Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[MrTickle]

no they wouldn't kill foreign leaders; they're too busy killing their own ordinary citizens: Stalin 20 million, Mao 18 - 50 million, and Pol Pot lol only 1.6 million

How many people have died because of capitalism? Order of magnitude more. Just think of US backed coups. Death squads. People who die of starvation, lack of water. Poverty is a HUGE killer.

In fact, lets forget all corporations and all countries and just focus on the USA (so we won't count how many marketing for cigarettes has killed, for example).

African slave trade 150mil+
Native american genocide? 100mil+
Korean War 10+
Vietnam War 10+ (plus cambodia and laos)

should I keep going?

US intervention in Latin America 5+
US in the Congo 5+

But thats so long ago, Mr Tickle!

Iraq war on terrorism 1+
Afghanistan war on terrorism 1+
US sanctions on iraq 1+
joining NATO in Libya 100k+
Selling poison gas to Saddam 400k+

What about the very foundation of USA?

US Revolutionary War 30k+
US Civil war 700k+

Outside middle east?
Bombing Yugoslavia 300k+
Guatemala 300k+
War against Phillipines 2mil+
Spanish American War 100k+
Funding General Suharto 1mil+ (god knows how many this actually is)


I'm sure there's more but I can't be arsed. You get the point.

[lol wow]

also send this idiot

[Dan Druff]

no they wouldn't kill foreign leaders; they're too busy killing their own ordinary citizens: Stalin 20 million, Mao 18 - 50 million, and Pol Pot lol only 1.6 million

How many people have died because of capitalism? Order of magnitude more. Just think of US backed coups. Death squads. People who die of starvation, lack of water. Poverty is a HUGE killer.

In fact, lets forget all corporations and all countries and just focus on the USA (so we won't count how many marketing for cigarettes has killed, for example).

African slave trade 150mil+
Native american genocide? 100mil+
Korean War 10+
Vietnam War 10+ (plus cambodia and laos)

should I keep going?

US intervention in Latin America 5+
US in the Congo 5+

But thats so long ago, Mr Tickle!

Iraq war on terrorism 1+
Afghanistan war on terrorism 1+
US sanctions on iraq 1+
joining NATO in Libya 100k+
Selling poison gas to Saddam 400k+

What about the very foundation of USA?

US Revolutionary War 30k+
US Civil war 700k+

Outside middle east?
Bombing Yugoslavia 300k+
Guatemala 300k+
War against Phillipines 2mil+
Spanish American War 100k+
Funding General Suharto 1mil+ (god knows how many this actually is)


I'm sure there's more but I can't be arsed. You get the point.

Hard to take you seriously when you claim the US Revolutionary War and US Civil Wars were "because of capitalism".

I mean, maybe in the broadest, broadest sense they were, but no... they really weren't.

I don't understand why it seems you're defending communism here.

Have you seen China's record with human rights lately?

[MrTickle]

Not defending any regime with any political bent, i’m just saying that you can’t criticise communism for deaths any more than any other economic system and thus the point is moot.

[Salty_Aus]

USA has way too many people in prison.

I cringe when I hear folks throw out the old China and human rights.

Percentage of your population that are in prison, is often a key indicator on human rights.

[Mintjewlips]

Lol at Mr Tickle not criticizing Mr. Putin.....I can respect that....when in rome....and what not....

[MrTickle]

Lol at Mr Tickle not criticizing Mr. Putin.....I can respect that....when in rome....and what not....

I don’t support Putin and he is responsible for many deaths. I criticis him all the time, but this is a US based site.

[Mintjewlips]

Lol at Mr Tickle not criticizing Mr. Putin.....I can respect that....when in rome....and what not....

I don’t support Putin and he is responsible for many deaths. I criticis him all the time, but this is a US based site.

Blink twice if you're ok




Seriously, he alley ooped the President the election so he's a good guy in my book...

[thesidedish]

AOC is a fake smart person IQ 120-125 range. Long winded response on something that takes 1 sentence is the tell. "I like to wear the same clothes so I can use my brain for other things" does not take an explanation that she's saying something brilliant.

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089757138535309312

[garrett]

AOC is a radical left Liberal who has grossly mistaken the American peoples desire to be radical left. Shes from New York City which is super diverse and of course radical in many ways but what her and most you all fail to understand is this country. The greatest in the world, the USA is in no way shape or form a Radical Left society.

[sonatine]

AOC is a fake smart person IQ 120-125 range. Long winded response on something that takes 1 sentence is the tell. "I like to wear the same clothes so I can use my brain for other things" does not take an explanation that she's saying something brilliant.

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089757138535309312

i think Einstein came up with that. someone along those lines. they had 7 identical suits/shirts and would just change into a new one every day so they could focus.

back then it was considered more or less revolutionary but today i think we would say its just some rainman shit.

and i like the fuck out of AOC but she aint on any rainman shit that i can see.

good politics and her heart is in the right place tho.

[Mintjewlips]

She's just a very unintelligent woman that gets constantly patted on the back, which only reinforces her false high self esteem........lol internets....

[Mintjewlips]

I just want everyone to notice the edits in her lol videos.....God I can only imagine the amount of tangents she goes on irl...

[GambleBotsSatire]

haters in the building

[Avon Barksdale]

haters in the building

Zuckerberg, Jobs and even that Elizabeth Holmes chick from Theranos subscribed to that.

[Sanlmar]

AOC is a fake smart person IQ 120-125 range. Long winded response on something that takes 1 sentence is the tell. "I like to wear the same clothes so I can use my brain for other things" does not take an explanation that she's saying something brilliant.

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089757138535309312

i think Einstein came up with that. someone along those lines. they had 7 identical suits/shirts and would just change into a new one every day so they could focus.

back then it was considered more or less revolutionary but today i think we would say its just some rainman shit.

and i like the fuck out of AOC but she aint on any rainman shit that i can see.

good politics and her heart is in the right place tho.

This is a United States congresswoman spending time and energy talking about pajamas.

This is always how I imagine people pass the time on Facebook.

I love the AOC brand. Catchy. That shit plays. Does she refer to herself as AOC? Tricky marketing question. Might appear arrogant in that third person style. Worked for Trump. We will get back to that.

If Mitch McConnell would review chicken sandwiches like the little black “Pengest Munch” kid in the UK I’d watch that. It would be good for his numbers. Times have prolly passed him by.

Trump was just the opening act for forthcoming bizarre US politics.

[sonatine]

i think Einstein came up with that. someone along those lines. they had 7 identical suits/shirts and would just change into a new one every day so they could focus.

back then it was considered more or less revolutionary but today i think we would say its just some rainman shit.

and i like the fuck out of AOC but she aint on any rainman shit that i can see.

good politics and her heart is in the right place tho.

This is a United States congresswoman spending time and energy talking about pajamas.

This is always how I imagine people pass the time on Facebook.

I love the AOC brand. Catchy. That shit plays. Does she refer to herself as AOC? Tricky marketing question. Might appear arrogant in that third person style. Worked for Trump. We will get back to that.

If Mitch McConnell would review chicken sandwiches like the little black “Pengest Munch” kid in the UK I’d watch that. It would be good for his numbers. Times have prolly passed him by.

Trump was just the opening act for forthcoming bizarre US politics.

you're druffing out.

go look at her social media feed. 99.7% of it is raw uncut fish-scale truth. but one bae-post about pj's and the sky is falling?

deal with it; shes 29 years old, adorable, and usually on the correct side of arguments.

why anyone would want to belittle that is between them and their therapists.

[v12cl]

This is a United States congresswoman spending time and energy talking about pajamas.

This is always how I imagine people pass the time on Facebook.

I love the AOC brand. Catchy. That shit plays. Does she refer to herself as AOC? Tricky marketing question. Might appear arrogant in that third person style. Worked for Trump. We will get back to that.

If Mitch McConnell would review chicken sandwiches like the little black “Pengest Munch” kid in the UK I’d watch that. It would be good for his numbers. Times have prolly passed him by.

Trump was just the opening act for forthcoming bizarre US politics.

you're druffing out.

go look at her social media feed. 99.7% of it is raw uncut fish-scale truth. but one bae-post about pj's and the sky is falling?

deal with it; shes 29 years old, adorable, and usually on the correct side of arguments.

why anyone would want to belittle that is between them and their therapists.

Adorable, and on the correct side of arguments, that’s some pure SIMP shit if I’ve ever seen it.

Half of the dudes praising this chick just want to fuck her.

[Sanlmar]

This is a United States congresswoman spending time and energy talking about pajamas.

This is always how I imagine people pass the time on Facebook.

I love the AOC brand. Catchy. That shit plays. Does she refer to herself as AOC? Tricky marketing question. Might appear arrogant in that third person style. Worked for Trump. We will get back to that.

If Mitch McConnell would review chicken sandwiches like the little black “Pengest Munch” kid in the UK I’d watch that. It would be good for his numbers. Times have prolly passed him by.

Trump was just the opening act for forthcoming bizarre US politics.

you're druffing out.

go look at her social media feed. 99.7% of it is raw uncut fish-scale truth. but one bae-post about pj's and the sky is falling?

deal with it; shes 29 years old, adorable, and usually on the correct side of arguments.

why anyone would want to belittle that is between them and their therapists.

If I’m Druffing out it’s time to shut it down.

My point is that AOC is Trump as far as the American consumer is concerned. I swear by all that is holy that half of the Facebook population (with their thickened frontal lobes) who voted for Trump would vote for her too.

“Trump and Ocasio-Cortez shine brighter on electronic screens than in real life.”

The following piece just came out and eloquently describes a concept I’ve been trying to convey - especially to you.

Trump and Ocasio-Cortez Are the Future of News
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...s-media-224214

[Sanlmar]

From the above article.

Trump doesn’t appear to have tweeted about Ocasio-Cortez yet, but she’s been on his radar.

The inevitable matter/anti-matter collision of Trump with Ocasio-Cortez can’t be far off

Someone is gonna end up with a detached retina. That someone will be you Sonatine

This prospect makes me a happier person than when I woke up this morning.