Quote Originally Posted by Sanlmar View Post
Quote Originally Posted by sonatine View Post
i always found it kinda gimmicky and trite but in its defense the movement it was trying to frame was also gimmicky and trite.
I never connected with it. I didn’t waste any time wondering why either. Thus, I haven’t read any of the 50 year analysis.

But I will do the bare minimum and ask you, “do you think Hopper was deliberately gimmicky and trite and he hit the bullseye?”

Honestly, I never considered that. I found Hopper and Fonda annoying and pompous. So again, I didn’t invest a lot of thought.... and I consider myself a big antihero guy. At least as much as the next guy.

That tgull’s first observation was how much ROI it achieved. That really is how this film is remembered. I think Hopper was silently proud of this.

there was a surprising depth / awareness / sensitivity to real life hopper. fonda was.. well, fonda.