.
.
Last edited by Game Protect; 08-09-2016 at 09:32 AM. Reason: see it later...
How do you expect to get money out of defunct companies with no presence in Curacao?
Do you think Jennifer Larson will be scared by any threats she gets from the licensing division of a tiny island like that?
Druff, what can you tell us about this seemingly omnipresent Game Protect guy without violating his privacy rights as a forum member?
Based on GPs apparent deletion of the initial posting and his smart ass response I guess that means he's decided to leave the forum for now.. Maybe permanently.. Always seemed like it was an angle shooting account to begin with, or some asinine attempt to drum up business for some scummy lawyer(s) who wanted way more then the normal legal fee to 'recover' funds from a source they had no hope of getting money from.. The fact this clown thought he could convince people to buy into his bullshit especially regarding Lock Poker was hilarious..
Curacao license 1668/JAZ scam, 100 questions from The Hague
THE HAGUE, WILLEMSTAD – The government in Curacao must answer all questions from the Parliament in The Hague about the gaming sector on the island. That is according to a majority of the Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliament.
The Minister of Kingdom Relations Ronald Plasterk has to send more than 100 questions asked by Dutch MPs to the Curacao government. Most of these questions come from the MP for the Socialist Party Ronald van Raak.
Van Raak indicated that he doesn’t like the answers he received from Plasterk. The MP now has the support of the ruling party VVD and the Labour Party PvdA to have the government in Willemstad answer these questions.
Van Raak believes that the gambling sector in Curacao is illegal and that the public company UTS is involved in it. He also believes that the KPMG is supporting UTS in this business.
Recently asked questions from van Raak about the Curacao gambling industry
1) Is it true that the construction of master and sub-licenses in the gambling industry used on Curacao has no legal basis?
2) Is it true that UTS as casino licensee shall not report unusual transactions to the MOT?
3) Is it true that the online casino network UTS also facilitates the use of (master-) licensing, Internet licensing, logo, marketing, and other turnkey services including colocation, e-zones services, legal and compliance services, corporate services, fiducary services, IT infrastructure and support, telephone, leased lines and internet infrastructure, gaming software, banking, card payment and authorization services?
4) Does the UTS (master-) licensee fulfill its responsibility for tax payments from its casino network?
5) Is it true that the service KPMG provides for UTS include legal, tax and financial advisory services, management consulting, marketing and sales operations, responsible for internal reporting and is for more than 15 years checking accounts?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)