Time to get on the TRUMP train

[TheXFactor]

A woman with a frozen face and a man with an orange face

[Daly]

trump just fired sessions

And what are the odds that he will be replaced by another racist white guy?

Trick question. All white guys are racist.

[Avon Barksdale]

sessions just got fired

How hard is vegas's dick right now?

[OSA]

sessions just got fired

How hard is vegas's dick right now?

Time to double down on the ETF.

[big dick]

adios Sessions you little faggot

[MumblesBadly]

Worth it just for the clips of Trump at his press conference yesterday.

[thesparten]

adios Sessions you little faggot

Your finally getting it..

Extra dick for you when u get home tonight, I'm finishing off your fat toothless wife now but your next(don't worry).

[limitles]

Worth it just for the clips of Trump at his press conference yesterday.

It's a beautiful thing. I didn't listen to anyone recapping the election but now I realize the importance of taking the House i.e. the
Mueller investigation and obstruction of justice (Tony). Nice to hear the popular vote counted for something

I'm going to have to watch a bit of that press conference to watch more unhinging.

Trump is a psychopath by definition....at least in the U.K.
The twenty traits on the Hare Psychopathy checklist are, (scored 0-2)

pathological lying 2
glib and superficial charm 2
grandiose sense of self 2
need for stimulation 2
cunning and manipulative 2
lack of remorse or guilt 2
shallow emotional response 2
callousness and lack of empathy 2
parasitic lifestyle 0
poor behavioural controls 2
sexual promiscuity 2
early behaviour problems 1
lack of realistic long-term goals 0
impulsivity 2
irresponsibility 2
failure to accept responsibility 0
many short-term marital relationships 1
juvenile delinquency 0
revocation of conditional release 0
criminal versatility 0

A score of 25 get's you a psychopath label in the U.K.
It's 30 in the U.S.A. but you get the picture.
Not exactly fit for office, any office.

[MumblesBadly]

adios Sessions you little faggot

[devidee]

The God King gonna get another pick...

[tony bagadonuts]

Trump is a psychopath by definition....at least in the U.K.
The twenty traits on the Hare Psychopathy checklist are, (scored 0-2)

pathological lying 2
glib and superficial charm 2
grandiose sense of self 2
need for stimulation 2
cunning and manipulative 2
lack of remorse or guilt 2
shallow emotional response 2
callousness and lack of empathy 2
parasitic lifestyle 0
poor behavioural controls 2
sexual promiscuity 2
early behaviour problems 1
lack of realistic long-term goals 0
impulsivity 2
irresponsibility 2
failure to accept responsibility 0
many short-term marital relationships 1
juvenile delinquency 0
revocation of conditional release 0
criminal versatility 0

A score of 25 get's you a psychopath label in the U.K.
It's 30 in the U.S.A. but you get the picture.
Not exactly fit for office, any office.

Did you answer these for Trump or yourself Les? I'd give you points for failure to accept responsibility, maybe parasitic life style and possibly lack of realistic long term goals.

[limitles]

Trump is a psychopath by definition....at least in the U.K.
The twenty traits on the Hare Psychopathy checklist are, (scored 0-2)

pathological lying 2
glib and superficial charm 2
grandiose sense of self 2
need for stimulation 2
cunning and manipulative 2
lack of remorse or guilt 2
shallow emotional response 2
callousness and lack of empathy 2
parasitic lifestyle 0
poor behavioural controls 2
sexual promiscuity 2
early behaviour problems 1
lack of realistic long-term goals 0
impulsivity 2
irresponsibility 2
failure to accept responsibility 0
many short-term marital relationships 1
juvenile delinquency 0
revocation of conditional release 0
criminal versatility 0

A score of 25 get's you a psychopath label in the U.K.
It's 30 in the U.S.A. but you get the picture.
Not exactly fit for office, any office.

Did you answer these for Trump or yourself Les? I'd give you points for failure to accept responsibility, maybe parasitic life style and possibly lack of realistic long term goals.

Oh Tony, not again? You choose to deflect and ignore. That's on another list but hey you're doing ok so fuck everyone and everything else.
Amirite? Yes I'm right. So are you.... just the wrong kind of right. ha ha

[thesparten]

adios Sessions you little faggot

Your finally getting it..

Extra dick for you when u get home tonight, I'm finishing off your fat toothless wife now but your next(don't worry).

By the way, I'm concerned about that whale (your wife)..

She has too eat real food!!!, She is too preoccupied in only ingesting my end product of real food..

Please do something...

[ErickAA]

Worth it just for the clips of Trump at his press conference yesterday.

It's a beautiful thing. I didn't listen to anyone recapping the election but now I realize the importance of taking the House i.e. the
Mueller investigation and obstruction of justice (Tony). Nice to hear the popular vote counted for something

I'm going to have to watch a bit of that press conference to watch more unhinging.

Trump is a psychopath by definition....at least in the U.K.
The twenty traits on the Hare Psychopathy checklist are, (scored 0-2)

pathological lying 2
glib and superficial charm 2
grandiose sense of self 2
need for stimulation 2
cunning and manipulative 2
lack of remorse or guilt 2
shallow emotional response 2
callousness and lack of empathy 2
parasitic lifestyle 0
poor behavioural controls 2
sexual promiscuity 2
early behaviour problems 1
lack of realistic long-term goals 0
impulsivity 2
irresponsibility 2
failure to accept responsibility 0
many short-term marital relationships 1
juvenile delinquency 0
revocation of conditional release 0
criminal versatility 0

A score of 25 get's you a psychopath label in the U.K.
It's 30 in the U.S.A. but you get the picture.
Not exactly fit for office, any office.

Honestly, I think you are being generous if we are talking about Trump. You have some zeros I think should definitely be 1's at the least. I don't think there is any denying he is some kind of sociopath, although I don't know what exact psychological category he would fall under. That being said, given he is a sociopath, I think the way everyone (mainly the Democrats and the MSM) is handling things is very poor and making things worse than they need to be.

[sonatine]

It's a beautiful thing. I didn't listen to anyone recapping the election but now I realize the importance of taking the House i.e. the
Mueller investigation and obstruction of justice (Tony). Nice to hear the popular vote counted for something

I'm going to have to watch a bit of that press conference to watch more unhinging.

Trump is a psychopath by definition....at least in the U.K.
The twenty traits on the Hare Psychopathy checklist are, (scored 0-2)

pathological lying 2
glib and superficial charm 2
grandiose sense of self 2
need for stimulation 2
cunning and manipulative 2
lack of remorse or guilt 2
shallow emotional response 2
callousness and lack of empathy 2
parasitic lifestyle 0
poor behavioural controls 2
sexual promiscuity 2
early behaviour problems 1
lack of realistic long-term goals 0
impulsivity 2
irresponsibility 2
failure to accept responsibility 0
many short-term marital relationships 1
juvenile delinquency 0
revocation of conditional release 0
criminal versatility 0

A score of 25 get's you a psychopath label in the U.K.
It's 30 in the U.S.A. but you get the picture.
Not exactly fit for office, any office.

Honestly, I think you are being generous if we are talking about Trump. You have some zeros I think should definitely be 1's at the least. I don't think there is any denying he is some kind of sociopath, although I don't know what exact psychological category he would fall under. That being said, given he is a sociopath, I think the way everyone (mainly the Democrats and the MSM) is handling things is very poor and making things worse than they need to be.

i wonder if his behavior is more psychopathic than sociopathic...

in addition to everything thats been pointed out, he's basically triangulating half of america against the other half. the fact that he clearly believes anything thats told to him by figures he perceives as authoritative complicates any sort of straight forward diagnosis tremendously.

[devidee]

Scribbles in journal...

Remember to order plenty of ovens for Australia.

[Lord of the Fraud]

UK's BBC news presenter Emily Maitlis on the Acosta/Trump clash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/46147166?...alflow_twitter

We were on our way to the White Press press conference yesterday morning - when we got redirected. Disappointed at the time, I am now relieved we were.

There is only one memorable moment from that press conference - and that was a one minute 20 seconds fight between the president and the CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta. No other question really got a look in.

I watched the whole thing live, of course. It unsettled me.

And here's why: when you look at the clips that have been running today, and the responses on social media, Jim Acosta emerges as the hero of the hour. The Man Who Stood Up To Trump. The Fighter for all our press freedom.

I don't know Jim. He seems like a good guy. But I feel the episode needs context which is sorely lacking.

Jim Acosta was called on by the president to ask a question.

I'll say that again. He was called on by Donald Trump to ask whatever question he liked. And when he'd finished asking one, he then asked another - with interruption follow-ups in between.

It was only when he attempted his third question - or possibly fourth depending on how you define the follow-ups - that the president got angry and asked him to sit down.

There ensued a tussle with the mic. And weirdly ridiculous words from the president about him being a rude and terrible person.

I'm pretty sure Acosta never intended to "mistouch" the young female intern. He was just trying to hold on to the mic.


My point is this - the scene was an incredible bit of theatre. We couldn't take our eyes off it. It just went on and on.

You could argue the president came looking for it - he does well, electorally, when he's berating the press.

But make no mistake. The media also does well when they are baiting the bear. The urge to poke can sometimes seem irresistible.

So let's take a step back. What happened in that room was not the ultimate fight for press freedom. This wasn't someone risking life and limb against a regime where freedom of speech is forbidden. This was a bloke sitting in a room full of colleagues who were all trying to ask questions too.

This was a man who'd had his turn and had been told he couldn't hog the whole time.

I've been in high-pressure press conferences. And the art is to ask the single most succinct question that will land you the best possible response.

The achievement is not meant to be one of endurance.

There are plenty of things to berate in the behaviour, language or ethics of Donald Trump. But this moment was not one of them. Pull him up for his lies, yes. But not for wanting to widen the conversation.

The president took CNN's question and then took more. And when he tried to move on, he couldn't. Once the Acosta incident was over, he went on to take questions from journalists from all over the world - for a total of 90 minutes.


What worries me is the wider question of how Trump and the media interact.

When you watch the US morning shows - and evening shows come to that - what you notice is how things have changed.

Even those who were not originally taking sides are now nailing their colours to the mast. Fox and MSNBC have always played to their own bases. But now CNN, too, has editorialised its evening slot with Chris Cuomo - who gives us an essay, a comment piece, on whatever is getting him fired up.

It's a good watch actually. And makes you engaged.

But make no mistake - it's the same game that Trump is playing. The one they pretend to despise. If DJT can rally his base - then - goes the logic - why shouldn't TV do it too.

It works for viewing figures in the same way it works for electoral success. It works, in other words, for those who like their chambers echoed - but it's an odd place for news to sit.

So yes, those in the media - the enemy of the people - know how the president likes to portray them. We know he picks fights with individuals. We know he may even revoke a White House press pass (that won't last - mark my words).

But we also know this: Never in the history of America has a president so loved the media and the air time we devote to him.

And never in the history of America has the media got so much entertainment from one president.

She nails it for me.

I watched it live and, despite my deep hatred for Trump, it was Asosta who was out of line here. Trump should've had the Secret Service throw him out the door.

She's also spot on about CNN. They are a joke.

We all want Trump gone, by any means necessary, but their 24/7 bashing hasn't worked... 18 months ago I said what Emily is saying now. That CNN's all out attack will prove counter productive, and it has.

They have a big roll to play for the 2020 election and they need a massive rethink on their approach to get him out. But they won't, cuz ratings.

[limitles]

UK's BBC news presenter Emily Maitlis on the Acosta/Trump clash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/46147166?...alflow_twitter

We were on our way to the White Press press conference yesterday morning - when we got redirected. Disappointed at the time, I am now relieved we were.

There is only one memorable moment from that press conference - and that was a one minute 20 seconds fight between the president and the CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta. No other question really got a look in.

I watched the whole thing live, of course. It unsettled me.

And here's why: when you look at the clips that have been running today, and the responses on social media, Jim Acosta emerges as the hero of the hour. The Man Who Stood Up To Trump. The Fighter for all our press freedom.

I don't know Jim. He seems like a good guy. But I feel the episode needs context which is sorely lacking.

Jim Acosta was called on by the president to ask a question.

I'll say that again. He was called on by Donald Trump to ask whatever question he liked. And when he'd finished asking one, he then asked another - with interruption follow-ups in between.

It was only when he attempted his third question - or possibly fourth depending on how you define the follow-ups - that the president got angry and asked him to sit down.

There ensued a tussle with the mic. And weirdly ridiculous words from the president about him being a rude and terrible person.

I'm pretty sure Acosta never intended to "mistouch" the young female intern. He was just trying to hold on to the mic.


My point is this - the scene was an incredible bit of theatre. We couldn't take our eyes off it. It just went on and on.

You could argue the president came looking for it - he does well, electorally, when he's berating the press.

But make no mistake. The media also does well when they are baiting the bear. The urge to poke can sometimes seem irresistible.

So let's take a step back. What happened in that room was not the ultimate fight for press freedom. This wasn't someone risking life and limb against a regime where freedom of speech is forbidden. This was a bloke sitting in a room full of colleagues who were all trying to ask questions too.

This was a man who'd had his turn and had been told he couldn't hog the whole time.

I've been in high-pressure press conferences. And the art is to ask the single most succinct question that will land you the best possible response.

The achievement is not meant to be one of endurance.

There are plenty of things to berate in the behaviour, language or ethics of Donald Trump. But this moment was not one of them. Pull him up for his lies, yes. But not for wanting to widen the conversation.

The president took CNN's question and then took more. And when he tried to move on, he couldn't. Once the Acosta incident was over, he went on to take questions from journalists from all over the world - for a total of 90 minutes.


What worries me is the wider question of how Trump and the media interact.

When you watch the US morning shows - and evening shows come to that - what you notice is how things have changed.

Even those who were not originally taking sides are now nailing their colours to the mast. Fox and MSNBC have always played to their own bases. But now CNN, too, has editorialised its evening slot with Chris Cuomo - who gives us an essay, a comment piece, on whatever is getting him fired up.

It's a good watch actually. And makes you engaged.

But make no mistake - it's the same game that Trump is playing. The one they pretend to despise. If DJT can rally his base - then - goes the logic - why shouldn't TV do it too.

It works for viewing figures in the same way it works for electoral success. It works, in other words, for those who like their chambers echoed - but it's an odd place for news to sit.

So yes, those in the media - the enemy of the people - know how the president likes to portray them. We know he picks fights with individuals. We know he may even revoke a White House press pass (that won't last - mark my words).

But we also know this: Never in the history of America has a president so loved the media and the air time we devote to him.

And never in the history of America has the media got so much entertainment from one president.

She nails it for me.

I watched it live and, despite my deep hatred for Trump, it was Asosta who was out of line here. Trump should've had the Secret Service throw him out the door.

She's also spot on about CNN. They are a joke.

We all want Trump gone, by any means necessary, but their 24/7 bashing hasn't worked... 18 months ago I said what Emily is saying now. That CNN's all out attack will prove counter productive, and it has.

They have a big roll to play for the 2020 election and they need a massive rethink on their approach to get him out. But they won't, cuz ratings.

I haven't watched the pc but I know this is straight up journalism. If you watch the CBC, trusted by an entire country I'd say, you would never see the type of editorializing that goes on in the U.S.

Then again you'd never see a prime minister disrespect the press like Trump has tried to do with the American media.
So it's a war out there and Trump is simply, no pun intended, outnumbered.

What Trump fails to realize is that the press now includes critics in the field of entertainment. Everyone is laughing and he will continue to spin out of control.

Trump avoids live press conferences like the plague. Live press conferences expose him for what he is a liar and an ignoramus. Remember his speech in front of the U.N. when he got laughs?

[Mintjewlips]

sessions just got fired

How hard is vegas's dick right now?

The irony in all this is, over the past 30 plus years, the Democrats have been the party to push regulations, now with a Democratic majority in the Congress plus a Republican Senate majority, plus a president that doesn't care for pot, expect to see a lot of "bipartisan" support on the regulation of marijuana........which only means the corporatization of marijuana....

[MumblesBadly]

This is what Acosta was trying to jab at Trump’s psyche about:

Donald Trump Jr. told friends he fears his indictment is imminent: report
https://www.salon.com/2018/11/08/don...ut-it_partner/