Since this is "our" forum and Druff doesn't want to make a decision maybe he will listen to us users.
This is a PUBLIC poll to prevent a million dupes from showing up so your vote will be seen by all.
Since this is "our" forum and Druff doesn't want to make a decision maybe he will listen to us users.
This is a PUBLIC poll to prevent a million dupes from showing up so your vote will be seen by all.
Feel free to add other options.
@POOH @TODDWITELLES WE NEED OPTION #UNDECIDED
silly to have 2 different options for ban. The poll should be ban, no ban but w sanctions (scammatar, etc), or no sanctions at all. He's not going to pay anyone $500, so that's kind of an unreasonable option.
I don't remember the bet he welched on, to be honest.
I thought it was about Whitney Houston and a napkin. Turns out that was an entirely different ordeal involving 408mike, predictably.
Aaaaand I bumped it.
Last edited by Henry; 04-27-2016 at 02:26 PM.
Searles should be knighted
I wonder if Drexel would have no showed a dinner date with Sir Jason Searles?
Free fluffer. Tired of this.
http://www.n-wordmania.com/
He should be banished to the above site where he will dispose pooh of grand wizard status.
I do let me change to, jsearless should make a donation to this wonderfull site in vegas's name he can then be reinstated.
http://n-wordmania.net/forum/forumdi...of-n-wordmania
I voted continue as is because he clearly gives no fucks to not being able to give rep or play in the freeroll.
BTW, I applaud BB for his stance in HIS poker room.
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
Originally Posted by Hockey Guy
WTF no option for 'Bag him the fuck up'?
The problem with this is Druff makes the final decision and usually it's to unban people over time then they do something or new information comes to light to reinstate the ban when it should have stuck permanently (in this case until jsearles paid vegas). Since it's Druff's forum he has that call but I can't say I agree with it in certain cases.
jsearles was a complete nuisance when banned a few years ago since the instant message feature still allowed him to send people FREE JSEARLES, which I got several of them messages when I had that left on and he could get into the chat room during radio to whine about his ban before Druff banned him from chat for the night.
I'm on the fence in this case because the bet welcher was allowed back because vegas said it was fine he wrote it off and now after the whole scamming shit involving Lannister we want to see the guy get banned again until he pays it after he was allowed back despite not paying?
I do agree if jsearles is gonna brag about how much money he has it's laughable and disgusting he can't man up by paying vegas.
Druff might want to consider a rule for people involved in any of these scams or welching that even if they make good on it at some point they can't participate in freerolls and other betting contests on the forum ever again just to save those involved the headaches. This might not be a popular choice since some people on this forum get off on the drama these individuals bring, thus they find a liking to that person but whatever.
When you're a married man who likely shares a bank account with the wife I would imagine it would be frowned upon to see a $500 payment go out to a stranger on a website known for black cocks. Just imo. However, don't make a bet if you can't pay the damn debt broke n-word.
jsearles, there is a $55 freeroll prize that you "won" which I am currently holding until resolution.
How about making some kind of settlement with vegas1369 for some middle ground, plus I will send him the $55l, and we will be done with it?
That sounds like the most reasonable course of action here where everyone will win (except for those who hate seeing you post on this forum).
This site was relatively new when the wager was made. But Searles new Vegas went back years on these forums, while Vegas seen Searles as just a cocky noob.
So why on earth was escrow not insisted upon for a wage as large as $500 when one party was basically just a random at the time?
But guess the reasoning for that must've already been answered..
btw the $500 is still a debt, but voted no restrictions as he was brought back in without restrictions. And that should still stand.
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)