How many sexual partners have you had? The average man has 7

[Hockey Guy]

what's the o/u for Druff's count

This was a trivia question on a radio game that I participated in. I believe I got it correct but don't remember the number.

[limitles]

not going to read the whole thread for a joke

at once?

[hongkonger]

Poll results reveal: PFA full of studs.

[Dan Druff]

the dude was on BBS's as far back as 86. Was on chatrooms since they became live somewhere around 89 (im totally guessing but it sounds right) and lurked them HARD.

my guess is he's bagged more than 10.

http://hawaiifiveo.org/

You're welcomed.

How did you find that site?

It just recently went up. The page you see is a placeholder and is actually a mirror of the front page of an old '90s website about Hawaii Five-O I once ran.

The previous owner of hawaiifiveo.org decided he didn't want it anymore, offered it to me, and I just took it over a few weeks ago.

Not sure what I am going to do with it.

[Dan Druff]

As far as the over/under is concerned, the over wins by a wide margin.

I've always been very good at talking to women on the phone. I stumbled upon this accidentally at the age of 17, but I improved upon it over the years to where I had a great routine down. Remember that story from 1992 where I banged that girl who called me as a wrong number? There were tons of them like this -- where basically I would get on the phone with a girl in some way, sometimes at random like that wrong number, and within a few hours the girl would be begging to meet and fuck me sight unseen.

You might think I'm bullshitting or exaggerating, but I promise that I'm not. Most of these girls also fell in the "average or better" category in the looks department, so they weren't gross chicks who were desperate for male attention.

It never had to do with money. In fact, I would greatly play down the money angle when meeting a new girl, usually just making it clear I wasn't broke, but otherwise staying away from the subject.

However, as I got older, this started to appeal to me less. As much as I liked sex, meeting for 1-night-stand type deals just started to seem depressing and empty. So I started turning a lot down or making excuses why I couldn't do it. I was generally only meeting the ones whom I liked beyond just sex.

I kid you not in the fact that my number could easily be well over 100 had I wanted it to be, and had I been single for longer. (Most of the time in the past 20 years, I've had a long-term girlfriend.) But it's nowhere near 100, or even 50, partially because I started to show restraint in my later single years.

[Kilgore Trout]

More than I have any right to, that's for sure.

LOL.
DITTO.


and fwiw, when I say this, I speak for the majority NOT the minority --you men severely underestimate us women. Not only are we dishonest (in droves) about how many partners we have had - but we also act disgusted and appalled (and overly judgy) of the mere suggestion you may have put up double digits.

( my first and second hand experiences prove this to be, fact. )


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Kilgore Trout]

7 seems really low. I'm guessing they didn't include gay people in the survey

7 or less Is an outright Pollyanna-ish lie for any attractive adult over 25 without a major mental affliction and who isn't living in Mom's basement (or riding a 10 speed as primary means of transport.)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Kilgore Trout]

what's the o/u for Druff's count

9.25

I should add, I didn't read more than the first two and last two posts in this thread. Sorry if any of my replies were repetitious or have otherwise been proven wrong (by Druff.)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[michael]

As far as the over/under is concerned, the over wins by a wide margin.

I've always been very good at talking to women on the phone. I stumbled upon this accidentally at the age of 17, but I improved upon it over the years to where I had a great routine down. Remember that story from 1992 where I banged that girl who called me as a wrong number? There were tons of them like this -- where basically I would get on the phone with a girl in some way, sometimes at random like that wrong number, and within a few hours the girl would be begging to meet and fuck me sight unseen.

You might think I'm bullshitting or exaggerating, but I promise that I'm not. Most of these girls also fell in the "average or better" category in the looks department, so they weren't gross chicks who were desperate for male attention.

It never had to do with money. In fact, I would greatly play down the money angle when meeting a new girl, usually just making it clear I wasn't broke, but otherwise staying away from the subject.

However, as I got older, this started to appeal to me less. As much as I liked sex, meeting for 1-night-stand type deals just started to seem depressing and empty. So I started turning a lot down or making excuses why I couldn't do it. I was generally only meeting the ones whom I liked beyond just sex.

I kid you not in the fact that my number could easily be well over 100 had I wanted it to be, and had I been single for longer. (Most of the time in the past 20 years, I've had a long-term girlfriend.) But it's nowhere near 100, or even 50, partially because I started to show restraint in my later single years.

I believe Druff, and he describes doing everything right in his post, it's even classic pua stuff.

Repetition and reference experience. He talked to so many girls that he probably started seeing all the patterns, what would work, what the objections would be, and how to maneuver around everything because he'd done it so much. Also getting his story down, this is like learning routines from the old school pua days.

Not spending money or qualifying himself with money to those girls. When you spend money or flash money buying drinks and dinner, this puts you in a provider frame instead of a lover frame to the girl. They will fuck the lover on the first date. They will string along the provider. Druff wasn't looking for a gf or wife from these girls, so he played it perfectly going for the lover angle.

Well played Druff. Respect.

[lol wow]

lol

[hongkonger]

7 seems really low. I'm guessing they didn't include gay people in the survey

7 or less Is an outright Pollyanna-ish lie for any attractive adult over 25 without a major mental affliction and who isn't living in Mom's basement (or riding a 10 speed as primary means of transport.)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're a woman? Now I find the Kilgore Trout reference even cooler. Stick around.

[LarryLaffer]

7 seems really low. I'm guessing they didn't include gay people in the survey

7 or less Is an outright Pollyanna-ish lie for any attractive adult over 25 without a major mental affliction and who isn't living in Mom's basement (or riding a 10 speed as primary means of transport.)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you should go back to lurking

[LarryLaffer]

7 or less Is an outright Pollyanna-ish lie for any attractive adult over 25 without a major mental affliction and who isn't living in Mom's basement (or riding a 10 speed as primary means of transport.)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're a woman? Now I find the Kilgore Trout reference even cooler. Stick around.

what? Wide Open Beavers?

[Drawingdead]

The chase is the best part, finding women who had zero interest in me and winning them over. Man I miss those days

[hongkonger]

You're a woman? Now I find the Kilgore Trout reference even cooler. Stick around.

what? Wide Open Beavers?

Vonnegut is god

[Kilgore Trout]

what? Wide Open Beavers?

Vonnegut is god

True Story.
Funny how the ref gets lost on most (and it's implied meaning.)
Nice catch.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[BlunderMaker]

What percentage of PFA has paid for sex? Somebody set the o/u

[Kilgore Trout]

What percentage of PFA has paid for sex? Somebody set the o/u

I feel like this needs be re-worded to "paid for sex or been paid for sex," in order to really qualify any quantitative data....right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[simpdog]

Don't we all pay for it???

[MrTickle]

As far as the over/under is concerned, the over wins by a wide margin.

I've always been very good at talking to women on the phone. I stumbled upon this accidentally at the age of 17, but I improved upon it over the years to where I had a great routine down. Remember that story from 1992 where I banged that girl who called me as a wrong number? There were tons of them like this -- where basically I would get on the phone with a girl in some way, sometimes at random like that wrong number, and within a few hours the girl would be begging to meet and fuck me sight unseen.

You might think I'm bullshitting or exaggerating, but I promise that I'm not. Most of these girls also fell in the "average or better" category in the looks department, so they weren't gross chicks who were desperate for male attention.

It never had to do with money. In fact, I would greatly play down the money angle when meeting a new girl, usually just making it clear I wasn't broke, but otherwise staying away from the subject.

However, as I got older, this started to appeal to me less. As much as I liked sex, meeting for 1-night-stand type deals just started to seem depressing and empty. So I started turning a lot down or making excuses why I couldn't do it. I was generally only meeting the ones whom I liked beyond just sex.

I kid you not in the fact that my number could easily be well over 100 had I wanted it to be, and had I been single for longer. (Most of the time in the past 20 years, I've had a long-term girlfriend.) But it's nowhere near 100, or even 50, partially because I started to show restraint in my later single years.

50 lifetime doesn't seem that high to me, especially in 2017. Over 4 years of college I'd say most people (males?) are closer to 50 than 0. When you're in your early 20s it's just not that hard to get laid at all.