Page 845 of 946 FirstFirst ... 345745795835841842843844845846847848849855895945 ... LastLast
Results 16,881 to 16,900 of 18903

Thread: So coronavirus is definitely going to kill a few of us.

  1. #16881
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Quote Originally Posted by splitthis View Post
    I’m sure there is no coincidence that they want to decrease human population by 80% and 80% got vaxxed.

    If you think THEY got vaxxed well you are hopeless.
    I don't think this would do a lot to decrease the population, even if the vax was killing mass numbers (which it isn't). For example, if the vax wiped out 80 million people on its own, the human population would still be 99% as large as it was before.

    I do think they both lied and exaggerated about the safety profile of the vaccine. They were overconfident about their initial findings, which dismissed some early concerns (such as the irregular menstruation), and they also likely simply covered up various potential safety issues. There is a reason why other vaccines go through years of trials before being released to the public. It's not just because of lack of resources or funding -- it's because time is an important factor when it comes to observation of vaccine side effects.

    I never believed this "almost completely safe" bullshit about the vaccine. I had arguments with various people about this back in 2021, including some in the medical profession who talked down to me. I did -- and still do -- believe that the vaccine was substantially less risky for me than getting original COVID or Delta at my age. But was it a risk? Of course.

  2. #16882
    Platinum devidee's Avatar
    Reputation
    1172
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,591
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Dr. Anthony Fauci and his wife’s net worth grew by $5 million during the COVID-19 pandemic as thousands of US residents struggled financially, according to a government spending watchdog group.

    The combined wealth of the 81-year-old retiring director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and his bioethicist wife, Christine Grady, soared from $7.5 million in 2019 to $12.6 million at the end of 2021, according to a report from the non-profit OpenTheBooks.

    Name:  5EE4E90C-2BED-4606-8855-F71F6D21BAD9.jpeg
Views: 351
Size:  23.6 KB

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Fuck that criminal

  3. #16883
    Platinum devidee's Avatar
    Reputation
    1172
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,591
    Load Metric
    65629084

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Get booooooosted

  4. #16884
    Gold
    Reputation
    308
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    1,741
    Load Metric
    65629084
    I suspect most elites got 2 or 3 vaccines. However, I would not be surprised at all if (like most Americans) they stopped after 2 or 3 when it became apparent the virus had mutated into basically a cold, and serious vaccine side effects became more obvious, even through all the obfuscation of the medical community.

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Elites got 0.0 vaccines.

  5. #16885
    Gold 1dollarboxcar's Avatar
    Reputation
    1609
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,631
    Load Metric
    65629084
    the depopulation thing doesn't have to happen all at once....

    1. there is a rise in this "sudden death syndrome" in all ages
    2. the myocarditis in the younger males might not kill them today or tomorrow, but they are fucked 8-12 yrs. from now ( inevitable death sentence ) if it didn't kill them already....
    3. miscarriage rates are way up
    4. the younger children that received this poison, is it sterilising them in girls reproductive organs? how about the boys, low or screwed up sperm, and we've already heard rumors about this, i mean none of these other "conspiracy theories" ever came to fruition now did they? oh wait yes they have....
    5. in Libtard Canada you can now "off" yourself and ask to be euthanized, Libtardville USA will probably be next and don't forget all the Libtard European countries that will probably follow suit....
    6. probably about 2-3 other things i can't think of right now, maybe someone else can chime in on that....
    7. so yeah you add all them factors together very possible to see about a 30-50% reduction in population starting from about 2021 and the next 30 years...

    All for a cold virus that has always had a 99.9% survival rate , but did/does transmit easily cause that's what is was engineered to do out of the Wuhan lab, whether it escaped accidentally or let out on purpose we will never know....

     
    Comments
      
      ok25: Keep reminding the morons bro. The denial is off the charts

  6. #16886
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by splitthis View Post
    I’m sure there is no coincidence that they want to decrease human population by 80% and 80% got vaxxed.

    If you think THEY got vaxxed well you are hopeless.
    I don't think this would do a lot to decrease the population, even if the vax was killing mass numbers (which it isn't). For example, if the vax wiped out 80 million people on its own, the human population would still be 99% as large as it was before.

    I do think they both lied and exaggerated about the safety profile of the vaccine. They were overconfident about their initial findings, which dismissed some early concerns (such as the irregular menstruation), and they also likely simply covered up various potential safety issues. There is a reason why other vaccines go through years of trials before being released to the public. It's not just because of lack of resources or funding -- it's because time is an important factor when it comes to observation of vaccine side effects.

    I never believed this "almost completely safe" bullshit about the vaccine. I had arguments with various people about this back in 2021, including some in the medical profession who talked down to me. I did -- and still do -- believe that the vaccine was substantially less risky for me than getting original COVID or Delta at my age. But was it a risk? Of course.


    Just take your L

    You're a chump

  7. #16887
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084
    https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-evidence




    The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed absolutely no all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit. There were no all-cause benefits at all. It was all negative. Ask your doctor why you should take a new, unproven medical intervention that is not shown to have an overall benefit. Even if there was a benefit of fewer COVID infections (which is seriously suspect due to the gaming below), the fact that the total all-cause numbers for both mortality and morbidity were negative means the intervention should not be recommended by any doctor.

    The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed that more people died (and were injured) who got the drug than who got the placebo. In other words, the cure was worse than the disease. The drug maker claimed that none of the people in the vaccine group were killed by the vaccine. They do not reveal the tests they did and explain how they were able to make that assessment. Why the secrecy here, especially in light of the study by Bhakdi and Burkhardt showing that trained medical examiners missed the causality link in 93% of the cases they looked at? The Pfizer vaccine had 4X as many cardiac arrests in the treatment group than the placebo (see page 12 of the Supplemental Appendix). This lines up very well with the numerous cardiac-related problems related to the vaccine as documented in the study by Retsef Levi and in the VAERS data which showed that the “cardiac arrest” reports were elevated by a factor of 93X higher than the annual baseline rate (VAERS reports from all vaccines combined in previous years). For some reason, the CDC wasn’t able to detect that signal (it was only 100 times higher than normal so they ignored it for some reason; they won’t let me ask them about it). In short, the claims from the manufacturer that none of the deaths were caused by the vaccine are highly suspect since all the evidence for those claims remains hidden from public view for some reason.

    The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed that at best, the drug saved only 1 COVID life per 22,000 recipients. This means that at best, after vaccinating 220M Americans, we might save 10,000 lives from COVID. But the VAERS reports show an excess death toll of well over 10,000 people and that’s before applying the minimum estimated under-reporting factor of 41. So there isn’t a mortality benefit: it’s actually the reverse. Furthermore, VAERS reports will likely only be filed for deaths in temporal proximity to the shot and is highly unlikely to report those deaths happening 5 months after the shot which appear to be the bulk of the deaths. This makes the comparison even worse. In short, we aren’t anywhere close to saving any lives at all.

    The Classen paper analyzed the clinical trial data for all three US vaccines and confirmed the lack of any overall benefit. There was an increase in morbidity which was highly statistically significant in all three vaccines. It concluded, “Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe.” This is exactly right.

    The paper by Christine Stabell Benn entitled, “Randomised Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Vaccines: Do Adenovirus-Vector Vaccines Have Beneficial Non-Specific Effects?” confirmed that there was no mortality benefit by taking the COVID mRNA vaccines. “Based on the RCTs with the longest possible follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against fatal COVID-19.” See this article by Daniel Horowitz for more information. In other words, these vaccines have no death benefit. Period. Full stop. This is exactly what the Canadian analysis below showed.

    Serious adverse reactions, including paralysis, were not reported to the FDA and there were other very serious discrepancies in the trials. For some reason, nobody seems to be interested in exploring or explaining these very serious issues. Some are very clear cut such as the case of Maddie de Garay who was one of 1,000 kids in the clinical trial. She’s paralyzed now and has to eat with a feeding tube. The FDA and Pfizer never investigated, but reported her results as mild abdominal pain in the trial results. This is fraud. Also, there were 5 times as many exclusions in the treatment arm as in the placebo arm of the trial: 311 vs. 60. Do the p-value computation on that one and you’ll find that it could not possibly have happened by chance (1e-40). It means the trial was not blinded. Why didn’t anyone in the medical community ever point this out? Nobody will tell me.

    Pfizer admitted to clinical trial fraud in federal court. Their defense was that the FDA was in on it.

    Official government data

    In Canada, the #1 cause of death is now “unexplained.” See Deaths with unknown causes now Alberta's top killer: province. If it isn’t the vaccine, what is causing this?

    In the US, the FDA is withholding autopsy reports from people who died shortly after vaccination. See “EXCLUSIVE: FDA Withholding Autopsy Results on People Who Died After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines.” Why would the FDA withhold from the public conclusive proof that the vaccines are safe and effective? The mainstream press isn’t asking about that. The article notes: “The FDA declined to release any reports, even redacted copies.” You don’t need anything more than that to figure out there is something very wrong.

    There aren’t any all-cause mortality studies vs. placebo on the COVID vaccine or any other vaccines for that matter. Why haven’t any governments anywhere in the world funded any such studies in the past 60 years? There must be a reason. Do you know what it is?

    The VAERS data, which is the official adverse event reporting system used by the US government, shows that an estimated hundreds of thousands have died and millions have been injured. If these weren’t caused by the vaccine, what caused them? Why are there more adverse events reported for these vaccines than for all other vaccines in history combined? Nobody can answer that question. See this tutorial and this recent confirmation and this article on VAERS and causality. Here’s how these numbers were calculated. Here is independent confirmation of the estimates by Dr. Naomi Wolf who used different datasets. No fact checker was interested in contacting me to challenge the facts since I always insist on recording any calls. Also, the causality of events was confirmed by the Israeli safety studies, but nobody wants to look at those.

    The US Social Security Death Master File showed a 60% increase in the all-cause death rate in September 2021 vs. September 2020 for ages 18 to 55. According to the insurance companies, it wasn’t COVID. COVID kills only a small fraction of people in this age range so even if the COVID death rate doubled, it would be a minor blip on the all-cause death rate. A five month delay in death vs. vaccination was discovered in multiple countries, not just the US. Different studies found nearly identical delays. Also, I find it very troubling that the insurance companies aren’t asking the family of the policyholders who died whether they were vaccinated with the COVID vaccine and when. They don’t want to collect this information for some odd reason. So let’s be clear that a 60% increase in all-cause death rate makes this intervention extremely dangerous. I’m not aware of anything that comes close to killing people in such massive numbers. The CDC is silent on this. They don’t even want to show the public this chart:

    US disability rose dramatically soon after the vaccines rolled out (Y axis is Z-score). A 3 sigma increase is hard to explain.

    As of Sep 2, 2022, the vaccination rate in Israel is now just 2.4%. They used to be one of the world’s most vaccinated countries. Today, very few people in Israel are considered to be vaccinated. If the vaccines are so beneficial, why has nearly the entire country shifted from extremely pro-vax to extremely anti-vax in such a short period of time?

    Statements from government officials

    The Israeli Ministry of Health revealed in a confidential meeting with scientists that the reason that they never notified the people of Israel about the safety issues from the vaccines was because of budget/staffing issues. Apparently, while they had millions of dollars to promote the vaccines as safe and effective, they forgot to budget for the possibility they were wrong.

    Independent expert reports solicited by government officials

    The Israeli vaccine safety data showed very clearly the side-effects are serious, long-lasting, and caused by the vaccines. Secondly, it showed that the Israeli authorities and the worldwide mainstream media are covering it all up. It also showed that US officials were not interested in seeing credible COVID vaccine safety that didn’t go along with the narrative. I tried to find out why, but nobody would talk to me. Harvard Professor Martin Kulldorff, a widely respected authority on vaccines, when asked why these people wouldn’t want to see the data, replied, “I don’t know.” This is the single most damaging report in the history of the COVID vaccines. Nobody wants to talk about it. They are hoping it will die. It won’t. Some people claim Israeli used a broad mix of vaccines, but that’s not true. Over 90% of the reports are from Pfizer, the bulk of the others are from Moderna. See also Israeli Investigators Find COVID-19 Vaccines Cause Side Effects: Leaked Video.

    The Canadian report prepared for the Liberal Party of Canada (Trudeau’s party) showed no benefit for infection, hospitalization, and death for those under 60. “The empirical evidence investigated in this report from PHO and PHAC does not support continuing mass vaccination programs, mandates, passports and travel bans for all age groups.” You can’t have a vaccine that doesn’t work in Canada work in other countries. The authors of the report had to hide their identities for fear of retribution. The statistics analyzed were those from Ontario which is not a small province (15M people). Naturally, the mainstream press ignored the report. Nobody has shown where the experts who wrote this made a mistake. The conclusion of the report is supported by independent analysis done by Mathew Crawford of the data from San Diego County, San Diego County Data Busts a Hole in Vaccine Efficacy Narrative. So apparently, the results are not limited to Ontario.

    Pre-prints from highly credible sources

    The Harvard-Hopkins-UCSF study showed it is unethical to mandate vaccination for college students and anyone younger. The study clearly said, “University booster mandates are unethical.”

    The Thailand study did blood tests before vs. after the jab and determined that nearly 30% of young adults experienced cardiovascular injuries after the jab. How is that safe? And why didn’t anyone in the US ever do such a study? Do we not want to know? This was a simple blood test before and after the vaccine. Why did they not notify parents as soon as the study was published?

    The study by Bhakdi and Burkhardt showing 93% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine

    The data showing the vaccines cause prion diseases shortly after vaccination. This is impossible if the vaccines are truly safe. See the paper on ScienceOpen.com (after ResearchGate removed it).

    Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis Requiring Hospitalization by Jessica Rose and Peter McCullough showing the myocarditis caused by the vaccine have distinct biomarkers.

    Papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals

    The Malhotra papers called for a halt to the COVID vaccines based on a 6 month look at the risk-benefit data. See Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine (Part 1 and Part 2). See also the backstory on these papers.

    The Fraiman-Doshi paper looked at serious adverse event rates and found that the vaccines may not be as safe as has been claimed, but they cannot do a proper analysis because they are not allowed to see the data. “Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, as we approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible.” You have to wonder: if the vaccine is so safe, why are the drug companies hiding the data?

    The Levi cardiac arrest rate elevation paper showed a troubling correlation between vaccine doses and increased cardiac events from January–May 2021. When they tried to get data after May 2021, they were refused access. This begs the question: if the vaccines are perfectly safe, what are they trying to hide?

    There are over 1,250 papers published in the scientific peer-reviewed literature showing the vaccines cause significant adverse events.

    The Walach paper found that the vaccines harm more people than they save.

    This news article published in the BMJ showed that 10 out of 100 deaths in elderly people they examined were "likely" caused by the vaccine. Funny, in America we think the number is 0. They can’t both be right. Someone should investigate why we have different results. This is very important. In fact, with a deeper investigation, over 90% of the deaths thought by medical examiners not to be caused by the vaccine were shown to be caused by the vaccine. This suggests that the US isn’t looking at the deaths.

    My colleagues and I are not misinformation spreaders according to this paper published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

    Articles by respected vaccine experts interpreting the data

    Are the Covid mRNA Vaccines Safe? was written by Harvard professor Martin Kulldorff who until recently was on vaccine committees of the FDA and CDC. He concluded:

    Fraiman and colleagues have produced the best evidence yet regarding the overall safety of the mRNA vaccines. The results are concerning. It is the responsibility of the manufacturers and FDA to ensure that benefits outweigh harms. They have failed to do so.

    Articles on court rulings and expert opinion

    Canadian court decisions on the constitutionality of Covid measures are invalid due to jurisdictional errors of law reviews court decisions on COVID and emphasizes the courts’ repeated over reliance on government expert testimony. Courts are supposed to find the truth and not rely on government representations or propaganda.
    Articles debunking bogus studies in the peer-reviewed scientific literature

    The Watson et al. “modeling study”: did “COVID vaccinations” really prevent 14 million deaths? The original paper was clearly bogus since the vaccines kill more people than they save. This article examines the paper claiming the vaccines have been ridiculously effective.

    Autopsy reports

    There are specialized tests required to diagnose a death from the COVID vaccine.

    The CDC has never told any medical examiner in the US about these tests.

    So the medical examiners aren’t implicating the vaccine in any of the deaths.

    The question is we know what the tests are, we know there is solid evidence from multiple countries that the vaccine causes death, yet we refuse to even consider the possibility that the vaccine caused the deaths. Why?
    Retracted papers published in peer-reviewed journals

    This paper, A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products, was retracted because the publisher didn’t like the result. So he unilaterally decided to retract the paper. This is unethical.

    Here’s the “withdrawn” notice.

    Here is the backstory as well as this censorship update.

    The publisher hasn’t fixed the problem in over a year despite assurances it would be quickly resolved.

    Here is another retracted paper that was correct:

    Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? by Ron Kostoff
    “Compared with the 28,000 deaths the CDC stated were due to COVID-19 and not associated morbidities for the 65+ age range, the inoculation-based deaths are an order-of-magnitude greater than the COVID-19 deaths!”

    That is basically what I found: the vaccines kill >10X more people than the number of COVID deaths that they save. The paper passed peer review and was published. The editor of the journal quit after he was overridden by the publisher on the retraction.

    The reason cited for the retraction:

    The use of key terminology, specifically the key terms “inoculation” and “vaccination” diverges from common use and are incorrect, indicating clear evidence of bias.

    Publicly available data from the United States Center for Disease Control (U.S. CDC) were concluded by the external reviewers to be misinterpreted to make the erroneous conclusion that the vast majority of reported deaths due to COVID-19 are actually due to other comorbidities. Such an egregious misinterpretation and misrepresentation are unacceptable.

    This is completely bogus for two reasons:

    The editor could have easily normalized the terminology to eliminate any perceived “bias.” They simply ask the author to do a quick search and replace.

    The vast majority of COVID-19 deaths were in fact due to other comorbidities. For example, the New Mexico death records where COVID-19 was listed as the cause of death and 5 out 6 were not consistent with a COVID death. If anyone wants to challenge me on that, I have access to the death data. In Massachusetts, only 10% to 20% of the deaths listed as COVID were actually caused by COVID. Most people don’t have access to the death data, but I do. So I wonder if the journal is interested in fixing their error?

    Hard-to-explain anecdotes

    Can anyone explain how these anecdotes are possible?

    Why don’t Dr. Paul Offit (FDA vaccine outside committee) and Professor Grace Lee (Chair, CDC vaccine outside committee) want to see the Israeli safety data? They are deliberately avoiding answering the question. Why?

    There is data from over 1,000 vaccine injured people where 10% of the injured report 30 or more symptoms that are unique to the vaccine injured. How is that possible if the vaccine is so safe? Marsha Gee was perfectly healthy before her COVID vaccine. Less than 1 hour after her first Pfizer shot she experienced severe symptoms and experiences 78 of symptoms common with other vaccine injured. If Marsha wasn’t injured by the COVID vaccine, what caused all these symptoms?

    Why is it illegal to analyze the vaccine vials? Why hasn’t a single medical institution done an analysis of the content of the vaccines to see if there are placebos with saline solution and the amount of mRNA degradation, rendering the vaccines useless? Why the secrecy here? If we knew what was in the vaccines would this cause harm? How?

    Why are prominent people risking their careers to obtain fake vaccine cards? We know top people at Mass General Hospital have fake vaccine cards. We’ve heard that people at the highest levels of the DoD can get fake vaccine cards. It is well known that the CEO of a large pharmaceutical company bought a fake vaccine card. Why would he risk spending years in jail if the vaccines are perfectly safe?

    The Died Suddenly group on Facebook was adding users at 20,000 per day making it the fastest growing group in Facebook history. They had to throttle the growth rate due to attempts by the British military to infiltrate the group to cause it to be shut down.

    The average age of the people reported dead in the Died Suddenly group has been trending younger and younger over time. How can you explain that? The only worldwide massive intervention that goes to younger people is the COVID vaccine.

    The embalmer data (such as The Epoch Times article and this interview). These clots are not blood clots, but they are clots embalmers never saw before mid-2021 (since they take 3 months or more to form into large sizes). If the vaccines are not causing these killer clots, what is? They can be found in up to 93% of the embalming cases.

    Insurance company data from insurance companies worldwide:

    Adults Aged 35–44 Died at Twice the Expected Rate Last Summer, Life Insurance Data Suggests

    Millennials Experienced ‘84 Percent Rise of Excess Mortality’ Into Fall 2021: Former BlackRock Portfolio Manager

    Wayne Root’s wedding: 200 guests, half vaxxed, half unvaxxed. Only the vaxxed got injured (26%) or died (7%). I surveyed my readers and collected data from over 600 readers who collectively reported very similar stats. That’s hard to explain if there isn’t a huge effect.

    My neurologist stats: 11 years without needing to do a single VAERS report; this year, she needs to file 1,000 VAERS reports on 20,000 patients in the practice. How can anyone explain that if the vaccine is perfectly safe with mild, short term effects? This is similar to the 4.5% rate of neurological injury reported earlier by the Israeli Ministry of Health.

    The polling results using third party polling firms (so not my followers) consistently show that more people died from the vaccine than from the virus. The mainstream media refuses to do similar surveys and most survey firms refuse to even ask the questions.

    Ten different surveys I did all showed the vaccines are more harmful than helpful.

    Doctors in Canada died at a rate that was more than 10X normal after getting the fourth dose of the vaccine. And those are just the ones we know about.

    The fact that Paul Offit isn’t going to get the latest booster even though the CDC says he should. Why should any of us take the shot if Paul Offit is refusing to take the shot? He’s arguably the world’s most respected authority on vaccines and sits on the FDA outside advisory committee?

    Why are health authorities removing safety data on the latest shots? If they are so safe, why not release the data?

    Google searches show people became interested in topics related to vaccine safety before they became popular on social media

    When I ask data/statistics experts such as Joel Smalley and Professor Norman Fenton whether they’ve seen any credible data proving the vaccines are safe and effective, they are unable to cite a single reference.

    A local news station (WXYZ-TV) asked people to report on unvaxxed loved ones that became sick and died and instead they got hammered with hundreds of thousands of people saying they lost loved ones to the jab. See my video on the WXYZ-TV story and also this video.

    Woman collapses and dies in the pharmacy 7 minutes after Booster shot… The stunning thing is the Twitter video documents that the pharmacy workers have been instructed to not bring it up when briefing patients and, if asked, not to comment on the death. Do you think they are looking out for your best interest by withholding adverse events like death 7 minutes after the shot from the public? That should never happen. Have you ever seen a video like this before the COVID vaccines rolled out? The death was ruled as “natural causes” which means it was from internal organ failure as opposed to being hit by a truck. However, the internal organ failure was due to an external event (vaccinated).

    Cancers

    Turbo-cancer is being reported now. It’s impossible to explain. Never been seen before.

    A reader wrote: I work in the financial services industry in Toronto. A co-worker of mine was recently diagnosed with cancer. He has been getting treated at Sunnybrook hospital for it. The doctors there told him they’ve seen a significant spike in cancer cases well above what could be explained by people missing getting screened due to the pandemic. What’s more though is that they catalogue the vaccine status of every cancer diagnosis and the spike in the number of cases is only occurring in those who are vaccinated- apparently they are researching it to try and find out why the vaxed have seen a spike in cancers vs the unvaxed who haven’t- obviously they are not ready to go public with this but they know about it and are researching it fwiw

    Books

    Turtles all the way down: Vaccine science and myth shows the vaccines are not nearly as safe as people think. This is the most damaging book ever written showing the safety of the vaccines is highly questionable. There isn’t a single risk-benefit trial on all cause mortality and morbidity vs. placebo for any of the 70 approved vaccines even though they’ve had 60 years to do this. If the vaccines are truly beneficial, why do you think it’s never been done for any vaccine? A team of Israeli scientists wrote this book over 5 years. It was recently translated into English and is available through purchase on Amazon.

    Dissolving Illusions: the history of vaccines shows they did a lot less than people think; probably next to nothing.

    The Real Anthony Fauci: illustrates the corruption in the medical community today. For example, they created a more accurate adverse event reporting system (ESP:VAERS) system and then scrapped it after it showed all the vaccines were unsafe.

    Slide presentations

    Vaccine Secrets: a 20 minute slide presentation from CHD

    The CCCA presentations:

    Stop the shots,

    More Harm Than Good

    Dispelling the Myth

    My mega-presentations:

    What I learned during the pandemic

    The elephant in the room

    Vaccine Policies

    Vaccine Essentials

    All you need to know

    Things you need to know

    180 questions they can’t answer

    Fact checks

    Once I established a policy of always recording calls with “fact checkers,” I’ve not had a single call from them trying to refute anything I’ve written.

    None of the drug companies that make these products will refute anything I’ve written or supply a representative to debate me or any of my colleagues in a live debate. They have immunity from liability and they are not willing to be held accountable in the court of public opinion either.

    The COVID lies by Dr. Michael Yeadon

    Mitigation measures: masks, vaccines, lockdowns, social distancing, 6 foot rule, …
    This was a very well done study, but it is of course attacked by the pro narrative people. We’d love to have an open debate about this study, but the other side doesn’t want to talk about it in a neutral forum.

    Masks don’t work at all. See this article which has plenty of references. If anything, masks are more likely to hurt you than to benefit you.

    There is no study at all on the 6 foot distance rule. They just made that one up.
    Origin of the virus investigation

    Professor Jeffrey Sachs was tasked by The Lancet to lead an independent investigation into the source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. After he determined it came from US biotechnology, all of a sudden nobody wanted to pursue the investigation any further.
    Conflicts of interest

    Tony Fauci gets paid every time you get a Moderna shot. He won’t disclose how much he makes and you can’t get via FOIA (it’s blacked out). If the Republicans get control of the Senate, that will change. Watch this video from Sept 20, 2022 of Rand Paul commenting on this as well as the well founded accusation that Fauci created the virus in the first place and then desperately tried to make it look like it came from nature after top scientists said it was a lab leak (watch the video at 2:00 onwards). Rand Paul called it, quite rightly, “the biggest cover-up in the history of science.”

    The question you have to ask yourself is why is Fauci keeping his funding of the gain of function research and also his compensation for each vaccine dose a secret?

    Tony Fauci was the primary reason that all early treatments were ignored by the government. It appears he did that because it would cut into his revenue stream.
    Early treatment options

    Early in the pandemic, two physicians, George Fareed and Brian Tyson, developed a treatment protocol using a variety of safe, low cost drugs and supplements with little to no side effects that had a near 100% success track record in preventing hospitalization, death, and long haul COVID if the patient started treatment shortly after realizing they were infected. They’ve treated over 10,000 patients. They wrote a best-selling book about it.

    Today, more than two years later, the FDA and the CDC have not returned their calls.
    Questions for lawmakers

    Why can't we have open forums where our public health officials can be challenged by experts who disagree? Is there proof that having open debate results in worse outcomes?

    Why doesn’t anyone want to see the Israeli safety data?

    Why isn’t anyone asking for Fauci’s unredacted emails?

    Is there a scientific reason that the CDC is ignoring me and all the experts I work with?

    Questions I'd love to ask Congresswoman Anna Eshoo... that she'll never answer

    Questions I’d like to ask the CDC

    Why hasn’t anyone calculated the minimum VAERS under-reporting factor (URF)?

    Did the propensity to report change in 2021 vs. previous years. What is the new number in 2021 and 2022 compared to previous years? How did you calculate it?

    Why do John Su and Tom Shimabukuro never talk about the URF in the ACIP meetings?

    There were over 14,000 excess deaths reported in VAERS. That’s before the URF is applied. If these weren’t caused by the vaccine, what caused them?

    If these vaccines are so safe, why are there more adverse events reported for these vaccines than for all other vaccines in history combined?

    I found thousands of adverse events that are elevated by these vaccines compared to all other vaccines combined in previous years. How many adverse events did the CDC find?

    There was a dramatic rise in adverse events reported in the VAERS system for the COVID vaccines. How could this not be a serious safety concern? The propensity to report did not increase. If you believe the propensity to report did increase, what data do you have to support that?

    My neurologist has been in practice for 11 years. She has 20,000 patients in her multi-physician practice. In that time, she’s never had to report a single event to VAERS. With the COVID vaccines, she now needs to make 1,000 reports. If the vaccines are safe and effective and most all the symptoms are mild and short term, how do you explain this? Her event rate similar to the 4.5% injury rate that the Israeli MoH found. So her reporting rate is more than 10,000 times higher than for any other vaccine. Couldn’t that be the explanation for the higher rate of VAERS reports? Doesn’t this suggest that the propensity to report is much lower this year because there are so many more events and doctors simply don’t have the time to report them all?

    The NEJM pregnancy paper by Tom Shimabukuro noted that the results on safety for pregnant women was preliminary since many of the women were still pregnant. What was the final result and why wasn’t it published?

    There was an analysis of the VAERS data by Hannah Rosenblum published in the Lancet. It never goes into explaining why there were elevated reporting rates and also the nature of the reported events are not normal background events. Couldn’t the elevated reporting rates be caused by a dangerous vaccine? Does she want to look at the Israeli safety data? If not, why not? The Israeli data directly contradicts the conclusion of the paper. Shouldn’t we figure out which conclusion is correct?

    Why does Carol Crawford not answer my questions about an open discussion with the top vaccine misinformation spreaders to resolve our differences and reduce vaccine hesitancy?

    Why does Martha Sharan ignore my emails and phone messages when I attempted to ask for permission to talk to the authors of the Rosenblum paper? Can’t she reply with the reason questions are not allowed?

    The unanswered questions

    Questions I’d love to get the answer to. These were asked, but never answered.

    Why did the CDC never publish the follow up on the NEJM pregnancy paper by Tom Shimabukuro?

    The CEO of Moderna was asked how the 19 nucleotide sequence from a Moderna patent got into the SARS-CoV-2 genome. That sequence is never found in a virus. How did it get in this one? The CEO said he’d look into it, but never reported the explanation. I’d love to know what it was.

    Why hasn’t any Democratic committee chairman asked the NIH for Tony Fauci’s unredacted emails? Don’t we want to know the truth about whether there was a deliberate cover-up? If there was, shouldn’t Fauci be fired?

    Fauci wasn’t supposed to be funding gain of function research but he was. How is he being held accountable?

    How much is Fauci making every time someone gets a Moderna shot? He’s a public official… Why is this a secret?

    Debates

    People who disagree with the mainstream narrative are rewarded with censorship, permanent bans on posting on social media, demonetization of your YouTube account, revocation of your medical license, revocation of your medical certifications, loss of hospital privileges, loss of job, loss of funding, loss of friends, and a Wikipedia entry labeling you a “misinformation spreader” and/or “conspiracy theorist.”

    This is a problem. I am not aware of any paper published in the medical literature that shows that such tactics result in better health decisions.

    Should we use the same rules at the UN when nations disagree? Do you think that will result in better outcomes?

    The way people resolve differences is by confronting the issues and talking through them. But we are not doing this:

    Why can't we find anyone who will defend the CDC, FDA, and NIH on camera?

    Dr. Byram Bridle and 2 colleagues challenged Canada's health authorities to a debate

    Vinay Prasad's most important op-ed

    Articles about the corruption of science

    The head of the CDC's outside committee on vaccine safety does not want to see the safety data collected by the Israeli Ministry of Health.

    This is objective proof of a broken system. It is indefensible. Caught on video camera. There is no reason that anyone in a position of authority on the COVID vaccines would refuse an opportunity to see the most thorough post-vaccine safety study ever done: one that shows causality of serious adverse events.

    From Israeli Investigators Find COVID-19 Vaccines Cause Side Effects: Leaked Video:

    Rechallenge changes a causal link “from possible to definitive,” Dr. Mati Berkovitch, head of the research team and a pediatric specialist, said at the meeting.

    and

    Many of the reported adverse events were found to be long-lasting, which researchers said in the meeting was surprising since the brochure handed to vaccine recipients says otherwise. They also said Pfizer officials told them that Pfizer did not know of any long-lasting symptoms.

    and

    In the official report later issued to the public, the MoH did not detail how researchers were caught off guard by the duration of the events and side effects. The health agency also stated that there were no new events identified.

    It concludes:

    The choice to omit some of the crucial findings discussed in the meeting from the public report is “a recipe to destroy” the entire vaccine program, according to Levi, an Israeli native and an expert in risk management.

    “The more pro-vaccine, the more disturbed you need to be from something like this,” Levi told The Epoch Times. “And the reason is that the two most important enablers for vaccine programs … to be successful is trust and transparency, that you actually communicate to people the real risk-benefits and allow them to make choices about what they want to do. The second thing is that you take care of the people that were harmed by the vaccine because no vaccine has 100 percent safety.”

    “I think we have in this example … where we violate these two very important principles,” he added. “This is a recipe to basically destroy all vaccine programs, so the more pro-vaccine you are, you should be more disturbed by this.”

    How can you have the chair of a safety committee not interested in seeing important safety data? Professor Grace Lee should be removed from her position by the CDC. Why isn’t she? Does anyone care?

    Why does Dr. Paul Offit ignore requests to see the same data?

    According to the Epoch Times article, everyone declined to comment on the story: the scientists, the MOH officials, and the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office declined to comment on the Israeli findings.
    Meta-collections

    If the above isn’t enough, there are hundreds more “hard to explain” data points.

    List of over 1,200 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals

    The safe and effective narrative is falling apart

    Think we got it wrong?

    How the authorities can INSTANTLY stop the spread of "COVID misinformation"

    Examining COVID Vaccine Efficacy

    Using all the available evidence

    There is an excellent article written in August 2020 by Norman Doidge entitled “Medicine’s Fundamentalists” which talks about the “all-available-evidence approach.” It should be read by every doctor in America. This is how medical science should work.
    The precautionary principle of medicine

    The precautionary principle medicine seems to have been thrown under the bus during the pandemic. It says in the face of uncertainty, one should take reasonable measures to avoid threats that are serious and plausible.

    For example, the Pfizer clinical trial showed the vaccine saved only one COVID death per 22,000 injected. That means we might only save around 10,000 lives if we inject 200M Americans. So if VAERS, which is at least 41 times under reported, is showing over 12,000 deaths associated with the vaccine, any reasonable person should say that killing more than 41 people to save 1 life is nonsensical… shouldn’t we put a PAUSE on this intervention until we resolve the uncertainty?

    In the current system, questioning the CDC or other authorities results in serious retribution as mentioned earlier.

    Is that really the right way to handle scientific dissent?
    Summary

    Are the vaccines “safe and effective” as claimed?

    To answer this, science requires that we look at all the available data and see whether the data is more consistent with the hypothesis of “safe and effective” or “not safe and effective.”

    All the data that I and my colleagues have seen end up being placed in the “not” bucket.

    We are open to being shown we got it wrong on the hundreds of pieces of evidence we have examined, but nobody is willing to discuss the data with us to resolve the issue, not even for $1M dollars.

    I even went to extraordinary lengths to offer the Israeli safety data to ACIP Chair Grace Lee. Her response: she called the police on me. That pretty much tells you everything you need to know: they simply refuse to look at any data that goes against their currently held beliefs. That’s the way science works.

    Please share this widely.

     
    Comments
      
      Tellafriend: could you just give us the cliffs? tia
      
      1dollarboxcar: please no more conspiracy theories bro :)

  8. #16888
    Platinum
    Reputation
    424
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,214
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Quote Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar View Post
    the depopulation thing doesn't have to happen all at once....

    1. there is a rise in this "sudden death syndrome" in all ages
    2. the myocarditis in the younger males might not kill them today or tomorrow, but they are fucked 8-12 yrs. from now ( inevitable death sentence ) if it didn't kill them already....
    3. miscarriage rates are way up
    4. the younger children that received this poison, is it sterilising them in girls reproductive organs? how about the boys, low or screwed up sperm, and we've already heard rumors about this, i mean none of these other "conspiracy theories" ever came to fruition now did they? oh wait yes they have....
    5. in Libtard Canada you can now "off" yourself and ask to be euthanized, Libtardville USA will probably be next and don't forget all the Libtard European countries that will probably follow suit....
    6. probably about 2-3 other things i can't think of right now, maybe someone else can chime in on that....
    7. so yeah you add all them factors together very possible to see about a 30-50% reduction in population starting from about 2021 and the next 30 years...

    All for a cold virus that has always had a 99.9% survival rate , but did/does transmit easily cause that's what is was engineered to do out of the Wuhan lab, whether it escaped accidentally or let out on purpose we will never know....
    Who knows what they are doing to destroy manhood in general, testosterone levels are down 20% in the last 20 years. Less men and masculinity means more control. The women aren't fighting back, the feminine men aren't either. The slow burn has been happening for some time we just didn't realize it. They want to slowly weaken any strength the people had hoping they can destroy it all before the masses realize what is going on.

     
    Comments
      
      1dollarboxcar: :)

  9. #16889
    Gold 1dollarboxcar's Avatar
    Reputation
    1609
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,631
    Load Metric
    65629084
    ooops truth bomb incoming


     
    Comments
      
      ok25: Jimmy is a good dude, metzger also

  10. #16890
    Platinum splitthis's Avatar
    Reputation
    907
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    At the Metroparks
    Posts
    4,641
    Load Metric
    65629084
    "Beware of false prophets who come disguised as harmless sheep but are really vicious wolves. You can identify them by their fruit, that is, by the way they act. Can you pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?" (Matthew 7:15-16, NLT)

     
    Comments
      
      1dollarboxcar: :)
    Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

    Ronald Reagan

  11. #16891
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084


    LMAO

    Most of you here are fucking morons

    Suck it

     
    Comments
      
      1dollarboxcar: ooops another truth bomb....

  12. #16892
    Platinum devidee's Avatar
    Reputation
    1172
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,591
    Load Metric
    65629084
    According to the CDC, 86% of children in the USA had antibodies from infection by July/August and every state (other than WA & ME) had seroprevelance >80%.

    In other words, everything failed to prevent childhood infection. Masks failed. School closures failed. Vaccines failed.

    Name:  896F21DC-7C62-4953-A0A6-CA848BDC3A7C.jpeg
Views: 258
Size:  116.2 KB

     
    Comments
      
      ok25: LOL. They just run away and pretend they weren't tricked by a collective of psychopathic criminals and their pathetic minions going along with all for a paycheck. GG human race, most of you are dumber than a dolphin.

  13. #16893
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084
    https://rumble.com/v1lv4dc-unpayable...h-ed-dowd.html

    All you dummies are trying the cope-a-dope

    Ignore your beatdown and hope we get sick of rubbing it in your faces what FOOLS you are

    We won't

    Get used to being laughed at you little bitches

  14. #16894
    Platinum Jayjami's Avatar
    Reputation
    879
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe
    Posts
    3,164
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Quote Originally Posted by splitthis View Post
    "Beware of false prophets who come disguised as harmless sheep but are really vicious wolves. You can identify them by their fruit, that is, by the way they act. Can you pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?" (Matthew 7:15-16, NLT)
    Where are the pics of the farm, dupe?

  15. #16895
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Tellafriend: could you just give us the cliffs? tia

    Fair

    I am a bastard

  16. #16896

  17. #16897
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084


    REMEMBER THIS?



    This is who Sloppy Joe gets his news from


     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Lol sloppy stupid

  18. #16898
    Diamond Sloppy Joe's Avatar
    Reputation
    1110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,483
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Quote Originally Posted by ok25 View Post


    REMEMBER THIS?



    This is who Sloppy Joe gets his news from

    Jesus, your presence is acknowledged one time and I'm already deep in your head?

    Sounds like a lonely existence, maybe you and splitthis can be friends.

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Together we laugh at u
      
      NaturalBornHustler: Hahaha
    PokerFraudAlert...will never censor your claims, even if they're against one of our sponsors. In addition to providing you an open forum report fraud within the poker community, we will also analyze your claims with a clear head an unbiased point of view. And, of course, the accused will always have the floor to defend themselves.-Dan Druff

  19. #16899
    Silver
    Reputation
    148
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    693
    Load Metric
    65629084
    Quote Originally Posted by Sloppy Joe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ok25 View Post


    REMEMBER THIS?



    This is who Sloppy Joe gets his news from

    Jesus, your presence is acknowledged one time and I'm already deep in your head?

    Sounds like a lonely existence, maybe you and splitthis can be friends.
    https://odysee.com/@EarthNewspaper:e...-Compilation:2

    These are your friends

    Your head is deep up your ass

    I just enjoy rattling the cage of smug know it all retards

    Lonely? lmao. You know nothing about me and you're reaching for excuses after being unable to make any point approaching logical, honest or worthwhile. Another TDS faggot like the ones who got chased out of this thread for being


  20. #16900

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. KILL WILL
    By Yebsite in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-19-2024, 09:28 PM
  2. Going to kill the next person...
    By SetofKs in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-19-2018, 12:05 AM
  3. DID BOVADA JUST KILL ALL LHE ABOVE 3-6?
    By SetofKs in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-05-2018, 04:55 PM
  4. So if you were going to kill yourself...
    By BetCheckBet in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-05-2017, 11:28 PM
  5. Kill this whitey
    By Pooh in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 03-30-2014, 03:13 PM

Tags for this Thread