After being told repeated not to do so, as a matter of simple respect to the student under his purview. Yes, that does indeed still sound like really shitty behavior from a public employee. If nobody ever found out about it, it would be inactionable, obv, but that's not how it happened, is it? No, the comments seemed to get back to the student quite often.
Again, I ask you, what if the student wanted pronouns "they" or "ze"? Would the teacher be expected to use those pronouns?
I'd be fine with it, since those are indeed gender-neutral. They are in all the dictionaries, they are proper English words, and it avoids a whole lot of issues that have nothing to do with the actual teaching of the student, so yes, IMO. It's such a small ask that means so much to the person asking that I wouldn't really give it a second thought, personally. I might even fuck it up occasionally, but as I think we both agree, if the student thinks I'm making a good faith effort, I dont believe there would be a single issue with it.
Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
You assumed that I don't have interactions with trans people, but you're incorrect. Two people I knew from the past are now male-to-female trans, and are Facebook friends. I interact with both, refer to them by their new name and female pronouns, and don't ever bring up them being trans unless it's relevant to the conversation. One of them recently posted an opinion on Facebook that they think the whole "non binary" thing is BS, and it's mostly people co-opting the trans identity in order to look cool/edgy. I said that I agreed.
Non-binary is a whole 'nother topic unrelated to transgender people. But if people treated trans people like you do, we'd never have a problem. When someone refuses to do so because they say your chosen identity is something they consider a lie, and against their religion, AND YOU WORK IN A PUBLIC SCHOOL, well, then we got problems. It's not even a lie to call someone the term they ask for. If I say you should call me Steve, and you do so, is that a lie? I also have very little patience who use the whole "Lying is against my religion" angle. It rarely stands up to scrutiny, as far as I've seen. If you still feel like its a lie, bring it up in confession and say you did it as a compassionate act for your student, and God will forgive you anyway. But to say that someone's identity is a lie, in your view and your religions view, and your job is serving children in a job paid for by tax money, then I believe the kids rights trump the teacher's in this case.
Let's consider Natalie's situation, someone who is literally famous for being transgender. Because of that, that's what people know of her when they meet her and in my opinion, that's probably why they overdo the whole pronoun thing with her. It's all they can see, not Nat the Human but Nat the Trans Hero With A Huge Platform, or whatever moniker you can think of. It's like anyone being famous for anything. The way people react you you skews so much towards what you are famous for that it becomes your entire public identity, and in her case, its being trans. I have no doubt that people react to her quite differently than non-famous trans people, for better in some case, for worse in others. I posit that her fame is a huge reason she is sick of people who can't get over what to call her, and the awkwardness and repetitiveness that comes from it.