Russia won.

[sonatine]

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Consider that this only contains the data that could be declassified.

[LarryLaffer]

can't you just bump one of the many threads you've already created on this?


http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...hp?4681-RUSSIA

[DonaldTrumpsHairPiece]

Don't summerize it, Ill read through it tonight when I have 4 hours.

[sonatine]

Don't summerize it, Ill read through it tonight when I have 4 hours.

TL;DR:

[abrown83]

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Consider that this only contains the data that could be declassified.

TL;DR

Russia campaigned for Trump

That's literally what it says.

It explicitly says they didn't manipulate the vote or cast illegal votes or change votes in any way.

Lulz Democrat official document tantrums.

[DonaldTrumpsHairPiece]

Well in that case... I heard briefly they are saying yes Kremlin/Putin ordered it ultimately and at least tried to put middle man between them and WikiLeaks thus WikiLeaks can say no Putin/Russian Gov didn't give us the leaks.

[blake]

i don't like trump, but the russia outrage strikes me as a little odd when you consider that the only thing the Russians are accused of doing is exposing private communications to voters, not actually rig voting machines.

i get that russia trying to influence our elections is a big deal, but i'd be shocked and even disappointed in our intelligence community if we weren't trying to do the same thing across the globe.

[sonatine]

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Consider that this only contains the data that could be declassified.

TL;DR

Russia campaigned for Trump

That's literally what it says.

It explicitly says they didn't manipulate the vote or cast illegal votes or change votes in any way.

Lulz Democrat official document tantrums.

TL;DR

Oh weird a forum-career hyperbolic republican grossly misrepresenting the facts that are literally in front of his face, because they dont fit into his democrats-are-mean-to-me-because-im-simple trip.


Cyber Espionage Against US Political
Organizations. Russia’s intelligence services
conducted cyber operations against targets
associated with the 2016 US presidential election,
including targets associated with both major US
political parties.
We assess Russian intelligence services collected
against the US primary campaigns, think tanks, and
lobbying groups they viewed as likely to shape
future US policies. In July 2015, Russian
intelligence gained access to Democratic National
Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that
access until at least June 2016.
 The General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate
(GRU) probably began cyber operations aimed
at the US election by March 2016. We assess
that the GRU operations resulted in the
compromise of the personal e-mail accounts of
Democratic Party officials and political figures.
By May, the GRU had exfiltrated large volumes
of data from the DNC.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data.
We assess with high confidence that the GRU used
the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and
WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in

cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to
media outlets.
 Guccifer 2.0, who claimed to be an
independent Romanian hacker, made multiple
contradictory statements and false claims
about his likely Russian identity throughout the
election. Press reporting suggests more than
one person claiming to be Guccifer 2.0
interacted with journalists.
 Content that we assess was taken from e-mail
accounts targeted by the GRU in March 2016
appeared on DCLeaks.com starting in June.

[NaturalBornHustler]

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Consider that this only contains the data that could be declassified.

If you are referring to literally controlling your brain from over 5,500 miles away, then yes you are absolutely correct.

They won in convincing fashion.

[sonatine]

i don't like trump, but the russia outrage strikes me as a little odd when you consider that the only thing the Russians are accused of doing is exposing private communications to voters, not actually rig voting machines.

i get that russia trying to influence our elections is a big deal, but i'd be shocked and even disappointed in our intelligence community if we weren't trying to do the same thing across the globe.

and this, right here, is how russia got away with it. if you cant find outrage in the scale and audacity of what they accomplished, you deserve every bit of whats about to happen.

[blake]

sonatine: read the fucking document. honestly.

Don't summerize it, Ill read through it tonight when I have 4 hours.

100% of the news to date has been that that the only thing russia did was hack emails and leak them to wikileaks so that trump would be elected or hillary would be weakened. if there's new info, i still haven't seen it reported. please enlighten us

[blake]

i don't like trump, but the russia outrage strikes me as a little odd when you consider that the only thing the Russians are accused of doing is exposing private communications to voters, not actually rig voting machines.

i get that russia trying to influence our elections is a big deal, but i'd be shocked and even disappointed in our intelligence community if we weren't trying to do the same thing across the globe.

and this, right here, is how russia got away with it. if you cant find outrage in the scale and audacity of what they accomplished, you deserve every bit of whats about to happen.

right, and to be clear, when you say got away with it, the "it" you're referring to is that the public got to see john podesta's private emails as well as the dnc's efforts to collude for hillary clinton in favor of bernie sanders, who would have curb stomped trump in the election.

[FPS_Russia]

Let's say they did the hack the emails.
None of that holds a candle to the email server debacle.

Bill and Lynch meeting on the tarmac,
deleting emails after they were subpoenaed,
fainting at the 911 memorial,
mishandling classified information,
stealing the primary,
dispatching paid trolls,
refusing to give a press conference
Weiner getting busted w 650k emails
and a million other scandals

There's no candidate in history that had as much support from the entire power structure. Even google was changing the auto-completes for her.

If a thread is about Hillary being at a disadvantage during this election or about her running in 2020.
I literally need a trigger warning..

I'm done for the day, that did me in.

[thesidedish]

Russia is god. USA is god. I am god. Libtards ain't shit

[limitles]

All aboard. Time to jump on Rasputin Rail



Snowden had some input yes?

[MumblesBadly]

To anyone who blames the Russians for Trump winning this election: Would their hacking campaign have worked to swing the election in Trump's favor if Bernie Sanders had been the Dem's presidential candidate? Or even it he had been Hillary's VP running mate?

If you answer "No" or "Not likely" to either of these questions, then the person who ultimately responsible for Trump winning his election is Hillary Clinton, for all the poor decisions she made leading up that election. And this is coming from someone who did *not* want Trump to win.

[Mintjewlips]

Libtards gonna lib

[hongkonger]

Well in that case... I heard briefly they are saying yes Kremlin/Putin ordered it ultimately and at least tried to put middle man between them and WikiLeaks thus WikiLeaks can say no Putin/Russian Gov didn't give us the leaks.

Well of course. Lol "Wikileaks said it didn't come from Russia"

[DonaldTrumpsHairPiece]

Well in that case... I heard briefly they are saying yes Kremlin/Putin ordered it ultimately and at least tried to put middle man between them and WikiLeaks thus WikiLeaks can say no Putin/Russian Gov didn't give us the leaks.

Well of course. Lol "Wikileaks said it didn't come from Russia"

Unreal how simple the game is lol

[Mintjewlips]

Well of course. Lol "Wikileaks said it didn't come from Russia"

Unreal how simple the game is lol

Wow hahaha