The Trump administration pressured the FDA to authorize unproven treatments for Covid-19 and the first Covid-19 vaccines on an accelerated timeline, according to a House report released Wednesday.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...finds-00053428
How does that one Shaggy song go?
Timeline:
Vaccine ok
Vaccine good
Vaccine mandatory
Vaccine deniers declared cranks and insane
Vaccine unavoidably suspicious
Vaccine not good
Vaccine bad
Trump did the vaccine.
lol really wouldnt surprise me a few months and all the pro vax, pro mask, pro lockdown biden supporters will be claiming they were against the jab all along and its all trumps fault
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
the media got them programmed so hard they will literally spout whatever they are told
it went from 100% safe and effective you wont catch covid to nobody said they would stop you getting covid or passing it on
For the first time in Canadian history, the number one cause of death is ‘unknown causes’.
Georgetown University imposing mask mandate on students again this fall. They don't want to let go. Booster shots mandatory too.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetow...ss-instruction
NEVER FORGET BIG DICK AND KHALWAT
TWO OF THE BIGGEST PROPAGANDA DRONE MORON FAGGOTS THIS SITE HAS EVER SEEN
https://nypost.com/2022/08/25/nate-s...covid-vaccine/
Liberals pressured Pfizer to delay vaccine until after election. We've truly been failed by our so called leaders.
LOL radio host "stunning anecdotal evidence."I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.
I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”
A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier.
And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.
This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.
Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:
In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”
you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death
would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.
I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).
An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Government which is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.
And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.
Just comparing the number of anecdotes on each side of the narrative makes it very clear that the vaccines are making things worse.
remember when you were a conspiracy theorist for daring to say lockdowns don't work?
https://twitter.com/theeliklein/status/1563192150522986496
If only people would have spoken up two years ago.
Oh wait, we did and we were labeled domestic terrorists for it.
Alex Berenson was just on Rogan it's a must watch, an unbelievable interview. That motherfucker has the receipts.
https://twitter.com/TheEliKlein/status/1563293091708436480
Now comes the point in the exercise where the Democrats deny that they said what they said and did what they did.
Just like the BLM riots that same year. "We never encouraged no violence! We never told no police to stand down! We never said to defund them police! These are all right wing lies, you see!"
In a few years, Democrats are going to deny that they were ever for the mutilation of "trans" children, and that Republicans are just smearing them again.
sorry todge but you completely bought into all the covid hysteria hook line and sinker so you dont get to gloat about this those are the rules
i mean you hid in your house for 2 years straight and got like 4 jabs by now so yeah the covid fear cult are your people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoningLOL radio host "stunning anecdotal evidence."I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.
I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”
A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier.
And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.
This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.
Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:
In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”
you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death
would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.
I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).
An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Government which is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.
And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.
Just comparing the number of anecdotes on each side of the narrative makes it very clear that the vaccines are making things worse.
LOL @ your dumb ass acting like this is what I stand my argument on, it's just some more info and yeah, an anecdote. If it's bullshit(could be) then the score in that contest is heavily weighted on 'experts' trucking theirs around for the last 3 years.
You're a retard
A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier.LOL radio host "stunning anecdotal evidence."I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.
I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”
A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier.
And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.
This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.
Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:
In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”
you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death
would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.
I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).
An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Government which is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.
And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.
Just comparing the number of anecdotes on each side of the narrative makes it very clear that the vaccines are making things worse.
And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Reply With Quote
