Time to get on the TRUMP train

[Mintjewlips]

DON'T SIT DOWN YOU'RE GONNA LOVE THE NEXT ONE





Line of the day...

[GambleBotsSatire]

who's writing this? either god or the cpu programmers of our simulation or are u really gonna tell me its completely random all the soyboys we've made fun of for years are now going to tilt on the starbucks CEO who may deliver 2020 to trump on a silver platter

schultz will only run if a progressive candidate wins the nomination
he should be the ceo of progressive insurance

[thesidedish]

who's writing this? either god or the cpu programmers of our simulation or are u really gonna tell me its completely random all the soyboys we've made fun of for years are now going to tilt on the starbucks CEO who may deliver 2020 to trump on a silver platter

schultz will only run if a progressive candidate wins the nomination
he should be the ceo of progressive insurance

idk, he seems pretty defiant that he can go all the way. saw him answer a question from someone "so Michael Bloomberg didn't run in 2016 cuz he thought he might help trump" and Shultz was all "I think maybe he thinks he made a mistake" and not in the sense of "trump won anyway" but "I think he mighta had it"

[blake]

schultz will only run if a progressive candidate wins the nomination
he should be the ceo of progressive insurance

idk, he seems pretty defiant that he can go all the way. saw him answer a question from someone "so Michael Bloomberg didn't run in 2016 cuz he thought he might help trump" and Shultz was all "I think maybe he thinks he made a mistake" and not in the sense of "trump won anyway" but "I think he mighta had it"

i don't know how much stock he owns in starbucks or if he even cares what happens to that company, but if he decides to run, starbucks will be hit with the largest boycott in history. the vast majority of starbucks' clientele has to be liberals

i can already see AOC's tweets

[Mintjewlips]

Blake yet again with the asinine claims....

[FR1GHT]

[blake]

Blake yet again with the asinine claims....

please just google boycott starbucks and you will see that it's already starting to happen. michael moore is calling for it now. when AOC gets into this, starbucks is losing 20% of its business.

[blake]

Officials at SKDKnickerbocker, a progressive public affairs and consulting firm, have been reaching out to Democratic operatives in the last week expressing fear the animus directed at Schultz over his proposed independent presidential bid was having a spillover effect on the coffee conglomerate he used to lead.

They really wanna make sure that Democrats and liberals aren’t going after Starbucks and are stressing that it’s not fair to the company,” said the operative, who relayed details about the conversation on condition of anonymity.

The company today isn’t run by Schultz, hasn't been run by Schultz [as he's considered running for president], he is not even on the board,” said the SKDK official, who spoke about private conversations on condition of anonymity. “So trying to punish Schultz through Starbucks is unfair when this company has done a huge amount of good and social impact. When you conflate the two you are making an assumption that the company is involved in politics when they’re not.”

Though Schultz may have left the company, he retains the title of chairman emeritus and his stake in Starbucks is estimated to be more than $2 billion.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-fi...tarbucks-alone


rofl -- good luck with getting dems not to boycott guys

[sonatine]

Officials at SKDKnickerbocker, a progressive public affairs and consulting firm, have been reaching out to Democratic operatives in the last week expressing fear the animus directed at Schultz over his proposed independent presidential bid was having a spillover effect on the coffee conglomerate he used to lead.

They really wanna make sure that Democrats and liberals aren’t going after Starbucks and are stressing that it’s not fair to the company,” said the operative, who relayed details about the conversation on condition of anonymity.

The company today isn’t run by Schultz, hasn't been run by Schultz [as he's considered running for president], he is not even on the board,” said the SKDK official, who spoke about private conversations on condition of anonymity. “So trying to punish Schultz through Starbucks is unfair when this company has done a huge amount of good and social impact. When you conflate the two you are making an assumption that the company is involved in politics when they’re not.”

Though Schultz may have left the company, he retains the title of chairman emeritus and his stake in Starbucks is estimated to be more than $2 billion.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-fi...tarbucks-alone


rofl -- good luck with getting dems not to boycott guys

boycotts are the least of their concerns.

cinderblocks through windows is going to be the theme song.

[blake]

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089254251111567360

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089585033269137409

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089864846374522881

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089190066214318082

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1089976231762767875

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/1090006077444362241

i can keep doing this for 500 more pages

[blake]

schultz's $2,000,000,000 worth of starbucks stock will be cut in half overnight if he says he's running.

he's just egomaniacal enough to not have realized this would happen

[Sloppy Joe]

I love how leftist news outlets are praising Stacey Abrams for her SOTU response.

She had a phony smile and came off totally insincere. Reminded me of a Denny's manager when I complain that my "Moons Over My Hammy" was undercooked, and she gives me that "I don't give a shit but I'm going to pretend to be polite" look and attitude.

Her short speech had little substance, but was mostly just fluff. It was comprised of generalities and inaccurate left-wing Trump attacks, such as the claim that he's putting children in cages. Ugh.

Also, her rant about voter suppression came off like a sore loser. I love how she claims to have founded a "non-partisan" organization called Fair Fight in order to "advocate for voting rights", when in reality Fair Fight's goals are identical lock-step with those of the Democratic Party. Why throw "non-partisan" in there when it's clearly not true?

I'm surprised that Democrats think this chick is a huge future star. Why? Because she's black and female?

I will concede that nearly everyone seems to come off badly in their SOTU response nowadays. Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio, Joni Ernst... all dreadful. And remember Joe Kennedy last year with the drool on his face the entire time? LOL

What did you think of Trump's speech?

[Mintjewlips]

Blake yet again with the asinine claims....

please just google boycott starbucks and you will see that it's already starting to happen. michael moore is calling for it now. when AOC gets into this, starbucks is losing 20% of its business.

So the boycott just started and Starbucks is down 20%??....yea....

[blake]

please just google boycott starbucks and you will see that it's already starting to happen. michael moore is calling for it now. when AOC gets into this, starbucks is losing 20% of its business.

So the boycott just started and Starbucks is down 20%??....yea....

is your response the product of english being a second language or is this more of an IQ thing?

[Mintjewlips]

The most popular coffee company that has ever existed is going to be affected by a couple hundred people on Twitter????.....

This polarization of everything is getting old and worn out, people go to Starbucks for their products not their idiology(yes I mean idiology, as in idiot beliefs), yet libtards think their rules for radicals will sway every billion dollar empire, its disgustingly arrogant and absurd....

[Mintjewlips]

So the boycott just started and Starbucks is down 20%??....yea....

is your response the product of english being a second language or is this more of an IQ thing?

It's a question of the ability to think critically, it's like you just see something and run with it because it confirms your bias.

Excuse me for not giving a fuck about trending Twitter topics..

[Mintjewlips]

Hold on, dont post your gonna like the next rant

[blake]

nobody tells me not to post.

[thesidedish]

Officials at SKDKnickerbocker, a progressive public affairs and consulting firm, have been reaching out to Democratic operatives in the last week expressing fear the animus directed at Schultz over his proposed independent presidential bid was having a spillover effect on the coffee conglomerate he used to lead.

They really wanna make sure that Democrats and liberals aren’t going after Starbucks and are stressing that it’s not fair to the company,” said the operative, who relayed details about the conversation on condition of anonymity.

The company today isn’t run by Schultz, hasn't been run by Schultz [as he's considered running for president], he is not even on the board,” said the SKDK official, who spoke about private conversations on condition of anonymity. “So trying to punish Schultz through Starbucks is unfair when this company has done a huge amount of good and social impact. When you conflate the two you are making an assumption that the company is involved in politics when they’re not.”

Though Schultz may have left the company, he retains the title of chairman emeritus and his stake in Starbucks is estimated to be more than $2 billion.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-fi...tarbucks-alone


rofl -- good luck with getting dems not to boycott guys

boycotts are the least of their concerns.

cinderblocks through windows is going to be the theme song.

amazingly enough the one building that got vandalized in DC on inauguration day was a starbucks. GREAT JOB PREDICTING THE FUTURE ANTIFA!!!

[sonatine]

i just want to take a second to point out that if it turns out that trump laundered money through his inaugural committee it will be in the top 10 stupidest fucking things ive ever heard of an adult doing, ever.