Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
But yes, Trump is a bigger dog now than in 2016, for sure.
This is due to a few factors:
1) Biden has much more natural popularity in PA than Hillary did
2) Dems aren't neglecting the northern states this time
3) The Dems successfully convinced dummies like big dick that 75% of the COVID deaths were Trump's fault, whereas in 2016 there was no COVID
4) The TDS among Bernie supporters is so severe that they somehow aren't pissed that the Dems cheated Bernie worse in 2020 than they did in 2016. In 2016, this bothered a lot of them, who refused to vote for Hillary.
simple google
Nearly 70,000 lives could be saved in the next 3 months if more Americans wore masks, researchers say
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/22/healt...day/index.html
How many needless Covid-19 deaths were caused by delays in responding? Most of them
That isn’t a hypothetical question. And the answer that emerges from a direct comparison of the fatalities in and policies of the U.S. and other countries — South Korea, Australia, Germany, and Singapore — indicates that between 70% and 99% of the Americans who died from this pandemic might have been saved by measures demonstrated by others to have been feasible.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/19/...vid-19-deaths/
Universal Mask Wearing Could Save Some 130,000 Lives In The U.S., Study Suggests
Universal mask wearing in public could greatly reduce the number of Americans who die by COVID-19 by February, a study published Friday in the journal Nature Medicine projects.
Researchers at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation made estimates based on some assumptions under different scenarios.
In what they describe as the worst-case scenario, they project that COVID-19 deaths could exceed a million between September 2020 and February 2021 if what they call "the current pattern of easing" restrictions continues in states.
In a second scenario that they think is more likely, they say 511,000 could die between September and February under the assumption that "states would once again shut down social interaction and some economic activity" for six weeks once deaths reach a certain threshold per million residents.
But in a third scenario where 95% of the population dons face coverings and social restrictions are in place, the projection is for deaths to be about 381,000 — or about 130,000 fewer than under the second scenario.
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronav...study-suggests