am a panty line expert I am 100% confident in my assessment.

Incorrect. Brandon Drexel clearly has a massive double chin acquired from years of being a McDonalds Guy

[Walter Sobchak]

Is this Brandon Drexel? Completely shameful to present yourself in public with such a repulsive double chin. The look of a McDonalds or Burger King Guy

Anna Khait has a flat ass and wears granny panties

Does this mean Drexel works for the FBI?

[Walter Sobchak]

BUMP

Props to ftpjesus, who fortunately avoided going DD recently from COVID.

But not just for that.

The thread title is, "Is Anna Khait antagonizing the Deep State and risking being suicided??", which I thought was ridiculous, but I decided to be nice and not say anything.

Well, looks like he was at least partially right.

Yes, Anna is indeed antagonizing the Deep State, and was indeed under investigation for it. Her target? The FBI. She was working with Project Veritas, the conservative group which makes undercover videos to expose bad actors on the left. Supposedly Khait was feigning interest in FBI agents in order to uncover Deep State conspiracies, while secretly recording.

Source?

The NY Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/13/u...t-veritas.html





I would support something like Project Veritas in theory, but they've gone way off the rails in recent times, and can't really be trusted anymore. I guess they needed a pretty girl to seduce potential targets, and they got a very dedicated one in Anna.

I'm glad to see that last paragraph from you because Project "Veritas" just makes shit up and always has.

[Walter Sobchak]

Evidence of the granny panties?

Also, in Brandon's defense, everyone looks like they have a double chin when photographed from below like that, unelss they're really skinny.

In the photo on the previous page you can see the crease of a very large underpant that covers her full buttox. I am a panty line expert I am 100% confident in my assessment.

Incorrect. Brandon Drexel clearly has a massive double chin acquired from years of being a McDonalds Guy

And you call Bill Gates creepy.

[garrett]

I would have never in a million years guessed this all. Someone like her could be some Covert Op, but I'd doubt that personally. And LOL I really did use to work for the US Goverment, so am aware of lots more then most here I'd imagine maybe.

I myself never heard of this Veritas or whatever group. Im also not the one one who would ever be moved mentally much I don't think. Or help with some kind of movement such as his may have been here. Now it's unspoken but we'll known that the US Govt does have entities all around us. They do go to the highest level within The United States Goverment of course. Been there done that with the Goverment in a sense. For me I don't care i'm not scared or Moved in anyway positive or negative by our Government at all. If I could help them and knew I should or could I would. Aside from All this 'OMG' she espionaged whoever. This really is stupid kid shit as far as I'm concerned. And I really have worked with and seen Special Forces do what the do the US Army and I can assure you all. This girl is cupcake stuff for real. Maybe she was an 'easy Mark (SFO)', shout out cmoney =).. for our Govt. To find out more about the whole poker or gambling worlds, who knows anything's possible but ive already thought about this stupid thing way too long now, so anyway.. That is possible and I could see that. But as far as she goes this is just cupcake stuff friends. She isn't a Covert Op highly doubt that. But whoever really know right. Some things actually really are 'Top Secret'. They do exist and are actually around us too at times. So who really knows actually.

This whole Anna Khait story actually has me smiling. I think she knows someone I know lol. I've never once heard anything bad or weird about her fwiw (Borgata Regs)..

[TheXFactor]

Obvious Russian spy and Donald Trump supporter.

[Kalam]

BUMP

Props to ftpjesus, who fortunately avoided going DD recently from COVID.

But not just for that.

The thread title is, "Is Anna Khait antagonizing the Deep State and risking being suicided??", which I thought was ridiculous, but I decided to be nice and not say anything.

Well, looks like he was at least partially right.

Yes, Anna is indeed antagonizing the Deep State, and was indeed under investigation for it. Her target? The FBI. She was working with Project Veritas, the conservative group which makes undercover videos to expose bad actors on the left. Supposedly Khait was feigning interest in FBI agents in order to uncover Deep State conspiracies, while secretly recording.

Source?

The NY Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/13/u...t-veritas.html





I would support something like Project Veritas in theory, but they've gone way off the rails in recent times, and can't really be trusted anymore. I guess they needed a pretty girl to seduce potential targets, and they got a very dedicated one in Anna.

I'm glad to see that last paragraph from you because Project "Veritas" just makes shit up and always has.

Are you claiming their audiotapes are fake? I have never heard anyone accuse them of that. I mean, its fine to accuse someone of being biased and unethical, but at some point the primary source material speaks for itself. When they record a CNN worker saying they don't report black on Asian crime because it doesn't fit the narrative, whatever unethical behavior they used to get to that point, the audio kind of speaks for itself, and shouldn't just be hand waived away as "making shit up"

[Dan Druff]

I'm glad to see that last paragraph from you because Project "Veritas" just makes shit up and always has.

Are you claiming their audiotapes are fake? I have never heard anyone accuse them of that. I mean, its fine to accuse someone of being biased and unethical, but at some point the primary source material speaks for itself. When they record a CNN worker saying they don't report black on Asian crime because it doesn't fit the narrative, whatever unethical behavior they used to get to that point, the audio kind of speaks for itself, and shouldn't just be hand waived away as "making shit up"

The problem is they don't present the entire videos for us to watch. We only get a highly edited version. I understand editing down for time, so the average viewer doesn't have to sit through 3 hours of crap to see 5 minutes worth of good stuff. However, they should make the unedited version available, or at least the unedited segments to where you're sure you're hearing everything in context.

I think they often expose some interesting stuff, but I always walk away thinking that I can't fully trust it because it's so damn edited. What are they hiding?

Also, it's disappointing to see that they got millions of funding, and chose to go after perceived anti-Trump Republicans and the FBI. Surely there was much better use of that money.

[Kalam]

Are you claiming their audiotapes are fake? I have never heard anyone accuse them of that. I mean, its fine to accuse someone of being biased and unethical, but at some point the primary source material speaks for itself. When they record a CNN worker saying they don't report black on Asian crime because it doesn't fit the narrative, whatever unethical behavior they used to get to that point, the audio kind of speaks for itself, and shouldn't just be hand waived away as "making shit up"

The problem is they don't present the entire videos for us to watch. We only get a highly edited version. I understand editing down for time, so the average viewer doesn't have to sit through 3 hours of crap to see 5 minutes worth of good stuff. However, they should make the unedited version available, or at least the unedited segments to where you're sure you're hearing everything in context.

I think they often expose some interesting stuff, but I always walk away thinking that I can't fully trust it because it's so damn edited. What are they hiding?

Also, it's disappointing to see that they got millions of funding, and chose to go after perceived anti-Trump Republicans and the FBI. Surely there was much better use of that money.

I hope you understand that this isn't any different than NYT, CNN, MSNBC, etc. These companies use extensive editing to take out anything that doesn't fit the narrative, and don't release full tapes. I mean, if the accusation is that Project Veritas is as bad and unethical journalistically as NYT, MSNBC and WaPo, I am fine with that.

My current favorite is a few weeks ago there was a video going around the progressive news circuit of some white guy who supposedly attacked a super elderly, frail Asian women in San Francisco who supposedly beat him up with a stick which they tied into their "white hate against Asians" narrative. And there was some extremely edited video supposedly supporting this narrative, and he was charged and had to be taken away by a paramedic. And I remember our own Jimmy proudly shared the video.

Anyways, because he was being charged the city has had to actually eventually make available the full video, and what it actually showed was he was in the process of being beat up by a couple black people, and while he was in the process of being beat up he confusedly lashed out and hit the Asian woman, and her beating him off with a stick did absolutely nothing, and the injuries he sustained were from the original beating.

Of course you won't see any retractions from the progressive MSM who inaccurately reported the story using edited video, and probably knew all along that is what they were doing.

Edit: It should be noticed if you watch the full unedited video you see all the people involved appear homeless and extremely mentally ill, and the correct narrative is probably more about homelessness, mental health disease and rampant drug use in the streets of San Francisco, than any race based narrative, especially a "white hate" narrative.

[JoeD]

Obvious Russian spy and Donald Trump supporter.

Anna is definitely prepared for combat and I feel a whole lot safer about it

[NickyPipes]

In the photo on the previous page you can see the crease of a very large underpant that covers her full buttox. I am a panty line expert I am 100% confident in my assessment.

Incorrect. Brandon Drexel clearly has a massive double chin acquired from years of being a McDonalds Guy

And you call Bill Gates creepy.

Sorry you haven’t seen enough women take off their pants to be able to immediately and confidently recognize when a woman is wearing different cut of panties. We all know you love Asians and they are wearing the biggest granny panties you can buy. Don’t be salty!

[Walter Sobchak]

And you call Bill Gates creepy.

Sorry you haven’t seen enough women take off their pants to be able to immediately and confidently recognize when a woman is wearing different cut of panties. We all know you love Asians and they are wearing the biggest granny panties you can buy. Don’t be salty!

Where do you get that.

[Kalam]

In my empirical experience Asian women don't wear the biggest granny panties, but admittedly very small sample size.

As an aside, when I was in a college gym a long time ago some Asian chick on the stretching mats was wearing very loose short shorts (this was before tights became popular) and when she went to do butterfly stretch her g-string was shifted to the side and you could see everything (scorched earth in case you were wondering). I didn't say anything to her, as I was not sure what the proper etiquette is to tell someone their pussy was showing (I still am not).

[NickyPipes]

In my empirical experience Asian women don't wear the biggest granny panties, but admittedly very small sample size.

As an aside, when I was in a college gym a long time ago some Asian chick on the stretching mats was wearing very loose short shorts (this was before tights became popular) and when she went to do butterfly stretch her g-string was shifted to the side and you could see everything (scorched earth in case you were wondering). I didn't say anything to her, as I was not sure what the proper etiquette is to tell someone their pussy was showing (I still am not).

Ever been to Asia pal?

African American women also wear HUGE MASSIVE granny panties under their tights. A dreadful and offensive sight that should be criminalized!

[Kalam]

In my empirical experience Asian women don't wear the biggest granny panties, but admittedly very small sample size.

As an aside, when I was in a college gym a long time ago some Asian chick on the stretching mats was wearing very loose short shorts (this was before tights became popular) and when she went to do butterfly stretch her g-string was shifted to the side and you could see everything (scorched earth in case you were wondering). I didn't say anything to her, as I was not sure what the proper etiquette is to tell someone their pussy was showing (I still am not).

Ever been to Asia pal?

African American women also wear HUGE MASSIVE granny panties under their tights. A dreadful and offensive sight that should be criminalized!

No, fair enough. I was thinking of Asian American women.

As an aside, I can't even get into Japanese porn at all. Between the blurring and the weird straight pubic hair it is just all too off-putting.

[rum dick]

In my empirical experience Asian women don't wear the biggest granny panties, but admittedly very small sample size.

As an aside, when I was in a college gym a long time ago some Asian chick on the stretching mats was wearing very loose short shorts (this was before tights became popular) and when she went to do butterfly stretch her g-string was shifted to the side and you could see everything (scorched earth in case you were wondering). I didn't say anything to her, as I was not sure what the proper etiquette is to tell someone their pussy was showing (I still am not).

Ever been to Asia pal?

African American women also wear HUGE MASSIVE granny panties under their tights. A dreadful and offensive sight that should be criminalized!

Which female ethnic group DOESN'T wear granny panties? Asking for a friend.

[NickyPipes]

Latina

[Dan Druff]

The problem is they don't present the entire videos for us to watch. We only get a highly edited version. I understand editing down for time, so the average viewer doesn't have to sit through 3 hours of crap to see 5 minutes worth of good stuff. However, they should make the unedited version available, or at least the unedited segments to where you're sure you're hearing everything in context.

I think they often expose some interesting stuff, but I always walk away thinking that I can't fully trust it because it's so damn edited. What are they hiding?

Also, it's disappointing to see that they got millions of funding, and chose to go after perceived anti-Trump Republicans and the FBI. Surely there was much better use of that money.

I hope you understand that this isn't any different than NYT, CNN, MSNBC, etc. These companies use extensive editing to take out anything that doesn't fit the narrative, and don't release full tapes. I mean, if the accusation is that Project Veritas is as bad and unethical journalistically as NYT, MSNBC and WaPo, I am fine with that.

My current favorite is a few weeks ago there was a video going around the progressive news circuit of some white guy who supposedly attacked a super elderly, frail Asian women in San Francisco who supposedly beat him up with a stick which they tied into their "white hate against Asians" narrative. And there was some extremely edited video supposedly supporting this narrative, and he was charged and had to be taken away by a paramedic. And I remember our own Jimmy proudly shared the video.

Anyways, because he was being charged the city has had to actually eventually make available the full video, and what it actually showed was he was in the process of being beat up by a couple black people, and while he was in the process of being beat up he confusedly lashed out and hit the Asian woman, and her beating him off with a stick did absolutely nothing, and the injuries he sustained were from the original beating.

Of course you won't see any retractions from the progressive MSM who inaccurately reported the story using edited video, and probably knew all along that is what they were doing.

Edit: It should be noticed if you watch the full unedited video you see all the people involved appear homeless and extremely mentally ill, and the correct narrative is probably more about homelessness, mental health disease and rampant drug use in the streets of San Francisco, than any race based narrative, especially a "white hate" narrative.

Believe me, I'm not any defender of the mainstream media, and yes, they will often show edited videos to mislead people. The Nick Sandmann story was one of the most egregious examples of this.

Still, when you're an alternative media organization like Project Veritas, which exists solely on the internet, you need to credibly back up what you're doing. So if you want to expose people, release the entire video on your website, and then also release an honestly-edited shorter version with the highlights. I guess you can edit out the really mundane parts which don't provide any value to the viewer, but you should always make the full context of conversations available.

In the recent video of the CNN editor admitting things, you just saw him making a bunch of statements, without any context of what was said before or after. That immediately raises red flags, even if they were legitimately exposing some wrongdoing at CNN.

Remember that incident some years ago where a pretty ESPN reporter was on video degrading a low-level employee at a tow truck company, after she got her car towed for being illegally parked? The mainstream media loved this, and used it to shame the rich, pretty, privileged woman who was talking down to a low-end, less-attractive female employee who was just doing her job at a towing company. Except the video was highly edited, and the media didn't bother to ask questions about that. Upon further investigation by internet sleuths, reviews of that company revealed countless people claiming that the staff at the tow truck comapny (including the employee in question) was incredibly rude and nasty to everyone, and that the company itself was basically operating a predatory towing scam which was made illegal in several US states. So that changed everything. This is why it's so important to see the entire conversation, and not just clips.

[ftpjesus]

In my empirical experience Asian women don't wear the biggest granny panties, but admittedly very small sample size.

As an aside, when I was in a college gym a long time ago some Asian chick on the stretching mats was wearing very loose short shorts (this was before tights became popular) and when she went to do butterfly stretch her g-string was shifted to the side and you could see everything (scorched earth in case you were wondering). I didn't say anything to her, as I was not sure what the proper etiquette is to tell someone their pussy was showing (I still am not).

Ever been to Asia pal?

African American women also wear HUGE MASSIVE granny panties under their tights. A dreadful and offensive sight that should be criminalized!

Mostly true but let’s be honest the serious criminal act clothingwise was the creation of Spanx.