Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Jordan Hunt: One of the most hated "men" in Toronto

  1. #1
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65674391

    Jordan Hunt: One of the most hated "men" in Toronto

    Jordan Hunt is a sniveling little abortion activist with a penchant for violence toward women.

    His M/O was to show up at anti-abortion rallies, try to strongarm signs away from female protesters, and destroy them.

    If any woman tried to fight back, he would get violent with them.

    In August, he showed up to a Toronto anti-abortion rally on a bike, and tried to wrestle signs away from female protesters. When on attempted to resist, he shoved her into a pole, then ran away. This got no publicity because the little video there was of the incident wasn't very clear.

    However, in October, he came to a similar rally and started vandalizing people's signs by scribbling all over them.

    And when one of the women tried to argue with him, this happened:




    He tried to make the excuse, "I meant to kick your phone", after the cold, calculated attack on the woman, where you can clearly see him winding up his body in preparation for it.

    He was identified shortly thereafter. Turns out he was a contract worker at a small hair salon, which promptly fired him and criticized his actions.

    Prior to being fired, Jordan knew what was coming. Hearing that the video of him was going viral (but he hadn't yet been identified), he told the salon's owner that "there's a viral video out there" and said that he "needs to leave town right away".

    Jordan turned himself in to police shortly after being identified, and has been charged with eight counts related to the attack, along with one other count related to August's attack.

    Amazing how so many of these "male feminists" secretly hate women.

    BTW, what's with these violent, effeminate SJW men in Toronto?

    In the viral Jordan Peterson video which catapulted him to fame, some androgynous looking dude smacked Lauren Southern when she was simply trying to video the incident.

    Here's the August video btw:


  2. #2
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65674391
    It's been over 2 months since this happened, and I can't find any evidence of any prominent or semi-prominent feminists condemning this freak's actions.

    I guess violence against women is okay, as long as the woman is right-wing.

  3. #3
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Remember the 2017 Women's March?

    Another one of these effeminate "feminists" hit a woman for no reason other than rage.

    Dion Bews was his name. This also occurred in Canada -- in Edmonton.





    He was later sued for $22,000, and lost, but only had to pay $3500. Laughably, in the criminal case, he was only given community service for his cowardly attack.

    https://edmontonjournal.com/news/loc...t-womens-march

  4. #4
    Hi Todd JACKDANIELS's Avatar
    Reputation
    811
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,369
    Load Metric
    65674391
    am gonna need you to simmer down todger

  5. #5
    Platinum
    Reputation
    336
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,694
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    It's been over 2 months since this happened, and I can't find any evidence of any prominent or semi-prominent feminists condemning this freak's actions.

    I guess violence against women is okay, as long as the woman is right-wing.
    And most prominent or semi-prominent conservatives are very forgiving of Trump's transgressions. In other breaking news, the sky is blue.

    As an aside, when it comes to both left and right wing activists/extremists, I think the motivations of a lot of persons have less to do with the ideology themselves, and more about a desire to enforce their will on others. Basically, a lot of activists are just bullies and the activism gives them an excuse to be the horrible person they are in a semi-socially acceptable manner. I would throw a lot of religious extremists in this same pile also.

    When it comes to these type of activists/extremists I wouldn't get too caught up in the hypcrocrisy of their ideology versus their actions, because the ideology isn't what is really driving them anyways.

  6. #6
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Our society should fight to make sure this idiot is brought to justice.

    Thank you for leading the charge, Druff.

  7. #7
    Gold
    Reputation
    78
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,146
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    It's been over 2 months since this happened, and I can't find any evidence of any prominent or semi-prominent feminists condemning this freak's actions.

    I guess violence against women is okay, as long as the woman is right-wing.
    You have taken one inconsequential and irrelevant person and made a whole thread about it. I literally thought LOL, Druff must be susceptible to propaganda. Did anyone make a thread over the guy that ran into all those people and convicted of it? Yet, to make some point Druff digs up some "viral" video of this guy. (And yes, I despise him, glad to see him charged)

    Thats not the end of it though. No, Druff expects someone else to find this inconseqential violent person and take a stand against him but because this person ISN'T discussed Druff comes away with conclusion that they support the violent actions. HUH

    I mean, that isn't at all how it works. It is just a LOL application of logic. It needs to be shown that the person is actually significant as opposed to just some random inconsequential nut.

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: All of pfa is inconsequential and irrelevant
      
      KidPresentable: Nailed it.

  8. #8
    Bronze KidPresentable's Avatar
    Reputation
    35
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    146
    Load Metric
    65674391
    The two times Druff will say something in support of women:

    1) he compliments a woman's physical appearance (usually with the caveat of the person looking good "for her age")
    2) he thinks he is owning the libs

  9. #9
    Gold DonaldTrumpsHairPiece's Avatar
    Reputation
    234
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SanFran
    Posts
    2,166
    Load Metric
    65674391
    #imwithtodd

  10. #10
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Quote Originally Posted by donkdowndonedied View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    It's been over 2 months since this happened, and I can't find any evidence of any prominent or semi-prominent feminists condemning this freak's actions.

    I guess violence against women is okay, as long as the woman is right-wing.
    You have taken one inconsequential and irrelevant person and made a whole thread about it. I literally thought LOL, Druff must be susceptible to propaganda. Did anyone make a thread over the guy that ran into all those people and convicted of it? Yet, to make some point Druff digs up some "viral" video of this guy. (And yes, I despise him, glad to see him charged)

    Thats not the end of it though. No, Druff expects someone else to find this inconseqential violent person and take a stand against him but because this person ISN'T discussed Druff comes away with conclusion that they support the violent actions. HUH

    I mean, that isn't at all how it works. It is just a LOL application of logic. It needs to be shown that the person is actually significant as opposed to just some random inconsequential nut.
    I'm not talking about whether or not "people" discuss him. For example, had I seen you reading this thread and noticed you didn't comment, I wouldn't have accused you of supporting his actions.

    Prominent feminists, however, are a different story, because they will jump at every opportunity to point out the "evil men" who mistreat women, and then find some way to link it to "rape culture" or some other generalization. Furthermore, this violence occurred involving a women's issue (abortion).

    Here we have a viral video of a self-described male feminist physically attacking a woman (plus another one of him doing it in August), and he's supposedly doing it because he's trying to support women and their abortion rights.

    Why shouldn't they comment upon this and condemn him?

    If a male pro-life nut kicked a female abortion rights protester and a viral video sprung from it, do you think those same feminists would be commenting on it (and sharing it all over Facebook)? Of course they would.

    It is well known that modern feminists aren't really pushing for women's rights. They're only concerned with liberal women's rights.

  11. #11
    Gold MrTickle's Avatar
    Reputation
    429
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    1,721
    Load Metric
    65674391
    why is men in quotation marks?

  12. #12
    Platinum
    Reputation
    997
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    4,184
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Quote Originally Posted by MrTickle View Post
    why is men in quotation marks?

    Probably because he's not a real man. This shouldn't be too difficult to understand.

  13. #13
    Platinum FRANKRIZZO's Avatar
    Reputation
    482
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,393
    Load Metric
    65674391
    anyone seen mike hunt?

  14. #14
    Platinum Lord of the Fraud's Avatar
    Reputation
    1272
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Get A BRAIN! MORANS - GO USA
    Posts
    4,973
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Turning up to anti-abortion rallies to violently attack protestors should be considered a legitimate sport.
    http://pnimg.net/w/articles-attachments/1/4c2/74d75c36d2.jpg

  15. #15
    Platinum Baron Von Strucker's Avatar
    Reputation
    513
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,192
    Load Metric
    65674391
    Quote Originally Posted by FRANKRIZZO View Post
    anyone seen mike hunt?


     
    Comments
      
      FRANKRIZZO: yup
    all hail Hydra



    Originally Posted by DanDruff:Since I'm a 6'2" Republican with an average-sized nose and a last name which doesn't end with "stein", "man", or "berg", I can hide among the goyim and remain undetected unless I open my mouth about money matters.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-08-2023, 11:21 PM
  2. Replies: 54
    Last Post: 10-09-2018, 12:43 PM
  3. "MODEL CITIZEN" "DAN DRUFF" "DOESNT" KILL CHIL'RIN
    By Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-04-2016, 12:46 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 03:09 PM