Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
Her entire questioning process was retarded.
"Did you see Joe Biden commit a crime?"
You don't have to physically see someone commit a crime to have knowledge of the crime they committed.
Tony Bobulinski has direct knowledge of Hunter's dealings, and was the first one (to my knowledge) to bring out the "10% for the big guy" thing. Anyone with half a brain knows that Hunter was getting these lucrative jobs because of his dad's influence, and then Hunter would kick 10% over to Daddy for it. It is likely that Biden did not get directly involved, so this way he could claim not to have any direct knowledge of his son's dealings, which is exactly what he did.
If you want to take the position that it will be hard to convict Biden, I will agree with you.
If you want to take the position that Biden was actually innocent here, you're a moron. The entire family is corrupt. Joe learned the grift young, becoming a Senator in 1973. Keep in mind that had it not been for the laptop, we would not know about any of this.