Thread: Time to get on the TRUMP train

  1. #29241
    Platinum
    Reputation
    336
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,694
    Load Metric
    65705055
    I am guessing in such a scenario the whole world is fucked to the point it really isn't worth worrying about, and everyone has large incentives to ensure that doesn't happen.

  2. #29242
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    ...

    The Stormy Daniels thing is stupid, and the left is falling into the same trap as the right did with Monica Lewinsky. They're obsessing over a President's personal morality (which with Trump we already knew was crappy anyway), and harping on some legal technicality which, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't matter much to the average American. Much like most people didn't care that Clinton "committed perjury" regarding his sex life, most people aren't worried that Trump technically committed a campaign finance violation to pay off a porn star he banged in 2006.

    I scratch my head wondering why the left is obsessing over this, when there is so much legitimate stuff to harp on if they really want to go after Trump.
    the stormy daniels thing may be stupid but this is an entirely self-inflicted problem for trump, and not just for the obvious reason like don't bang a pornstar when married.

    trump just can't keep his mouth shut and he truly seems to enjoy lying. like, everyone lies but i've never seen anyone that truly relishes in just saying idiotic and obviously false things like he does (another reason he should not agree to a mueller interview).

    everything he's said on this issue is a complete lie and is usually contradicted within 24 hours.

    this video from fox news' own neil cavuto is a must watch on this

    Cavuto is going all-in!

    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  3. #29243
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post
    I am guessing in such a scenario the whole world is fucked to the point it really isn't worth worrying about, and everyone has large incentives to ensure that doesn't happen.
    We live in scary times. All it takes is a rogue element, a misstep while saber rattling, or some extremists and it's on... or even an error of some sort.

    I have no doubt the USA has peeked as a super-power and is on the decline, and this scares me more then anything else.

    Believe there is a very high possibility the USA will become more divided as the years go-by and there will be a horrendous civil war.... less something changes drastically.

    It's sad, human nature and history is all about killing each other. We keep repeating history, and fail to learn.

    Do hope I'm wrong. I dream of world peace nearly everyday.

  4. #29244
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hongkonger View Post

    Also China has a lot of soldiers but only a handful of nukes and their military hardware is LOL.

    If it really came to that, which I hope it doesn't.
    I think you need to catch up with the times.
    Perhaps 30 years ago their military was a bit LOL

    The USA has a lot of aircraft carriers, the Chinese have one. Aircraft carriers are a good mobile platform to attack under-powered countries who don't have the ability to destroy your carriers.
    The Chinese will target your carriers with weapons like the DF21D if they get too close, good luck stopping a carrier killer that can do in excess of Mach 10.

    The new VT4 main battle tank is cheap and easy to produce, the Soviets showed the world just how important cheap and easily produced tanks are.

    They also have some new aircraft. Fifth generation J31 stealth fighter for starters will be coming online very soon. The carrier based J15 is perhaps a bit LOL. The J11B copy of the Su-27SK looks very effective on the armament side of things, and it's somewhat agricultural in it's design which means it will be easy to maintain and be battle ready. They also have the new J-20 that's just come into service, sure it looks like they've copied a lot of stuff... but don't underestimate this aircraft.

    Your satellites are now a soft target too. The DN3 has the ability to easily destroy your satellites. This will surely effect your advanced targeting systems among many things.

    Of course they have drones too. Many we don't really know about. The ones we do know about are drones like the CAIG Wing Loong. The Chinese can build five of these for the same price as one of your Predator drones, and about thirty for one compared to the newer Reaper drone. There is about half a dozen different versions of this drone already, and the weapons it can carry are significant.
    This is the future of advanced warfare in my opinion. $150 billion is a lot of unmanned drones at a significantly lower cost then your own, and the ability to build them at a much faster rate then the USA.

    Obviously they have a huge amount of soldiers too, but I don't think this is really that critical.

    As to the handful of nukes they have, you must have staggeringly large hands. They have over 300 warheads and reasonably advanced delivery systems including a new heavy bomber the H6K. Just about anything the USA has the Chinese have already reverse engineered, and they are exceptionally good at this. Remember they have over 50 years experience with nukes already, they tested a hydrogen bomb in the late 60's.

    To weigh it all up, the USA is a more powerful military at this very moment. They're really well prepared to attack weaker countries with ease. The Chinese are not weak though, and if they ramp up for war I doubt you can compete with their ability to produce cheap and effective weapons in great numbers.

    this is a weird analysis. you conclude that the US is stronger militarily but that China would catch up with the US in the event of a war. not only does this conflict with literally any article on the subject of military might, but it doesn't make logical sense. if china could easily catch up with the US, it already would have.

    in any event, the discussion itself is completely pointless. there is a reason that countries with nuclear weapons don't have conventional wars with other nuclear armed countries. can you guess what that is?

  5. #29245
    Platinum
    Reputation
    336
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,694
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post

    I think you need to catch up with the times.
    Perhaps 30 years ago their military was a bit LOL

    The USA has a lot of aircraft carriers, the Chinese have one. Aircraft carriers are a good mobile platform to attack under-powered countries who don't have the ability to destroy your carriers.
    The Chinese will target your carriers with weapons like the DF21D if they get too close, good luck stopping a carrier killer that can do in excess of Mach 10.

    The new VT4 main battle tank is cheap and easy to produce, the Soviets showed the world just how important cheap and easily produced tanks are.

    They also have some new aircraft. Fifth generation J31 stealth fighter for starters will be coming online very soon. The carrier based J15 is perhaps a bit LOL. The J11B copy of the Su-27SK looks very effective on the armament side of things, and it's somewhat agricultural in it's design which means it will be easy to maintain and be battle ready. They also have the new J-20 that's just come into service, sure it looks like they've copied a lot of stuff... but don't underestimate this aircraft.

    Your satellites are now a soft target too. The DN3 has the ability to easily destroy your satellites. This will surely effect your advanced targeting systems among many things.

    Of course they have drones too. Many we don't really know about. The ones we do know about are drones like the CAIG Wing Loong. The Chinese can build five of these for the same price as one of your Predator drones, and about thirty for one compared to the newer Reaper drone. There is about half a dozen different versions of this drone already, and the weapons it can carry are significant.
    This is the future of advanced warfare in my opinion. $150 billion is a lot of unmanned drones at a significantly lower cost then your own, and the ability to build them at a much faster rate then the USA.

    Obviously they have a huge amount of soldiers too, but I don't think this is really that critical.

    As to the handful of nukes they have, you must have staggeringly large hands. They have over 300 warheads and reasonably advanced delivery systems including a new heavy bomber the H6K. Just about anything the USA has the Chinese have already reverse engineered, and they are exceptionally good at this. Remember they have over 50 years experience with nukes already, they tested a hydrogen bomb in the late 60's.

    To weigh it all up, the USA is a more powerful military at this very moment. They're really well prepared to attack weaker countries with ease. The Chinese are not weak though, and if they ramp up for war I doubt you can compete with their ability to produce cheap and effective weapons in great numbers.

    this is a weird analysis. you conclude that the US is stronger militarily but that China would catch up with the US in the event of a war. not only does this conflict with literally any article on the subject of military might, but it doesn't make logical sense. if china could easily catch up with the US, it already would have.

    in any event, the discussion itself is completely pointless. there is a reason that countries with nuclear weapons don't have conventional wars with other nuclear armed countries. can you guess what that is?
    I think he is arguing that China could convert civilian manufacturing infrastructure for military purposes and very quickly catch up and overtake US if they chose to. This is what the US did during WWII, and is very reasonable in some alternate universe where it was possible China and the US would get into a full scale conventional war, which would never happen.

     
    Comments
      
      Salty_Aus: Russia did the same thing during WWII to a large extent

  6. #29246
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post

    I think you need to catch up with the times.
    Perhaps 30 years ago their military was a bit LOL

    The USA has a lot of aircraft carriers, the Chinese have one. Aircraft carriers are a good mobile platform to attack under-powered countries who don't have the ability to destroy your carriers.
    The Chinese will target your carriers with weapons like the DF21D if they get too close, good luck stopping a carrier killer that can do in excess of Mach 10.

    The new VT4 main battle tank is cheap and easy to produce, the Soviets showed the world just how important cheap and easily produced tanks are.

    They also have some new aircraft. Fifth generation J31 stealth fighter for starters will be coming online very soon. The carrier based J15 is perhaps a bit LOL. The J11B copy of the Su-27SK looks very effective on the armament side of things, and it's somewhat agricultural in it's design which means it will be easy to maintain and be battle ready. They also have the new J-20 that's just come into service, sure it looks like they've copied a lot of stuff... but don't underestimate this aircraft.

    Your satellites are now a soft target too. The DN3 has the ability to easily destroy your satellites. This will surely effect your advanced targeting systems among many things.

    Of course they have drones too. Many we don't really know about. The ones we do know about are drones like the CAIG Wing Loong. The Chinese can build five of these for the same price as one of your Predator drones, and about thirty for one compared to the newer Reaper drone. There is about half a dozen different versions of this drone already, and the weapons it can carry are significant.
    This is the future of advanced warfare in my opinion. $150 billion is a lot of unmanned drones at a significantly lower cost then your own, and the ability to build them at a much faster rate then the USA.

    Obviously they have a huge amount of soldiers too, but I don't think this is really that critical.

    As to the handful of nukes they have, you must have staggeringly large hands. They have over 300 warheads and reasonably advanced delivery systems including a new heavy bomber the H6K. Just about anything the USA has the Chinese have already reverse engineered, and they are exceptionally good at this. Remember they have over 50 years experience with nukes already, they tested a hydrogen bomb in the late 60's.

    To weigh it all up, the USA is a more powerful military at this very moment. They're really well prepared to attack weaker countries with ease. The Chinese are not weak though, and if they ramp up for war I doubt you can compete with their ability to produce cheap and effective weapons in great numbers.

    this is a weird analysis. you conclude that the US is stronger militarily but that China would catch up with the US in the event of a war. not only does this conflict with literally any article on the subject of military might, but it doesn't make logical sense. if china could easily catch up with the US, it already would have.

    in any event, the discussion itself is completely pointless. there is a reason that countries with nuclear weapons don't have conventional wars with other nuclear armed countries. can you guess what that is?
    No shit, Sherlock.

    Ummm, why would they want to have the strongest military in the world?
    Not like they invade countries willy-nilly and need it to prop up their interests in foreign lands.... they are more then capable to defend themselves, and they are not right now dependent on hostile activities.

    I don't think logic is your strong point, attack China and you will awaken the sleeping giant.

    Yeah it's pointless, no way the USA or anyone attacks China in the foreseeable future!

     
    Comments
      
      garrett: Australia sounds amazing

  7. #29247
    Platinum garrett's Avatar
    Reputation
    29
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    4,259
    Load Metric
    65705055
    What Country are you from Salty_Aus if you don't mind I ask, because you seem to have a deluded understanding of this stuff....

     
    Comments
      
      Salty_Aus: Use the grey matter between your ears to figure it out yourself... it's obvious.
      
      BCR: Oh sweet

  8. #29248
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by garrett View Post
    What Country are you from Salty_Aus if you don't mind I ask, because you seem to have a deluded understanding of this stuff....
    When you get a chance, please explain how you're going to do this? You do realize China is the largest foreign holder of US debt already?

    "First we are going to squash them Economically and then when they are weak enough, we will destroy them Militarily.

    EZ Game"

     
    Comments
      
      BCR: That’s up there with Michael Angelo

  9. #29249
    Master of Props Daly's Avatar
    Reputation
    2671
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10,306
    Load Metric
    65705055
    The chances of a USA China "conventional war" at any point on the reasonable horizon rounds to 0.0%

    It doesn't matter is China is "as strong" as the USA because they are already = where it counts. Same with the U.K., France, Israel, India, Pakistan, China, Russia and DPRK.

    People think of China as an enemy. The truth is they are our best friends. Most people think the US Economy is a fraud. Truth if he matter is China is 10x worse. The malinvestment in China Infrastructure is on a scale much higher than the mortgage crisis of 2008. Most people think it's the US economy that's going to take down china and they are propping us up. The truth is it's the other way around, or at the very least more in the middle.

  10. #29250
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by Daly View Post
    The chances of a USA China "conventional war" at any point on the reasonable horizon rounds to 0.0%

    It doesn't matter is China is "as strong" as the USA because they are already = where it counts. Same with the U.K., France, Israel, India, Pakistan, China, Russia and DPRK.

    People think of China as an enemy. The truth is they are our best friends. Most people think the US Economy is a fraud. Truth if he matter is China is 10x worse. The malinvestment in China Infrastructure is on a scale much higher than the mortgage crisis of 2008. Most people think it's the US economy that's going to take down china and they are propping us up. The truth is it's the other way around, or at the very least more in the middle.
    Yup, you depend on each other.
    All this enemy talk just gives me the shits, it serves no reasonable purpose.

    Investing in infrastructure can't be that bad a thing though can it?
    The speed in which China are building HUGE infrastructure works is quite amazing, and the USA's infrastructure is crumbling.

    Don't think you'll be changing your ways too soon, you're addicted to that cheap Chinese stuff... just like the rest of the world.

  11. #29251
    Platinum garrett's Avatar
    Reputation
    29
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    4,259
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by garrett View Post
    What Country are you from Salty_Aus if you don't mind I ask, because you seem to have a deluded understanding of this stuff....
    When you get a chance, please explain how you're going to do this? You do realize China is the largest foreign holder of US debt already?

    "First we are going to squash them Economically and then when they are weak enough, we will destroy them Militarily.

    EZ Game"

    We leveraged our debt on China to such an extent that if they decide to get squirmy, we can just not pay it..

    That would be the tipping point of an already fragile Economy that's being propped up by artificial growth, and currency manipulation. It's not that hard to tumble China if you think about it, when most there debt is leveraged against 1 super-powerful country, the U.S.

    beyond that is Top Secret

     
    Comments
      
      Salty_Aus: You deserve a green for making this grumpy old man smile :)

  12. #29252
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by garrett View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post

    When you get a chance, please explain how you're going to do this? You do realize China is the largest foreign holder of US debt already?

    "First we are going to squash them Economically and then when they are weak enough, we will destroy them Militarily.

    EZ Game"

    We leveraged our debt on China to such an extent that if they decide to get squirmy, we can just not pay it..

    That would be the tipping point of an already fragile Economy that's being propped up by artificial growth, and currency manipulation. It's not that hard to tumble China if you think about it, when most there debt is leveraged against 1 super-powerful country, the U.S.

    beyond that is Top Secret
    Not pay them?

    Guess you can also stop them from dumping that debt too in your fantasy land? (no reason they would want to do this anyway as it will hurt them too)

    I don't think you quite grasp basic concepts.

  13. #29253
    Master of Props Daly's Avatar
    Reputation
    2671
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10,306
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Fun fact: depending on the day of the week it may actually be Japan and not China that is the biggest non US holder of debt.

  14. #29254
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by Daly View Post
    Fun fact: depending on the day of the week it may actually be Japan and not China that is the biggest non US holder of debt.
    Japan is the biggest seller of US debt right now, and I believe the China figures are higher then reported.

    Second fun fact: Russia is the biggest buyer right now.

  15. #29255
    Master of Props Daly's Avatar
    Reputation
    2671
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10,306
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by garrett View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post

    When you get a chance, please explain how you're going to do this? You do realize China is the largest foreign holder of US debt already?

    "First we are going to squash them Economically and then when they are weak enough, we will destroy them Militarily.

    EZ Game"

    We leveraged our debt on China to such an extent that if they decide to get squirmy, we can just not pay it..

    That would be the tipping point of an already fragile Economy that's being propped up by artificial growth, and currency manipulation. It's not that hard to tumble China if you think about it, when most there debt is leveraged against 1 super-powerful country, the U.S.

    beyond that is Top Secret
    I don't even know where to start with this.

  16. #29256
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post


    this is a weird analysis. you conclude that the US is stronger militarily but that China would catch up with the US in the event of a war. not only does this conflict with literally any article on the subject of military might, but it doesn't make logical sense. if china could easily catch up with the US, it already would have.

    in any event, the discussion itself is completely pointless. there is a reason that countries with nuclear weapons don't have conventional wars with other nuclear armed countries. can you guess what that is?
    I think he is arguing that China could convert civilian manufacturing infrastructure for military purposes and very quickly catch up and overtake US if they chose to. This is what the US did during WWII, and is very reasonable in some alternate universe where it was possible China and the US would get into a full scale conventional war, which would never happen.
    but the US would just do the same thing.....

    also actual wars between superpowers would take weeks and not years like during WW2. there would be no time to "catch up" with the US. entire countries would be leveled within a month or within days if either side wanted it, which they would.

    yet another reason why this whole conversation is idiotic. (not directed at you, i realize this is salty aus's bizarre thread derail.)

  17. #29257
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post

    Yeah it's pointless, no way the USA or anyone attacks China in the foreseeable future!


    glad we're on the same page

  18. #29258
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by verminaard View Post

    I think he is arguing that China could convert civilian manufacturing infrastructure for military purposes and very quickly catch up and overtake US if they chose to. This is what the US did during WWII, and is very reasonable in some alternate universe where it was possible China and the US would get into a full scale conventional war, which would never happen.
    but the US would just do the same thing.....

    also actual wars between superpowers would take weeks and not years like during WW2. there would be no time to "catch up" with the US. entire countries would be leveled within a month or within days if either side wanted it, which they would.

    yet another reason why this whole conversation is idiotic. (not directed at you, i realize this is salty aus's bizarre thread derail.)
    I didn't derail shit. I merely pointed out attacking China was a real bad idea... a point SOMEONE ELSE made first!

  19. #29259
    Diamond blake's Avatar
    Reputation
    1440
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,950
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post

    but the US would just do the same thing.....

    also actual wars between superpowers would take weeks and not years like during WW2. there would be no time to "catch up" with the US. entire countries would be leveled within a month or within days if either side wanted it, which they would.

    yet another reason why this whole conversation is idiotic. (not directed at you, i realize this is salty aus's bizarre thread derail.)
    I didn't derail shit. I merely pointed out attacking China was a real bad idea... a point SOMEONE ELSE made first!
    ok glad we agree that nuclear powers going to war would end very badly for the globe.

  20. #29260
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65705055
    Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post

    I didn't derail shit. I merely pointed out attacking China was a real bad idea... a point SOMEONE ELSE made first!
    ok glad we agree that nuclear powers going to war would end very badly for the globe.
    Perhaps you can brush up on your reading and comprehension skills next time, before you go-off half cocked.

    BAH

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 24 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 24 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Picture of train coming at me while I'm parked on the tracks
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 07-06-2016, 03:03 PM
  2. Who is on the North Carolina Train??????
    By Fartapotomous in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04-05-2016, 04:08 AM
  3. Question about taking a long train ride
    By Drexel in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-17-2015, 12:58 AM
  4. Trump Entertainment Resorts files for Bankruptcy for the second time
    By BeerAndPoker in forum Scams, Scandals, and Shadiness
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-10-2014, 06:05 AM
  5. amazing train wreck in spain
    By Rollo Tomasi in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-25-2013, 02:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

# tyde is back, # tyde is black, ##408america, #4dragons was right, #big dick has a glass eye, #pepe dry humps tina's fat roll, ...scandinavian bob for white house plumber, 408dragons, 408trump, 4dragons flunked out of trump university, :peet, barry loves the smell of hillary's vagina, barry pisses in the ladies bathroom at target, big dick denies his mexican heritage, big dick is a cock gobbler, big dick menstruates thru his ass, big dicks dick is massive and his balls are grande, bill came on muck's blue dress, blake = george conway, blake smoked all of nita's n-word weed, boogiemen, dirtyb licks feminist armpits, drk has lost his ever freaking mind, drk snorts viagra and dyes his pubes, drkstrisntrichenough, fresh jelly beaners on the side, gare down the rabbit hole, gare is fat and skiny at the same time, godless self hating jews for trump, goosestepping, in the flesh, info sec pros endorse hillary, is anyone as dumb as gordman?, jimmy films hilary sucking kaps milk choc pole, jimmyg_415 is fucking retarded, ken hordells tits are the tits, larrylafferforpresident, league of extraordinary retards, libtards justify voting for a criminal, lol wow cant handle his drink, lol wows british dad, lord of the faggots returns to suk dick, marty eats barbequed iguana, marty needs a mandatory tooth brushing policy, mintjewlips = nut low, mintjewlips smells his hand after jerking off, mommy buy me a boogie board please, mossad, mossad had fps banned, muck ficon eats dead dick, muck ficon has 2 retarded eyes, muck ficon plays with barbie dolls, muck ficon's racist girlfriend voted for trump, mumblesforvp, n-wordtoes, nsa, ramrod, redram, side dish is a nazi, sidedish gives hongkonger free money, sk drug abusing package n-word, sk got his shit pushed in, sk is just the ms part, someone named el gallo doesnt know he is hispanic, sonatine eats trump milk steaks, sonatine got fat eating trump steaks, sonatine has ikea furr for pubes, sonatine spirit cooks his limp dick, suicide king identifies as a potato, tellafriend= mintjewlips' penis protector, thesaddish sold his sold on a bad bet, tine the card carrying liberal, trump doesnt brown the meat, trumpsucks, tyde stores trumps jizz in his goiter, vegas defends his n-word weed empire, virtue signal here if you love n-words, ¿a qué hora se ducha tu hermana?

View Tag Cloud