why are you using the word "exonerates" when it specifically said DOESN'T exonerate
why are you using the word "exonerates" when it specifically said DOESN'T exonerate
Originally Posted by MrTickle
Why are u such an easily manipulated drone u cant tell that line is in there specifically so donkeys like u have a counter argument. SO DONT USE IT! But yes they are absolutely drawing dead on obstruction cuz they cant prove any malicious motivation by trump cuz 0 Russian collusion. They can NEVER prove he fired Comey to weasel out of something. Game over, wait for ur next complaining instructions and get ready to follow them to the letter. Kill urself
it is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.
Why are u such an easily manipulated drone u cant tell that line is in there specifically so donkeys like u have a counter argument. SO DONT USE IT! But yes they are absolutely drawing dead on obstruction cuz they cant prove any malicious motivation by trump cuz 0 Russian collusion. They can NEVER prove he fired Comey to weasel out of something. Game over, wait for ur next complaining instructions and get ready to follow them to the letter. Kill urself
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
I'm not up to date on all the lawyerings, but it sounds like a "You're being arrested for refusing arrest" kind of scenario.it is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
Donald Trump may have acted illegally while trying to thwart a coup based on a complete lie made up by the opposition party.
That's the new Democratic platform?
Yeah, Trump by a landslide in 2020.
Ex-Nevada Dem Assemblywoman Accuses Joe Biden of ‘Blatantly Inappropriate and Unnerving’ Behavior
"I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified. I thought to myself, “I didn’t wash my hair today and the vice-president of the United States is smelling it. And also, what in the actual fuck? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?” He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head. My brain couldn’t process what was happening. I was embarrassed. I was shocked. I was confused. There is a Spanish saying, “tragame tierra,” it means, “earth, swallow me whole.” I couldn’t move and I couldn’t say anything. I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me. My name was called and I was never happier to get on stage in front of an audience.
https://www.mediaite.com/online/brea...ving-behavior/
Yeah he’s been creepy before. I’m curious to see if he apologizes or denies it with her being a Bernie loyalist. They drag on each other and have a lot of crossover appeal despite one being moderate and one a dem socialist. When you removed Biden from polling
Bernie is the biggest beneficiary. I saw he went down 19c on predictit before this broke so clearly someone got down a few $
he's in a no-win situation as not only is this disqualifying, if true, but denying an accusation like this from a female is also disqualifying in the democrat party.
also there has to be thousands of these accounts ready to come out of the woodwork. we've all seen video of joe doing this at least a dozen times already.
Yeah, I would guess he’s just going to apologize, say it was innocent, and stay retired and not run. It will likely be the end if he sits it out. This is basically a kick in the balls telling him get out now or they’ll be talking about creepy uncle Joe all day. I assume he sits it out. Its probably why he hasn’t announced yet and why Obama threw his people and infrastructure behind beto.he's in a no-win situation as not only is this disqualifying, if true, but denying an accusation like this from a female is also disqualifying in the democrat party.
also there has to be thousands of these accounts ready to come out of the woodwork. we've all seen video of joe doing this at least a dozen times already.
he's come out and said he has no recollection of this (smart that it's not a denial) but that she has every right to share her experience and the country is better for it.Yeah, I would guess he’s just going to apologize, say it was innocent, and stay retired and not run. It will likely be the end if he sits it out. This is basically a kick in the balls telling him get out now or they’ll be talking about creepy uncle Joe all day. I assume he sits it out. Its probably why he hasn’t announced yet and why Obama threw his people and infrastructure behind beto.
i guess that's the best possible statement he could make. i still have trouble figuring out how he runs as a democrat in the "me too" and virtue signaling age we're in
Tulsi Gabbard comes out and states it's a good thing that the POTUS wasn't colluding with the Russians and Democrats eviscerate her.
LULZ
Just shut that clown party down already.
CAN TAKO FALL DUNK A BASKETBALL???
FUCKING ALLEY OOP TO THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2020
If you want to see what a Trump 2020 campaign trail will look like, picture the Michigan rally every city he shows up to.
The man is an unstoppable force, his momentum is the equivalent to a comet on a collision course with the DNC.
They should just concede and save everyone the trouble....
Last edited by Mintjewlips; 03-29-2019 at 03:45 PM.
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Gerson
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
_____________________________________________
Way be way off here but what hurt the N.Y. crimes families big time was the Dons were ultimately guilty forit is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
the crimes committed under their rule
Look you have 500 plus days left of campaigning. Give that politician all the air time she can get.
In fact I'm thinking of donating to her Patreon page where I'll get the extra back stage photos
The “smoking gun” evidence in Nixon’s downfall was the audio recording of him directing his staff to effect the covering up of the Watergate break-in, initially with the payoffs to the burglars’ families, and then getting the CIA to deflect the FBI’s investigation of the hush money trail through a bank in Mexico. But there was no proof available to Congress by then that Nixon ordered the Watergate break-in or even knew about it beforehand. So, he faced certain conviction in the Senate merely on obstruction of justice given that “smoking gun” evidence.it is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
Here he is with Eva Longoria at the same event
There are currently 20 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 20 guests)
Reply With Quote
