The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals actually decided a case today where a monkey's right to sue was in question.
I can't believe this made it all the way to the high court.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...aque-cant-sue/
A monkey grabbed a photographer's camera in 2011 and accidentally took 3 selfies, all of which came out pretty well.
The images were published in the photographer's book, and PETA sued the photographer on behalf of the monkey, claiming they had standing to do so because they were "friends of the monkey", and that the monkey's legal rights were violated (lol).
The suit was thrown out in January 2016 because a monkey can't have rights of ownership, but it was appealed.
In September 2017, the book author settled the lawsuit by agreeing to give 25% of the proceeds of his book to the reserve where the monkey lives.
The 9th Circuit ruled on it anyway, affirming that monkeys do not have the right to sue.
Doesn't PETA have something better to do with its time and resources than suing people on behalf of monkeys who took photos?