Page 609 of 857 FirstFirst ... 109509559599605606607608609610611612613619659709 ... LastLast
Results 12,161 to 12,180 of 17129

Thread: Blatant Gambling Scammer Christopher Mitchell (YouTube/Baccarat/Roulette/Sportsbetting)

  1. #12161
    Gold The Boz's Avatar
    Reputation
    798
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    1,039
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Yes it can be a Facebook strike for streaming content that doesn’t belong to you. This would include unauthorized rebroadcast of a PPV fight.

    https://blog.onestream.live/facebook...rights-issues/

    https://www.vondranlegal.com/legal-r...-united-states

    https://www.geekwire.com/2015/perisc...from-the-game/

    https://m.facebook.com/help/325058084212425

    Druff, you have any thoughts on going after todays video illegally rebroadcasting the PPV fight?

  2. #12162
    Silver
    Reputation
    880
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    626
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Did anyone else catch a short glimpse of Stacy during the live boxing event? No wonder her pictures haven’t been posted on the website. She looks haggard and is beginning to pack on the pounds to keep up with her tubby husband. As they say, Keeping Up with the Mitchells!

  3. #12163
    Silver
    Reputation
    880
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    626
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by crudebar View Post
    Him stating it was rigged and his reasoning made absolutely no sense.

    If it was rigged they would have had Paul win by knock-out in the later rounds.

    As if they thought "lets make the fight boring and have Fury win by decision." Yeah that makes sense money wise.

    A Paul knock out in 8th would have been huge. But no lets rig it so Fury just touches his glove to the mat and wins by decision anyways. Haha. Yeah makes sense.

    The boxing was actually decent. For some reason Chris thought boxing was like the Rocky movies. Another thing he hasn't a clue. Chris was actually hoping it was rigged for Paul and the knock out. He didn't get the rigged so cried rigged on it not being rigged.
    I still believe that Chrissy bet on Jake Paul. He could not admit to the viewers that he picked the wrong boxer to win the fight. Saying that he bet that fight wouldn't go over 6 rounds is much easier for him to accept in his little pea brain than choosing the actual fighter. Didn't the existing inner circle chums get his pick? It would be great to hear from one of them to find out the truth.

    By the way, hy didn't he show the ticket?

    If he waa clever enough to give out his pick to his chums and they bet it through BOL, he really scored with that angle.

    I will thank The Bloat for letting me watch the fight for free though. I have a package subscription to Hulu, Disney and ESPN+ but for some reason, ESPN locked me out of viewing the fight.

    Anyone else think that he bet on Paul?

     
    Comments
      
      BedWetterBettor: Yea, even he wouldn't be dumb enough to lay down a 5 figure bet on KO in 6 rounds or less. That's such an awful bet no matter the odds. Mayyybe for a prop bet of $25 or less. He likely did bet on Paul and saw he was winded by Round 6 and losing,.
      
      The Boz: It was a PPV fight card that isn’t included with ESPN+. Also he did say anyone who get on Paul was an idiot so I don’t think he did.

  4. #12164
    Bronze
    Reputation
    920
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    462
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Yes it can be a Facebook strike for streaming content that doesn’t belong to you. This would include unauthorized rebroadcast of a PPV fight.

    https://blog.onestream.live/facebook...rights-issues/

    https://www.vondranlegal.com/legal-r...-united-states

    https://www.geekwire.com/2015/perisc...from-the-game/

    https://m.facebook.com/help/325058084212425

    Druff, you have any thoughts on going after todays video illegally rebroadcasting the PPV fight?
    Name:  Screenshot 2023-02-26 162547.png
Views: 220
Size:  304.6 KB

    Even worse, he's got the entire Live video available now as a regular video post on his FB.

    But probably so do 100's, if not 1000's of other people, so I doubt this would result in anything other than the specific post being removed, if even that.

  5. #12165
    Silver
    Reputation
    880
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    626
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by PositiveVariance View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bad_ip View Post
    Yes, sadly I have to agree with you. Countless number of times I’ve won $5000 playing roulette thinking my “strategy” was sound, only to play the exact same way hours or days letting and lose your bankroll, with the exact same strategy.

    There are a few strategies that you can utilize to potentially win more than you lose but such strategies require playing online and such small initial bets and patience with small wins that it’s not really sustainable. Eventually emotions and human nature will kick in and you will make bigger bets to make more money and you will lose!
    bad_ip, both Crudebar and Pickleball did a good job explaining why stratagies CANT win long term. NONE of these stratagies that these scammers provide can beat the house edge. I just want to add to what they both said.

    I know a lot of this has already been gone over numerous times and I apologize for those who have read this, but there are many new people who read this thread that may not be aware.

    Regardless of how you structure your bets or what sequence you choose to use, this CAN NOT overcome the house edge long term.

    Let's take Roulette for example. Double Zero 5.26% Edge. If we flip a coin and you win $47 for every correct heads/tails guess and lose $53 for every incorrect guess, there is no way you will come close to breaking even long term. This is the same way to he house edge works.

    bad_ip, I will show you the BEST way to compare stratagies:
    This is the main point you have to remember:
    ALL STRATAGIES ARE THE SAME. They ALL EQUALLY LOSE at the EXACT same rate!

    For example: Let's say we were able to obtain all of Chrissy's Roulette stratagies. Let's say he has 50 of them. Remember Math does not lie. We can run all 50 stratagies through a simulation on a computer program to see what the results will be. Fortunately we already know the results - And so can you! We simulate 1 Billion hands of each strategy, yes this is a lot.

    The Results? ALL 50 Stratagies perform EXACTLY the SAME and LOSE 5.26% of money bet. This means for every $100 that is bet on the table $5.26 will be lost to the house. You get back $94.74 long term.


    So when Chrissy or any other Scammer says, "I have a new strategy", YOU ALREADY KNOW EXACTLY HOW MUCH IT LOSES. Not just close, you know EXACTLY. You make these system sellers look like a clown.

    To make it easy for you, here is a small list games so you know exactly what the return is when he says, I have a "Bacarrat Strategy". You make him look like the fool he is.

    Roulette (Double Zero) 5.26%
    Bacarrat (Banker Bet) 1.06%
    Bacarrat (Player Bet) 1.24%
    War 2.8%

    So when he says, I have a Bacarrat system, you can ignore any instructions on how to play it, because you already know the outcome.


    Remember, cards have NO MEMORY! The Roulette ball has no memory. Previous outcomes have zero impact on future results. See
    PV, extremely well said!

  6. #12166
    Platinum
    Reputation
    2219
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,619
    Load Metric
    68251968
    FB might not care about live streaming the PPV (they probably do), but the PPV provider will definitely care.
    IN NZ they would definitely hunt down anyone who did this.

    As for Chrissy betting on this, if he's just now learning that boxing is fixed, he is even more stupid than I thought, and he was around hovering sub 90 IQ.

    Has he actually shown a winning ticket yet?

     
    Comments
      
      BedWetterBettor: In the US, the FCC shuts down any illegal PPV streams and issues cease & desist orders like crazy. Perhaps send that link the FCC?
    When faced with a difficult decision, ask yourself "What would Micon do?", then do the opposite.

    PFA Rookie of the Year Awards
    2012: The Templar (unknown)
    2013: Jasep $5000+
    2015: Micon's gofundme legal defense $3k begging for 100k:
    2018: 4Dragons
    2019: Dutch Boyd: Mike Postle
    2020: Covid19
    2021: SMIFlorida and some sort of shit coins for $50k
    2022: BDubs leaks chums club info
    2023: 22nd Feb 4th Dec Youtube channels removed
    2024: Dustin Morgan wins Chrissy's $1000 contest

  7. #12167
    Cubic Zirconia
    Reputation
    22
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    10
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickleball View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PositiveVariance View Post

    bad_ip, both Crudebar and Pickleball did a good job explaining why stratagies CANT win long term. NONE of these stratagies that these scammers provide can beat the house edge. I just want to add to what they both said.

    I know a lot of this has already been gone over numerous times and I apologize for those who have read this, but there are many new people who read this thread that may not be aware.

    Regardless of how you structure your bets or what sequence you choose to use, this CAN NOT overcome the house edge long term.

    Let's take Roulette for example. Double Zero 5.26% Edge. If we flip a coin and you win $47 for every correct heads/tails guess and lose $53 for every incorrect guess, there is no way you will come close to breaking even long term. This is the same way to he house edge works.

    bad_ip, I will show you the BEST way to compare stratagies:
    This is the main point you have to remember:
    ALL STRATAGIES ARE THE SAME. They ALL EQUALLY LOSE at the EXACT same rate!

    For example: Let's say we were able to obtain all of Chrissy's Roulette stratagies. Let's say he has 50 of them. Remember Math does not lie. We can run all 50 stratagies through a simulation on a computer program to see what the results will be. Fortunately we already know the results - And so can you! We simulate 1 Billion hands of each strategy, yes this is a lot.

    The Results? ALL 50 Stratagies perform EXACTLY the SAME and LOSE 5.26% of money bet. This means for every $100 that is bet on the table $5.26 will be lost to the house. You get back $94.74 long term.


    So when Chrissy or any other Scammer says, "I have a new strategy", YOU ALREADY KNOW EXACTLY HOW MUCH IT LOSES. Not just close, you know EXACTLY. You make these system sellers look like a clown.

    To make it easy for you, here is a small list games so you know exactly what the return is when he says, I have a "Bacarrat Strategy". You make him look like the fool he is.

    Roulette (Double Zero) 5.26%
    Bacarrat (Banker Bet) 1.06%
    Bacarrat (Player Bet) 1.24%
    War 2.8%

    So when he says, I have a Bacarrat system, you can ignore any instructions on how to play it, because you already know the outcome.


    Remember, cards have NO MEMORY! The Roulette ball has no memory. Previous outcomes have zero impact on future results. See
    PV, extremely well said!
    If Roulette could be beat, then it wouldn’t be gambling then. The issue is whether you can play European roulette consistently and win more money than you lose. You guys are saying no, and that very well may be the case, but I’m not yet convinced that you can’t play in a manner that results in net profit in the long run. I’m not saying I’m correct. I’m saying that all results in European Roulette are possible, but there are many results that are much less probable. For example, how often do you see a perfect chop between 1st dozen and 3rd dozen for 8 consecutive spins?

    I would submit that this is a result that is possible but isn’t probable. In thousands of hours playing and specifically watching for this result, I’ve seen it occur only one time.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by bad_ip; 02-26-2023 at 06:18 PM.

  8. #12168
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10158
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,811
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Definitely report the video for copyright violation. I'll be doing it myself.

    Unfortunately, it may require the owner of the video to report it, in order to get any action. Since it's Chrissy showing himself watching TV, it is harder for the bots scanning for copyright violations to catch it.

    100% Chrissy bet on Jake Paul. I don't need to see any ticket. He wouldn't have been watching if he didn't bet, and Chrissy LOVES favorites. He is incapable of betting on any kind of dog moneyline, and even in spreads he's almost always on the favorite.

    Chrissy's pea brain thinks, "A is better than B, so I'll bet on A! I'm so smart!!!"

    Keep in mind that there were articles on sites like Yahoo which pushed the narrative that this was just a numbers builder for Paul, citing that Tommy Fury's last eight opponents had a combined 24-176-5 record.

    Chrissy might have read articles like the one above, and thought it was free money to bet on Paul. Whoops.

    I think Chrissy learned his lesson from the New Years debacle to not post big tickets in advance of any sport he's claiming to be betting.

     
    Comments
      
      Forum Wars: It's all very funny because it's all very true...LOLOLOLO
      
      Pickleball: Excellent anaolgy!

  9. #12169
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10158
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,811
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Never mind regarding reporting. You need to be the copyright holder to report it. Dumb.

    Only an intellectual property rights owner or their authorized representative may report a suspected infringement. If you believe content on Facebook infringes someone else’s copyright or trademark rights, you may want to let the rights owner know.
    https://www.facebook.com/help/102063...=about_content

  10. #12170
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10158
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,811
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Go to the 44:00 mark of his video and watch him talk about how the fight was rigged, and then concede, "Oh well, it's just money, I made $36k this week". referring to how he can absorb the loss.

    LOL!!

    So he did bet Paul! I knew it!




    https://fb.watch/iXP9QTVLOz/

     
    Comments
      
      Pickleball: I thought he bet Paul as well. He almost always bets on the favorite in any sporting event. Psychologically he couldn't tell the truth that he bet on the wrong boxer. It is always easier for him to lie about nearly everything.
      
      Tellafriend: he's worse than Verm

  11. #12171
    Silver
    Reputation
    700
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    610
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Go to the 44:00 mark of his video and watch him talk about how the fight was rigged, and then concede, "Oh well, it's just money, I made $36k this week". referring to how he can absorb the loss.

    LOL!!

    So he did bet Paul! I knew it!
    I have no clue who he bet. But i do know he didn't bet 10k.

    Just for reference. When he said that----he said he had bet under 6.5 rounds and stated the 36k win after it went past

  12. #12172
    Silver
    Reputation
    700
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    610
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by bad_ip View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickleball View Post

    PV, extremely well said!
    If Roulette could be beat, then it wouldn’t be gambling then. The issue is whether you can play European roulette consistently and win more money than you lose. You guys are saying no, and that very well may be the case, but I’m not yet convinced that you can’t play in a manner that results in net profit in the long run. I’m not saying I’m correct. I’m saying that all results in European Roulette are possible, but there are many results that are much less probable. For example, how often do you see a perfect chop between 1st dozen and 3rd dozen for 8 consecutive spins?

    I would submit that this is a result that is possible but isn’t probable. In thousands of hours playing and specifically watching for this result, I’ve seen it occur only one time.

    You simply can't be more wrong. Sorry but roulette is 100 percent unbeatable long term. Once again, it's a mathematical certainty.

    Playing roulette thinking you can make money long term is the equivalent to the dog chasing the mechanical rabbit in a dog race. "oooo i am so close." you will 100 percent NEVER get there....

    This is also one of the reasons casinos only take a rather smaller percentage as their edge. It makes one think they are so close when in reality there was never a chance at success.

  13. #12173
    Cubic Zirconia
    Reputation
    22
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    10
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by crudebar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bad_ip View Post
    If Roulette could be beat, then it wouldn’t be gambling then. The issue is whether you can play European roulette consistently and win more money than you lose. You guys are saying no, and that very well may be the case, but I’m not yet convinced that you can’t play in a manner that results in net profit in the long run. I’m not saying I’m correct. I’m saying that all results in European Roulette are possible, but there are many results that are much less probable. For example, how often do you see a perfect chop between 1st dozen and 3rd dozen for 8 consecutive spins?

    I would submit that this is a result that is possible but isn’t probable. In thousands of hours playing and specifically watching for this result, I’ve seen it occur only one time.

    You simply can't be more wrong. Sorry but roulette is 100 percent unbeatable long term. Once again, it's a mathematical certainty.

    Playing roulette thinking you can make money long term is the equivalent to the dog chasing the mechanical rabbit in a dog race. "oooo i am so close." you will 100 percent NEVER get there....

    This is also one of the reasons casinos only take a rather smaller percentage as their edge. It makes one think they are so close when in reality there was never a chance at success.
    Ok you win. 100% of players who play roulette over the “long term” (a term you still refuse to define by the way) have lost more money than they’ve won. It is impossible to even be +$100 in the “long term” over a casino in roulette. You got it!

    Per Google:
    How many years does long term mean?
    There are no exact definitions, but short-term usually means a period shorter than two years, medium-term covers a range from 2 to 5 or 10 years and long-term is a period longer than 5 or 10 years.


    I’ve watched all the videos on why the house always wins and negative EV. That doesnt mean that 100% of players play roulette at net negative, even in the long term.

     
    Comments
      
      Pickleball: If you believe that, you should join Chrissy's Elite Inner Circle Club and find our his secret stratergies that he does not give away for free.
    Last edited by bad_ip; 02-26-2023 at 07:29 PM.

  14. #12174
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10158
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,811
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by crudebar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Go to the 44:00 mark of his video and watch him talk about how the fight was rigged, and then concede, "Oh well, it's just money, I made $36k this week". referring to how he can absorb the loss.

    LOL!!

    So he did bet Paul! I knew it!
    I have no clue who he bet. But i do know he didn't bet 10k.

    Just for reference. When he said that----he said he had bet under 6.5 rounds and stated the 36k win after it went past
    I guess it's possible he bet under 6.5 rounds instead of Paul. Either way he lost.

    The 36k win was obviously a "complete lie" and just a way to save face with the chums.

    It's great watching the Billy Goat lose in front of all of his idiot followers.

  15. #12175
    Silver
    Reputation
    880
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    626
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Go to the 44:00 mark of his video and watch him talk about how the fight was rigged, and then concede, "Oh well, it's just money, I made $36k this week". referring to how he can absorb the loss.

    LOL!!

    So he did bet Paul! I knew it!




    https://fb.watch/iXP9QTVLOz/
    Was anyone able to get a screen shot of the fake stacks of 100s that Bubs was playing with? I could not freeze the video and get the screen shot but I clearly saw that every bill had the exact same color on the sides unlike stacks of real 100 dollar bills. The Bloat always has to have that prop working for him. What a schmo.

    Also, I think that Chrissy bet a small wager on Paul because if he had bet 10K on him, he would have come unglued during the live stream. He was far too calm to show his fake cheese grin throughout the stream. Compare his demeanor after he lost 21K on Michigan to how he acted tonight. A 10K loss would have put him over the edge and he might have cut the live stream off to conceal his foul behavior.

    He sure is Father of the Year when he starts swearing in front of Bubs.
    Last edited by Pickleball; 02-26-2023 at 08:33 PM.

  16. #12176
    Silver
    Reputation
    700
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    610
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by bad_ip View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by crudebar View Post


    You simply can't be more wrong. Sorry but roulette is 100 percent unbeatable long term. Once again, it's a mathematical certainty.

    Playing roulette thinking you can make money long term is the equivalent to the dog chasing the mechanical rabbit in a dog race. "oooo i am so close." you will 100 percent NEVER get there....

    This is also one of the reasons casinos only take a rather smaller percentage as their edge. It makes one think they are so close when in reality there was never a chance at success.
    Ok you win. 100% of players who play roulette over the “long term” (a term you still refuse to define by the way) have lost more money than they’ve won. It is impossible to even be +$100 in the “long term” over a casino in roulette. You got it!

    Per Google:
    How many years does long term mean?
    There are no exact definitions, but short-term usually means a period shorter than two years, medium-term covers a range from 2 to 5 or 10 years and long-term is a period longer than 5 or 10 years.


    I’ve watched all the videos on why the house always wins and negative EV. That doesnt mean that 100% of players play roulette at net negative, even in the long term.

    Then you don't understand -EV. That precisely means that 100 percent of all players lose long-term. Last i'll comment on this because it's off topic of Chris.

  17. #12177
    Silver
    Reputation
    700
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    610
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickleball View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Go to the 44:00 mark of his video and watch him talk about how the fight was rigged, and then concede, "Oh well, it's just money, I made $36k this week". referring to how he can absorb the loss.

    LOL!!

    So he did bet Paul! I knew it!




    https://fb.watch/iXP9QTVLOz/
    Was anyone able to get a screen shot of the fake stacks of 100s that Bubs was playing with? I could not freeze the video and get the screen shot but I clearly saw that every bill had the exact same color on the sides unlike stacks of real 100 dollar bills. The Bloat always has to have that prop working for him. What a schmo.
    I liked how he called the wife to basically get the kid the hell out of there---what a lawn tool this tiny tiny man is....

     
    Comments
      
      Pickleball: I heard Stacy in the background say that having this fight on PPV, was ridiculous. lol

  18. #12178
    Platinum
    Reputation
    2219
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,619
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Quote Originally Posted by crudebar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickleball View Post

    Was anyone able to get a screen shot of the fake stacks of 100s that Bubs was playing with? I could not freeze the video and get the screen shot but I clearly saw that every bill had the exact same color on the sides unlike stacks of real 100 dollar bills. The Bloat always has to have that prop working for him. What a schmo.
    I liked how he called the wife to basically get the kid the hell out of there---what a lawn tool this tiny tiny man is....

    I havent watched chrissy's nonsense yet:
    When you say called, do you mean on the phone, gvien he's done that before, even when they in the same apartment.

     
    Comments
      
      Pickleball: He just asked he to come get Bubs as he had a stack of his play money. No phone was used.
    When faced with a difficult decision, ask yourself "What would Micon do?", then do the opposite.

    PFA Rookie of the Year Awards
    2012: The Templar (unknown)
    2013: Jasep $5000+
    2015: Micon's gofundme legal defense $3k begging for 100k:
    2018: 4Dragons
    2019: Dutch Boyd: Mike Postle
    2020: Covid19
    2021: SMIFlorida and some sort of shit coins for $50k
    2022: BDubs leaks chums club info
    2023: 22nd Feb 4th Dec Youtube channels removed
    2024: Dustin Morgan wins Chrissy's $1000 contest

  19. #12179
    Bronze
    Reputation
    97
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    67
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Crudebar; I'm aware there is no long term winning strategy, no need to be so touchy daddy, I did mention losing, just give it a rest.

    So here is Chrissys sport pick
    He bet the under of 6 1/2 rounds. LOSER once again, KEK.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

     
    Comments
      
      Forum Wars: Thanks Infuri8. Imagine you pay a guy $999 for loser gambling strategies. Then, he makes 35% of your losses. Insane to belong to this Elite Chum Club...those people are truly unsavable.
      
      RMS9: Thanks for sharing, Infuri8. Keep this sort of stuff coming.
      
      Tellafriend:
    Last edited by infuri8; 02-26-2023 at 11:36 PM.

  20. #12180
    Silver
    Reputation
    482
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    582
    Load Metric
    68251968
    Folks, reading with interest the winning at roulette conversation.

    I have a strategy that wins 100% of the time short medium and long term,
    I will give it away for free here 👍

    It’s called HorneyGale

    To keep it simple just use the outside bets.

    Rule 1-IGNORE THE GREEN ZERO(s) IT DOESN’T EXIST

    If your first bet loses double the next bet aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand add another 18.3% (HorneyGale)

    Rinse and repeat 🔁 until you win.
    I have NEVER seen 5 losses on the trot so I just use the casinos 🎰 as my personal atm.

    I am a bit reluctant to post this as I have stayed under the radar so if you do use this strategy Folks keep your bets small so they don’t find out what we are up to.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 14 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 13 guests)

  1. TheRivers

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 12-16-2021, 09:01 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-06-2018, 04:14 AM
  3. Replies: 119
    Last Post: 08-02-2013, 12:37 PM
  4. Christopher Dorner is one mad guy
    By rickastley in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 234
    Last Post: 03-29-2013, 04:20 AM
  5. professional workplace dilemma
    By mulva in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-29-2012, 05:20 AM

Tags for this Thread