I would again like to point out that I probably read DailyMail more than anyone else here, and even I acknowledge they have licensing agreements with the CCP, so we should probably take anything coming from DailyMail with a grain of salt.
For one, you have to be clear to make a demarcation between actual study results, and "propaganda" adjacent to said results.
For example, when they reference a research paper that says scientists looked at a bunch of different stains in vitro and determined some strains infect human in vitro cell lines better than others, that is fine.
Them citing "reports" that a group of Americans (whatever this even means) are responsible for spreading a specific virulent strain in Wuhan, that is just propaganda.