I think it would be a reasonable attack.
We need to prove world dominance, we will lay waste to all communists.
I think it would be a reasonable attack.
We need to prove world dominance, we will lay waste to all communists.
"I hit that shot because it was a defining moment and when a defining moment comes along, you either define the moment or the moment defines you" Roy "Tin Cup" Mcevoy
https://twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/825588486895988737
Cracking NK parody account to follow. Money back if no likey.
Just a reminder, Trump's not the only corrupt loose cannon.
Excerpts from an article titled
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/01...rld-war-again/
Israel gets caught orchestrating world war—again
Much more in linkGordon Duff wrote in 2013 that the Israeli regime was caught red-handed, orchestrating a world war through covert operations and deceptive means. “Israel is putting into motion their ‘final solution,’” said Duff then, “a campaign to pit nation against nation. The result, the planet a smoldering ruin, Israel ruling over the ashes and mass graves, is a foregone conclusion, at least to Netanyahu and his worldwide terrorist network.”
Pipes declared that “the West should prevent either side in the civil war from emerging victorious by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their conflict.’”[1]
Duff brought a number of evidence to back his claims and added that the Israelis intended to pit nations against each other, which means that they would end up killing two birds with one stone. Did they actually plan this? Duff wrote:
“Yes, they actually do, the Zionists, the Neocons, and the Dominionists, a vast worldwide network of financial criminals, corrupt politicians and power-mad tyrants. In America, those now seeking to stage a military coup in the United States, submit to full Israeli control and lead the world into a new ‘dark age.’”
Duff wrote those words on April 29, 2013. By May of the same year, Jewish Neocons Daniel Pipes stunned us all by proving that Duff was right all along. In an article entitled, “Support the Syrian Rebels?,” Pipes posited a bold claim on the Syrian government and the Syrian rebels/terrorists/jihadists, two entities that have been in mortal combat since the beginning of the war.
Did you catch any of that? The world should support both the Assad government and the terrorist cells so that they could end up killing each other. What if it costs millions of lives? What if thousands upon thousands of mothers end up losing their precious sons and daughters and even their husbands?
Well, too bad. What if it costs millions dollars? It’s a small price to pay, Pipes seems to think. What seems to matter to Pipes is that both entities have to go, no matter what the cost.
Now this is not coming from a man who doesn’t understand international law, logic and reason. Pipes is a Harvard graduate, with a Ph.D. in medieval Islamic history. His father was Harvard historian Richard Pipes.
Pipes certainly knows what he is doing. With respect to his essentially diabolical plan for Syria we have just looked at, he said, “This policy recommendation of ‘helping whichever side is losing’ sounds odd, I admit, but it is strategic.”
Pipes could not get around his conscience which kept telling him that the plan was “odd,” but he ended up suppressing practical reason and replacing it with, well, essentially Talmudic mores.
We've got a long way to go, I'm guessing 35% chance a nuke gets detonated in combat within the next 4 yrs.
Tyde how many times have you checked this thread to see if DirtyB dressed you down yet?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)