Blatant YouTube Baccarat Scammer Christopher Mitchell “Professional Gambler”

[Mrhorney]

My stupidity Folks , I have only just realised that Elmo isn’t tied up but is voluntarily going going around on the fan to amuse his fellow coked up friends , I didn’t think really think that anyone would be that mean to Elmo , sorry 😣

[PositiveVariance]

Did you guys see the comments on yesterdays Blackjack video??

User FELIX ANDERSSEN, OWNED Chrissy in his comments. Why on earth Chrissy would leave it up, I have no idea. He explains to Chrissy what we already know. Then Chrissy challenges him to "Compare Bank Accounts". When Felix agrees, Chrissy goes silent. LOL










I think its funny how Chrissy thinks everyone is the Idiot, when players and casino personnel look at Chrissy as the true idiot.

[PositiveVariance]

This is the major issue Chrissy doesn't understand with Martingaling Blackjack. Unlike Baccarat where you almost have a 50/50 chance of winning (or losing), Blackjack is much different. Your chances of winning a given hand are far below 50%. The difference between the actual winning percentage and the losing percentage in many games is very close to the house edge. Blackjack is different because not all bets are paid 1:1, and the player is allowed other opportunities such as splitting and doubling when the odds of winning are higher. As we know with Chrissy's system, he chooses not to take these advantageous opportunities.

Excluding ties (Makes it easier to explain), The player has a 46.36% chance of winning and a 53.64% chance of losing. So to martingale a system where you only have a 46% chance of winning is disastrous! This is why Chrissy is the only IDIOT that Martingales or does No Bust, No Split, No Double. He just doesn't do one or the other which is straight up moronic, he DOES BOTH!

[JeffDime]

This is the major issue Chrissy doesn't understand with Martingaling Blackjack. Unlike Baccarat where you almost have a 50/50 chance of winning (or losing), Blackjack is much different. Your chances of winning a given hand are far below 50%. The difference between the actual winning percentage and the losing percentage in many games is very close to the house edge. Blackjack is different because not all bets are paid 1:1, and the player is allowed other opportunities such as splitting and doubling when the odds of winning are higher. As we know with Chrissy's system, he chooses not to take these advantageous opportunities.

Excluding ties (Makes it easier to explain), The player has a 46.36% chance of winning and a 53.64% chance of losing. So to martingale a system where you only have a 46% chance of winning is disastrous! This is why Chrissy is the only IDIOT that Martingales or does No Bust, No Split, No Double. He just doesn't do one or the other which is straight up moronic, he DOES BOTH!

Well done PV. This is something I really would like to explore and expose further. Like you said in Baccarat there is one decision point. You choose Player or Banker and the cards fall as they may. You can’t fuck it up. However, in Blackjack he can both do stupid shit like martingaling and then proceed to play the hand horribly. It is a recipe for annihilation of a bankroll.

[TheRivers]

This is the major issue Chrissy doesn't understand with Martingaling Blackjack. Unlike Baccarat where you almost have a 50/50 chance of winning (or losing), Blackjack is much different. Your chances of winning a given hand are far below 50%. The difference between the actual winning percentage and the losing percentage in many games is very close to the house edge. Blackjack is different because not all bets are paid 1:1, and the player is allowed other opportunities such as splitting and doubling when the odds of winning are higher. As we know with Chrissy's system, he chooses not to take these advantageous opportunities.

Excluding ties (Makes it easier to explain), The player has a 46.36% chance of winning and a 53.64% chance of losing. So to martingale a system where you only have a 46% chance of winning is disastrous! This is why Chrissy is the only IDIOT that Martingales or does No Bust, No Split, No Double. He just doesn't do one or the other which is straight up moronic, he DOES BOTH!

And he truly seems to think it works. But he has to have played the game enough to know that it doesn’t. I’m sure it works at this table...or that table. Heck you might have a series of tables where it will make you profit. But I agree with you. In Blackjack that 6 martingale loss is going to happen much more frequently. In baccarat yo can likely get away with it for a while longer...but it will bite you there as well.

And I love how he refers to basic strategy players as “selfish” because they take cards that appear to always be the ones that he needs to get a good hand. He doesn’t see the randomness and long-term leveling of the whole thing. But then again, why would he? He thinks that because he never sits there beyond 15 minutes that there isn’t enough time for him to lose. He fails to understand that playing time is cumulative. It doesn’t matter how many small chunks you create out of it. The more of those 15 minute chunks you play the more of those 6 martingale losses you’re going to encounter in Blackjack. With what I tested yesterday the whole “team” of no bust brainiacs ran into it on only their second table (or...their second 15 minute gambling session if you use Chrissy’s terms).

[shoeshine box]

I had a little time to kill today so I decided to take Chrissy at his word. In his Blackjack demonstration videos he always says that if you don’t believe him “try it yourself.” So...I did.

I dealt actual cards to three players in the Chrissy ultimate Nirvana situation....all three of the players would be playing the no bust and would be martingaling. You know the scenario....the one that Chrissy says it’s impossible for the casino to win on?

Here’s what I set up:

- 8 decks of cards in a shoe (yes I do own an actual shoe)
- 3 players each starting with $6300 in chips (which is enough to martingale 6 times with a base bet of $100)
- No player would hit on any hard hand of 12 or above
- No player would hit on a soft hand of 17 or above (because Chrissy says the odds are better here that you will worsen your hand than improve it)
- No player would double down
- No player would split
- No player would take insurance
- Everyone would martingale

The object was to play two shoes with all players playing Chrissy’s exact strategy. If at any time a player suffered the “impossible” 6 losses in a row that player would be done for the simulation while the remaining players continued. Any player who did not experience the 6 in a row loss would keep playing all the way till the end of the second shoe. Once either all three players had dropped out or the second shoe ended I would tally up how much money each player had left.

So...here’s what happened.

In shoe number one none of the three players suffered the 6 in a row loss. Player number 2 made it to his fifth martingale at one point but won that hand. Player number 3 made it to the fifth martingale once (and got a Blackjack on it) and then also got to a sixth martingale but won that hand as well. So...first shoe comes to an end and Chrissy is looking like a genius. Every player had made profit.

Now...on to shoe number two....and since I know Chrissy would just say that everyone should walk away from the table since they were ahead I got up from where I was playing and moved to a different part of my house...you know...because this makes the cards fresh and is a far better strategy than just playing a new shoe at the same table.

The second shoe started off well and good with all players winning units with only a few levels of martingale. But then approximately 35% into the shoe player 2 was on his 6th martingale and player 3 was on his 5th. Both players would be done in consecutive hands. That’s right...two players achieved the six in a row loss (the one that isn’t supposed to happen when you martingale and everyone at the table is playing no bust) pretty much at the same time, Can you imagine that? So this left player number one. He played 1:1 with the dealer from that point forward...and he almost made it all the way to the end...But that 6 in a row loss was not to be denied. It happened to him just a few hands before the cut card was to come out.

So...in just a single shoe (albeit the second one ...or the second “table” that was played) all three players suffered the six in a row loss and gave the house $6300 each. But because the first shoe had gone okay for them no player had gone completely bust. Based on different players having gotten Blackjacks at different times during the proceedings the remaining numbers were different across the three. Here are the final tallies after two shoes:

Player 1 - Finished with $3300 for a loss of $3000
Player 2 - Finished with $2000 for a loss of $4300
Player 3 - Finished with $3900 for a loss of $2400

Remember that Player 3 was the one that hit the Blackjack on his 5th martingale, which meant that he picked up an extra 8 units just on that one hand. Player 2 might have hit one blackjack the whole time and it was at one of the lower martingales....so he did the worst.

So yes...we had the scenario here where for a little while this strategy appeared to be working well. But all it took was one more shoe (which could have just as easily been a different table at the same casino or moving to a completely different casino...it really doesn't’ matter) and already all three players were in he negative by a considerable amount. You can play 15 minutes per table or 15 minutes per casino and it doesn’t matter. 15 minutes at two tables is the same as 30 minutes at one...it’s just that simple. And it doesn’t matter if the time is in a single day or spreads across multiple days....at some point the six in a row will come.

While I didn’t keep stats specifically on this I can say that I observed a lot of situations wherein the players lost because they didn't’ take hits on 12-16 and had they done so it could have worked out a little differently (i.e. this was not a situation where the dealer was simply getting 20s every hand. But the dealer also wasn’t busting a lot at various times and that’s where the whole no bust strategy is going to kill you.

Hopefully the people who have started thinking that Chrissy’s strategy is great are reading this and will maybe think twice. I was hoping to video the whole thing but didn’t. Maybe next time.

-------------------------------FANTASTIC!TREMENDOUS! please tell us you really did move to another part of the House!! I love it!

"Now...on to shoe number two....and since I know Chrissy would just say that everyone should walk away from the table since they were ahead I got up from where I was playing and moved to a different part of my house...you know...because this makes the cards fresh and is a far better strategy than just playing a new shoe at the same table."



funny that was, alas I still think ?Rivers et al..educated CM more in this thread than any book, he gonna digest and re-gurgitate and refine his own weak game....
he shd be learning what he is told here by the $eat of his shorts..Using a Martingale in the way he does is a Fools errand he shd of been aware of since a lad...
..to much valuable info he rcvs here when he can find it if he searched for it, keep him busy to $cam ppl to.....
you do bequeath him to generously. imo.... But thanks for the refresher course! I enjoyed reading how spot on the post is.! SSbx.
stay humble...

[Dan Druff]

In Chrissy's last blackjack video, it's hilarious when he starts dealing cards onto his cheap fold-up table, and keeps saying, "See? I'm starting out losing, you know this is random!"

Yeah Chrissy, those cards are random. I actually agree.

However, it's also NOT live. So if you record yourself playing your dumbass flatbet Martingale strategy and lose the dreaded 6 hands in a row, you simply press the delete button on the recording and start over. Then you keep repeating this until you ultimately "win", and post that one.

I could do the same thing with myself playing poker. I could record sessions online and only post the winners, and then claim I win 100% of the time.

Zero point zero chance Chrissy would ever post a video of him losing.

[TheRivers]

Ladies and gentlemen...the transition solely (or mostly) to crypto has occurred. Quite the move by a guy who has spent so much time pushing Blackjack over the past month.

And Stacy’a plan for crypto is exploding all over the internet. Better get on it quickly.

And like I said a month ago when he started pushing this...this is a much better scam for him. He literally doesn’t have to show anything..and he even eludes to this...Doesn’t have to go into casinos (where he’s been banned anyway), doesn’t have to worry about chips and scorecards, and regardless of what actually happens in the market he will tell you he made money (Bitcoin value goes up then he’s sitting on a profit...Bitcoin value goes down then he shorted it and therefore still made money...even hinted at this in a response to a comment today). It’s all vapor and right up his alley. And anyone who believes that in just one month this guy has done enough with crypto to become a mentor is out of their mind.

Oh...and gambling in a casino is now officially a J.O.B. because you trade your time there for money You can’t make this stuff up.

The ones I really feel bad for are the people who paid him money to get the “package” with his new inner circle. They are about to find out that the package is now down to one thing...Crypto.

[JeffDime]

Chrissy’s pivot to Blackjack was a transparent attempt to start to charge for “new strategies”. I think it’s clear the number of suckers have dried up and the onslaught of negative information regarding him clearly has reached more and more potential victims.

I would of loved to have seen the comments he had to delete from his ridiculous video where he deals himself Blackjack using the “No Bust” strategy. Of note is a decent sized gap (3 days or so) between that video and his video today. Look, he will go back to baccarat any day now, we know that. However, making that blackjack video was a big error on his part.

While Baccarat continues to be ripe for all these infinite strategies, as it is basically a binary decision, the book on beating blackjack has basically been written. You need to be able to count cards, have a game with the proper rules, deck penetration, bankroll, discipline etc.

Even for a two-bit hustler like Chrissy, that ridiculous video really showed his ass (per usual). I don’t know what will become of this Bitcoin Inner Circle nonsense. I don’t even know how one makes a video to show he’s no Bitcoin expert, it’s just so utterly ridiculous. Even by Chrissy standards.

[AhoosierA]

Hmmm....Chrissy is trying to move his channel to a Crypto channel? Well, we've seen a professional, with a much bigger following than CM try this move before, and it didn't go well. Ever hear of Professional Poker Player (former?) Doug Polk?? his poker following did not transfer well to the crypto world.

I would have to imagine that the majority of CM's REAL following is from degenerate gamblers who believe there is some code to crack to make it as a whale in the casino.

These degenerates get a thrill from the gamble. They bet money, and get an INSTANT gratification, or disappointment from winning or losing. Investing is slow and boring and therefore they rarely get the instant gratification.

He will start to lose his following, and there are a lot more channels out there that are giving way better advice for crypto and investing.

It's only a matter of time before he starts focusing back on baccarratt and blackjack.

[Forum Wars]

lol. Why quit at leveraging 100x then, Chris? Why not put some of your millions in there and leverage at that 100x and more? You CANNOT lose, up or down. You are truly special.

I believe it is this man's vision alone that alone keeps him in the latest (and by latest I mean 2018) Walmart table-napkin collared shirts.

Alchemists have nothing on this brilliant whacker.

[JeffDime]

Hmmm....Chrissy is trying to move his channel to a Crypto channel? Well, we've seen a professional, with a much bigger following than CM try this move before, and it didn't go well. Ever hear of Professional Poker Player (former?) Doug Polk?? his poker following did not transfer well to the crypto world.

I would have to imagine that the majority of CM's REAL following is from degenerate gamblers who believe there is some code to crack to make it as a whale in the casino.

These degenerates get a thrill from the gamble. They bet money, and get an INSTANT gratification, or disappointment from winning or losing. Investing is slow and boring and therefore they rarely get the instant gratification..

He will start to lose his following, and there are a lot more channels out there that are giving way better advice for crypto and investing.

It's only a matter of time before he starts focusing back on baccarratt and blackjack.

Well said Hossier. This will last for as long as people are joining his “inner circle”. Basically as things inevitably blew up in his face (per usual for this queen) with the baccarat Facebook group, he had to justify throwing people out and resetting. Now we have this ridiculous “inner circle”.

I guess maybe he’ll get a few suckers, but not nearly enough to sustain himself. Then the cycle begins again back with baccarat. Until his channel is down, he goes to jail or he literally is so broke he can’t muster enough energy to make a video (Highly Unlikely). The sand in the hour glass is moving quickly to the end of his Crypto nonsense.


Addl note- in part this crypto pivot, I believe, is to help clean up the mess left in the Baccarat Facebook group. He claims he is “semi-retired” to try and subside the resistance. Once he feels things have toned down enough, he will be back to bacc 100%

[Forum Wars]

At 6:04 in the newest video



Christopher is 100% doing this...




In fact, he almost never touches his face in videos (low baseline).

Guy is a scammer. As someone else said earlier, I wish he played poker.

[BedWetterBettor]

This is the face of someone who is retired, coincidentally he never touches his face with his hands, they’re preoccupied with little Kyle Jr.



He also has the meth stains on his teeth to go with his receding hairline!



This is the face of a scammer who is trying to divert your attention away from his current failed scam and on to the next. He even says around 14:40 he is NOT done playing Baccarat and will return to it once he cons more people with his Inner Circle Jerk scam.

He’s simply creating a false sense of urgency like before and making suckers think the only way to get his worthless strategies and advice is to pay $1000 now.

Wasn’t he also promising to play live in the casino once or twice a week for the Inner Circle Jerk members? Guess he’s starting the lies early this time!!

[TheRivers]

So here’s a thought....Could we be about to see a Chrissy exit from Vegas? Could that be factoring into the new focus on crypto? He’s coming up on one year in that condo...and while who knows for sure if he’s been paying his rent all along we do know that evictions could be possible soon. And if he had a one year lease...well that’s coming to an end...so possibly another reason for the owner to get him out of there. Not being in Vegas would mean a burden for the gambling scam (even though he did it plenty before he moved to Vegas). But crypto (as he so clearly pointed out) can be done from anywhere. His son is a bit older now and would likely be a bit more difficult to drag around than he was a year ago....even though that was downright offensive the way they dragged him from casino to casino as an infant. They only have one car so no way he could leave Stacy and Champers at home while he himself went back to driving all over the country.

No way to know for certain..but the timing sure would line up for an exit from Vegas.

The other thing is....I don’t get why he he’s positioning Stacy as the mastermind of the crypto millionaire plan. Wouldn’t Mr. Crypto Secret Handshake Club want to promote himself as the genius with all of the fool-proof strategies that are guaranteed to make you rich? I mean...seriously....he could have just gone into the casinos day after day playing that brew Baccarat strategy that he thought up at the end of 2020 and he’d have guaranteed income every single day. Surely he’d only give up a 100% winning activity if the crypto thing had the same guarantee with even larger payouts than 2K-3K per day. Could Stacy really be smarter than him and come up with a better way of life than Baccarat? He would never live with himself if that were the case. Heck he was embarrassed when she beat him at bowling.

Anyway...just some thoughts that popped into my head. We now return you to your regularly scheduled scam busting.

[Dan Druff]

I think Chrissy's transition to "only crypto" is because he lost his ass at blackjack in some recent attempt to actually play (which of course we didn't see), and now he's demoralized that he's losing in both games consistently.

So he can't even bring himself to do videos about "winning strategies" when every time he's getting slaughtered at the casino.

In the meantime, the idiot probably bought a small amount of bitcoin a month ago, and saw it appreciate, and now thinks that's his way to those elusive riches. The lazy side of him loves it even more, because as he said, it's not "work". You just buy and sit on it. Even gambling requires some effort.

As AHoosierA said, this isn't going to translate well, because Chrissy's followers are there for gambling systems, not crypto systems. Gambling "systems" appeal to people because they get instant gratification, and they also imagine themselves getting comps and having the gambling itself pay for their vacation to Vegas. Crypto is far less sexy, as it more resembles the stock market.

Folks, once there is a lack of interest in his crypto BS, he will be right back to baccarat, and pretend he never "retired".

Also LOL @ paying for Stacy's systems. Isn't she just a former nurse? Why does she have any expertise at crypto or gambling? (Of course we know the answer -- she doesn't!)

[JeffDime]

Also LOL @ paying for Stacy's systems. Isn't she just a former nurse? Why does she have any expertise at crypto or gambling? (Of course we know the answer -- she doesn't!)

So Chrissy, you being so healthy & wealthy, living the life of your dreams and all you want to do is change peoples lives. No shot you’re dusted, busted & not to be trusted. You also encourage people to hit the red subscribe button, if they like the video you encourage them to hit the like button, if they need to contact you the information is in the description and you encourage them to leave a comment which will most likely be deleted.

That being said, you are dumb washed up scamming old queen. Your justification for charging people for your “inner circle” was partly to offset the “5K” you get charged to be in the Illuminati of crypto “inner circle”. But you just said your wife came up with your whole Bitcoin system. So I guess you don’t need to keep paying for your inner circle and can stop charging people for, let’s be kind fuckhole, “novice advice”.

I would encourage you to grow a spine and go to the nearest police department & turn yourself in. Just tell them you are total piece of shit fraud that has conned people out of 100’s of thousands. Ahhh they probably won’t give a shit for a two-bit old scamming queen like you. I guess I just encourage you to go fuck yourself for now. The time will come when someone of authority will care. In the meantime enjoy those little bottles of shampoo, the towels & blankets you undoubtedly hoarded from your hotel stays. That’s as close to a suite you are going to get nowadays.

[Elmo]

This fucking cunt just never stops...

[Dan Druff]

He wishes he was scamming the casinos.

The casinos have taken a ton of money from him.

Unfortunately, that money came from scam victims who thought they were learning to beat the casinos.

[AhoosierA]

Some good news today!!

The judge had reversed the TPO order he had erroneously issued against me from CM, but he had scheduled a "follow up" hearing because he wanted to make sure we were leaving each other alone (as the judge still believed I was responsible for the YTSE videos).

My lawyer stated that unless I had any issues I wanted to bring up, I wouldn't need to show up and he would represent me. I felt comfortable enough for him to do that.

Christopher Mitchell didn't even show up and the judge completely closed it out. That chapter in the saga is over.

I believe Druff is still accepting donations as we haven't reached the $1.5k yet that it cost me to hire the attorney to get the TPO reversed, if anyone is still feeling generous.

Thank you.