Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
It's been over 2 months since this happened, and I can't find any evidence of any prominent or semi-prominent feminists condemning this freak's actions.
I guess violence against women is okay, as long as the woman is right-wing.
You have taken one inconsequential and irrelevant person and made a whole thread about it. I literally thought LOL, Druff must be susceptible to propaganda. Did anyone make a thread over the guy that ran into all those people and convicted of it? Yet, to make some point Druff digs up some "viral" video of this guy. (And yes, I despise him, glad to see him charged)
Thats not the end of it though. No, Druff expects someone else to find this inconseqential violent person and take a stand against him but because this person ISN'T discussed Druff comes away with conclusion that they support the violent actions.
HUH
I mean, that isn't at all how it works. It is just a LOL application of logic. It needs to be shown that the person is actually significant as opposed to just some random inconsequential nut.