Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
Don't take this thew wrong way, but this is exactly why you shouldn't make these cards. You can't separate allegations from facts, and you jump to your own conclusions.
If I remember correctly, The consensus in those posts was that based on this 100-hand session Mark Seif bascially shows everyone he could superuse them because he was tilted??? A guy who had the capability to super-use and make any amount he wanted to decides to only use it once to win $12k because he didn't like the other guy. Yeah that's more plausible than a strong, but outclassed, poker player running super-hot for 100 hands...
Regardless of which of the above is correct, neither can be proven so neither should be hoisted-up as truth. Stick to facts with this project; there are plenty of admittances and conclusive evidence to out people.