Pornmegeddon aka Black Monday on Pornhub

[ftpjesus]

Not sure how nobody posted about this yet on here knowing the kind of pervies we have hanging in here.. Just came across the article after checking the trending on twitter feed.. Apparently Pornhub pulled literally MILLIONS of videos down yesterday from any and all sources that werent verified on their site.. This comes after the two biggest credit card processing companies decided suddenly to stop providing services to them similar to what happened with poker sites many years ago.. Big corporate nannies strike again.. (Like they wont find a work around by recoding shit doh..). My guess is then Pornhub just flushed every bit of their free content and only thing left is their premium shit they were charging for and now have no way to get money without going cryptocurrency I guess..

The stories out there claim that they had tons of child porno on the site Im sure there was some hidden but anything blatant I doubt they would leave up obviously because of attracting the attention of Interpol and every other 3 letter agencies in the USA and worldwide. Its not like PH was or is some sort of darkweb seedy site.. On a side note apparently some other sites like Brazzers, RedTube, PornTube and others have also been cut off from funding sources..

[Walter Sobchak]

This is why we can't have nice thingies.

[desertrunner]

Im ok with any child pron being removed. What about Xhamster, did they get clipped too?

[Kalam]

Some news story said 80% of the material was removed. I noticed the last few years there has been a ton of new videos centered around a storyline of a (legal aged?) step-daughter having sex with her step father, or step-son/stepmother, etc. etc. Of course the actress is always in her 20s-30s. But I am guessing they are removing all of these videos because they are suggestive of pedophilia. I suspect there is WAY more of this type of stuff than actual pedophilia.

[Krypt]

you fkn boomers actually use pornhub? you morons realize that it’s just a meme right?

no masturbator of any substance uses pornhub; use spankbang instead and thank me later

[PuppyMonkeyBaby]

you fkn boomers actually use pornhub? you morons realize that it’s just a meme right?

no masturbator of any substance uses pornhub; use spankbang instead and thank me later

you providing advice is kind of humorous as we all know you don't masturbate, you're a connoisseur of the professional working girl anyway Krypt.. Side note everybody being morons and panick buying Bread Milk and TP for the massive "blizzard" coming?? Seems to be a common winter sport in the DMV as it has been for decades.

[desertrunner]

This was probably what really started the whole thing...

[sonatine]

you fkn boomers actually use pornhub? you morons realize that it’s just a meme right?

no masturbator of any substance uses pornhub; use spankbang instead and thank me later

you know whats wild tho, imagine a world where pornhub literally shuts down, and things get super fucking real.

like pornhub, who had so much fucking money that they were literally giving away porn to entire countries because 'pandemics are awful' might actually not survive 2021.

[Gordman]

you fkn boomers actually use pornhub? you morons realize that it’s just a meme right?

no masturbator of any substance uses pornhub; use spankbang instead and thank me later

While I think it's pretty LOL that you specifically are giving this advice due in part to your history here, you are pretty correct here imo.

I've found over time that if someone is looking for a specific video or whatnot, one of the keys are to sort by "new", because after a certain amount of time certain videos will be removed (once in a while voluntarily, but primarily due to DMCA complaints)

Pornhub on the other hand i think has their algorithm in place that stops a lot of possible copyright content etc before it is even shared.

[Sanlmar]

you fkn boomers actually use pornhub? you morons realize that it’s just a meme right?

no masturbator of any substance uses pornhub; use spankbang instead and thank me later

you know whats wild tho, imagine a world where pornhub literally shuts down, and things get super fucking real.

like pornhub, who had so much fucking money that they were literally giving away porn to entire countries because 'pandemics are awful' might actually not survive 2021.

I remember hacking porn passwords using bots on certain IRC channels. I cherish those mammeries. Somehow we got by without free porn.

[desertrunner]

Don’t know what to make of this....

[desertrunner]

Whole lot more information here, makes more sense now...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...kg4g7oMHEn9R-8

[SPIT this]

WE CAN NOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE VIRUS

[Dan Druff]

I still don't fully understand this.

It looks like they're being sued for tricking girls into performing in porn without telling them that it would be available on Pornhub. Okay... but isn't that kind of the expectation when you do porn, that it might show up on the internet? Does any chick knowingly performing in porn really believe it will somehow remain private?

I'm also not understanding what this has to do with removing videos posted by "unverified" users.

With that said, I agree with the policy of taking down videos which simulate underage encounters, even if all of the actors/actresses are over 18. That's obviously aimed at pedos, and that type of shit should not be encouraged.

I also don't understand the appeal of incest videos, even if they are just simulated and the people in them aren't actually related. Not sure how people are turned on by incest, but I guess there's a lot of freaks out there. I'm not saying those should be deleted (provided the characters aren't implied to be underage). I'm just saying it's gross.

[Kalam]

I still don't fully understand this.

It looks like they're being sued for tricking girls into performing in porn without telling them that it would be available on Pornhub. Okay... but isn't that kind of the expectation when you do porn, that it might show up on the internet? Does any chick knowingly performing in porn really believe it will somehow remain private?

I'm also not understanding what this has to do with removing videos posted by "unverified" users.

With that said, I agree with the policy of taking down videos which simulate underage encounters, even if all of the actors/actresses are over 18. That's obviously aimed at pedos, and that type of shit should not be encouraged.

I also don't understand the appeal of incest videos, even if they are just simulated and the people in them aren't actually related. Not sure how people are turned on by incest, but I guess there's a lot of freaks out there. I'm not saying those should be deleted (provided the characters aren't implied to be underage). I'm just saying it's gross.

You know you have been watching porn way too long when you are seeing the exact same Porn videos that you remember seeing 10+ years ago with no incestuous undertones, except now they are rebranded as "brother-sister" or whatever.

[Dan Druff]

BTW, speaking of pedos and people pretending to be underage, there was an interesting criminal case in Nevada about a decade ago.

Some pedo in Reno was talking to an uncover officer pretending to be a 12-year-old girl. The suspect seemed to honestly believe he was talking to a 12-year-old, pushed the conversation to be very explicitly sexual, and expressed a desire to meet this "girl" to do it in person. However, he seemed slow to actually arrange a real meet-up, and the cops started to get impatient.

He was then arrested, and told the bad news that he was really talking to a cop the whole time.

However, in a landmark case for the state of Nevada, he beat the charges. The man's defense was that he knew all along that he was talking to an adult, and the entire thing was just a fantasy. He claimed he had no actual intention to meet, even though he claimed in the chat that he wanted to do so. He said that he believed it was simply an adult pretending to be a 12-year-old girl, and he was enjoying the roleplay.

Clearly this wasn't true, but the state had a hard time proving it. Indeed, he was really talking to an adult, and there was no way to prove whether or not he was aware of it. Thus, the court ruled that people could not be prosecuted in Nevada for explicit chats with fake minors -- only real minors. They could only be busted in stings if they actually went to meet what they believed to be the minor in person, which this guy didn't.

Not sure how other states view this, but that's what Nevada did.

Would be funny if the government had some agreement with Pornhub to get the IPs of those watching the simulated pedo movies, and then would start watching them. I bet they'd catch a lot of pedos that way.

[Texter]

More importantly...why do so many black dudes wear socks while fucking....?

[gut]

I still don't fully understand this.

It looks like they're being sued for tricking girls into performing in porn without telling them that it would be available on Pornhub. Okay... but isn't that kind of the expectation when you do porn, that it might show up on the internet? Does any chick knowingly performing in porn really believe it will somehow remain private?

LOL yeah, I immediately thought of a possibly very awkward conversation some of those ladies may have had with investigators:

"I didn't think this would be on the internet"

"So, you're saying you were just privately having sex for money.....?"