Right but the fact that it's even that close in AZ and GA just proves what a shitty candidate Trump is
Right but the fact that it's even that close in AZ and GA just proves what a shitty candidate Trump is
Obama was -190 or so on this date 2012.
She is -380
He's fucked latinos early voting is up 100%+
Predictit still alive and well
I have like $2500 on there at the moment
Fees suck balls though
Trump is in for a rude awakening if he thinks financial professionals all along the east coast are voting for him. He's going to get his shit pushed in.
This thread has now entered the coffee talk stage making it even more awful.
I'd be stocking up on canned goods and getting all the ammunition and fuel possible not to mention the best Mad Max ride available
Typical Persian who thinks he knows everything. Start saving up for the $200,000 weddings and hairy wife. The only thing worse than an Armenian scumbag in Los Angeles is a fucking Persian. I have fucked a few Persian women and they sure do love to suck cock but why do they insist to get fucked in the ass? To preserve their virginity ?
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...no-longer-over
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...r-clinton.html
I have to go with Charlie Cook. Basically, he says that Clinton is the favorite in any state that is polling within the margin of error because of the mighty Democratic ground game. The Republicans are possibly better at this than they were four years ago, but that's not saying much. This is pretty much what happened to Romney, though I like Trump in Iowa and maybe Ohio, but that's it for real battleground states (Arizona and Georgia are about two presidential cycles away from real battleground status). It's interesting that there is one American Indian Democratic elector in Washington state who will not vote for Clinton, but probably not decisive.
It wasn't russia who did the leaks, should be common knowledge by now. Assange even had to go out of his way and finally say it wasnt cuz it was such stupid political propaganda by the Democrats. EVERY country hacked us cuz hillary is an incompetent boob, but couldve easily been a 400 lber sitting in his bed as well who actually turned in the leaks.
FFS, Druff! The FBI does NOT have the authority to charge people with crimes. It is like a national police force, not a prosecutor's office.
http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2...ts-prosecuted/
But the public may not always understand that the FBI does not have the job of deciding who should, or should not, be prosecuted for crime. It was created to do investigations – period. When it finishes one of its probes, it can and usually does make recommendations, but someone else has the job of deciding what to do with the results of those investigations – an actual prosecutor.
Back to -400 because people still think Russia did not do the leaks and literally cant distinguish fact from fiction.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Last edited by JohnCommode; 11-06-2016 at 12:44 AM.
New Hampshire Republicans are moderate Eisenhower type Republicans and are comfortable with women in power--their incumbent Repiblican senator and her Democratic challenger are both women. Although its demographics aren't typical Clinton demographics, New Englanders are also not Trump people. No way Trump wins NH.
I think this election is a different situation for two reasons:
1) NH leads the nation in percentage of "independent" voters, and many of these people consider themselves independent because they hate establishment politics. This clearly favors Trump.
2) There is plenty of bitterness there over the Bernie Sanders situation, and the e-mails have stoked that bitterness once again.
For those who care, here are the % chances for Trump to win in the various battleground states, according to the betting on PredictIt:
NH: 39%
AZ: 75%
WI: 17%
MI: 22%
IA: 79%
OH: 70%
FL: 37%
PA: 23%
NV: 23%
CO: 23%
GA: 84%
NC: 42%
So these people aren't very bullish on Trump's overall chances.
After further looking into Nevada, I agree he is probably screwed there: http://www.ktnv.com/news/ralston/the...ly-voting-blog
I think there may be some value going with Trump in NH and perhaps NC.
There may be some additional value for Clinton in AZ, given what seems to be happening in NV, though I still don't think she's winning there.
Also might be some Hillary value in Iowa, given that one poll did show her ahead there.
There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 22 guests)