"thesidedish, complete dipshit, said this was happening to him 2.5 years ago" not hard
"thesidedish, complete dipshit, said this was happening to him 2.5 years ago" not hard
ya really a "new study"? why would that dipshit even be close to being in my league as someone who lived it 500 days straight, don't be a fkn gasbag on my watch u fkn faggot
DAN DRUFF IS WASHED UP TRASH LIKE ATINE THATS WHY IM THE QUINTESSTIONAL GREATEST TROLL ON THE SITE
they used to be world class but now I think they're kinda pathetic and im way out of their league now
sorry, I need to fight someone
ya ur right I didn't post anything special cuz it was out of ur league and u had no clue what I was saying. suit boy told u tho so u get it now, fkn pathetic
why would I lie, that's really the problem the beta cuck libtards don't understand. im just a complete dipshit man's man drinking gambling god. I don't even wanna hang out with u faggots, im doing u a favor with my posts. I had like 200 posts in 3 years prior to "trump train" cuz I only chimed in when I had something important to say. WHEN I TALK U LISTEN KAPICHE?!
if they're left leaning in the USA that equals straight down the middle in the rest of the world - good job zuck
lol at druff just plagiarizing dish's posts
wow this is why the right cant run a social media platform. all they do is steal each others posts and refuse to give credit.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
jesus I was canned. I was even spamming cleatus on pfa chat
Where did I say that the commission was “self-appointed”? I said that it was *headed* by a staunch rightwinger. Facebook most likely did this to ward off criticism from the rightwing that the commission fundings would be leftwing-biased, but that doesn’t keep it from from being rightwing-biased.
The commission may have been right-wing based, but I think most of its conclusions were very reasonable and hard to doubt.
The only part of the report I found useless was their interviews with right wingers regarding their "concerns" about Facebook. That could have been briefly stated and summarized. The commission should have simply researched facts (which it also did), and then presented their findings.
The biggest problems it unearthed seem very real. The "fact checking" sites ranged from left-biased to very left-biased, the SPLC created their hate speech guidelines (lol), and the appeals process was non-transparent and a complete joke.
Do you doubt any of these conclusions?
I actually agree that relying upon the SPLC to set the standard for hate speech is a mistake. At one time they were fair and pioneering in bringing attention to dangerous hate speech. But in the past decade they had become quite and unbending to valid criticism, with only being sued for defamation as the only legal means to get them to back off from negatively labeling someone or organization.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.new...981879%3famp=1
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)