This is the elephant in the room which neither party will talk about
:
http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/20/news...sts/index.html
If you've been to the doctor, or especially the ER, you have been prescribed useless and wasteful medical tests, either to run up your bill or to protect them from liability.
A good example:
In 2014, I fainted during a bad stomach flu, and broke 3 ribs. A week later, I went to the ER when I had symptoms which seemed similar to a ruptured spleen, which is very dangerous.
Obviously any test related to the spleen was justified.
However, when I came into the ER, the first thing they did was bring an EKG machine to me. I asked, "Why an EKG? Why are you doing this?"
The response was, "We always take an EKG if you have pain anywhere near your heart."
"But I fell and broke my ribs last week. I know that. The reason for the pain at my ribs is very clear to me. I don't need any tests for that. I don't want this."
They wheeled the machine away.
I then second-guessed myself and texted my brother (a cardiology professor), asking if I made a mistake refusing the EKG under these circumstances. He texted back that I was 100% correct in doing so, and that indeed this was wasteful and useless in such a situation.
After the ER visit (which fortunately revealed no spleen damage), I got a bill in the mail. One of the elements listed was a coagulation test.
I couldn't imagine why they would have administered that.
I called the hospital and asked, "Why the coag test?"
"Well, we needed to know the results in case your spleen was ruptured and you needed surgery."
"Yeah, but if I needed surgery, couldn't you have done the coag test once you found that out? Why do it in advance when you don't know if surgery is necessary?"
"Well... umm... yes," they responded. "Look, no problem, we'll take that off the bill."
Again, my brother agreed this was just something done to pad the bill.
I have refused other bullshit tests which seemed clearly wasteful or extraneous.
My brother told me that a common trick in cardiology in recent years is the "nuclear stress test" -- something massively overused simply because it's expensive. Even worse, you are exposed to a lot of radiation, so this is a bad test to do unnecessarily even if you're getting it for free!
Bottom line is that we need to cut out waste and fraud first and foremost.
This line in the article is all you need to know:
To cut down on needless care, Cedars-Sinai arranged for doctors to be alerted electronically when they ordered tests or drugs that run contrary to 18 Choosing Wisely recommendations.
The hospital analyzed alerts from 26,424 patient encounters from 2013 to 2016.
All of the guidelines were followed in 6% of those cases, or 1,591 encounters.
So this study found that, in all patient encounters where tests were ordered, doctors only did it properly 6% of the time.
And this was an internal study!!