Page 28 of 82 FirstFirst ... 182425262728293031323878 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 560 of 1627

Thread: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

  1. #541
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post

    it's even worse than that. in addition to the Amazon jobs, between 40,000 and 60,000 additional non-amazon jobs (to support the new amazon employees) were expected to have been created.

    oh and the amazon jobs were supposed to average $150,000 a year

    but hey, no gentrification so AOC's happy
    25,000 jobs at an *average* of $150,000??? Even if true, a number of upper management making many millions in pay can seriously skew the arithmetic average. What was the projected *medium* compensation?
    sounds like a crazy number but that comes from amazon itself. i googled it and didn't see any word of a median income, but short of bezos, himself, being on the payroll, i would think it would be impossible for it to just be a handful of top executives making a ton of money.

    There's probably not more than a handful of top executives making more than $1,000,000 as it is. you would need $3.75 billion to average $150,000 for 25,000 people

  2. #542
    Plutonium sonatine's Avatar
    Reputation
    7376
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    33,418
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post

    25,000 jobs at an *average* of $150,000??? Even if true, a number of upper management making many millions in pay can seriously skew the arithmetic average. What was the projected *medium* compensation?
    sounds like a crazy number but that comes from amazon itself. i googled it and didn't see any word of a median income, but short of bezos, himself, being on the payroll, i would think it would be impossible for it to just be a handful of top executives making a ton of money.

    There's probably not more than a handful of top executives making more than $1,000,000 as it is. you would need $3.75 billion to average $150,000 for 25,000 people

    my employer paid out 1.5b in bonuses alone this year.

    i mean...
    "Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky

    "America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs

  3. #543
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10137
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,746
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by Mintjewlips View Post
    I could help AOC with her public perception, sex sells, just wear tight clothing with low cleavage and 50% of all men will vote for you just solely based on that.....there....don't say I'm all hate....

    She is really underestimating her sex factor, God gave you that nice rack, socialize that cleavage.....one time...
    Kyrsten Sinema recognized this, and even played up the bisexual thing.

    Great success!

  4. #544
    Plutonium sonatine's Avatar
    Reputation
    7376
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    33,418
    Load Metric
    67484352
    an AOC sex tape would set the fucking universe on fire.
    "Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky

    "America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs

  5. #545
    Plutonium sonatine's Avatar
    Reputation
    7376
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    33,418
    Load Metric
    67484352
    there, i said it.
    "Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky

    "America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs

  6. #546
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10137
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,746
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    AOC just getting buried on MSNBC today, saying she's "economically illiterate" for celebrating the loss of $1,000,000,000 to NY a year.

    did anybody actually watch the video of her celebrating this?

    this will be a very unpopular opinion, but she's essentially a less intelligent donald trump.

    i'm seriously beginning to loathe her and she will become the de facto candidate trump is running against in 2020. her idiotic statements -- like "the reason unemployment is low is because people work two jobs" (that actually happened) -- will be what trump runs against. eliminate air travel in 10 years? can you please shut the fuck up and not say this publicly?

    you're fucking handing the election to trump, which i'm on record as saying i didn't think was possible.

    she needs to clear every single word she wants to say by nancy pelosi before actually saying it
    Between allowing AOC to become the de facto Democratic spokesperson and passing abortion legislation supported by only 13% of Americans, the Dems are really doing their best to get Trump reelected.

    Trump may run better than any politician in memory. First a weak Republican field, then Hillary completely screwing up the campaign strategy, and now Dems shooting themselves in the foot repeatedly.

    Nice life. If I run that well this summer, I'll win 3 bracelets.

  7. #547
    Diamond Tellafriend's Avatar
    Reputation
    1612
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    7,183
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    i'm going to need you all to actually watch this. only 90 seconds. you need to actually watch her talk to get a feel for her lack of intelligence.

    "well we were subsidizing those jobs." what the fuck? NO YOU WEREN'T YOU FUCKING IDIOT. does she not understand basic economics, incentives, taxes?

    she wants to take the $3,000,000,000 in tax breaks that amazon would get -- but only if they first brought in $27,000,000,000 in tax revenue -- and redistribute it to teachers, etc.?

    what money?

    tine don't ever defend this monstrosity again. congrats AOC, you've set back the progressive agenda 80 years.


    Exhibit A on why universal suffrage is a bad idea.

  8. #548
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    AOC just getting buried on MSNBC today, saying she's "economically illiterate" for celebrating the loss of $1,000,000,000 to NY a year.

    did anybody actually watch the video of her celebrating this?

    this will be a very unpopular opinion, but she's essentially a less intelligent donald trump.

    i'm seriously beginning to loathe her and she will become the de facto candidate trump is running against in 2020. her idiotic statements -- like "the reason unemployment is low is because people work two jobs" (that actually happened) -- will be what trump runs against. eliminate air travel in 10 years? can you please shut the fuck up and not say this publicly?

    you're fucking handing the election to trump, which i'm on record as saying i didn't think was possible.

    she needs to clear every single word she wants to say by nancy pelosi before actually saying it
    Between allowing AOC to become the de facto Democratic spokesperson and passing abortion legislation supported by only 13% of Americans, the Dems are really doing their best to get Trump reelected.

    Trump may run better than any politician in memory. First a weak Republican field, then Hillary completely screwing up the campaign strategy, and now Dems shooting themselves in the foot repeatedly.

    Nice life. If I run that well this summer, I'll win 3 bracelets.
    LOL your assessment that the Dems losing versus Trump because the Dems becoming more progressive because of AOC’s popularity! Progressive like AOC are motivating legions of otherwise politically apathetic “socialism”-loving millenials to get politically active. And establishment Dems like Kamala Harris and Cory Booker will be a hell of lot more politically savvy in tapping into that enthusiasm than the hubristically self-assured Hillary Clinton.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  9. #549
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Between allowing AOC to become the de facto Democratic spokesperson and passing abortion legislation supported by only 13% of Americans, the Dems are really doing their best to get Trump reelected.

    Trump may run better than any politician in memory. First a weak Republican field, then Hillary completely screwing up the campaign strategy, and now Dems shooting themselves in the foot repeatedly.

    Nice life. If I run that well this summer, I'll win 3 bracelets.
    LOL your assessment that the Dems losing versus Trump because the Dems becoming more progressive because of AOC’s popularity! Progressive like AOC are motivating legions of otherwise politically apathetic “socialism”-loving millenials to get politically active. And establishment Dems like Kamala Harris and Cory Booker will be a hell of lot more politically savvy in tapping into that enthusiasm than the hubristically self-assured Hillary Clinton.
    literally anyone would drive huge anti-trump numbers in 2020. it's the reason i've said i don't think trump will get reelcted. it was close in 2016 with no tunout from minorities or young people.

    but, i'm terrible at predicting and was wrong in 2016, obv. AOC is needlessly complicating things with some of her idiotic statements. trump is already running on some of the details of the "green new deal."

    how do you think lines like "we'll provide guaranteed universal income to those unable OR UNWILLING to work" will play with most people?

    how about, we'll eliminate air travel in 10 years? you don't think trump will hammer all dems with this?

    she just chased amazon and 60,000+ jobs out of new york cause she's brain dead.

    for all her faults, nancy pelosi would never make these horrific mistakes

    she needs to shut the fuck up. for real.

  10. #550
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post

    LOL your assessment that the Dems losing versus Trump because the Dems becoming more progressive because of AOC’s popularity! Progressive like AOC are motivating legions of otherwise politically apathetic “socialism”-loving millenials to get politically active. And establishment Dems like Kamala Harris and Cory Booker will be a hell of lot more politically savvy in tapping into that enthusiasm than the hubristically self-assured Hillary Clinton.
    literally anyone would drive huge anti-trump numbers in 2020. it's the reason i've said i don't think trump will get reelcted. it was close in 2016 with no tunout from minorities or young people.

    but, i'm terrible at predicting and was wrong in 2016, obv. AOC is needlessly complicating things with some of her idiotic statements. trump is already running on some of the details of the "green new deal."

    how do you think lines like "we'll provide guaranteed universal income to those unable OR UNWILLING to work" will play with most people?

    how about, we'll eliminate air travel in 10 years? you don't think trump will hammer all dems with this?

    she just chased amazon and 60,000+ jobs out of new york cause she's brain dead.

    for all her faults, nancy pelosi would never make these horrific mistakes

    she needs to shut the fuck up. for real.
    Trump won’t be running against AOC in 2020. She can make a ton of gaffes before then and still end up motivating millions of millenials to come out and vote for the eventual Dem candidate for prez.

    You know who else was perceived as a gaffe machine by his political opponents, even within his own party, before he proved the skeptics wrong because they severely underestimated his ability to get beyond the gaffes and communicate his core messages that spoke to enough in the electorate? This guy:

    Name:  4CE802C3-F13C-47A2-9368-483EE741547F.jpeg
Views: 259
Size:  1.23 MB
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  11. #551
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post

    literally anyone would drive huge anti-trump numbers in 2020. it's the reason i've said i don't think trump will get reelcted. it was close in 2016 with no tunout from minorities or young people.

    but, i'm terrible at predicting and was wrong in 2016, obv. AOC is needlessly complicating things with some of her idiotic statements. trump is already running on some of the details of the "green new deal."

    how do you think lines like "we'll provide guaranteed universal income to those unable OR UNWILLING to work" will play with most people?

    how about, we'll eliminate air travel in 10 years? you don't think trump will hammer all dems with this?

    she just chased amazon and 60,000+ jobs out of new york cause she's brain dead.

    for all her faults, nancy pelosi would never make these horrific mistakes

    she needs to shut the fuck up. for real.
    Trump won’t be running against AOC in 2020. She can make a ton of gaffes before then and still end up motivating millions of millenials to come out and vote for the eventual Dem candidate for prez.

    You know who else was perceived as a gaffe machine by his political opponents, even within his own party, before he proved the skeptics wrong because they severely underestimated his ability to get beyond the gaffes and communicate his core messages that spoke to enough in the electorate? This guy:

    Name:  4CE802C3-F13C-47A2-9368-483EE741547F.jpeg
Views: 259
Size:  1.23 MB

    jesus, why would u compare Reagan to AOC and not trump unless u were completely out of it



    oh

  12. #552
    Platinum
    Reputation
    631
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,892
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by sonatine View Post
    an AOC sex tape would set the fucking universe on fire.
    I said it earlier in this thread, it's out there...

    I want my green rep on this post when it comes out...

  13. #553
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10137
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,746
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Mumbles, Reagan was very appealing to the masses and seemed to make sense to swing voters, especially ones frustrated with the government's various failures in the 70s.

    AOC has tons of extreme and ill-informed ideas which don't play well with middle-ground voters. Even if she excites some additional young people to vote at a higher rate, she will lose more swing voters compared to a more traditional Democratic candidate.

    A young, exciting candidate isn't a bad idea, but it has to be one who is intelligent, informed, and non-extreme. AOC is the clueless, idealistic college student whose ideas won't play well with mainstream America, especially when they come from a place of ignorance.

  14. #554
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    67484352
    mumbles is an interesting study, it is guaranteed that he will behave in the way the MSM is trending. I get why 20 something millennials do it, fitting in is their #1 priority usually, but how does one explain the baby boomers that are so easily manipulated? I guess u just kinda have to go with it so u don't question the last 50 years of ur life??

  15. #555
    Diamond
    Reputation
    690
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,030
    Load Metric
    67484352
    What if Judge Judy ran in the primaries against Trump? Would she make it close or even win?

  16. #556
    Diamond Mintjewlips's Avatar
    Reputation
    -1094
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    6,681
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Just bring the girls out sweetie, those old cunts have to cover their chest because they have no choice.

    Nothing like a titillating candidate.....
    "Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Gerson

    "ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine

    "Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis


    "DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER

  17. #557
    Diamond Mintjewlips's Avatar
    Reputation
    -1094
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    6,681
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Your face is ok, but we never look at your face with a body like that, you can socialize me anyday....
    "Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Gerson

    "ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine

    "Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis


    "DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER

  18. #558
    Diamond BCR's Avatar
    Reputation
    2028
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,917
    Load Metric
    67484352
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post

    literally anyone would drive huge anti-trump numbers in 2020. it's the reason i've said i don't think trump will get reelcted. it was close in 2016 with no tunout from minorities or young people.

    but, i'm terrible at predicting and was wrong in 2016, obv. AOC is needlessly complicating things with some of her idiotic statements. trump is already running on some of the details of the "green new deal."

    how do you think lines like "we'll provide guaranteed universal income to those unable OR UNWILLING to work" will play with most people?

    how about, we'll eliminate air travel in 10 years? you don't think trump will hammer all dems with this?

    she just chased amazon and 60,000+ jobs out of new york cause she's brain dead.

    for all her faults, nancy pelosi would never make these horrific mistakes

    she needs to shut the fuck up. for real.
    Trump won’t be running against AOC in 2020. She can make a ton of gaffes before then and still end up motivating millions of millenials to come out and vote for the eventual Dem candidate for prez.

    You know who else was perceived as a gaffe machine by his political opponents, even within his own party, before he proved the skeptics wrong because they severely underestimated his ability to get beyond the gaffes and communicate his core messages that spoke to enough in the electorate? This guy:

    Name:  4CE802C3-F13C-47A2-9368-483EE741547F.jpeg
Views: 259
Size:  1.23 MB
    She’s going to be a net negative. Gaffes are one thing. They’re like mental typos. Guys like Biden or Reagan, it almost was endearing. These aren’t gaffes. She appears stone cold stupid. All her early success and social media popularity is emboldening her. She’s saying dumb shit with more confidence. She’s going to be extremely hard to reign in. She generates enthusiasm for the most part in places already deeply blue.

  19. #559
    Gold MrTickle's Avatar
    Reputation
    429
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    1,721
    Load Metric
    67484352
    It’s great how many people she scares the fuck out of.

  20. #560
    Plutonium lol wow's Avatar
    Reputation
    1082
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    10,568
    Load Metric
    67484352
    scares the fuck out of shes a fucking moron are you too stupid to get that

     
    Comments
      
      GambleBotsSatire: we see you hi hater

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Cortez, the socialist bitch
    By thesparten in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 01-12-2019, 05:58 PM

Tags for this Thread