Originally Posted by
AhoosierA
I'll be on radio tonight fellas. Explaining my court dealings with CM.
I listened the interview...but one thing sticks out. Why didn't you or your attorney just show that you aren't Kevin Davis (or whatever the guy's name is who has been posting about the scammer)? All you had to do is to show who is the operator of the site, and where it is originated from. The "Not me" defense works every time when you can show who actually is doing the conduct Mitchell was complaining about. Back when I was litigating, it worked every time I used it. Also, your attorney saying you "made a mistake" was a huge mistake. You didn't make the mistake...Kevin Davis did.
Druff was correct in his assessment of the appellate process. And all you had to show was that there was no evidence presented at the original hearing to prevail. But, the Judge knew it was never going to get to that stage and just did as he pleased. The Judge was probably thinking the whole thing didn't pass the smell test. And, he may be correct. There are things you aren't telling us about the whole thing.