Stones livestream player Mike Postle accused of "live superusing"

[Dan Druff]

Another Postle supporter has committed Twitter suicide.

@pokergirlcarrie, who taunted Postle accusers with obnoxious memes when these accusations first came out, has deleted her Twitter.

I wonder if Postle was banging these chicks, or at least spending money on them (or both?) to where they became such staunch supporters, to the point of facing down the angry Twitter mob (and actually taunting/trolling accusers!)

There's some dude currently trolling Twitter in a pro-Mike fashion, but I don't know if he's serious.

[MrTickle]

Joey went over a stream of Postle's only losing session. He doesn't have the hat, or his phone in his lap. And the guy thought to be helping him is absent. Look how different he plays in this hand, compared to when he knew everyone's holdings.

[Crowe Diddly]

this thread and story is super interesting, as all poker cheating stories are, but I'm kinda fixated on the hat. If the audio quality is half decent, I think I'd love something like that.

[JoeD]

this thread and story is super interesting, as all poker cheating stories are, but I'm kinda fixated on the hat. If the audio quality is half decent, I think I'd love something like that.

No way it could work without the hat, would be way too obvious.

[GambleBotsChafedPenis]

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179679602530086913

[MrTickle]

This is the smoking gun for me. It wasn’t edited 30 mins after when it’s shown to the public, because it’s all done live and just shown 30 mins later. That means someone changed the cards before Mike had a chance to tell them the RFID was wrong. Super shady.

Ryan Feldman, who works at Live at the Bike, had this excellent point to make, regarding the 96o hand which they instantly changed on the stream because "the RFID was wrong":

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179575834685788160

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179576174411780096

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179576456948568065

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179577427023974400

[duped_samaritan]

[Kuntmissioner]

Does anyone think he’s not guilty? I can’t find anyone

He's not guilty until proven so beyond and to the exclusion of reasonable doubt. He hasn't even been charged with a crime. However, I think he definitely cheated. But, he's not guilty and from his statement...he doesn't feel guilt or remorse.

______

FWIW, the exact method is still up for debate, but the evidence clearly is pointing to him having help. I think it goes all the way to the top. This streaming game needs publicity. They need characters and story lines, just the way "reality" tv is programmed. They wanted to have player characters to create a buzz. This was all part of the game design. The company's initial statement kind of leads me to believe that whomever wrote had full knowledge of what is going on. Just MHO

So NOW you believe he is guilty?

[Cerveza Fria]

He's not guilty until proven so beyond and to the exclusion of reasonable doubt. He hasn't even been charged with a crime. However, I think he definitely cheated. But, he's not guilty and from his statement...he doesn't feel guilt or remorse.

______

FWIW, the exact method is still up for debate, but the evidence clearly is pointing to him having help. I think it goes all the way to the top. This streaming game needs publicity. They need characters and story lines, just the way "reality" tv is programmed. They wanted to have player characters to create a buzz. This was all part of the game design. The company's initial statement kind of leads me to believe that whomever wrote had full knowledge of what is going on. Just MHO

So NOW you believe he is guilty?

No. He is not guilty. But, I do think he cheated either the full knowledge and assistance of the production crew. But since he hasn’t even been charged with a crime, let alone proven beyond and to the exclusion of reasonable doubt, he is not guilty. There is a difference between being a scumbag cheater and being guilty of a crime.

Sorry, it’s the lawyer in me.

[BeerAndPoker]

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179164422176002048

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179895307175247872

[Kuntmissioner]

______

FWIW, the exact method is still up for debate, but the evidence clearly is pointing to him having help. I think it goes all the way to the top. This streaming game needs publicity. They need characters and story lines, just the way "reality" tv is programmed. They wanted to have player characters to create a buzz. This was all part of the game design. The company's initial statement kind of leads me to believe that whomever wrote had full knowledge of what is going on. Just MHO

So NOW you believe he is guilty?

No. He is not guilty. But, I do think he cheated either the full knowledge and assistance of the production crew. But since he hasn’t even been charged with a crime, let alone proven beyond and to the exclusion of reasonable doubt, he is not guilty. There is a difference between being a scumbag cheater and being guilty of a crime.

Sorry, it’s the lawyer in me.

Is he GUILTY of cheating?

[Crowe Diddly]

No. He is not guilty. But, I do think he cheated either the full knowledge and assistance of the production crew. But since he hasn’t even been charged with a crime, let alone proven beyond and to the exclusion of reasonable doubt, he is not guilty. There is a difference between being a scumbag cheater and being guilty of a crime.

Sorry, it’s the lawyer in me.

You ain't in court, dog, and this ain't a trial. There's no jury or judge here, just people stating what appears obvious, using terms that have obvious meaning outside a court of law.

Guy's as guilty as the Ultimate Bet superusers, whom would also not be guilty by your stance since a judge or jury never convicted, even though they are clearly guilty so far beyond any reasonable doubt that you couldn't even find anyone anywhere who would make such an argument against their guilt.

Unless you want to make it. Guess I should ask, was Russ Hamilton guilty in your opinion?

[ftpjesus]

It was only a matter of time.

https://www.captiongenerator.com/153...ostle-Cheating

[WillieMcFML]

i wonder if mikey paid his taxes

there's a pretty good accounting of his wins and losses now

[Dan Druff]

i wonder if mikey paid his taxes

there's a pretty good accounting of his wins and losses now

Definitely worth a tip to the IRS. Normally I think it would be a super dick move to report a poker pro to the IRS, and it's something I have never even considered doing to anyone, including those I dislike.

However, in the case of a blatant cheater like this who accumulated his winnings by ripping people off, that's a different story entirely.

[Dan Druff]

Soo.... two weeks ago, Benjamin brought home a cold, which then went to Ben's mom, and then went to me.

Unfortunately I have major symptoms right now and cannot do radio, which is why I haven't done an emergency PFA show yet.

The earliest possible show could be Saturday.

The good news is that Veronica has agreed to come on. So there's a very good chance I'll have an interview with her.

[BeerAndPoker]

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1179969560629383169

So the same terminally ill man with cancer not only got cheated by Brian Voytek but Postle as well? Very sad!

[GambleBotsChafedPenis]

holy shit it's gonna be on SVPs 'One Big Thing' tonight...should be coming on within 30 minutes of this post...

[Dan Druff]

Let's talk about that "investigator" Stones hired.

Michael Lipman, whose qualifications of "assistant US Attorney" and "chief of fraud investigations" sounds highly qualified.

However, as with everything Stones has done lately, it's not what it seems to be on the surface.

Michael Lipman is now a private practice attorney, who has represented two Stones owners (Ryan Stone and Kermit Schayltz) as recently as 2016. Obviously this is not going to be "independent" at all.

[BeerAndPoker]

Notice the persons name who uploaded this.