Blatant Gambling Scammer Christopher Mitchell (YouTube/Baccarat/Roulette/Sportsbetting)

[Dan Druff]

Interestingly, there is a criminal element to this situation which the perpetrator may not even realize makes the situation more serious.

Cyberstalking/threats for personal reasons can be difficult to prosecute for various reasons:

1) There's two sides to every story. The pereptrator can claim he was a victim himself, and was simply fighting back. (We're seeing some of that bullshit here, with this "I always protect family" nonsense.)

2) It needs to be shown that there was a criminal motive, not just in-the-moment anger.

3) In general, personal disputes tend to escalate on both sides, and people say things they don't mean.


Therefore, in order to prosecute someone criminally for cyberstalking and criminal threats, you need to show:

1) A pattern of this behavior, ideally with multiple unrelated victims

2) A clear criminal motive

3) Proof that all or most of the escalation was on the end of the perpetrator


But guess what we have here?

A financial motive.

Yes, notice that this individual runs a channel where is consistently attempting to build traffic, and then posts affiliate links to gambling sites which make him money. (Oddly he criticizes CM for doing the same thing!)

In fact, just recently he was promoting an upcoming video advertising legal sportsbooks. But since that video never came to exist, don't worry. I have copies of videos where affiliate links were already posted in the past.

This individual's attacks against innocent people have almost all come against those with competing channels or forums!

It is clear that he is trying to inditimidate and terrorize all competing channels into taking their content down, so his can have the monopoly on CM-related content. It is further clear that he is trying to intimidate and terrorize me into taking this forum or thread down, as it is also competing with his channel, and in fact some users will point out holes in the "information" he posts about CM, which harms his channel's credibility.

This is a very clear pattern. He is running a channel supposedly to "expose scammers", yet in reality is attempting to build traffic to post affiliate links, and is using intimidation and threats to get the perceived competition to go away.

This is very different than normal cyberstalking or internet threats. Here he is engaging in threats/cyberstalking to serve a commercial interest, which is a more serious charge, and is much more likely to get the attention of both law enforcement and prosecutors.

Furthremore, it will be much easier to prove in civil court that the harassment campaign against me was part of a larger pattern of harassing perceived competitors, and not simply because he (erroneously) believed I was working with Morgenstern.

I can't take full credit for this one. One of the attorneys I spoke to brought this point up, when he asked, "Why is this guy doing this to you?", and I explained that I'm one of several he threatens and harasses. After hearing more about it, the attorney explained to me that this is a clear case of threats to commercial competitors, which is a huge no-no and gets people actually put in prison. He said that given the large number of people threatened, and given that almost all of them either competed with his channel or questioned information presented on his channel, this would be an easy one to prove.

Imagine how it will sound to the jury when a montage of threats are played and read to the court, and all of them happen to be either competitors or critics of your channel. Oh, and all the anti-gay slurs will go over great as well. I'm sure they'll have tons of sympathy, especially given your previous conviction.

[Dan Druff]

Here are some questions one might ask this individual in court:

Have you ever signed up for any online casino or sportsbook affiliate accounts, where you either make money for each signup or make a percentage of the profit gained from the person signing up?

Have you ever promoted these affiliate links on your channel, or stated the intention to promote them?

What is your current financial situation?

Would the potential thousands of dollars per month via these affiliate links make a significant difference in your financial situation?

Did you ever make videos about another person with similar affiliate links, and how you believe this individual is supporting himself via these affiliate programs?

Have you ever insulted those running competing channels?

Have you ever threatened those running competing channels?

Of those people you insulted and threatened, did they insult or threaten you first? If so, can you tell us which videos where this happened?

How many times did you attack the PFA forum for having a thread where Christopher Mitchell was being discussed? If your goal was to bring awareness to Mitchell and his alleged scams, why were you attacking a forum with the same goal?

Do you feel your channel would have more views if similar channels about CM went down?

Do you feel your channel would have more views if the PFA forum discussing CM went down?

Would more traffic on your channel lead to more potential affiliate profits?

How can you explain why such a high percentage of your attacks, threats, and insults seem to come to those also presenting content about CM, even to those who never previously discussed you?

Can you explain why so many unrelated people whom you've never met are here today to testify that you physically threatened them over the past 4 years?

Have you attempted to portray that you have violent men working for you, who are willing to beat or kidnap your perceived enemies upon your command? Why did you claim such things, if the goal wasn't intimidation and elimination of perceived competition and criticism?

Of all the people here to testify about your threats, can you show evidence of even one of them threatening you first?



Imagine this and more playing out in an actual courtroom!

As I said, a slam dunk. Threatening and intimidating strangers with the goal of financial gain. But I'm sure that public defender you'll get will do a bang-up job of explaining why so many unrelated people were threatened over the past 4 years.

[Dan Druff]

Here's an example of harassment to service a commercial purpose: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/s...rgeting-natick

A couple from Massachusetts had a website about eBay, and frequently criticized eBay's decisions.

eBay executives instructed their security team to put an end to it, and members of eBay security then began a bizarre campaign to cyberstalk, threaten, and harass them.

Even though the couple never suffered any physical harm, six people were charged by the DOJ for this scheme, and a few have already been sentenced to years in federal prison.

The perpetrators were committing cyberstalking/threats/harassment to serve a commercial goal (in this case, stop them from criticizing eBay). See link above for details. Keep in mind that this only occurred over a period of weeks, yet six people are going to prison for years!


In the case here, we have an individual who feels he has the monopoly on exposing an increasingly high profile YouTube scammer. Any others who attempt to do the same thing are harassed, threatened, and intimidated. People are led to believe that this individual has violent men working for him, who will commit kidnapping, assault, and other acts of violence, simply on his command. Over a 4-year period, and especially over the past 2 years when he's had his YouTube channel, this individual has engaged in such intimidation tactics against competitors or those who criticize his channel's content. This individual has signed up for online casino affiliate programs which he promotes via his channel, where he makes money by signups, and thus benefits financially from increased traffic to his channel. Such traffic would greatly change this individual's financial situation, thus providing the motivation to threaten and intimidate these perceived competitors and critics.

Imagine the number of witnesses that can be brought to all basically report the same thing.

If people got years in federal prison for WEEKS of cyberstalking/threats for a commercial gain, imagine what would happen to this guy, who has done it for 4 years? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

I just hope he understands the can of worms he's opening here.

[TheRivers]

Ohio State wins another one today and is now 9-1 after already coming into the day as the number 4 ranked team in the country. Such an embarrassment to the city of Columbus and the state of Ohio they are.

And oh yes…they did cover the 19 point spread over Purdue today.

[Dan Druff]

Okay, I probably shouldn't reveal this, but...


On April 7, 2021, a video was posted threatening violence against CM's very own "Champers", a 1-year-old child.

That video is no longer on YouTube, but YouTube has it saved, as they do for all removed videos.

At the time, a report to law enforcement was made regarding the video, and a criminal investigation was opened.

I will not say anything further, but this individual can check his records from April 7, 2021, and he'll see that I'm right, and he'll need to ask himself how I know about this.

This threat occurred about 3 weeks after a threat made to me. In my investigation of that threat against me, I uncovered the report about the 4/7/21 incident, and was led to certain law enforcement bodies investigating it. I also uncovered that certain casinos made complaints about "harassing" phone calls from this same indivudual.

I have held this back for a long time, and I didn't ever plan to post this here. However, I really want this guy to realize how close he is to seeing the inside of a prison cell, and that I've compiled a very thick file of his transgressions, ready to present it to the proper parties.

The video would be played in court (both criminal and civil) to establish this individual's pattern of behavior. Imagine how it would look to a jury, regardless of how people might feel about CM and his scams. Threatening a 1-year-old. Think about what kind of vile person does that.


Seriously, last chance to cut out the bullshit for good.

[Elmo]

Wow…

All the cockroaches are coming out of the woodworks again…well, this is how the Inner Circle Jerks will end up if they keep up following their fake Messiah aka Christopher Mitchell. Let this be a stern warning to you.



Delusional…looks like someone needs a mental health evaluation.



He drives a taxi, wife left him, and looks like he’s filming vlogs outside a homeless shelter. Sounds like a millionaire lifestyle to me.

[shoeshine box]

Wow…

All the cockroaches are coming out of the woodworks again…well, this is how the Inner Circle Jerks will end up if they keep up following their fake Messiah aka Christopher Mitchell. Let this be a stern warning to you.



Delusional…looks like someone needs a mental health evaluation.



He drives a taxi, wife left him, and looks like he’s filming vlogs outside a homeless shelter. Sounds like a millionaire lifestyle to me.

I love this guy...seen him around for years and his pals from Etrimea? near Ethiopia
See him at Gold Coast/ Orleans. works by Cabs before orleans

[PositiveVariance]

This individual's attacks against innocent people have almost all come against those with competing channels or forums!

Yup...

Poker Fraud Alert Forum - Check
Druff - Check
Jeff Dime - Check
Brian Dempsey - Check
Lee Bradbury - Check
Card Shark - Check
Double Jackpot - Check
Bart Simple Life - Check

Our buddy Cheetos Baccarat was the only one he didn’t go after, wonder why?

[donkey]

What’s going on? What’s going on?

Time for a Saturday night Marvin Gayle…

6:10 mark through 6:21 mark…. YouTube! YouTube! Prrrtsktska, prrtskk…

[Dan Druff]

Just watched the latest KD video where he addressed me, and (surpirsingly) outed his own Betonline situation. So let's delve into some things here.

First off, good work tricking Yvonne into admitting that Betonline gives fake affiliate money (upon request) to streamers. Notice that I never doubted that they did -- I only doubted that Chrissy is solely playing with such money. However, you'll see in my post about Chrissy and BOL that I thought he was using a combination of real money and fake affiliate money. I still think that. Why? Because Chrissy is a degenerate -EV gambler who can't help himself. Regardless, your video was the first one I've seen with actual proof that BOL does this, so good job there. If you did more of that, and less terrorizing of the perceived "competition", you would have a good channel, and nobody besides the scammers would dislike you.


Next, let's discuss the allegation that you're a Bovada affiliate. You seem to think that you owned everyone by "proving" that you're not a member of their affiliate program. Instead, you showed an e-mail exchange where they say you aren't an affiliate, and never have been.

Now, you blocked out the e-mail address you used, so this easily could have been sent from an e-mail associated with a second account of yours. But let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you're not an affiliate.

You know what that makes you?

STUPID

If you're going to promote a link to Bovada, the least you can do is make maximum money for doing so. If you're simply using their lol "$50 refer a friend" code, that's hilarious. That code is meant for people who have a few buddies they want to bring over to Bovada, but aren't actively advertising the site anywhere. All you're doing is leaving money in Bovada's pocket by referring that way, rather than becoming an actual affiliate.

Hell, even Chrissy was smart enough to become a BOL affiliate, rather than just taking the pittance they give for referring friends.

I don't know why you're bragging about this. However, you still admitted that you've provided the link on your channel to make $50 per signup (which would result in $2000 if just 40 people signed up), plus you admitted that you were referring to your $15 sports pick page. While this isn't big money, simply 40 people signing up from that link AND buying access to your sports picks would result in a $2600 profit.

This again brings me to my point that you would financially gain by forcing other CM-related channels and forums to shut down via intimidation and threats.

Now, $2600 isn't a lot of money to some people, but I think we both know that an extra $2600 per month would indeed make an impact on your life. So all of my points still stand. It is clear to me, and it would be clear in any courtroom, that you are threatening perceived competitors and critics for financial gain.



Now... I'll delve into the BOL stuff next, since you brought it up and even provided the link in your description (which I will now post here, after holding it back)...

See next post.

[Dan Druff]

KD has talked about askgamblers.com recently. He has praised them as trustworthy. I was actually surprised to hear him say this, because he had a less-than-favorable experience with them.

Here's the link KD provided in today's video description: https://www.askgamblers.com/casino-c...ontest-winners

It will take a bit of time to load, because askgamblers has a shitty server for whatever reason. Be patient and give it like 30-120 seconds without refreshing.



You'll see a thread that KD started regarding a 2019 BOL "referral contest", where they awarded a fixed number of prizes based upon who got the most referrals.

They paid $6000 for first, $4000 for second, $3000 for third, $1500 for fourth, and a bunch of smaller prizes beyond that.

KD made an effort to refer people, and finished third, earning him $3000. He initially started the complaint on askgamblers.com because they hadn't paid him by October 6th, 2019, as promised.

On October 9, they paid him $1500, instead of $3000. They also noted on askgamblers that they had paid him.

KD then complained that they stiffed him out of half the prize. They did not immediately respond in the askgamblers thread, but KD himself was going nuts, hammering them with customer service calls, some of which he recorded and posted on Vimeo (now deleted).

On October 11, they told him that 6 of his 16 referrals were disqualified, due to having signed up under his same IP address! Therefore, they dropped him to 4th place, only paying $1500 instead of $3000.




KD, of course, denied this. However, he couldn't explain why BOL would do this to him. They obviously didn't gain from doing such a thing, as the contest was going to pay out the $3000 to SOMEONE, so what would BOL care if it's KD or someone else? They're paying the same money either way.

KD then rambled for 3 more days on askgamblers.

Finally, on October 14th, BOL posted this response:

Hello,

At BetOnline.ag, we pride ourselves on providing our players with a trusted and reliable online experience that delivers exceptional customer service. In return, we expect fair and ethical play from our players. We take the security and safety of our players seriously, and we will not stand for cheating or fraud of any kind on our network. With that being said, any player found doing anything that we believe compromises the fairness of play or terms and conditions will not be tolerated.

After a further investigation and numerous times to validate the referred players we deemed their accounts as invalid for the RAF leaderboard in accordance with our Terms and Conditions:
1. BetOnline.ag reserves the right to restrict eligibility for refer-a-friend bonuses if the referee or referred are considered bonus abusers, if we are unable to validate each players’ individuality or if the new accounts are not considered genuine (VPN’s)
2. Referrals with same street address or IP address do not qualify.

Based on these rules, the referred accounts were unable to pass our verification process as the information registered was considered invalid (I.e. Invalid numbers, Incomplete Addresses, Emails). In addition, the accounts in question had inconsistent logins, IP's based on different locations which may be VPN's and links to the Referral via other accounts with the same pattern. As a result, the accounts were not determined for the RAF leaderboard subsequently.

BOL then went the extra mile and showed this exact evidence to askgamblers.

askgamblers reviewed the evidence, and decided Kevin was full of shit. They ruled against him:

AskGamblers Complaints Team has been provided with enough information and evidence on behalf BetOnline Casino management in regards of this complaint to confirm and justify the casino actions.

Based on the above, AskGamblers Complaints Team consider this case as Resolved and it is now officially closed. In case of a disagreement with our decision we remind player that further assistance on this matter could be requested from the relevant regulatory body.

So we have two possibilties here:

1) A huge operation like BOL decided out of nowhere to screw Kevin out of $1500 and give it to another contestant, for no apparent reason. Then, when called out, they falsified evidence to present to askgamblers --- all to save $1500 which was going to another player anyway.
-or-
2) Kevin, who was having well-documented financial struggles at the time, tried to cheat the contest, got caught, and couldn't accept the consequences.


I'll let the reader determine who was right and wrong here.

[Dan Druff]

Now, time to respond to one more thing regarding BOL.

KD claimed in today's video that he has hated BOL for several years -- long before this contest -- because of their affiliation with Morgenstern in 2017.

He swore that this referral contest situation had absolutely nothing to do with his bitterness towards them.

Uh huh.

This is what Kevin wrote on October 10, 2019 -- two full years after his issues with Morgenstern there:

I tried many times to work this out with Betonline. I've been with them 2 + years and refered alot of people in that time. Which is the root of this complaint. They ran a referal contest to get players to try to get as many people to join, deposit & play at Betonline. For 3 weeks, I worked hard trying to recruit people. Friends, Facebook, Reddit, many gamblinng forums,my own discord forum etc,etc. Everyday & in the end I finished in 3rd place, 16 qualified referaals for a $3000 prize. Now, to try to get referals, you have to sell people on how great, safe, reliable Betonline is. I put myy word, trrust & reputation on the line for every referal I got.
.
.
.
Like I said, I've been great, loyal customer for over 2 years. I also spent hours of my time helping catch & alert betonline to fraudulent gamblers in their live casino.

So despite supposedly hating them, he "refered alot of people" over the prior two years (not just for that contest), and put his "reputation on the line" that "Betonline is great, safe, reliable". He was also a "great, loyal customer for over 2 years", and even put his own time into alerting them to "fraudulent gamblers" on the site.

Yeah, sounds like he absolutely despised them, huh? Keep in mind this was well AFTER his issues with Morgenstern being an affiliate there!

Clearly he was a huge BOL fan prior to this referral fiasco. Since that incident, he developed a vendetta which continues to this day.

Now you understand the vitriol against BOL.

Also, notice he didn't tell anyone this story until I threatened to make it public. He's talked about BOL for months now, but never mentioned this situaiton at all in the past. Wouldn't it be very useful for the viewer to know that BOL "cheated" him? Obviouslty he didn't want that out there, because the truth of the matter says otherwise, and it's all right there in that askgamblers thread.


Have I blown my entire load on this one?

Of course not. I have a lot more -- not about this referral contest (you pretty much know everything about that now), but about other matters related to KD's BOL account.

However, I am a man of my word, and will not post about that stuff for now. That will depend upon his own actions going forward.

I hope you enjoyed this trip back to 2019, a much simpler time when we didn't need vaccines or masks, and our only worry was getting caught cheating casino referral contests.

[Dan Druff]

Finally, KD asked a fair question in today's video.

If I really have all these resources and contacts in the gambling world, why am I focusing so hard on him, rather than CM?

Well, I have a few answers to that:

1) You are directly attacking, harassing, and threatening me, as well as repeatedly attacking this forum and threatening my members. Therefore, you are a bigger concern to me personally at the moment than CM, who is just scamming random people who stumble upon his videos.

2) I never said I could get Chrissy's BOL affiliate account terminated. I can't. I don't have that kind of pull with them, and I've never claimed I did. However, if he ever does get any kind of affiliate account with a legalized casino, I can assure you that I'll get those deals terminated quickly. BOL does have very loose lips, though, especially when it comes to people they feel are putting out effort to harm their business. I'll give you that one.

3) Regarding William Hill, yes, I'll look into that one regarding your claim that Chrissy got banned. I will report back with my findings when I get the info. But why wait for me? Put the full details out there yourself.


But yeah, someone actively harassing, threatening, and slandering me is a much higher priority to deal with than some buffoonish scammer on YouTube. I'm sorry you are having a hard time understanding that.

[shoeshine box]

Saw the KD video, I must say, impressive and proves 2 things.

1.M.M is not all there and has had a tuff childhood that did not correct..dangerous to himself and all near him...

2. Chrismitchell 100% might as well admit DEALER told him FU TIP me w/ affiliate $...hahaahhah.
funnier is CM thought HE WAS being a SPORT an was Hurt when he turnt volume up for the Narc. mandatory must hear a Ty reply, and got a FU...


This is a good video KD did.and I never heard a inflection that suggested you exist Tddd..TBH.and fair...peace..KD keep it up ,you really got something there. Peace.

[crudebar]

something might be working. He is definitely not putting out videos at the same pace any longer.

[zealanddonk]

something might be working. He is definitely not putting out videos at the same pace any longer.

its reasonably speculated that he gets his money/reload around the 14th or 15th, so dont be surprised if theres a quick flurry of videos soon.

[zealanddonk]

And today's video is a semi-expected set of nonsense after his IG post the other day.

He got a free comp to the Rio so decided to go stay, and visit the steak house and the top floor/open air section.

He sets it up as "Here's where I first learnt to gamble [and lost my ass], so I decided to take the wife and the son to show them"

No gambling takes place.
He covertly films a couple on the zipline which is probabky legal but is definitely dubious.
He also uses this as an opportunty to mock one of his inner circle guys for not liking heights [which you recall Chrissy hated for decades]
He walks around the casino floor for a minute or so, highlights the craps table he first learnt to lose money on [again definitely dubious and I would have thought against casino rules as patrons appear unblurred in it].

He explains lovingly his critieria for places where his family stays "a big area for his son to run around".
As other s have pointed out, no sign of toys, ever.

20:30 mark he starts rambling about people with 9-5 jobs cannot possibly ever be happy but only those who have a calling, helping people in their lives.
Naturally I thought he meant the therapists who would be heklping bubs, but no, he meant himself.

Definitely nothing of note in this video, other than ignore all your friends and family, join Chrissy's colt cult today!11!!!11111!!1!!!!

[The Boz]

In other words it might be time for a Good Samaritan to update the current owners of publicly traded Caesars on who they are comping rooms to.

And who is using their licensed casino to promote their YouTube channel with their comped rooms as a prop. And for anyone with status and comps to explain why it’s hard to patronize their casinos while they allow individuals like this to use their casinos as a prop for scams.

[Dan Druff]

In other words it might be time for a Good Samaritan to update the current owners of publicly traded Caesars on who they are comping rooms to.

And who is using their licensed casino to promote their YouTube channel with their comped rooms as a prop. And for anyone with status and comps to explain why it’s hard to patronize their casinos while they allow individuals like this to use their casinos as a prop for scams.

Caesars is a freaking mess (as I'm sure you well know), but I'll see who I can reach out to and get their attention focused upon this.

Funny enough, Chrissy just missed running into me, as I just left the Rio a few days ago. I was there for the World Series of Poker. Otherwise I wouldn't stay at that rundown dump.

Caesars may be unhappy about a few things:

1) Chrissy is using their casino to promote a scam

2) Chrissy is filming tables

3) Chrissy typically uses his channel to direct people to illegal online casinos, and away from brick-and-mortar places like their properties

[zealanddonk]

5:17 mark he purposefully zooms in on the room number if that is of use to anyone:
39018


He comments he didnt kinow about the steak house, despite going to the Rio 3-4 years ago, and obv being a fine diner in Vegas.