Haha...pretty good.Originally Posted by Buck Nasty
But his competitive advantage is his pillows will be designed to handle biting.
Haha...pretty good.But his competitive advantage is his pillows will be designed to handle biting.
No one said it isn’t, I said David Hogg starting a pillow company to put my pillow out of business will sell more my pillowsHe made that argument also right after getting dropped by Wallmart, Bed Bath and Beyond, Costco, BJs, QVC and a few others.
I'm sure there will be some people that are more loyal than ever to his company, but there's no way his company isn't taking a bath because he can't shut up about his retarded conspiracy theories.
That kid should just shut up and let that goofy my pillow guy dig his own grave.
Bed, Bath & Beyond recently dropped mypillows and sales have dropped 35%. They lost my business for sure. Two can play the game, bitches.
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
In the past year right wingers have committed about two hours of violence with one death but no businesses/neighborhoods destroyed. Left wingers have committed hundreds of hours of violence with 47 deaths, hundreds of businesses destroyed, and neighborhoods decimated. There is no comparison. You lefties have a lot of blood on your hands. The businesses you looted and burned down? Mostly minority owned. You pay a lot of lip service to minorities but in the end you dont' give a fuck about them at all. They are just pawns in your evil game.lol so you admit that this was violence on the part of the right then?
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
2 hours, lol. Take your head out of the mud old man.
White supremacists behind majority of US domestic terror attacks in 2020
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ic-terror-2020
Far-Right Groups Are Behind Most U.S. Terrorist Attacks
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/24/u...st-groups.html
DHS: White Supremacists ‘The Most Persistent and Lethal Threat’ Within the U.S.
https://www.usnews.com/news/national...-within-the-us
In America, far-right terrorist plots have outnumbered far-left ones in 2020
https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...t-ones-in-2020
lol you dumb fucking faggot you are full of shit. right supremacists, excuse me white supremacists are by far the largest terror threat to our nation. Love you try to keep downplaying the insurrection too we saw it you dumb motherfucker, two hours one death lmao holy fuck you are dense.In the past year right wingers have committed about two hours of violence with one death but no businesses/neighborhoods destroyed. Left wingers have committed hundreds of hours of violence with 47 deaths, hundreds of businesses destroyed, and neighborhoods decimated. There is no comparison. You lefties have a lot of blood on your hands. The businesses you looted and burned down? Mostly minority owned. You pay a lot of lip service to minorities but in the end you dont' give a fuck about them at all. They are just pawns in your evil game.
Lets try to keep this thread on topic so Todd doesn't get upset.
It might appear that they are 'questioning' details of her story', but the 'details' are made up. This is a very common and effective way to spread misinformation. If I wanted to make people think you had sex with an underaged boy, "Druff slept with an underage boy" would be less effective than "Druff knew the boy was underage when they had sex".
The question: 'Was aoc even in the capital building when they stormed the capital.
The implied lie: 'AOC claimed she was in the Capital building'
The desired result: Discredit AOC, make people think that the storming of the capital was not as bad as it appeared.
The truth: She never claimed she was in the Capital building. In fact, she described exactly where her office was in detail before explaining what happened while she was in her office:
“For you all to know, there’s the Capitol Hill complex, but members of Congress, except for, you know, the speaker and other very, very high ranking ones, don’t actually work in a building with the dome. There’s buildings like right next to the dome, and that’s where our actual offices are.”
It looks to me like you might be genesis of this lie:
You already know that's not true, but for anyone following along that doesn't, here's what she really said:
"The reason I say this and the reason I'm getting emotional in this moment is because these folks who tell us to move on, that it's not a big deal, that we should forget what's happened, or even telling us to apologize. These are the same tactics of abusers. And, um, I'm a survivor of sexual assault, and I haven't told many people that in my life. But when we go through trauma, trauma compounds on each other. And so, whether you had a negligent or a neglectful parent, and -- or whether you had someone who was verbally abusive to you, whether you are a survivor of abuse, whether you experience any sort of trauma in your life, small to large -- these episodes can compound on one another."
Hope that helps and you're able to see the irony in what you said before (hint: it wasn't her loyal fans on the left she was worried about):
very well thought out and good post, but dude, she did lie and embellished details about that day, if you can't see that... wait a minute, you're duped_by_smollett, what am I doing trying to get you to see right side of the argumentLets try to keep this thread on topic so Todd doesn't get upset.
It might appear that they are 'questioning' details of her story', but the 'details' are made up. This is a very common and effective way to spread misinformation. If I wanted to make people think you had sex with an underaged boy, "Druff slept with an underage boy" would be less effective than "Druff knew the boy was underage when they had sex".
The question: 'Was aoc even in the capital building when they stormed the capital.
The implied lie: 'AOC claimed she was in the Capital building'
The desired result: Discredit AOC, make people think that the storming of the capital was not as bad as it appeared.
The truth: She never claimed she was in the Capital building. In fact, she described exactly where her office was in detail before explaining what happened while she was in her office:
“For you all to know, there’s the Capitol Hill complex, but members of Congress, except for, you know, the speaker and other very, very high ranking ones, don’t actually work in a building with the dome. There’s buildings like right next to the dome, and that’s where our actual offices are.”
It looks to me like you might be genesis of this lie:
You already know that's not true, but for anyone following along that doesn't, here's what she really said:
"The reason I say this and the reason I'm getting emotional in this moment is because these folks who tell us to move on, that it's not a big deal, that we should forget what's happened, or even telling us to apologize. These are the same tactics of abusers. And, um, I'm a survivor of sexual assault, and I haven't told many people that in my life. But when we go through trauma, trauma compounds on each other. And so, whether you had a negligent or a neglectful parent, and -- or whether you had someone who was verbally abusive to you, whether you are a survivor of abuse, whether you experience any sort of trauma in your life, small to large -- these episodes can compound on one another."
Hope that helps and you're able to see the irony in what you said before (hint: it wasn't her loyal fans on the left she was worried about):
I didn't watch the entire video, what did she lie about?very well thought out and good post, but dude, she did lie and embellished details about that day, if you can't see that... wait a minute, you're duped_by_smollett, what am I doing trying to get you to see right side of the argumentLets try to keep this thread on topic so Todd doesn't get upset.
It might appear that they are 'questioning' details of her story', but the 'details' are made up. This is a very common and effective way to spread misinformation. If I wanted to make people think you had sex with an underaged boy, "Druff slept with an underage boy" would be less effective than "Druff knew the boy was underage when they had sex".
The question: 'Was aoc even in the capital building when they stormed the capital.
The implied lie: 'AOC claimed she was in the Capital building'
The desired result: Discredit AOC, make people think that the storming of the capital was not as bad as it appeared.
The truth: She never claimed she was in the Capital building. In fact, she described exactly where her office was in detail before explaining what happened while she was in her office:
“For you all to know, there’s the Capitol Hill complex, but members of Congress, except for, you know, the speaker and other very, very high ranking ones, don’t actually work in a building with the dome. There’s buildings like right next to the dome, and that’s where our actual offices are.”
It looks to me like you might be genesis of this lie:
You already know that's not true, but for anyone following along that doesn't, here's what she really said:
"The reason I say this and the reason I'm getting emotional in this moment is because these folks who tell us to move on, that it's not a big deal, that we should forget what's happened, or even telling us to apologize. These are the same tactics of abusers. And, um, I'm a survivor of sexual assault, and I haven't told many people that in my life. But when we go through trauma, trauma compounds on each other. And so, whether you had a negligent or a neglectful parent, and -- or whether you had someone who was verbally abusive to you, whether you are a survivor of abuse, whether you experience any sort of trauma in your life, small to large -- these episodes can compound on one another."
Hope that helps and you're able to see the irony in what you said before (hint: it wasn't her loyal fans on the left she was worried about):
she just lied dude just accept it OMGWTFBBQI didn't watch the entire video, what did she lie about?very well thought out and good post, but dude, she did lie and embellished details about that day, if you can't see that... wait a minute, you're duped_by_smollett, what am I doing trying to get you to see right side of the argumentLets try to keep this thread on topic so Todd doesn't get upset.
It might appear that they are 'questioning' details of her story', but the 'details' are made up. This is a very common and effective way to spread misinformation. If I wanted to make people think you had sex with an underaged boy, "Druff slept with an underage boy" would be less effective than "Druff knew the boy was underage when they had sex".
The question: 'Was aoc even in the capital building when they stormed the capital.
The implied lie: 'AOC claimed she was in the Capital building'
The desired result: Discredit AOC, make people think that the storming of the capital was not as bad as it appeared.
The truth: She never claimed she was in the Capital building. In fact, she described exactly where her office was in detail before explaining what happened while she was in her office:
“For you all to know, there’s the Capitol Hill complex, but members of Congress, except for, you know, the speaker and other very, very high ranking ones, don’t actually work in a building with the dome. There’s buildings like right next to the dome, and that’s where our actual offices are.”
It looks to me like you might be genesis of this lie:
You already know that's not true, but for anyone following along that doesn't, here's what she really said:
"The reason I say this and the reason I'm getting emotional in this moment is because these folks who tell us to move on, that it's not a big deal, that we should forget what's happened, or even telling us to apologize. These are the same tactics of abusers. And, um, I'm a survivor of sexual assault, and I haven't told many people that in my life. But when we go through trauma, trauma compounds on each other. And so, whether you had a negligent or a neglectful parent, and -- or whether you had someone who was verbally abusive to you, whether you are a survivor of abuse, whether you experience any sort of trauma in your life, small to large -- these episodes can compound on one another."
Hope that helps and you're able to see the irony in what you said before (hint: it wasn't her loyal fans on the left she was worried about):
she said she could hear "rioters" outside her office when they were no where even near her?I didn't watch the entire video, what did she lie about?very well thought out and good post, but dude, she did lie and embellished details about that day, if you can't see that... wait a minute, you're duped_by_smollett, what am I doing trying to get you to see right side of the argumentLets try to keep this thread on topic so Todd doesn't get upset.
It might appear that they are 'questioning' details of her story', but the 'details' are made up. This is a very common and effective way to spread misinformation. If I wanted to make people think you had sex with an underaged boy, "Druff slept with an underage boy" would be less effective than "Druff knew the boy was underage when they had sex".
The question: 'Was aoc even in the capital building when they stormed the capital.
The implied lie: 'AOC claimed she was in the Capital building'
The desired result: Discredit AOC, make people think that the storming of the capital was not as bad as it appeared.
The truth: She never claimed she was in the Capital building. In fact, she described exactly where her office was in detail before explaining what happened while she was in her office:
“For you all to know, there’s the Capitol Hill complex, but members of Congress, except for, you know, the speaker and other very, very high ranking ones, don’t actually work in a building with the dome. There’s buildings like right next to the dome, and that’s where our actual offices are.”
It looks to me like you might be genesis of this lie:
You already know that's not true, but for anyone following along that doesn't, here's what she really said:
"The reason I say this and the reason I'm getting emotional in this moment is because these folks who tell us to move on, that it's not a big deal, that we should forget what's happened, or even telling us to apologize. These are the same tactics of abusers. And, um, I'm a survivor of sexual assault, and I haven't told many people that in my life. But when we go through trauma, trauma compounds on each other. And so, whether you had a negligent or a neglectful parent, and -- or whether you had someone who was verbally abusive to you, whether you are a survivor of abuse, whether you experience any sort of trauma in your life, small to large -- these episodes can compound on one another."
Hope that helps and you're able to see the irony in what you said before (hint: it wasn't her loyal fans on the left she was worried about):
.
You've got the right name, duped_schmuck, because you have sure been duped. LOL at the Guardian article that says only one attack by far left in 2020. Fucking idjuts. That pretty much sums it up for all these articles you posted. Far left propaganda bullshit. Hell, in Portland alone they attacked like 150 straight days. Get a clue, moron. The NYTimes is a far left loony bin that wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass. No cred, fred. You were duped again, duped_schmuck. usnews is another lefty piece of shit organization.2 hours, lol. Take your head out of the mud old man.
White supremacists behind majority of US domestic terror attacks in 2020
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ic-terror-2020
Far-Right Groups Are Behind Most U.S. Terrorist Attacks
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/24/u...st-groups.html
DHS: White Supremacists ‘The Most Persistent and Lethal Threat’ Within the U.S.
https://www.usnews.com/news/national...-within-the-us
In America, far-right terrorist plots have outnumbered far-left ones in 2020
https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...t-ones-in-2020
The left needs a new boogieman to scare people. So the false narrative of the danger of white supremacy is the new mantra. The mainstream media is seeing a big ratings drop without Trump in the picture. CNN is down 45% this week, MSDNC is down 20%. They will go with the white supremacy boogieman too to try to recapture ratings.
The leftiest propaganda you listed here cannot cover up the multi-billions of dollars in damage done and 47 lives lost in the big cities by leftist political violence in 2020. But you can dream it will.
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOB SEE SLOPPY JOE THE TRANNIE HO.
She claimed she heard someone banging on her door and yelling 'where is she' and was terrified it might be the protesters but didn't know who it was. It turned out to be the capital police evacuating the building.she said she could hear "rioters" outside her office when they were no where even near her?I didn't watch the entire video, what did she lie about?
She may have said she heard the rioters at some other point, which is possible if she has a window in her office facing the main building.
Even if they totally underreported all the lefty violence, your claims about right wing violence still seem to be false.
Where should I look for the truth? How do you know that "In the past year right wingers have committed about two hours of violence with one death" and that there were '47 killed in lefty riots'?
Last edited by duped_samaritan; 02-06-2021 at 01:24 PM.
why are you defending her so much, she lied, she's an awful attention seeking whore, she's not going to fuck you, put your white guilt aside and see that all politicians are lying scammers and stop defending every Democrat like they're your parentsShe claimed she heard someone banging on her door and yelling 'where is she' and was terrified it might be the protesters but didn't know who it was. It turned out to be the capital police evacuating the building.she said she could hear "rioters" outside her office when they were no where even near her?
She may have said she heard the rioters at some other point, which is possible if she has a window in her office facing the main building.
why are you defending her so much, she lied, she's an awful attention seeking whore, she's not going to fuck you, put your white guilt aside and see that all politicians are lying scammers and stop defending every Democrat like they're your parentsShe claimed she heard someone banging on her door and yelling 'where is she' and was terrified it might be the protesters but didn't know who it was. It turned out to be the capital police evacuating the building.
She may have said she heard the rioters at some other point, which is possible if she has a window in her office facing the main building.
He's still holding out a sense of hope.
All of her fans are.why are you defending her so much, she lied, she's an awful attention seeking whore, she's not going to fuck you, put your white guilt aside and see that all politicians are lying scammers and stop defending every Democrat like they're your parents
He's still holding out a sense of hope.
Just defending the truth.why are you defending her so much, she lied, she's an awful attention seeking whore, she's not going to fuck you, put your white guilt aside and see that all politicians are lying scammers and stop defending every Democrat like they're your parentsShe claimed she heard someone banging on her door and yelling 'where is she' and was terrified it might be the protesters but didn't know who it was. It turned out to be the capital police evacuating the building.
She may have said she heard the rioters at some other point, which is possible if she has a window in her office facing the main building.
If you want to attack her do it for the way she described the cop, she said "he was looking at me with a tremendous amount of anger and hostility,"...I doubt it was that bad.
Don't just make shit up though. And if you fall for someone elses made up shit, just own up to it.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote
