Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: When $400 becomes $410 -- hidden add-on at WPT event angers Allen Kessler, others

  1. #1
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    4686
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    32,921
    Blog Entries
    2

    When $400 becomes $410 -- hidden add-on at WPT event angers Allen Kessler, others

    Allen Kessler posted about a small but problematic "fine print" issue regarding a WPT tournament at Maryland Live! casino.

    Here's the structure sheet:

    Name:  wptlive.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  104.7 KB

    You buy in for $400 and start with 12,000 chips. Buried in "Event Details", it turns out you can add on another 5,000 chips for just $10 -- something one would be an absolute moron to turn down. So you're basically committed to spend $410 on the event, not $400, unless you want to play with a tremendous disadvantage.

    The $10 is for "the dealers", which is fine. What's not fine is the fact that this cost is hidden. This can especially cause problems if someone brought exactly $400 with them, and doesn't have $10 on them to add on. There's no reason to hide things like this.

    Simply make it a $410 event, give $10 of it to the dealers, and be done with it.

    It's possible that this is a legal thing. Perhaps they can't withhold $10 from the regular prize pool for the dealers, under Maryland law? I doubt it, but even if that's the case, they can at least clearly state this when promoting the tournament, so everyone knows it's a $410 event, and everyone knows to bring another $10.

    Some people on Kessler's Facebook page are mocking him for this. Rebuttals include "It's only $10", "It's for the dealers, who cares?", and "It's not mandatory. I'd only have a problem if it's mandatory."

    These people are all missing the point. Tournament structure sheets and promotional material should NEVER be misleading, whether it's for $1, $10, or $1000. It's the principle of the matter, and poker players shouldn't accept being tricked just because the amount of money is low, or because the money is going to a good cause. If these principles are not upheld, the incidence of this will increase, and for more money. Look at what Venetian is doing right now as a good example.

    Furthermore, the "it's not mandatory" response is laughable, since it's virtually mandatory unless you want to play with a gigantic disadvantage. Once you spend $400 on 12,000 chips, you are pot committed to spend $10 more on 5,000 additional chips. So it's basically mandatory for anyone with a sense of very basic mathematics.

  2. #2
    hate add ons haven't seen it live yet
    Last edited by FRANKRIZZO; 09-27-2019 at 05:23 PM.

  3. #3
    This is very common in small rooms across the country

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Allen Kessler, bracelet winner?
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-13-2019, 12:39 PM
  2. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-28-2017, 11:39 PM
  3. allen Kessler banned from 2+2
    By AT-6ed in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-06-2015, 10:32 PM
  4. Kessler wins Foxwoods Main Event
    By simpdog in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-26-2014, 02:11 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-01-2012, 07:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •