Originally Posted by
gimmick
Quite a lot of people have said that. I said this more than a year ago...
"Herd immunity is a thing, but it's associated with an unnecessary body count with unknown efficacy. Mutations are thing. It's a bad gamble."
...with vaccines it's closer to a freeroll, but efficacy/mutations are problematic. Oh and this is what you were saying at the time about 3rd wave being bad...
"I don't believe this.
The worst we've seen was NYC circa April, and since then nowhere has been that bad. Sure, there's been flare-ups, but nothing like greater NYC in the spring."
https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...l=1#post932456
The worst we saw was NYC in the spring. In death per million population, that was as bad as it got here (for any metro area, not the country).
Of course mutations were a possibility regarding the inability to kill COVID. It's the same reason we can't eradicate the flu.
However, the assumption was that, barring new mutations forming which could evade the vaccine, we would achieve herd immunity at 80% or so. That didn't happen. Even had Omicron never appeared, we weren't going to get herd immunity via the vaccines. Part of the problem was that the vaccines degraded in efficacy a lot more than first assumed, allowing enough breakthroughs plus unvaccinated people to keep it alive.
There is some belief that Omicron will rip through the population so quickly that it will finally bring us to herd immunity, but I don't believe it. We will have the same breakthrough problem all over again when the boosters get a few months older.
However, the next mutation might actually be a cold, or something very close to it, so that will pretty much be game over anyway if such a thing occurs.