The news the MSM ignores because it does not fit the narrative

[blake]

I have been playing poker in a casino and cnn has been on and the headline and topic of convo all day has been CNN proudly discussing how they caught him golfing when he tweeted he was working.

Their obsession with going after Trump is seriously reaching clownish levels. No one but them gives a flying F if he is golfing. No one has any expectations he is going to wake up tomorrow and decide to work 100 hours/week. Their obsession is just making them look ridiculous at this point.

i'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and say that you were just not aware of trump's previous criticisms of obama

"He played more golf last year than Tiger Woods," Trump said of Obama in December after being elected president.

"We don't have time for this. We have to work," Trump said at that time.

And, at an August campaign event, Trump said: "I'm going to be working for you. I'm not going to have time to go play golf."

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/20/presi...-business.html

and lol at sean spicer in 2012

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/229644347228950528

[blake]

verminaard, if you have even a shred of integrity you'll concede, after seeing trump's earlier tweets and statements on obama's golfing, that the media is not bashing him hard ENOUGH over it

but i suspect you'll nap it out as per your usual

[devidee]

This poor Palestinian boy was killed while trying to immigrate to Europe.



LULZ.

Just kidding.

He was killed by joos.

(obviously)

[FPS_Russia]

You guys are arguing about Trump's golf trips well I got news for you, Trump's a card carrying member of the Russian Jewish Mafia and they just looted our country, actually they've been doing it for decades. Bernie described it like this "If you're middle class you should be pretty nervous". Plus you can find comments from 08 where people claim that rabbi trump pardoned is in the Jewish mafia and the other Jews made it to Israel to evade prosecution.

This 20 min clip will clear any doubt about who was behind Sept 11 attacks. Mueller was head of the FBI on Sept 11. smh

Dawson has a 5 hour 911 documentary that puts it all together

Hey Goy just wait for Mueller, crickets. Ok ok go to his country club and protest about how much golf he's been playing.

[ErickAA]

verminaard, if you have even a shred of integrity you'll concede, after seeing trump's earlier tweets and statements on obama's golfing, that the media is not bashing him hard ENOUGH over it

but i suspect you'll nap it out as per your usual

So now Trump is the metric for rationale, responsible behavior?
I mean if you really believe that than I guess CNNs behavior is on par, so it is ok.

Regardless, I just sat in a casino for 6 hours with CNN on and the whole time they were camped outside whatever golf course he was playing at like paparazzi outside a hospital after some famous celebrity OD's, and that was the entirety of the "news" for that 6 hour stretch. It was truly a pathetic sight to behold.

They really are completely unhinged by this Trump thing.

[donkdowndonedied]

verminaard, if you have even a shred of integrity you'll concede, after seeing trump's earlier tweets and statements on obama's golfing, that the media is not bashing him hard ENOUGH over it

but i suspect you'll nap it out as per your usual

So now Trump is the metric for rationale, responsible behavior?
I mean if you really believe that than I guess CNNs behavior is on par, so it is ok.

Regardless, I just sat in a casino for 6 hours with CNN on and the whole time they were camped outside whatever golf course he was playing at like paparazzi outside a hospital after some famous celebrity OD's, and that was the entirety of the "news" for that 6 hour stretch. It was truly a pathetic sight to behold.

They really are completely unhinged by this Trump thing.

"They" camped outside. You make it sound like every CNN employee was sitting there.

So do you not think it is appropriate for CNN to cover whatever it is Trump is doing? They should have left and found something else to do than cover the President?

was the entirety of the "news" for that 6 hour stretch.
<-- THere is no way in hell I begin to believe this is true.

You're a mess from your own biases. You probably have something of a point, but it is completely lost in your obvious exaggeration.

[FPS_Russia]

Reddit home
[QUOTE]This is my uncle, he just finished running 22 miles a day for a total of 1776 miles to spread awareness for the 22 veterans who take their lives on a daily bases.[/QUOTE]

That's fucking amazing, he doesn't have that look of a long distance runner, great job.
#thankaneocon

[FPS_Russia]

Nostradamus strikes again.
This is incredible, is Pierce a time traveler or what. Since this isn't covered properly in the MSM here's some useful background stuff to keep in my mind.
This vid is about the Rabbi Trump just pardoned. It's about his Postville Iowa meatpacking plant, their religious beliefs etc. His sentence was reduced from 27 years to just 8 years.

This video is from 2001 the plant didn't get raided until 2008. In 08 he was charged with $26 million in fraud, making SS cards for illegals, animal abuse, all kinds of crazy shit.

In an episode of American Greed a PETA member describes the abuse of animals as "the worst they've ever seen."

This vid describes the beliefs of Jared Kushner and probably the entire Trump cabal. Pierce mentions Rabbi Schneerson, Kushner visited his grave on election eve and prayed.

I think these beliefs reflect in the tax bill, the arrest of inauguration protesters and even the pardon itself.

Is this required viewing for understanding Trump's policies? Absolutely.
11:50 for Postville

[blake]

verminaard, if you have even a shred of integrity you'll concede, after seeing trump's earlier tweets and statements on obama's golfing, that the media is not bashing him hard ENOUGH over it

but i suspect you'll nap it out as per your usual

So now Trump is the metric for rationale, responsible behavior?
I mean if you really believe that than I guess CNNs behavior is on par, so it is ok.

Regardless, I just sat in a casino for 6 hours with CNN on and the whole time they were camped outside whatever golf course he was playing at like paparazzi outside a hospital after some famous celebrity OD's, and that was the entirety of the "news" for that 6 hour stretch. It was truly a pathetic sight to behold.

They really are completely unhinged by this Trump thing.

americans will tolerate a lot but not hypocrisy.

if you don't think it's newsworthy to cover trump's golfing trips (he's golfed more than any other president combined btw) after he promised he wouldn't go golfing while campaigning and bashed obama for years on the subject, you're proving once again that you are the most partisan poster on pfa, which should be impossible

[ErickAA]

So now Trump is the metric for rationale, responsible behavior?
I mean if you really believe that than I guess CNNs behavior is on par, so it is ok.

Regardless, I just sat in a casino for 6 hours with CNN on and the whole time they were camped outside whatever golf course he was playing at like paparazzi outside a hospital after some famous celebrity OD's, and that was the entirety of the "news" for that 6 hour stretch. It was truly a pathetic sight to behold.

They really are completely unhinged by this Trump thing.

americans will tolerate a lot but not hypocrisy.

if you don't think it's newsworthy to cover trump's golfing trips (he's golfed more than any other president combined btw) after he promised he wouldn't go golfing while campaigning and bashed obama for years on the subject, you're proving once again that you are the most partisan poster on pfa, which should be impossible

Partisan of what? I am legitimately curious what I am the biggest partisan supporter of. The truth? I’ll wear that one.

And to answer your question, No, I do not think Teump golfing 2 days after Christmas is newsworthy enough to send a news van and news team to a golf course and sit outside for several hours “reporting” that Trump is golfing and having that be the top news of the day. I find it absolutely absurd.

If you do think that is appropriate we will have to just agree to disagree and move on.

[blake]

americans will tolerate a lot but not hypocrisy.

if you don't think it's newsworthy to cover trump's golfing trips (he's golfed more than any other president combined btw) after he promised he wouldn't go golfing while campaigning and bashed obama for years on the subject, you're proving once again that you are the most partisan poster on pfa, which should be impossible

Partisan of what? I am legitimately curious what I am the biggest partisan supporter of. The truth? I’ll wear that one.

i've said this before, but my calling you a partisan refers to the fact that you're a fake centrist. you may even believe you're a centrist yourself.

you begin many of your points here by criticizing the GOP (to appear as a moderate) but then quickly pivot for the next 20 posts on hammering liberals.

your focus on culture issues and religion, while criticizing liberals and the GOP establishment is very trump/bannonesque.

[ErickAA]

Partisan of what? I am legitimately curious what I am the biggest partisan supporter of. The truth? I’ll wear that one.

i've said this before, but my calling you a partisan refers to the fact that you're a fake centrist. you may even believe you're a centrist yourself.

you begin many of your points here by criticizing the GOP (to appear as a moderate) but then quickly pivot for the next 20 posts on hammering liberals.

your focus on culture issues and religion, while criticizing liberals and the GOP establishment is very trump/bannonesque.

Where did I say I was a centrist? It is weird how your mind just makes up things I said. I try to just look beyond all the bullshit and try to see the heart of the matter. I will let you all worry about fitting into ideologies.

[ErickAA]

WHY am I even bothering? How do you engage with someone who just makes up your positions for you and then tells you why they are wrong. The thing is, I think you honestly believe I have said a bunch of stuff i never said. And the fact there is written proof I never said any of it doesn’t matter in the slightest.

[blake]

i've said this before, but my calling you a partisan refers to the fact that you're a fake centrist. you may even believe you're a centrist yourself.

you begin many of your points here by criticizing the GOP (to appear as a moderate) but then quickly pivot for the next 20 posts on hammering liberals.

your focus on culture issues and religion, while criticizing liberals and the GOP establishment is very trump/bannonesque.

Where did I say I was a centrist? It is weird how your mind just makes up things I said. I try to just look beyond all the bullshit and try to see the heart of the matter. I will let you all worry about fitting into ideologies.

in fairness, I don’t recall you actually calling yourself a “centrist.” that was my interpretation of how you classified yourself considering that you start so many of your posts bashing republicans only to focus most of your venom towards liberals.

if you freely admit you’re far right, that’s fine.

[peter mcneil]

Where did I say I was a centrist? It is weird how your mind just makes up things I said. I try to just look beyond all the bullshit and try to see the heart of the matter. I will let you all worry about fitting into ideologies.

in fairness, I don’t recall you actually calling yourself a “centrist.” that was my interpretation of how you classified yourself considering that you start so many of your posts bashing republicans only to focus most of your venom towards liberals.

if you freely admit you’re far right, that’s fine.

I think he should admit he clearly leans right but I don't think he's far right. What positions does he hold that makes you think he's far right?

[ErickAA]

in fairness, I don’t recall you actually calling yourself a “centrist.” that was my interpretation of how you classified yourself considering that you start so many of your posts bashing republicans only to focus most of your venom towards liberals.

if you freely admit you’re far right, that’s fine.

I think he should admit he clearly leans right but I don't think he's far right. What positions does he hold that makes you think he's far right?

I would probably view myself a classic liberal, which is probably a little right on social topics in today's political climate.

When it comes to economics, I don't think I have made a single post one would characterize as right leaning at all. I think what tends to happen is the ideological libs on the site just focus on the stuff they disagree with and like to just pigeon hole you based on that. I do find it interesting that everyone just asserts I am regurgitating Breitbart and Fox News. As I don't ever go to either site or watch Fox News at all, I don't know how similar my arguments are to what goes on on those sites, but I am very skeptical.

I have listened to Hannity a little on the radio. And the rhetorical gymnastics he undergoes to spin the nonsense going on in the Republican Party as a positive thing is an amazing thing to behold.

[blake]

I think he should admit he clearly leans right but I don't think he's far right. What positions does he hold that makes you think he's far right?

I would probably view myself a classic liberal, which is probably a little right on social topics in today's political climate.

When it comes to economics, I don't think I have made a single post one would characterize as right leaning at all. I think what tends to happen is the ideological libs on the site just focus on the stuff they disagree with and like to just pigeon hole you based on that. I do find it interesting that everyone just asserts I am regurgitating Breitbart and Fox News. As I don't ever go to either site or watch Fox News at all, I don't know how similar my arguments are to what goes on on those sites, but I am very skeptical.

I have listened to Hannity a little on the radio. And the rhetorical gymnastics he undergoes to spin the nonsense going on in the Republican Party as a positive thing is an amazing thing to behold.

in what aspects, would you classify yourself as liberal or even slightly left of center? not trolling, actually curious. are you an economic liberal?

it seems like you take what would be considered the conservative or pro-trump stance in every discussion. maybe it’s just because the topic being discussed involves social issues for which you lean hard right. i could probably point to your last 20 posts on pfa as examples.

there’s obv nothing wrong with this. it’s just that you’re not what most people would consider moderate or centrist, which is how i thought you identified.

[ErickAA]

I would probably view myself a classic liberal, which is probably a little right on social topics in today's political climate.

When it comes to economics, I don't think I have made a single post one would characterize as right leaning at all. I think what tends to happen is the ideological libs on the site just focus on the stuff they disagree with and like to just pigeon hole you based on that. I do find it interesting that everyone just asserts I am regurgitating Breitbart and Fox News. As I don't ever go to either site or watch Fox News at all, I don't know how similar my arguments are to what goes on on those sites, but I am very skeptical.

I have listened to Hannity a little on the radio. And the rhetorical gymnastics he undergoes to spin the nonsense going on in the Republican Party as a positive thing is an amazing thing to behold.

in what aspects, would you classify yourself as liberal or even slightly left of center? not trolling, actually curious. are you an economic liberal?

it seems like you take what would be considered the conservative or pro-trump stance in every discussion. maybe it’s just because the topic being discussed involves social issues for which you lean hard right. i could probably point to your last 20 posts on pfa as examples.

there’s obv nothing wrong with this. it’s just that you’re not what most people would consider moderate or centrist, which is how i thought you identified.

Classical liberalism and The current new left (which is basically Neo Marxism) are 2 very different things.

Classical liberalism focuses more on how we should for the most part have individual freedom and the govt should only get involved to protect freedom.

The new left focuses more on addressing issues of social inequity, with the role of the govt being to promote equity (which as currently being used means it is the role of govt to make sure the top 1% gets most of the shit and everyone else should be equally poor, where we are all defined by group identity politics.

[blake]

in what aspects, would you classify yourself as liberal or even slightly left of center? not trolling, actually curious. are you an economic liberal?

it seems like you take what would be considered the conservative or pro-trump stance in every discussion. maybe it’s just because the topic being discussed involves social issues for which you lean hard right. i could probably point to your last 20 posts on pfa as examples.

there’s obv nothing wrong with this. it’s just that you’re not what most people would consider moderate or centrist, which is how i thought you identified.

Classical liberalism and The current new left (which is basically Neo Marxism) are 2 very different things.

Classical liberalism focuses more on how we should for the most part have individual freedom and the govt should only get involved to protect freedom.

The new left focuses more on addressing issues of social inequity, with the role of the govt being to promote equity (which as currently being used means it is the role of govt to make sure the top 1% gets most of the shit and everyone else should be equally poor, where we are all defined by group identity politics.

i don't necessarily disagree with this. i'm just wondering if you consider yourself liberal (from a modern viewpoint) or "new left" if you prefer that description. if so, in what areas?

[blake]

the question i asked might be too vague. a better question is are there any areas in which you find yourself siding with the democratic stance and not the republican stance? globally, economically, culturally, etc.