Thread: Time to get on the TRUMP train

  1. #32181
    Bronze RS_'s Avatar
    Reputation
    28
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    266
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post
    Let's be honest. Anything to do with Trump and the Republicans should be blocked. It's a party that won an election with fewer votes than it's opposition. From what I can recall the Republicans successfully blocked a Democrat nominee to the Supreme court and now they're pushing their nominee before mid term elections. They don't care about due process.
    It's a sham of a political system.
    If I'm not mistaken, Trump won by 77 votes.

    Edit: Go back to your bottle and keep drinking. The more sloshed you get, the more interesting your posts are. tyvm

  2. #32182
    Gold abrown83's Avatar
    Reputation
    430
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,972
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by MumblesBadly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by abrown83 View Post

    Mumbles you do realize at this point that all the accusers are all lying right?

    Facts have a funny way of getting in the way of hysteria.

    The two besides Ford are totally not even worth talking about (even the Senate wouldn't give them the time of day) and one is already being investigated for false claims and will probably be prosecuted.

    Ford I think at this point there's a 95% chance that she made up the story. I can list all the reasons if you want but a simple Google search shows that basically her story doesn't really hold up to being credible.

    I don't really like the guy cause of his take on the 4th Amendment but this was never about his competency as a judge.
    Re Ford: List away.
    She said the incident occurred in the mid 1980s to the WaPO, but then when it was obviously pointed out that Kavanaugh would have been in college a couple weeks later she changed it to the early 1980s, then during her polygraph they crossed out early from the question and just asked her 1980s because presumably she didn't pass early 1980s. Then she told her therapist that it happened in her late teens (which would have been the mid 1980s), but then years later she changed her age to 15.

    She doesn't know where the party happened

    She doesn't know when it happened

    She doesn't know how she got home. She could describe getting to the party, locking herself in a bathroom, screaming but can't remember how she got home or when it happened or where it happened???

    All three eyewitnesses, even a close personal friend to Ford (to this day), specifically say they don't recall this event. Her friend not only said she doesn't remember the event, but she went further and said that she has never met Kavanaugh and was never at a party with him.

    She has changed her story about what happened after the alleged assault. That she heard the guys talking and laughing downstairs to she couldn't hear anything in the bathroom.

    She refused to show her Therapy Notes to the Senate presumably because they won't back her ever changing story.

  3. #32183
    Gold abrown83's Avatar
    Reputation
    430
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,972
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by abrown83 View Post

    Mumbles you do realize at this point that all the accusers are all lying right?

    Facts have a funny way of getting in the way of hysteria.

    The two besides Ford are totally not even worth talking about (even the Senate wouldn't give them the time of day) and one is already being investigated for false claims and will probably be prosecuted.

    Ford I think at this point there's a 95% chance that she made up the story. I can list all the reasons if you want but a simple Google search shows that basically her story doesn't really hold up to being credible.

    I don't really like the guy cause of his take on the 4th Amendment but this was never about his competency as a judge.
    Let's be honest. Anything to do with Trump and the Republicans should be blocked. It's a party that won an election with fewer votes than it's opposition. From what I can recall the Republicans successfully blocked a Democrat nominee to the Supreme court and now they're pushing their nominee before mid term elections. They don't care about due process.
    It's a sham of a political system.
    I mean at least I can respect this take instead of the fake Kavanaugh outrage.

    You are totally wrong, on just about every count. Yes Trump won with fewer votes, but did all those House of Reps and Senators win with fewer votes? Did the Republicans gain control of all parts of government with fewer votes?

    Republicans blocked Democrats nominee because they controlled 1/3rd of the government and they were within their rights. Honestly, the Dems created this problem by changing it from 60 votes to 50. If that never happened then Kavanaugh never gets through. So really, 100% of the blame lands on the Dems for fucking up the old process that worked.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: Bullshit re 60 to 50. The GOP was going to do it regardless.
      
      Tellafriend:

  4. #32184
    Feelin' Stronger Every Day tony bagadonuts's Avatar
    Reputation
    558
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,517
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Susan Collins won the day and owned the illiberal leftist progressives' lying faces.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/susan-...ding-kavanaugh

  5. #32185
    Canadrunk limitles's Avatar
    Reputation
    1650
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    In Todd's head
    Posts
    17,648
    Blog Entries
    1
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by RS_ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post
    Let's be honest. Anything to do with Trump and the Republicans should be blocked. It's a party that won an election with fewer votes than it's opposition. From what I can recall the Republicans successfully blocked a Democrat nominee to the Supreme court and now they're pushing their nominee before mid term elections. They don't care about due process.
    It's a sham of a political system.
    If I'm not mistaken, Trump won by 77 votes.

    Edit: Go back to your bottle and keep drinking. The more sloshed you get, the more interesting your posts are. tyvm
    Popular vote Clinton 65,853,514 Trump 62,984,828

    48.2% - 46.1

    Go fuck yourself


  6. #32186
    Platinum Lord of the Fraud's Avatar
    Reputation
    1272
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Get A BRAIN! MORANS - GO USA
    Posts
    4,973
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quotes from Lindsey Graham in the WP.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-...=.23dd4d764590

    http://pnimg.net/w/articles-attachments/1/4c2/74d75c36d2.jpg

  7. #32187
    Platinum Lord of the Fraud's Avatar
    Reputation
    1272
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Get A BRAIN! MORANS - GO USA
    Posts
    4,973
    Load Metric
    65724853
    It truly is tragic that a gang of religious, bigoted, scorched-earthers are running the show in America.

    Allowing these lunatics to run the asylum is your greatest ever shame.
    http://pnimg.net/w/articles-attachments/1/4c2/74d75c36d2.jpg

  8. #32188
    Master of Props Daly's Avatar
    Reputation
    2671
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10,306
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RS_ View Post
    If I'm not mistaken, Trump won by 77 votes.

    Edit: Go back to your bottle and keep drinking. The more sloshed you get, the more interesting your posts are. tyvm
    Popular vote Clinton 65,853,514 Trump 62,984,828

    48.2% - 46.1

    Go fuck yourself


    Not sure what these made up numbers are.

    Name:  927B6DF3-E390-4D08-85D3-424C29716863.png
Views: 400
Size:  119.5 KB

  9. #32189
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,627
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65724853
    limitles, are you really bringing out that tired, popular vote thing from 2 years ago?

    I realize you're in Canada, but please understand that the US is not one government, but rather a co-op of 50 different state governments. That's why the electoral college exists, and should still exist.

    If we kill the electoral college, small population states will cease to matter, and Presidential candidates will simply focus their time, money, and energy on the big population centers.

    Also, even if you want to say the electoral college is unfair, those were the rules in place at the time of the 2016 election, and both candidates campaigned based upon that set of rules.

    If it were about popular vote only, Trump might have campaigned differently, and might have won that vote anyway. Instead, he smartly focused on the states with more vulnerable blue-collar swing voters, and it worked.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: I actually agree with you on this matter, but I’d like each state to only get 1 electoral vote for both senators.

  10. #32190
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,627
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Count me as a right winger who believes Ford, though.

    It's doubtful that she would have made all of this up many years before Kavanaugh was considered for Supreme Court. When bad things happen to you, you tend to remember those things a lot more than the person who did it to you.

    Want a good example? Think of poker. When you take a bad beat in a critical spot in a tournament, it often sticks with you for life. The person putting the beat on you is unlikely to remember it for very long. I've had guys come up to me and say, "Oh, remember when you hit that backdoor 2-pair on me and knocked me out in 39th? Man, that hurt!", and I honestly have no clue what the fuck they're talking about. Yet if I was the one taking the beat, I remember everything about it.

    Anyway, I think Kavanaugh was a somewhat aggressive horndog in 1982 when he was 18, and he probably did some inappropriate things to Ford at that party. He was probably drunk and barely would have remembered it a week later, let alone 36 years later. I 100% believe the guy when he says he has no recollection of the incident.

    I think Ford is mostly telling the truth, though perhaps the 36 years (and the fact that she only started talking about it in the 2010s) have warped some of the details. It is possible that she remembers it being worse than it actually was, but I'm just about sure that something inappropriate happened with her, and that it involved Kavanaugh.

    You do need to consider the year it occurred and the age of the people involved, though. He was 18. She was 15. They were at an '80s high school party where just about everyone drinks. There was some degree of tolerance in the '80s of sexual aggressiveness, which would be considered sexual harassment today. So if a teenage boy is used to being moderately sexually aggressive with girls and society basically doesn't frown too much on it (at the time), then it's hard to leap to the point of saying that the guy is unfit to hold an important job in his 50s.

    At the same time, we live in a different age, and "society was okay with it" isn't really a valid excuse to act like an asshole. So given the high profile position Kavanaugh will hold, and given the recent societal focus upon preventing sexual harassment (which I think is good), I don't really have a problem with him being denied the position.

    I don't agree with conservatives who call Ford "a liar", nor do I think that Kavanaugh is being unfairly attacked.

    I do think we are spending far too much time and energy focusing on an alleged event from 1982 between two teenagers, which is unlikely to ever be fully understood.

    I do think that there's too much bullshit surrounding this whole thing, including that whole stupid yearbook thing, which was pretty much standard for teen boys in 1982 to do. The yearbook by no means indicates that Kavanaugh was a rapist or sexual harasser.

    I do laugh at liberals who are screaming loudly that Kavanaugh and all his supporters are pure evil, yet these same people will have positive things to say about Bill Clinton when asked. Clinton almost definitely raped a woman when he was in his 30s. Kavanaugh is accused of aggressive sexual behavior (but not rape) when he was 18. If any outrage is justified here, it should be more aimed at Clinton, or at least at both men.

     
    Comments
      
      Sloppy Joe: Fair take

  11. #32191
    Gold abrown83's Avatar
    Reputation
    430
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,972
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Count me as a right winger who believes Ford, though.

    It's doubtful that she would have made all of this up many years before Kavanaugh was considered for Supreme Court. When bad things happen to you, you tend to remember those things a lot more than the person who did it to you.

    Want a good example? Think of poker. When you take a bad beat in a critical spot in a tournament, it often sticks with you for life. The person putting the beat on you is unlikely to remember it for very long. I've had guys come up to me and say, "Oh, remember when you hit that backdoor 2-pair on me and knocked me out in 39th? Man, that hurt!", and I honestly have no clue what the fuck they're talking about. Yet if I was the one taking the beat, I remember everything about it.

    Anyway, I think Kavanaugh was a somewhat aggressive horndog in 1982 when he was 18, and he probably did some inappropriate things to Ford at that party. He was probably drunk and barely would have remembered it a week later, let alone 36 years later. I 100% believe the guy when he says he has no recollection of the incident.

    I think Ford is mostly telling the truth, though perhaps the 36 years (and the fact that she only started talking about it in the 2010s) have warped some of the details. It is possible that she remembers it being worse than it actually was, but I'm just about sure that something inappropriate happened with her, and that it involved Kavanaugh.

    You do need to consider the year it occurred and the age of the people involved, though. He was 18. She was 15. They were at an '80s high school party where just about everyone drinks. There was some degree of tolerance in the '80s of sexual aggressiveness, which would be considered sexual harassment today. So if a teenage boy is used to being moderately sexually aggressive with girls and society basically doesn't frown too much on it (at the time), then it's hard to leap to the point of saying that the guy is unfit to hold an important job in his 50s.

    At the same time, we live in a different age, and "society was okay with it" isn't really a valid excuse to act like an asshole. So given the high profile position Kavanaugh will hold, and given the recent societal focus upon preventing sexual harassment (which I think is good), I don't really have a problem with him being denied the position.

    I don't agree with conservatives who call Ford "a liar", nor do I think that Kavanaugh is being unfairly attacked.

    I do think we are spending far too much time and energy focusing on an alleged event from 1982 between two teenagers, which is unlikely to ever be fully understood.

    I do think that there's too much bullshit surrounding this whole thing, including that whole stupid yearbook thing, which was pretty much standard for teen boys in 1982 to do. The yearbook by no means indicates that Kavanaugh was a rapist or sexual harasser.

    I do laugh at liberals who are screaming loudly that Kavanaugh and all his supporters are pure evil, yet these same people will have positive things to say about Bill Clinton when asked. Clinton almost definitely raped a woman when he was in his 30s. Kavanaugh is accused of aggressive sexual behavior (but not rape) when he was 18. If any outrage is justified here, it should be more aimed at Clinton, or at least at both men.
    Druff it's interesting that we use the same exact logic and came to different conclusions.

    I used September 11th as an example to a friend that is all in on Ford. Where were you when you found out about the planes hitting World Trade Center? My friend explained in detail where he was, what he was doing, how he felt that day, every little detail about the day. I asked him, "how do you remember that much?" It was a defining moment in my life and I guess strong memories last longer. "Oh so how do you feel about Ford now?" .... silence.

    I don't see how something so traumatic for her, has so many flaws and lack of details in her story.

    Also there's that funny coincidence of she only named him after he was short listed for possible Republican Supreme Court nominees in 2011/2012.

  12. #32192
    Gold abrown83's Avatar
    Reputation
    430
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,972
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Also Mumbles get fucked, "Republicans were going to change it anyways."

    You mean when Obama, and the Senate Democrats controlled everything and changed the rules?

    Republicans weren't in power, they didn't change the rules.

    “I say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, you’ll regret this,” McConnell, then the minority leader, told them. “And you may regret it a lot sooner than you think.”

     
    Comments
      
      Tellafriend: Lol at arguing w a failed academic turned truck driver

  13. #32193
    Bronze RS_'s Avatar
    Reputation
    28
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    266
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by Daly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post

    Popular vote Clinton 65,853,514 Trump 62,984,828

    48.2% - 46.1

    Go fuck yourself


    Not sure what these made up numbers are.

    Name:  927B6DF3-E390-4D08-85D3-424C29716863.png
Views: 400
Size:  119.5 KB
    lol limitless is mad again.


    BTW, just as an FYI, the map you posted isn't necessarily "accurate", although it kind of is and kind of isn't. The map reflects what the electoral college should have voted, if there were no faithless electors. However, there were at least 7 faithless electors, I believe.

    The map shows Trump should have gotten 306, but he actually got 304.
    It shows Clinton should have gotten 232, but she actually got 227.

    So there were at least 7 faithless electors. The difference adds up to 7, but there could have been more (EG: One who was supposed to vote for Clinton could have voted for Trump while one who was supposed to vote for Trump voted for Clinton, not sure if this happened [doubt it], though.)

    I believe (not going to read through bunch'a stuff, TBH) that there were only 2 faithless electors that should have voted for Trump, but didn't. And Hillary had 5 faithless electors who should have voted for her, but also didn't. Colin Powell got 3 votes, Sanders 1, John Kasich 1, Ron Paul 1, and Faith Spotted Eagle 1. As mentioned earlier, Trump got 304 and Hillary got 227.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...,_2016#Results - Scroll a bit down to "candidates table".



    NOTE: I say "should" have voted for that person, not because they morally or whatever should have, but because that's the way their constituents have voted. Not sure if I used constituent properly, but you get the gist.

  14. #32194
    Diamond TheXFactor's Avatar
    Reputation
    1199
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,935
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    limitles, are you really bringing out that tired, popular vote thing from 2 years ago?

    I realize you're in Canada, but please understand that the US is not one government, but rather a co-op of 50 different state governments. That's why the electoral college exists, and should still exist.

    If we kill the electoral college, small population states will cease to matter, and Presidential candidates will simply focus their time, money, and energy on the big population centers.

    Also, even if you want to say the electoral college is unfair, those were the rules in place at the time of the 2016 election, and both candidates campaigned based upon that set of rules.

    If it were about popular vote only, Trump might have campaigned differently, and might have won that vote anyway. Instead, he smartly focused on the states with more vulnerable blue-collar swing voters, and it worked.
    The electoral college should have been abolished over 100 years ago.

    I don't give a shit about New Hampshire, Idaho, Iowa, Utah, Montana, Maine, North & South Dakota.

    Should these states have the same political influence as California? Fuck No!!!

    Republicans have rigged the U.S. political system so they will always have the advantage now, plus they fucking CHEAT.

    TWICE, in the past 20 years. The person with the LEAST amount of votes has become President. What does that mean? Your vote doesn't mean shit. And it will happen again. It is the only way Republicans can win.

    Yeah, Donald Trump would have campaigned differently if it was only about the popular vote. I'm sure he would've fucked more pornstars and playboy playmates. He would have also LOST the election by a landslide.



  15. #32195
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by abrown83 View Post
    Also Mumbles get fucked, "Republicans were going to change it anyways."

    You mean when Obama, and the Senate Democrats controlled everything and changed the rules?

    Republicans weren't in power, they didn't change the rules.

    “I say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, you’ll regret this,” McConnell, then the minority leader, told them. “And you may regret it a lot sooner than you think.”
    The GOP was abusing the fillibuster in an unprecedented way for years during Obama’s admin, doing anything they could to block his judicial appointments. This had never happened before, *ever*. It was a sign that the GOP would do anything within the rules to achieve its agenda, employing to an unprecedented level a kind of smashmouth politics that Newt Gingrich had pioneered in the 90s, but had backfired on the GOP when Clinton came out of being impeached by the GOP-controlled House being more popular than ever.

    And the GOP in the Senate immediately after Obama was elected adopted a no-holds-barred unprecedented partisan strategy to oppose an opposition president even when it meant outright reversing itself on particular policies. So, they were essentially taunting the Dems to change the Senate rules in advance of them losing the Senate.

    And the GOP’s disregard for Senate traditions was confirmed by not even holding a hearing for Merrick Garland, also utterly unprecendented. And they did so knowing that most of the voters didn’t really care. And they figured this out long before the Dems in the Senate. That’s why the GOP essentially didn’t suffer any consequences for all those years of purely obstructionist fillibustering. And knew that they wouldn’t suffer any consequences of watering it down themselves even if the Dems didn’t do so before them. Only political geeks care about such matters, not the vast majority of voters.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  16. #32196
    Bronze RS_'s Avatar
    Reputation
    28
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    266
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RS_ View Post
    If I'm not mistaken, Trump won by 77 votes.

    Edit: Go back to your bottle and keep drinking. The more sloshed you get, the more interesting your posts are. tyvm
    Popular vote Clinton 65,853,514 Trump 62,984,828

    48.2% - 46.1

    Go fuck yourself

    Pretending like the popular vote matters is like............boasting that you have an 80% win percentage in sports, but you're still losing because you're betting favorites and laying a bunch. "Oh ma guhh, it isn't fair! I win 80% of my bets and I'm still down!!! Wtf!!!"

    The name of the game in sports betting is to WIN MONEY. I don't give a shit what my win percentage is, I want to profit.

    Similarly, the way a winner is decided for the presidential election is NOT who gets more popular votes, but who wins more electoral college votes. Unless Wikipedia is incorrect in their stats, or I'm just terrible at math, Trump won by 77 votes.

  17. #32197
    Bronze RS_'s Avatar
    Reputation
    28
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    266
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by TheXFactor View Post
    TWICE, in the past 20 years. The person with the LEAST amount of votes has become President.
    This is demonstrably false, unless you're talking about president of something else that's not the USA, whether you're using electoral college votes or popular votes as the metric.

    Actually, I don't think this has EVER happened, with the possible exception of George Washington.

  18. #32198
    Gold abrown83's Avatar
    Reputation
    430
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,972
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by TheXFactor View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    limitles, are you really bringing out that tired, popular vote thing from 2 years ago?

    I realize you're in Canada, but please understand that the US is not one government, but rather a co-op of 50 different state governments. That's why the electoral college exists, and should still exist.

    If we kill the electoral college, small population states will cease to matter, and Presidential candidates will simply focus their time, money, and energy on the big population centers.

    Also, even if you want to say the electoral college is unfair, those were the rules in place at the time of the 2016 election, and both candidates campaigned based upon that set of rules.

    If it were about popular vote only, Trump might have campaigned differently, and might have won that vote anyway. Instead, he smartly focused on the states with more vulnerable blue-collar swing voters, and it worked.
    The electoral college should have been abolished over 100 years ago.

    I don't give a shit about New Hampshire, Idaho, Iowa, Utah, Montana, Maine, North & South Dakota.

    Should these states have the same political influence as California? Fuck No!!!

    Republicans have rigged the U.S. political system so they will always have the advantage now, plus they fucking CHEAT.

    TWICE, in the past 20 years. The person with the LEAST amount of votes has become President. What does that mean? Your vote doesn't mean shit. And it will happen again. It is the only way Republicans can win.

    Yeah, Donald Trump would have campaigned differently if it was only about the popular vote. I'm sure he would've fucked more pornstars and playboy playmates. He would have also LOST the election by a landslide.


    If you don't conceptually understand how the Electoral College has a built in bias for Democrats, there's never going to be chance for you.

    What blows my mind is you think the President actually matters.

    What you should really be asking yourself is what does it say about the Democratic party that at every level of government they have lost over a 1,000 seats (roughly 20%) to Republicans since 2009? In a single decade the biggest thing that happened under Obama wasn't that he was elected, but how the Democrats power grab was so unanimously rejected that it will take multiple decades to recover.

    All 2016 to now has shown is that the Democrat party loves to complain about old white men running the Republican Party but who is actually in charge and the face of the Dems?

    Sanders -77
    Pelosi - 78
    Feinstein - 85
    Hillary Clinton - 70
    Elizabeth Warren - 69
    Biden - 75
    Schumer - 67
    Durbin - 73

    That's a lot of old white people.

    Their desire to grab and keep power tied with the total demise of the Democrat party has prevented the next generation from coming and taking power and control. Only now in the last 6 to 12 months are you starting to really see some new faces get press time.

    Here's the honest truth about the Presidency.

    All the Democrats had to do was not rig their nomination for Hillary because it was "her turn". Put forth actual challenges to her that weren't socialists and guess what probably would have happened? She wouldn't have gotten the nomination and the Democrats would have the Presidency right now.

    If you really want to do something about this, you should literally start spending every waking moment figuring out how to get Kirsten Gillibrand to run for President. She's exactly the type of person who could win for the Dems. Clinton, Sanders, Biden, Warren they all literally have zero chance of beating Trump.

  19. #32199
    Master of Props Daly's Avatar
    Reputation
    2671
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10,306
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by abrown83 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheXFactor View Post

    The electoral college should have been abolished over 100 years ago.

    I don't give a shit about New Hampshire, Idaho, Iowa, Utah, Montana, Maine, North & South Dakota.

    Should these states have the same political influence as California? Fuck No!!!

    Republicans have rigged the U.S. political system so they will always have the advantage now, plus they fucking CHEAT.

    TWICE, in the past 20 years. The person with the LEAST amount of votes has become President. What does that mean? Your vote doesn't mean shit. And it will happen again. It is the only way Republicans can win.

    Yeah, Donald Trump would have campaigned differently if it was only about the popular vote. I'm sure he would've fucked more pornstars and playboy playmates. He would have also LOST the election by a landslide.


    If you don't conceptually understand how the Electoral College has a built in bias for Democrats, there's never going to be chance for you.

    What blows my mind is you think the President actually matters.

    What you should really be asking yourself is what does it say about the Democratic party that at every level of government they have lost over a 1,000 seats (roughly 20%) to Republicans since 2009? In a single decade the biggest thing that happened under Obama wasn't that he was elected, but how the Democrats power grab was so unanimously rejected that it will take multiple decades to recover.

    All 2016 to now has shown is that the Democrat party loves to complain about old white men running the Republican Party but who is actually in charge and the face of the Dems?

    Sanders -77
    Pelosi - 78
    Feinstein - 85
    Hillary Clinton - 70
    Elizabeth Warren - 69
    Biden - 75
    Schumer - 67
    Durbin - 73

    That's a lot of old white people.

    Their desire to grab and keep power tied with the total demise of the Democrat party has prevented the next generation from coming and taking power and control. Only now in the last 6 to 12 months are you starting to really see some new faces get press time.

    Here's the honest truth about the Presidency.

    All the Democrats had to do was not rig their nomination for Hillary because it was "her turn". Put forth actual challenges to her that weren't socialists and guess what probably would have happened? She wouldn't have gotten the nomination and the Democrats would have the Presidency right now.

    If you really want to do something about this, you should literally start spending every waking moment figuring out how to get Kirsten Gillibrand to run for President. She's exactly the type of person who could win for the Dems. Clinton, Sanders, Biden, Warren they all literally have zero chance of beating Trump.

  20. #32200
    Diamond TheXFactor's Avatar
    Reputation
    1199
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,935
    Load Metric
    65724853
    Quote Originally Posted by abrown83 View Post
    If you don't conceptually understand how the Electoral College has a built in bias for Democrats, there's never going to be chance for you.

    What blows my mind is you think the President actually matters.

    What you should really be asking yourself is what does it say about the Democratic party that at every level of government they have lost over a 1,000 seats (roughly 20%) to Republicans since 2009? In a single decade the biggest thing that happened under Obama wasn't that he was elected, but how the Democrats power grab was so unanimously rejected that it will take multiple decades to recover.

    If you really want to do something about this, you should literally start spending every waking moment figuring out how to get Kirsten Gillibrand to run for President. She's exactly the type of person who could win for the Dems. Clinton, Sanders, Biden, Warren they all literally have zero chance of beating Trump.
    The only woman who has a chance of becoming President is Kim Kardashian.

    The millennials who are supposed to change our corrupt system of government are smoking too much weed to give a fuck.




Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Picture of train coming at me while I'm parked on the tracks
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 07-06-2016, 03:03 PM
  2. Who is on the North Carolina Train??????
    By Fartapotomous in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04-05-2016, 04:08 AM
  3. Question about taking a long train ride
    By Drexel in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-17-2015, 12:58 AM
  4. Trump Entertainment Resorts files for Bankruptcy for the second time
    By BeerAndPoker in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-10-2014, 06:05 AM
  5. amazing train wreck in spain
    By Rollo Tomasi in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-25-2013, 02:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

# tyde is back, # tyde is black, ##408america, #4dragons was right, #big dick has a glass eye, #pepe dry humps tina's fat roll, ...scandinavian bob for white house plumber, 408dragons, 408trump, 4dragons flunked out of trump university, :peet, barry loves the smell of hillary's vagina, barry pisses in the ladies bathroom at target, big dick denies his mexican heritage, big dick is a cock gobbler, big dick menstruates thru his ass, big dicks dick is massive and his balls are grande, bill came on muck's blue dress, blake = george conway, blake smoked all of nita's n-word weed, boogiemen, dirtyb licks feminist armpits, drk has lost his ever freaking mind, drk snorts viagra and dyes his pubes, drkstrisntrichenough, fresh jelly beaners on the side, gare down the rabbit hole, gare is fat and skiny at the same time, godless self hating jews for trump, goosestepping, in the flesh, info sec pros endorse hillary, is anyone as dumb as gordman?, jimmy films hilary sucking kaps milk choc pole, jimmyg_415 is fucking retarded, ken hordells tits are the tits, larrylafferforpresident, league of extraordinary retards, libtards justify voting for a criminal, lol wow cant handle his drink, lol wows british dad, lord of the faggots returns to suk dick, marty eats barbequed iguana, marty needs a mandatory tooth brushing policy, mintjewlips = nut low, mintjewlips smells his hand after jerking off, mommy buy me a boogie board please, mossad, mossad had fps banned, muck ficon eats dead dick, muck ficon has 2 retarded eyes, muck ficon plays with barbie dolls, muck ficon's racist girlfriend voted for trump, mumblesforvp, n-wordtoes, nsa, ramrod, redram, side dish is a nazi, sidedish gives hongkonger free money, sk drug abusing package n-word, sk got his shit pushed in, sk is just the ms part, someone named el gallo doesnt know he is hispanic, sonatine eats trump milk steaks, sonatine got fat eating trump steaks, sonatine has ikea furr for pubes, sonatine spirit cooks his limp dick, suicide king identifies as a potato, tellafriend= mintjewlips' penis protector, thesaddish sold his sold on a bad bet, tine the card carrying liberal, trump doesnt brown the meat, trumpsucks, tyde stores trumps jizz in his goiter, vegas defends his n-word weed empire, virtue signal here if you love n-words, ¿a qué hora se ducha tu hermana?

View Tag Cloud