Thread: Time to get on the TRUMP train

  1. #31661
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    65715714
    HEY U FKN WORTHLESS LOSERS THAT SHOULD BE GETTING ME COFFEE: TELL SOMEBODY UR PISSED OFF FOR PUSHING "MUH RUSSIA"


    until then, u are irrelevant and should be getting me coffee, its that simple

  2. #31662
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    65715714
    GET ME COFFEE. I dont even drink coffee, get me coffee 300x a day so u dont make anybodys day worse


    "Sir heres ur coffee"

    "Ok thanks go get me coffee and stop bothering me"


    This is ur role in life until further notice JFC

  3. #31663
    Canadrunk limitles's Avatar
    Reputation
    1650
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    In Todd's head
    Posts
    17,648
    Blog Entries
    1
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by thesidedish View Post
    HEY U FKN WORTHLESS LOSERS THAT SHOULD BE GETTING ME COFFEE: TELL SOMEBODY UR PISSED OFF FOR PUSHING "MUH RUSSIA"


    until then, u are irrelevant and should be getting me coffee, its that simple
    keep your cool fool

  4. #31664
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    65715714
    many ppl ITT who believe everything the democrats say about the emails that show them being scamming pos have called me a retard




    HEY LIBTARDS WHATS 1 MINUS 0 OR IS THAT TOO TOUGH FOR U


    I tell u what, I was bombed tonight and asked a cpl Democrats who said they hate trump what they thought of "Russia" and they said "ugh, its a democrat story"



    AND U? FKN PATHETIC I NEVER WANT TO SEE THAT WORD AGAIN



    ALSO LOL @ LORD OF THE FRAUD, U GUYS ARE SO FAR BEHIND UR BASICALLY A MONKEY

  5. #31665
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by thesidedish View Post
    I tell u what, I was bombed tonight and asked a cpl Democrats who said they hate trump what they thought of "Russia" and they said "ugh, its a democrat story"
    What do you think they said after you walked away?

  6. #31666
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by duped_samaritan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by thesidedish View Post
    I tell u what, I was bombed tonight and asked a cpl Democrats who said they hate trump what they thought of "Russia" and they said "ugh, its a democrat story"
    What do you think they said after you walked away?


    "KEEP AMERICA GREAT 2020" MORON

  7. #31667
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    65715714
    ROFL SECONDARY HEADLINE AT CNN.COM


    https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/08/polit...ach/index.html



    "The onetime mistress of former deputy Republican National Committee Finance Chairman Elliott Broidy alleged in newly revealed court documents that she was physically abused by Broidy, and she charges that he was emboldened by President Donald Trump's alleged mistreatment of women and belief that he could get away with it."

  8. #31668
    Diamond
    Reputation
    476
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,894
    Load Metric
    65715714
    CONGRATULATIONS BARACK OBAMA ON UR "ETHICS IN GOVERMENT" AWARD GREAT JOB GREAT SPEECH




  9. #31669
    Gold Wiganer's Avatar
    Reputation
    386
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,566
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyde View Post
    I stay to myself and keep out of trouble and/or potentially problematic scenarios

  10. #31670
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,627
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by thesidedish View Post
    ROFL SECONDARY HEADLINE AT CNN.COM

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/08/polit...ach/index.html

    "The onetime mistress of former deputy Republican National Committee Finance Chairman Elliott Broidy alleged in newly revealed court documents that she was physically abused by Broidy, and she charges that he was emboldened by President Donald Trump's alleged mistreatment of women and belief that he could get away with it."

    This Broidy guy sounds like a scumbag, but LOL at this passage in the court documents:

    Mr. Broidy admired Mr. Trump's uncanny ability to sexually abuse woman and get away with it. Mr. Broidy began to hurt Ms. Bechard physically during their sexual activities -- touching her in ways to which she did not consent.

    pe

    Sounds like typical lawyer-speak, sensationalizing court documents for maximum emotional effect.

    I obviously don't know this Broidy guy, but I highly doubt that he "admired Trump's uncanny ability to sexually abuse women and get away with it".

    More likely Broidy was just a perv who enjoyed rough sex and S&M stuff, and probably his wife wasn't on board for it. So he got this mistress and acted out those fantasies on her.

    Not defending the guy, but I doubt any of this has to do with Trump.

  11. #31671
    Platinum
    Reputation
    336
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,694
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Do people even still watch/read CNN?

    If I want liberal spin on a story I go to MSNBC. They obviously have an agenda, but they seem to be interested in actually reporting news with some level of integrity.

    At this point I consider CNN and the NYT just straight Breitbart level propaganda, with no integrity or intellectual honesty at all.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: JFC!!!
      
      hongkonger: :cosby

  12. #31672
    Canadrunk limitles's Avatar
    Reputation
    1650
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    In Todd's head
    Posts
    17,648
    Blog Entries
    1
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post
    Do people even still watch/read CNN? If I want liberal spin on a story I go to MSNBC. They obviously have an agenda, but they seem to be interested in actually reporting news with some level of integrity. At this point I consider CNN and the NYT just straight Breitbart level propaganda, with no integrity or intellectual honesty at all.
    Propoganda? If you believe that then you have ingested too much cool-aid.
    That's paranoia talking.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: :this^10
      
      hongkonger:

  13. #31673
    Gold
    Reputation
    78
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,146
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post
    Do people even still watch/read CNN?

    If I want liberal spin on a story I go to MSNBC. They obviously have an agenda, but they seem to be interested in actually reporting news with some level of integrity.

    At this point I consider CNN and the NYT just straight Breitbart level propaganda, with no integrity or intellectual honesty at all.
    Verm, I want to think you are worth reading, but saying NYT is equivalent to CNN/Breitbart then following up with "no integrity or intellectual honesty at all" doesn't put you in a good spot. To me, it is epic nonsense, but PLEASE redeem yourself.

    Please post how NYT just pumps out non-factual shit.

    Please entertain me, as I would most appreciate being informed.

  14. #31674
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,627
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Supposedly the White House has the author down to "a few possible individuals".

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/07/polit...rch/index.html


  15. #31675
    Platinum
    Reputation
    336
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,694
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by donkdowndonedied View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post
    Do people even still watch/read CNN?

    If I want liberal spin on a story I go to MSNBC. They obviously have an agenda, but they seem to be interested in actually reporting news with some level of integrity.

    At this point I consider CNN and the NYT just straight Breitbart level propaganda, with no integrity or intellectual honesty at all.
    Verm, I want to think you are worth reading, but saying NYT is equivalent to CNN/Breitbart then following up with "no integrity or intellectual honesty at all" doesn't put you in a good spot. To me, it is epic nonsense, but PLEASE redeem yourself.

    Please post how NYT just pumps out non-factual shit.

    Please entertain me, as I would most appreciate being informed.
    Here is a very quick example. It is one of many I could come up with, as it is pretty indicative of how the NYT works.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/s...-for-life.html

    This is a hit piece written about Jordan Peterson. It isn't an op-ed. It is "journalism" (at least for the NYT). Peterson said the woman who interviewed him followed him around and interviewed him for 2 days. He says they spent about 5 minutes talking about "enforced monogamy," and it was a very minor part of the interview. He also said she understood exactly what he was communicating, and she intentionally took him out of context and basically flat out lied with the truth. He also said she wrote about nothing they spent most of the time discussing. It was obvious she came in with a narrative, and she twisted some minor stuff he said completely out of context to shape that narrative.

    This is what the NYT does. They may not be as liberal as Breitbart with publishing work that is completely false, but they have no problem being intellectually dishonest with the truth. Is this better? You could actually argue it is worse, because when push comes to shove in a court of law Breitbart will admit they are not real journalism, but the NYT will keep up the facade and pretend they aren't intellectually dishonest propaganda.

     
    Comments
      
      BiffCo99:
      
      Tellafriend:
      
      JimmyG_415: Op-ed means opposite moron. Your argument is non sense.

  16. #31676
    Canadrunk limitles's Avatar
    Reputation
    1650
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    In Todd's head
    Posts
    17,648
    Blog Entries
    1
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by donkdowndonedied View Post

    Verm, I want to think you are worth reading, but saying NYT is equivalent to CNN/Breitbart then following up with "no integrity or intellectual honesty at all" doesn't put you in a good spot. To me, it is epic nonsense, but PLEASE redeem yourself.

    Please post how NYT just pumps out non-factual shit.

    Please entertain me, as I would most appreciate being informed.
    Here is a very quick example. It is one of many I could come up with, as it is pretty indicative of how the NYT works.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/s...-for-life.html

    This is a hit piece written about Jordan Peterson. It isn't an op-ed. It is "journalism" (at least for the NYT). Peterson said the woman who interviewed him followed him around and interviewed him for 2 days. He says they spent about 5 minutes talking about "enforced monogamy," and it was a very minor part of the interview. He also said she understood exactly what he was communicating, and she intentionally took him out of context and basically flat out lied with the truth. He also said she wrote about nothing they spent most of the time discussing. It was obvious she came in with a narrative, and she twisted some minor stuff he said completely out of context to shape that narrative.

    This is what the NYT does. They may not be as liberal as Breitbart with publishing work that is completely false, but they have no problem being intellectually dishonest with the truth. Is this better? You could actually argue it is worse, because when push comes to shove in a court of law Breitbart will admit they are not real journalism, but the NYT will keep up the facade and pretend they aren't intellectually dishonest propaganda.
    This is what you must not do when critiquing anything.
    Jordan Peterson says this. Ok, what does the reporter say?
    There are two sides to every story. Peterson does not have some pass whereby anything he says is accurate or true.
    Unless you have the other side to the story you can't be confident in your judgement

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: Jordan Peterson is a known liar/twister of facts to promote his agenda.

  17. #31677
    Gold
    Reputation
    37
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    1,935
    Load Metric
    65715714
    The New York Times has admitted to changing its editorial policy and standards simply because they oppose Trump.

    New York Times is to the left what Breitbart is to the right.

     
    Comments
      
      duped_samaritan: muh failing new york times

  18. #31678
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Supposedly the White House has the author down to "a few possible individuals".

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/07/polit...rch/index.html

    Good chance this is a bluff. Best move WH could do is leak that they have it narrowed down to a few people, whether it's true or not. There's a good chance the writer won't be able to continue functioning normally.

    I feel like it's around even money we learn who wrote it by the end of the month. Surely they will have to go into hiding.

  19. #31679
    Platinum duped_samaritan's Avatar
    Reputation
    689
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,680
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by BiffCo99 View Post
    The New York Times has admitted to changing its editorial policy and standards simply because they oppose Trump.
    link?

     
    Comments
      
      hongkonger:

  20. #31680
    Platinum
    Reputation
    336
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,694
    Load Metric
    65715714
    Quote Originally Posted by limitles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post

    Here is a very quick example. It is one of many I could come up with, as it is pretty indicative of how the NYT works.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/s...-for-life.html

    This is a hit piece written about Jordan Peterson. It isn't an op-ed. It is "journalism" (at least for the NYT). Peterson said the woman who interviewed him followed him around and interviewed him for 2 days. He says they spent about 5 minutes talking about "enforced monogamy," and it was a very minor part of the interview. He also said she understood exactly what he was communicating, and she intentionally took him out of context and basically flat out lied with the truth. He also said she wrote about nothing they spent most of the time discussing. It was obvious she came in with a narrative, and she twisted some minor stuff he said completely out of context to shape that narrative.

    This is what the NYT does. They may not be as liberal as Breitbart with publishing work that is completely false, but they have no problem being intellectually dishonest with the truth. Is this better? You could actually argue it is worse, because when push comes to shove in a court of law Breitbart will admit they are not real journalism, but the NYT will keep up the facade and pretend they aren't intellectually dishonest propaganda.
    This is what you must not do when critiquing anything.
    Jordan Peterson says this. Ok, what does the reporter say?
    There are two sides to every story. Peterson does not have some pass whereby anything he says is accurate or true.
    Unless you have the other side to the story you can't be confident in your judgement
    Well, in this case it is pretty cut and dry. Jordan Peterson made a written reply to the article. He basically said the reporter knew exactly what he meant and purposefully twisted his words to fit her narrative. I listen to Jordan Peterson a lot, and he kinda just repeats the same stuff over and over, and his version (which doesn't match what the reporter wrote) is consistent with what he always says, so I am inclined to believe him.

    Also, one thing you will not find is the NYT acknowledging that Peterson wrote a concise, articulate reply saying the reporter was being dishonest. Because they aren't in the business of reporting the truth. They are in the business of pushing their own narrative.

    He also said the entire 2 days they were together the reporter was very cordial with him and they talked about a lot of stuff in a respectful fashion. He said when she wrote the article she completely changed and got very confrontational and judgmental, and on top of that she ignored 95% of what he said and just focused on pushing her own narrative, which covered about 5 minutes of their 2 day conversation. Basically a straight ambush.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Picture of train coming at me while I'm parked on the tracks
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 07-06-2016, 03:03 PM
  2. Who is on the North Carolina Train??????
    By Fartapotomous in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04-05-2016, 04:08 AM
  3. Question about taking a long train ride
    By Drexel in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-17-2015, 12:58 AM
  4. Trump Entertainment Resorts files for Bankruptcy for the second time
    By BeerAndPoker in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-10-2014, 06:05 AM
  5. amazing train wreck in spain
    By Rollo Tomasi in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-25-2013, 02:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

# tyde is back, # tyde is black, ##408america, #4dragons was right, #big dick has a glass eye, #pepe dry humps tina's fat roll, ...scandinavian bob for white house plumber, 408dragons, 408trump, 4dragons flunked out of trump university, :peet, barry loves the smell of hillary's vagina, barry pisses in the ladies bathroom at target, big dick denies his mexican heritage, big dick is a cock gobbler, big dick menstruates thru his ass, big dicks dick is massive and his balls are grande, bill came on muck's blue dress, blake = george conway, blake smoked all of nita's n-word weed, boogiemen, dirtyb licks feminist armpits, drk has lost his ever freaking mind, drk snorts viagra and dyes his pubes, drkstrisntrichenough, fresh jelly beaners on the side, gare down the rabbit hole, gare is fat and skiny at the same time, godless self hating jews for trump, goosestepping, in the flesh, info sec pros endorse hillary, is anyone as dumb as gordman?, jimmy films hilary sucking kaps milk choc pole, jimmyg_415 is fucking retarded, ken hordells tits are the tits, larrylafferforpresident, league of extraordinary retards, libtards justify voting for a criminal, lol wow cant handle his drink, lol wows british dad, lord of the faggots returns to suk dick, marty eats barbequed iguana, marty needs a mandatory tooth brushing policy, mintjewlips = nut low, mintjewlips smells his hand after jerking off, mommy buy me a boogie board please, mossad, mossad had fps banned, muck ficon eats dead dick, muck ficon has 2 retarded eyes, muck ficon plays with barbie dolls, muck ficon's racist girlfriend voted for trump, mumblesforvp, n-wordtoes, nsa, ramrod, redram, side dish is a nazi, sidedish gives hongkonger free money, sk drug abusing package n-word, sk got his shit pushed in, sk is just the ms part, someone named el gallo doesnt know he is hispanic, sonatine eats trump milk steaks, sonatine got fat eating trump steaks, sonatine has ikea furr for pubes, sonatine spirit cooks his limp dick, suicide king identifies as a potato, tellafriend= mintjewlips' penis protector, thesaddish sold his sold on a bad bet, tine the card carrying liberal, trump doesnt brown the meat, trumpsucks, tyde stores trumps jizz in his goiter, vegas defends his n-word weed empire, virtue signal here if you love n-words, ¿a qué hora se ducha tu hermana?

View Tag Cloud