Time to get on the TRUMP train

[rum dick]

Biff gets his news from cliven bundy's facebook page, stormfront and rural west virginia topix boards. And anyone who thinks the above aren't fair and balanced or gets his news from different sources is a total libtard.

Also, there is a 93% chance biff jerked off while reading the Starr Report.

[4Dragons]

Guccifer 2.0 strikes again. Releases emails / phone numbers of Congressmen, god knows what else: http://thesmokinggun.com/buster/demo...cc-hack-645891

“Guccifer 2.0” also invited reporters to contact him via Twitter direct message: “Dear journalists, you may send me a DM if you’re interested in exclusive materials from the DCCC, which I have plenty of.”

[Mintjewlips]

Guccifer 2.0 strikes again. Releases emails / phone numbers of Congressmen, god knows what else: http://thesmokinggun.com/buster/demo...cc-hack-645891

“Guccifer 2.0” also invited reporters to contact him via Twitter direct message: “Dear journalists, you may send me a DM if you’re interested in exclusive materials from the DCCC, which I have plenty of.”

[blake]

Trump's latest rant in PA:

The only way we can lose, in my opinion — I really mean this, Pennsylvania is if cheating goes on and we have to call up law enforcement and we have to have the sheriffs and the police chiefs and everyone watching because if we get cheated out of this election, if we get cheated out of a win in Pennsylvania, which is such a vital state especially when I know what is happening here... She can’t beat what’s happening here. The only way they can beat it in my opinion, and I mean this 100 percent, if in certain sections of the state they cheat.

yeah, the only conceivable way he can lose a state that's voted democratic the past 6 elections and has him down by nearly 10 in the polls is by cheating. also, i wonder what parts of the state is he talking about? what a fucking clown.

if you bunch of michael angelos don't realize how bad this is for our entire system of government, there is just no hope for you

[Corrigan]

It's to the point where it will take a right wing authortarian to dismantle the shit show that is US foreign policy. Since i've already said Obama may be the last US President a few times, we may be picking a ruler for life. That being the case, I want the one that believes in a hand up, not a hand out.

I will bet you any amount of money that the person elected PotUS this November will serve a maximum of two full terms, and some other person will take the office on or before Jan 20, 2025. ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY. Ready to put your Fox News wacky conspiracy theory money where your mouth is?

[hongkonger]

I will bet you any amount of money that the person elected PotUS this November will serve a maximum of two full terms, and some other person will take the office on or before Jan 20, 2025. ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY. Ready to put your Fox News wacky conspiracy theory money where your mouth is?

Whenever someone calls him out on his kooky bullshit he either runs away like a bitch or he claims we didn't understand what he was saying.

[thesidedish]

:TRAIN

[thesidedish]

1:33 IS GOD

[Dan Druff]

As a Republican, I don't find that it's enough to only get news from the sources you listed.

They are often slanted toward the left, or more commonly, simply avoid stories which make the left look bad (unless they are too big to ignore).

I will admit that much of the "news" from right wing sites is crap. In fact, sometimes I get frustrated reading these sites, as it is clear they are purposely slanting the story so much to their own side that it's impossible to get a grip on the reality of the situation, even if a neutral reporting of the story would still favor the right.

Of course, the same happens from left wing sites. For example, I just ran into a laughable HuffPo article which takes Republicans to task for "falsely" claiming crime is on the rise. Knowing that violent crime IS indeed on the rise, I was wondering how this article was going to "prove" its point. The article cited data that "violent crime has decreased in the past decade".

I laughed.

The past decade? Talk about a manipulation of statistics. In reality, crime was decreasing for the first 7 years of the past decade (as it was for the past 16 years before that), but has gone sharply UP in the past 3 years. So overall the crime rate in 2016 might be lower than what we saw in 2006, but it's way higher than 2013, which is much more important. The HuffPo used "the past decade" as its analyzed timespan to cover this fact up, and attempted to make Republicans look like lying snakes despite their TRUE claim about rising violent crime. Terrible.

Bottom line is that, regardless of your political affiliation, you need to read news from left, center, AND right wing sources, and then make up your mind.

I really find it difficult to take what you say seriously anymore after learning you are voting for Trump.

I'm not voting for Trump. I don't know where you "learned" that.

I'm also not voting for Hillary.

[Dan Druff]

Seriously though, the NY Times is known to lean very much left, and I'm surprised that some people here are questioning that.

I thought even liberals acknowledged this.

[LarryLaffer]

I really find it difficult to take what you say seriously anymore after learning you are voting for Trump.

I'm not voting for Trump. I don't know where you "learned" that.

I'm also not voting for Hillary.

well, you did say it on the radio a few months back, that'd you'd vote for Trump in a "lessor of two evil scenario" I posted a link to it (with a time stamp).

but that's none of my business.

you do acknowledge saying that right?

edit: you don't have to bc you actually said it.

[LarryLaffer]

maybe he learned it here.

there's a radio show in the 'chives with Brandon, and China as guest hosts, it was before Trump got the GOP nomination. Brandon asks the question "if you had to vote for the lessor of 2 evils, who would it be?" and druff replied that he'd vote for Trump.


it was playing last night when i caught it.


So after hearing that, it's safe to say Druff will be "silently" voting for Donald Trump in november.

his reason?

"Hillary has been involved with scandals going back 20 years"

edit:
easy find: http://pokerfraudalert.com/radio/rad...3-19-30-00.mp3

at the 5 hour and 16 minute mark, you have it. Brandon asks, Druff delivers.

[4Dragons]

I will bet you any amount of money that the person elected PotUS this November will serve a maximum of two full terms, and some other person will take the office on or before Jan 20, 2025. ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY. Ready to put your Fox News wacky conspiracy theory money where your mouth is?

It's preposterous. PFA won't exist in even 2 years, much less 4, 8 or 16, and escrowing something.. anything for that amount of time is bat shit crazy, just like the flaming tire necktie commie that proposed it.

I mean I get it, you all hate the United States, the Constitution and what getting back to limited government would mean to your livelihoods. Sorry, not sorry.

[blake]

It's preposterous. PFA won't exist in even 2 years, much less 4, 8 or 16, and escrowing something.. anything for that amount of time is bat shit crazy, just like the flaming tire necktie commie that proposed it.

I mean I get it, you all hate the United States, the Constitution and what getting back to limited government would mean to your livelihoods. Sorry, not sorry.

what's not preposterous though is your belief that the next president will become dictator.



and rofl at trump being the limited government candidate. real conservatives understand that a trump win would do far more damage to the conservative movement and republican party than a trump loss

[ToasterOven]

It's preposterous. PFA won't exist in even 2 years, much less 4, 8 or 16, and escrowing something.. anything for that amount of time is bat shit crazy, just like the flaming tire necktie commie that proposed it.

I mean I get it, you all hate the United States, the Constitution and what getting back to limited government would mean to your livelihoods. Sorry, not sorry.

All I feel now is sadness.

[ToasterOven]

Seriously though, the NY Times is known to lean very much left, and I'm surprised that some people here are questioning that.

I thought even liberals acknowledged this.

This is the problem. "Lean very much to the left" is nonsense. Does that equal Fox, which "leans very much to the right"? Or Breitbart? Or Glenn Beck? Or Rush?

News outlets like NYT or the Post, or even the networks have an interest in getting things correct and accurate. From Fox news and everything right of that, there is no interest in fact, or any kind of penalty when they are wrong.

I thought everyone understood that. Sad!

[BiffCo99]

Seriously though, the NY Times is known to lean very much left, and I'm surprised that some people here are questioning that.

I thought even liberals acknowledged this.

This is the problem. "Lean very much to the left" is nonsense. Does that equal Fox, which "leans very much to the right"? Or Breitbart? Or Glenn Beck? Or Rush?

News outlets like NYT or the Post, or even the networks have an interest in getting things correct and accurate. From Fox news and everything right of that, there is no interest in fact, or any kind of penalty when they are wrong.

I thought everyone understood that. Sad!

Man, you have serious problems. This explains a lot. Let me explain something to you: Everything you read and consume is skewed. That's how human beings operate. When the New York Times hires editors and writers who all come from liberal universities, you don't think that will show up in its content?

You take all this shit at face value beacuse it falls in line with your beliefs. Well guess what, not everyone shares your beliefs. That's why America was founded, to be a place where people were free to have different opinions. The left in its current state is against people having different opinions. It's a think this way or else mentality.

If you don't share my opinion you will be ostracized. That is how the left today thinks. There is no room for discussion, and that is what's scary.

Fuck, you can't even acknowledge that the New York Times leans very left. That is insanity.

People like you sit and wonder how could Donald Trump get this far in this race, how could it be? Guess what, YOU CREATED DONALD TRUMP.

[ToasterOven]

Maybe Trump isn't as delusional as we thought. He's starting to protect his home media market over pretending he can win....

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...g-there-226959

[ToasterOven]

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-spo...ided-to-go-in/


This is a spokesperson for a major party candidate.

But, how can we blame her? She gets her news from the same places as Mint, Saddish, 4d, Biff, Gordo, Natural Born Retard etc. This is what these people have been taught.

I have empathy, but I'm frightened by how easily they are manipulated.

[hongkonger]

It's preposterous. PFA won't exist in even 2 years, much less 4, 8 or 16, and escrowing something.. anything for that amount of time is bat shit crazy, just like the flaming tire necktie commie that proposed it.

I mean I get it, you all hate the United States, the Constitution and what getting back to limited government would mean to your livelihoods. Sorry, not sorry.

what's not preposterous though is your belief that the next president will become dictator.



and rofl at trump being the limited government candidate. real conservatives understand that a trump win would do far more damage to the conservative movement and republican party than a trump loss

Getting favors, tax breaks, etc from the government is an important part of Trump's business model, as it is with many Republican freeloaders.