Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: When $400 becomes $410 -- hidden add-on at WPT event angers Allen Kessler, others

  1. #1
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65623358

    When $400 becomes $410 -- hidden add-on at WPT event angers Allen Kessler, others

    Allen Kessler posted about a small but problematic "fine print" issue regarding a WPT tournament at Maryland Live! casino.

    Here's the structure sheet:

    Name:  wptlive.jpg
Views: 723
Size:  104.7 KB

    You buy in for $400 and start with 12,000 chips. Buried in "Event Details", it turns out you can add on another 5,000 chips for just $10 -- something one would be an absolute moron to turn down. So you're basically committed to spend $410 on the event, not $400, unless you want to play with a tremendous disadvantage.

    The $10 is for "the dealers", which is fine. What's not fine is the fact that this cost is hidden. This can especially cause problems if someone brought exactly $400 with them, and doesn't have $10 on them to add on. There's no reason to hide things like this.

    Simply make it a $410 event, give $10 of it to the dealers, and be done with it.

    It's possible that this is a legal thing. Perhaps they can't withhold $10 from the regular prize pool for the dealers, under Maryland law? I doubt it, but even if that's the case, they can at least clearly state this when promoting the tournament, so everyone knows it's a $410 event, and everyone knows to bring another $10.

    Some people on Kessler's Facebook page are mocking him for this. Rebuttals include "It's only $10", "It's for the dealers, who cares?", and "It's not mandatory. I'd only have a problem if it's mandatory."

    These people are all missing the point. Tournament structure sheets and promotional material should NEVER be misleading, whether it's for $1, $10, or $1000. It's the principle of the matter, and poker players shouldn't accept being tricked just because the amount of money is low, or because the money is going to a good cause. If these principles are not upheld, the incidence of this will increase, and for more money. Look at what Venetian is doing right now as a good example.

    Furthermore, the "it's not mandatory" response is laughable, since it's virtually mandatory unless you want to play with a gigantic disadvantage. Once you spend $400 on 12,000 chips, you are pot committed to spend $10 more on 5,000 additional chips. So it's basically mandatory for anyone with a sense of very basic mathematics.

  2. #2
    Platinum FRANKRIZZO's Avatar
    Reputation
    482
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,393
    Load Metric
    65623358
    hate add ons haven't seen it live yet
    Last edited by FRANKRIZZO; 09-27-2019 at 05:23 PM.

  3. #3
    Gold SPIT this's Avatar
    Reputation
    346
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,755
    Load Metric
    65623358
    This is very common in small rooms across the country

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Allen Kessler, bracelet winner?
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-13-2019, 12:39 PM
  2. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-28-2017, 11:39 PM
  3. allen Kessler banned from 2+2
    By AT-6ed in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-06-2015, 10:32 PM
  4. Kessler wins Foxwoods Main Event
    By simpdog in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-26-2014, 02:11 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-01-2012, 07:09 AM