Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Populist Hero Mike Pence Casts Tie-Breaking Vote to Protect Banks from Lawsuits

  1. #1
    Gold GambleBotsSatire's Avatar
    Reputation
    483
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,280
    Load Metric
    68053136

    Populist Hero Mike Pence Casts Tie-Breaking Vote to Protect Banks from Lawsuits

    Name:  mike-pence-screw-over-consumers.jpg
Views: 269
Size:  107.4 KB

  2. #2
    Banned
    Reputation
    254
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    642
    Load Metric
    68053136
    My understanding was that this only applies to people who signed an arbitration-only agreement with banks and credit bureaus. I have no association with Equifax, so I should still be able to sue them in a class action, correct?
    Last edited by SrslySirius; 10-25-2017 at 02:52 PM. Reason: bureaus, not unions lol

  3. #3
    Gold GambleBotsSatire's Avatar
    Reputation
    483
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,280
    Load Metric
    68053136
    pal i didnt read the story, i was Binging the butter shortage in france and saw this headline on bings homepage, i only posted it to twist the butter knife in these trumptards that fill this literal hate site

  4. #4
    Diamond hongkonger's Avatar
    Reputation
    706
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,640
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by SrslySirius View Post
    My understanding was that this only applies to people who signed an arbitration-only agreement with banks and credit unions. I have no association with Equifax, so I should still be able to sue them in a class action, correct?
    Almost any time you sign up for anything financial these days, whether you read it or not, you sign away your rights and agree to an arbitration clause.
    HILLARY WON

  5. #5
    Banned
    Reputation
    254
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    642
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post
    Almost any time you sign up for anything financial these days, whether you read it or not, you sign away your rights and agree to an arbitration clause.
    I didn't sign up for shit with Equifax. They acquired my information from other parties. Most Americans have never had any dealings with them.

    It sucks that I may not be able to sue my bank if they fuck me over, but my more pressing concern right now is credit bureaus.

  6. #6
    Gold handicapme's Avatar
    Reputation
    361
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,182
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by SrslySirius View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post
    Almost any time you sign up for anything financial these days, whether you read it or not, you sign away your rights and agree to an arbitration clause.
    I didn't sign up for shit with Equifax. They acquired my information from other parties. Most Americans have never had any dealings with them.

    It sucks that I may not be able to sue my bank if they fuck me over, but my more pressing concern right now is credit bureaus.
    Not 100% sure but I wouldn't be surprised that if you ever had your credit run using any of them (CC,mort,car loan, etc.) That you agree to all there terms by proxy when the underwriters ask if it is okay to run your credit.
    "I GOT NO TOE"

    #FreeFluffler #FreeThisGuyIsCreepy #lockupGarrett

  7. #7
    Banned
    Reputation
    254
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    642
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by handicapme View Post
    That you agree to all there terms by proxy when the underwriters ask if it is okay to run your credit.
    That makes absolutely no sense, and I'm sure you can imagine all the problems that would arise if contracts actually worked like that.

  8. #8
    Canadrunk limitles's Avatar
    Reputation
    1638
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    In Todd's head
    Posts
    17,736
    Blog Entries
    1
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SrslySirius View Post
    My understanding was that this only applies to people who signed an arbitration-only agreement with banks and credit unions. I have no association with Equifax, so I should still be able to sue them in a class action, correct?
    Almost any time you sign up for anything financial these days, whether you read it or not, you sign away your rights and agree to an arbitration clause.
    There should be a law against these fucking terms of agreement that are unreadable by design

  9. #9
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2686
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by SrslySirius View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post
    Almost any time you sign up for anything financial these days, whether you read it or not, you sign away your rights and agree to an arbitration clause.
    I didn't sign up for shit with Equifax. They acquired my information from other parties. Most Americans have never had any dealings with them.

    It sucks that I may not be able to sue my bank if they fuck me over, but my more pressing concern right now is credit bureaus.

    Most people have an unrealistic view of their relationship with Equifax. People are not the customers of Equifax, people are the product.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: Spot on!

  10. #10
    Diamond Pro Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe's Avatar
    Reputation
    1416
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,795
    Load Metric
    68053136
    why is it that Christians are so retarded that when they get power they just go to bat for Jewish banks and Israel?

  11. #11
    Bronze
    Reputation
    89
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    425
    Load Metric
    68053136
    I am as liberal as they come but class actions are crap- have no consumer benefit and only make lawyers rich.
    If banks are abusive, regulators should respond. Empowering private lawyers doesn’t work because their motivation is not even nominally consumer benefit. It is solely money.
    Arbitration clauses save consumers money who ultimately would be paying.

  12. #12
    Diamond Tellafriend's Avatar
    Reputation
    1625
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    7,254
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe View Post
    why is it that Christians are so retarded that when they get power they just go to bat for Jewish banks and Israel?
    The Jewish Book of Fairytales, otherwise known as the Old Testament.

  13. #13
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellafriend View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe View Post
    why is it that Christians are so retarded that when they get power they just go to bat for Jewish banks and Israel?
    The Jewish Book of Fairytales, otherwise known as the Old Testament.


    It's because the role Israel is prophesized to play in ushering the End Times per The Book of the Revalation. Were that outrageously fanciful fever dream/nigutmare narratve not biblical canon, most evangelical Chtistians wouldn't give two shits about the wealthful of Jews or Israel.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  14. #14
    Diamond hongkonger's Avatar
    Reputation
    706
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,640
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellafriend View Post

    The Jewish Book of Fairytales, otherwise known as the Old Testament.


    It's because the role Israel is prophesized to play in ushering the End Times per The Book of the Revalation. Were that outrageously fanciful fever dream/nigutmare narratve not biblical canon, most evangelical Chtistians wouldn't give two shits about the wealthful of Jews or Israel.
    There are also the geopolitical considerations--a path to controlling the Middle East and its oil.

     
    Comments
      
      Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe: basically i agree w you. the bible shit is how they trick plebs into being pro Israel
    HILLARY WON

  15. #15
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    68053136
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post



    It's because the role Israel is prophesized to play in ushering the End Times per The Book of the Revalation. Were that outrageously fanciful fever dream/nigutmare narratve not biblical canon, most evangelical Chtistians wouldn't give two shits about the wealthful of Jews or Israel.
    There are also the geopolitical considerations--a path to controlling the Middle East and its oil.
    Actually, the US supporting Isreal has repeatedly imposed huge costs and risk of loss of access to Middle East oil, with the first significant cost being the Arab oil embargo in 1973 in response to US support of Israel in that conflict.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-10-2017, 03:09 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-08-2016, 09:26 PM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-26-2016, 02:40 PM
  4. new poster in the SSS forum. Game Protect
    By LarryLaffer in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-21-2016, 10:57 AM
  5. A vote for Chaps, is a vote for a better future
    By DJ_Chaps in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-06-2015, 02:29 PM