LOL, at DWAI, that is the best you can do? Really?
You guys haven't landed a blow, w/out lying, since the liar in chief
rode down that elevator (w/the paid fans)
The RW media rallying around Ted "Cancun" Cruz is rich.
Can't wait to hear how Fox "news" will blame Lyin' Ted's vacation on AOC, but they will find a way.
Meanwhile Beto was working,
(so when you hear the "What good could Cruz do in Texas" BS, this,
he could've got on the phone and help a constituent or two.)
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1362280019863564291
San Francisco crowned the ‘world’s best’ city to live: survey
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/...o-live-survey/
PokerFraudAlert...will never censor your claims, even if they're against one of our sponsors. In addition to providing you an open forum report fraud within the poker community, we will also analyze your claims with a clear head an unbiased point of view. And, of course, the accused will always have the floor to defend themselves.-Dan Druff
There was mostly peaceful protesting and also senseless violence. Because you disagree with the BLM movement politically you're trying to discredit them by claiming the worst protests represent all the protests. Ironically, the same kind of strategy that racists use to discredit people of other races.
I've already given you tons of examples of people on the left condemning the violence, so stop pretending to be ignorant.
Most of Trumps speeches did not end in violence, the one on Jan 6th, his final speech, did. Dwai was making light of/downplaying the events of that day, so I called him out on it.
Last edited by duped_samaritan; 02-18-2021 at 05:03 PM.
Dems didn’t condemn the summer riots until polls came out showing the American people were sick of them. Not sure if I can find it, but Cuomo and Lemon talked about the polls one night and the next day Biden and other Dems finally condemned the summer violence. Not sure what the point of saying mostly peaceful is or how that’s judged but at the Capitol there were hundreds of thousands of peaceful people.
You're wrong.
George Flloyd was killed on May 25th
Biden on May 29th:
People have a right to be, in fact, angry and frustrated. And more violence, hurting more people, isn’t going to answer the question.
May 31:
Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.
The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest. It should not drive people away from the just cause that protest is meant to advance.
June 2:
There is no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches or destroying businesses.
We need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest and opportunistic violent destruction.
[QUOTE=duped_samaritan;963045]Hey Gringo duped_samaritan, "There was mostly peaceful protesting and also senseless violence." WTF?!!!!
The use of the term "mostly peaceful protest" is pure bullshit. The violence and lotting is not "mostly peaceful". Every time a black person gets killed is not supposed to be a sign that it's time to go shopping for a new free flat screen tv. So, let's put an end to that bullshit once and for all. Because, it just bullshit and it needs to stop. And until you libtards stop defending that bullshit, it will continue.
Last edited by Cerveza Fria; 02-18-2021 at 07:20 PM.
Na, you’re wrong. He may have initially said a couple things but then he shut the fuck up for months as the rioting continued. Joe Biden won the Dem nomination on June 6th then got real quiet about the rioting, probably didn’t want to piss off his far left and get canceled, a valid concern.
Then during the DNC the Dems avoided talking about the rioting and it showed up in polling so CNN told Biden he had to address it.
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020...for-democrats/
That segment was on 8/25/2020, notice Lemon even calls it rioting for the first time. I was actually watching live and about shit my pants, even posted about it in the Kenosha thread.
And then like magic, he releases a statement on ending the violence the very next day.
https://nypost.com/2020/08/26/biden-...lake-shooting/
From that day on he was far more active about condemning violence. It was political, all about the polls.
Give me a break dude. He won the nomination on Super Tuesday in March, nothing changed politically when he formally accepted it in June.
"Dems didn’t condemn the summer riots until polls came out showing the American people were sick of them." is a false statement. Period.
You know, there would be no shame in saying something like "My bad, I didn't realize Biden had condemned the violence several times in May and June." Tons of shit has happened since then, it feels like 10 years ago.
Or you could just insist you were right anyway, throw a bunch of facts that don't support your original claim, maybe an insult and a meme and look like an idiot.
1) We aren't just talking about Biden. We are talking about the media, other Democratic politicians, and the general tone of regular Dems such as yourself. Almost all of it was excuse-making, denial, and blaming of others.
2) Biden was very careful in these early statements NOT to call for the aggressive arrest and prosecution of rioters. Instead, he was gently begging everyone to stop. "There's no place for violence" doesn't equal condemnation, nor is it a call to action by law enforcement to end it. It's intentionally weak and permissive. Surely you're not so dumb to where you think the above statements were a "condemnation", right?
3) Kamala tweeted out a fund to bail out rioters who were arrested in Minnesota. That fund has since been used to bail out serial rapists and child molesters. Kamala has never apologized for directing people to donate to this fund, and has never explained why she was suggesting donations for a fund to help criminals destroying Minneapolis. Even the fund itself never promised to focus solely upon people they felt were wrongly arrested. It was to be used for anyone arrested during the protest who needed bail money, but then it extended to bail out horrendous sex offenders.
"Hey you guys weren't mad enough about the 'BLM riots' so now you don't get to be mad about our attempted insurrection"
Here's the what I was responding to:
It's false. The poll was in August. Biden condemned the violence multiple times in May and June and called for the 'arsonists and anarchists' to be prosecuted in July, all before the poll he claimed was the only reason he 'finally condemned the violence'. This one is clear cut. The facts are the facts.Cuomo and Lemon talked about the polls one night and the next day Biden and other Dems finally condemned the summer violence.
I think you said something similar about Pelosi in August/September, implying that it was the first time she had come out and condemned the violence.
It's just not true.
I could give you a long list of democrats condemning the violence before that, but what's the point? You could just google it yourself and find the numerous fact checks, but you don't believe fact checkers anymore and even if you did you'd just pivot away from the fact that you're wrong, like Kamala tweeting out the bail fund. Cool, valid criticism. Doesn't make it ok to make a bunch of other shit up.
Last edited by duped_samaritan; 02-19-2021 at 01:03 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)