Time to get on the TRUMP train

[tyde]

BIG FAT NOTHING BURGER TOMORROW

[tyde]

Melania and Barron Trump moving into the White House next week on June 14th


FIRST FAMILY SETTLING IN NICELY

[ToasterOven]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.248347613197

I know we think we're all experts, some of us have even written exceptional college papers, but here's an actual expert.

[hongkonger]

Melania and Barron Trump moving into the White House next week on June 14th


FIRST FAMILY SETTLING IN NICELY

Better not unpack too much stuff

[hongkonger]

you realize this was what happened in watergate too, right? it was the coverup that got him, not the crime

Dummy,

Watergate was about a CRIME. Burglary. And a series of crimes that followed covering up the burglary. Watergate was an orchestrated coverup that involved a million dollar in payments out of the White House to keep people silent. Many people went to jail.

This bullshit, there was no crime. No coverup. You have no idea what you are talking about. It does not matter. Trump is spinning libtards out of control. You among them. You will never see Trump impeached, although you will likely see him re-elected. You don't understand how impeachment works and how impossible it is, but keep watching MSNBC, they draw lemmings like you in for ratings. (Fox does the same thing as well).

Obstruction of Justice is a crime. You stupid fuck.

[hongkonger]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.248347613197

I know we think we're all experts, some of us have even written exceptional college papers, but here's an actual expert.

Comey’s statement lays out a case against the president that consists of a tidy pattern, beginning with the demand for loyalty, the threat to terminate Comey’s job, the repeated requests to turn off the investigation into Flynn and the final infliction of career punishment for failing to succumb to the president’s requests, all followed by the president’s own concession about his motive. Any experienced prosecutor would see these facts as establishing a prima facie case of obstruction of justice.

Exactly.

[DirtyB]

As Team Retard is so fond of reminding us, Trump is of course the President.

He's just not the leader of the western world, and now it seems like he's not even the leader of the United States anymore.

http://www.iflscience.com/environmen...ris-agreement/

http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la...607-story.html

Jerry Brown going to China and making climate change agreements isn't exactly constitutional. But apparently if Trump is allowed to wipe his ass with the constitution, Brown figures the Republicans have no standing to make a big deal out of it.


In other news, our PRESIDENT has the approval of 34% of his constituents and disapproval of 57%.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...ac-poll-239250

[BCR]

Comey’s statement lays out a case against the president that consists of a tidy pattern, beginning with the demand for loyalty, the threat to terminate Comey’s job, the repeated requests to turn off the investigation into Flynn and the final infliction of career punishment for failing to succumb to the president’s requests, all followed by the president’s own concession about his motive. Any experienced prosecutor would see these facts as establishing a prima facie case of obstruction of justice.

Exactly.

But the last two paragraphs kind of matter, right? Obviously I agree with you that he's the American head of the Putin cartel, but criminals less than presidents slip the noose. I'm not arguing with a law school grad(I'm pretty sure I recall you went the JD route), but those last two paragraphs seem to imply getting to that proving it stage is far from a slam dunk

But whether a sitting president may be indicted while in office is an open question. I advised the Watergate special prosecutors (and argued to the Supreme Court in the Nixon tapes case) that the president enjoys no unique immunity from obeying criminal laws. Other Justice Department officials, however, have taken a contrary position.

The ball now is in Mueller’s court to decide whether he has (or will have) enough evidence to charge Trump with obstruction and, if so, whether to reach the same conclusion that I reached in the Nixon investigation — that, like everyone else in our system, a president is accountable for committing a federal crime.


Shit is so partisan now that all these Watergate guys I've seen the past few weeks remind me of Vincent Bugliosi during the OJ trial. He'd come on every night talking about how bad the prosecutors were, and how it was an easy slam dunk if he was trying the case, as if convicting a clown with a swastika on his head to an all white jury was an apples to apples comparison. I always thought, run your game past half of Compton Vince and get a guilty verdict against a black guy and then I'll listen. Politics feels that fixed. That trial was lost when venue was changed and the jury was seated. Getting Trump to trial may have been lost when he carried both seats of power on election night.

[vegas1369]

Psst Vegas. To get impeachment you need a majority of the House to vote for Impeachment (never happening with Republicans). In the Senate you need 67 Senators to convict (never happening).

I get the fact you are shitting bricks because you think Sessions is going to nuke your pot farm, but don't intentionally ignore reality. Then you just become an every day troll like HongMonger and laughed at.

Try to stay up on current events.

Hey dummy... Show me in my post where I said he's getting impeached. I didn't. I know he's not getting impeached. Scumbag Republican politicians would never choose country over party. That would mean they understood what patriotism is, which we all know ain't the case.

[hongkonger]

Exactly.

But the last two paragraphs kind of matter, right? Obviously I agree with you that he's the American head of the Putin cartel, but criminals less than presidents slip the noose. I'm not arguing with a law school grad(I'm pretty sure I recall you went the JD route), but those last two paragraphs seem to imply getting to that proving it stage is far from a slam dunk

But whether a sitting president may be indicted while in office is an open question. I advised the Watergate special prosecutors (and argued to the Supreme Court in the Nixon tapes case) that the president enjoys no unique immunity from obeying criminal laws. Other Justice Department officials, however, have taken a contrary position.

The ball now is in Mueller’s court to decide whether he has (or will have) enough evidence to charge Trump with obstruction and, if so, whether to reach the same conclusion that I reached in the Nixon investigation — that, like everyone else in our system, a president is accountable for committing a federal crime.


Shit is so partisan now that all these Watergate guys I've seen the past few weeks remind me of Vincent Bugliosi during the OJ trial. He'd come on every night talking about how bad the prosecutors were, and how it was an easy slam dunk if he was trying the case, as if convicting a clown with a swastika on his head to an all white jury was an apples to apples comparison. I always thought, run your game past half of Compton Vince and get a guilty verdict against a black guy and then I'll listen. Politics feels that fixed. That trial was lost when venue was changed and the jury was seated. Getting Trump to trial may have been lost when he carried both seats of power on election night.

That's true, I doubt he is even impeached let alone convicted. But he should be.

As to whether he can be criminally indicted while in office, outside of the impeachment process, is an open question as the article says. But in my opinion a president can be criminally indicted, and he should be. The president should not be able to commit crimes and be beyond the reach of the law.

[limitles]

Comey‘s testimoniy will likely just fan the flames as it's really just step one in allowing the electorate to have their suspicions about Trump confirmed or denied and it will be interesting to see if anything can shut that gaping maw of his for 10 minutes. If somehow it is found no intentional wheeling and dealing, profiteering or coverups have occured then you're left with the most incompetent Presidency ever.

"GET HIM OUT"

[hongkonger]

[sonatine]

Eventually Trump is going to ramble on at some dinner about odious he finds the blacks and someones going to tape it and that will be that.

All this shit is just background noise, its going to be his own mouth that does him in.

[hongkonger]

Eventually Trump is going to ramble on at some dinner about odious he finds the blacks and someones going to tape it and that will be that.

All this shit is just background noise, its going to be his own mouth that does him in.

If his talk about grabbing women by the pussy didn't do him in, him saying something about blacks won't do it either.

He could be recorded chuckling with other billionaires about what rubes Americans are that they elected him to rob them blind, and retards like Tyde and Bottomfag and sidedish would still be on here saying all he does is win.

[tyde]

Eventually Trump is going to ramble on at some dinner about odious he finds the blacks and someones going to tape it and that will be that.

All this shit is just background noise, its going to be his own mouth that does him in.

If his talk about grabbing women by the pussy didn't do him in, him saying something about blacks won't do it either.

He could be recorded chuckling with other billionaires about what rubes Americans are that they elected him to rob them blind, and retards like Tyde and Bottomfag and sidedish would still be on here saying all he does is win.

you're such a TILTED pussy liberal bitch

[sonatine]

Team Trump's talking points to undermine Comey's credibility have already been leaked:


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...ility-47882327

[tyde]

Team Trump's talking points to undermine Comey's credibility have already been leaked:


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...ility-47882327

Comey has done more than a sufficient job undermining his own credibility


Trump will come out smelling like a rose tomorrow


AGAIN

[limitles]

This a normal day in the States, shit goes on that would make you wanna curl, but the big fish are in the barrel and it should be good tv, which is all that really matters. This video plays today and tomorrow and is also normal in the U.S. because the money/power/fame game has taken top spot for some time and the result is a Kelly Ann Conway getting paid well to stare right at the camera and manage to get through it.

They even have a Hitler inference.

[LarryLaffer]

Team Trump's talking points to undermine Comey's credibility have already been leaked:


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...ility-47882327

Comey has done more than a sufficient job undermining his own credibility


Trump will come out smelling like a rose tomorrow


AGAIN

do roses to you smell like shit?

[tony bagadonuts]

I'll wait until after Comey's testimony to spike the football, but it seems increasingly likely that there is going to be no "smoking gun" and a lot of people on the left are going to be upset. The only hope for libs is that Comey is saving some good stuff for the Q&A.

Trump is corrupt, compromised, inattentive, impulsive, ignorant, narcissistic and prone to tantrums. This was all apparent before anyone knew anything about Russia. Smoking gun or no smoking gun is not the issue. Demanding personal loyalty from law enforcement officials is the opposite of the "nation of laws, not of men" that the founders designed. He's not fit to be president of a boy scout troop.