The Telford Child Grooming Scandal

[FPS_Russia]

What's the truth about Muslims immigration, rape, the media, etc. Is there really a conspiracy?

This Telford Scandal seems like the perfect litmus test. A week ago on Reddit I noticed this scandal with 8k comments IIrc most of the top comments were about white and asian men and there was some outrage but nothing about Muslim's and immigrants or refugees. i didn't really believe it because of my experience discussing such things. Let's put it this way, I went thru a few SN's and no one seemed genuine, it was odd.

So i decided to look into it today. Here's the Wikipedia link and it has this message at top.
This article is currently protected from editing until March 21, 2018. That's weird
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telfor...sex_abuse_ring
I read it and it seemed like some old story see what you think.
If you Google it idk the results aren't clear, the media outlets are like lesser known. Some say the BBC is covering it up, then there's the police chief claiming it's being sensationalized and exaggerated.
Here's Stefan Molyneauxs take

The comments claim they're not really Asians or white, they're almost all Muslims etc.
Is it possible that damn near every political, law and media estab. in Europe are evil enough to cover this up and the racists from the alt media are telling the truth? LOL That's totally absurd but i believe it, we'll see.

[JACKDANIELS]

It's true that the rape gangs are predominantly Muslims of Pakistani heritage, haven't seen anyone claiming these gangs are white in the media.

This is like the 3rd major ring to be exposed in the UK in the past few years after Rochdale and Rotherham all gangs had very similar MO's targeting mostly working class white girls.

Could well be the tip of the iceberg and I'd agree that not enough is being said about the backgrounds of the people committing the crimes. However the Telford case was first reported in the Mirror which is a left leaning tabloid newspaper in the UK so not true that it's not getting any coverage in mainstream media

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...oming-12165527

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-43441030

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...rying-12170716

[sonatine]

JACK SO ON TOP OF LATEST RAPE TRENDS

[JACKDANIELS]

GOT ME

[ErickAA]

Whereas when we use the term "Asian" we specifically are referring to Orientals, in Britain the liberal media has started using the term much more liberally as a means to disguise the group of the person they are talking about. If the British media ever uses the word "Asian" to describe a suspect in a crime, you can assume it is a Muslim of Pakistani or Middle Eastern descent and you will be right most of the time. If it wasn't, they would use a narrower term that was less vague.

It is pretty much the British version of how our media will show a white suspect of a crime immediately, but if the suspect isn't white they will wait a day or 2 till the story dies down a little.

[The_Lurker]

Whereas when we use the term "Asian" we specifically are referring to Orientals, in Britain the liberal media has started using the term much more liberally as a means to disguise the group of the person they are talking about. If the British media ever uses the word "Asian" to describe a suspect in a crime, you can assume it is a Muslim of Pakistani or Middle Eastern descent and you will be right most of the time. If it wasn't, they would use a narrower term that was less vague.

It is pretty much the British version of how our media will show a white suspect of a crime immediately, but if the suspect isn't white they will wait a day or 2 till the story dies down a little.

We all know what a racist prick you are.

Two things, Pakistan and India are in the continent of "Asia", and there are a whole lot of "Asians" that have brown skin, literally Billions.

[ErickAA]

Whereas when we use the term "Asian" we specifically are referring to Orientals, in Britain the liberal media has started using the term much more liberally as a means to disguise the group of the person they are talking about. If the British media ever uses the word "Asian" to describe a suspect in a crime, you can assume it is a Muslim of Pakistani or Middle Eastern descent and you will be right most of the time. If it wasn't, they would use a narrower term that was less vague.

It is pretty much the British version of how our media will show a white suspect of a crime immediately, but if the suspect isn't white they will wait a day or 2 till the story dies down a little.

We all know what a racist prick you are.

Two things, Pakistan and India are in the continent of "Asia", and there are a whole lot of "Asians" that have brown skin, literally Billions.

I am well aware of basic geography.

That is not the point. The point is the British media intentionally uses the term "Asian" in a very specific manner to obfuscate who is committing crimes. Ironically, if the person was Chinese (what we would consider Asian) the British media will normally just say Chinese. I am not arguing whether it is technically right or not. I am pointing out what is going on and the motive behind it.

I mean, our media could start using the generic term "American" to describe anyone who was born in the continents of North or South America, but it doesn't because all it does is obfuscate things. The British media has started using the generic term "Asian" intentionally to obfuscate things. Maybe our media will eventually follow this example and do the same thing.

It also amuses me when the BBC is talking about a crime that happened in Europe and they will say, "A Swedish man committed so and so crime..." but they don't elaborate. Then you go to a less PC news outlet and discover the "Swedish" man's name is Achmed Muhammad Ali" or something similar and they are a refugee from somewhere in North Africa or the ME.

[The_Lurker]

We all know what a racist prick you are.

Two things, Pakistan and India are in the continent of "Asia", and there are a whole lot of "Asians" that have brown skin, literally Billions.

I am well aware of basic geography.

That is not the point. The point is the British media intentionally uses the term "Asian" in a very specific manner to obfuscate who is committing crimes. Ironically, if the person was Chinese (what we would consider Asian) the British media will normally just say Chinese. I am not arguing whether it is technically right or not. I am pointing out what is going on and the motive behind it.

I mean, our media could start using the generic term "American" to describe anyone who was born in the continents of North or South America, but it doesn't because all it does is obfuscate things. The British media has started using the generic term "Asian" intentionally to obfuscate things. Maybe our media will eventually follow this example and do the same thing.

It also amuses me when the BBC is talking about a crime that happened in Europe and they will say, "A Swedish man committed so and so crime..." but they don't elaborate. Then you go to a less PC news outlet and discover the "Swedish" man's name is Achmed Muhammad Ali" or something similar and they are a refugee from somewhere in North Africa or the ME.

You do understand that normal people don't consider the race of any criminal to be relevant?

[ErickAA]

I am well aware of basic geography.

That is not the point. The point is the British media intentionally uses the term "Asian" in a very specific manner to obfuscate who is committing crimes. Ironically, if the person was Chinese (what we would consider Asian) the British media will normally just say Chinese. I am not arguing whether it is technically right or not. I am pointing out what is going on and the motive behind it.

I mean, our media could start using the generic term "American" to describe anyone who was born in the continents of North or South America, but it doesn't because all it does is obfuscate things. The British media has started using the generic term "Asian" intentionally to obfuscate things. Maybe our media will eventually follow this example and do the same thing.

It also amuses me when the BBC is talking about a crime that happened in Europe and they will say, "A Swedish man committed so and so crime..." but they don't elaborate. Then you go to a less PC news outlet and discover the "Swedish" man's name is Achmed Muhammad Ali" or something similar and they are a refugee from somewhere in North Africa or the ME.

You do understand that normal people don't consider the race of any criminal to be relevant?

I would characterize this statement as categorically false.

[The_Lurker]

That's because you are a racist.

And certainly not normal

[GambleBotsSatire]

Whereas when we use the term "Asian" we specifically are referring to Orientals, in Britain the liberal media has started using the term much more liberally as a means to disguise the group of the person they are talking about. If the British media ever uses the word "Asian" to describe a suspect in a crime, you can assume it is a Muslim of Pakistani or Middle Eastern descent and you will be right most of the time. If it wasn't, they would use a narrower term that was less vague.

It is pretty much the British version of how our media will show a white suspect of a crime immediately, but if the suspect isn't white they will wait a day or 2 till the story dies down a little.

actually they use asian and oriental, asians for the pakis, etc and orientals for the gooks, chinks, japs, etc

[FPS_Russia]

Just a fyi, the guy with the Nazi Pug has been found guilty and will be sentenced next month, meanwhile all these 'Asian and British' savages a free to rape and kill kids for decades. Hate speech and insensitive comments are like the only law they enforce and they've arrested thousands.

Speaking of alt right and immigration. Check out the incredible deception that the GOP pulled off with the help of the media, corporations and 'white supremacists' like Bannon who are funded by his long time associates the Mercers.

Who was the pro openborder candidates last election? Hillary was pretty bad and (((Bernie))) omg he would literally let in everyone like a Trudeau on steroids.

Who was the candidate that was going to ban Muslims, close the border, build a wall and throw out every stinking illegal and MAGA? Trump W the help of his two white supremacist advisers, Bannon and Miller.

Wait are you sure Bernie's for open border? This was buried deep i just happen to run into it.

OH SHIT~
This is what we could of had if Debbie Schultz (B and Sonatine, never forget) and the DNC didn't rig the primary. They media will ponder election influences all day but will not mention the only one that's admitted and confirmed, probably because they helped rig it.


So hows Trump been doing on immigration.
Just last week the Koch's made two new pro immigrant DACA ads. The all time top recipient of Koch cash is Mike Pompeo and Trump's already let in 19,000 afghans hidden under the title translator. A couple years back Sheldon Abelson and bill gates urged congress to grant immigrants legal status and more H1B Visas.

While the media was faking outrage over trump's shithole comment, Trump's immigration policy was released and almost all of them are black and Muslim aka Somalian. I'm not racist but lets be honest, there's no Halle Berry's hidden among them, they all look like they have down syndrome or some shit. I personally find them uniquely repulsive, the global nut low if you will.

Also each and every state has a fusion center , that's basically a multi agency police force who protect Muslims or some shit. Sounds like there's more to come whether you like it or not.
So what's the moral of the story?

 

Don't ever vote Republican or any other corporate prostitute no matter what they say! Everything they say is probably a clever lie made up by Cambridge Analytica, the Kochs etc.

Also Chain Migration means all immigrants counted can bring the whole family.