Originally Posted by
Towerflower
Do you have a source to this TV interview?
To claim that I am blackmailing lock pros and mgmt to pay me, is the criminal offense of defamation. On the other hand, if you have proof that I blackmailed any of the participants of the Lock Poker FRAUD, feel free to post that proof here.
Wait wat? Didn't you say that if lock pros and ownership didn't pay you you would report them for not paying taxes or something along that line? Also the name you are using on pfa is tower flower. Is that in fact your real name?
Post 283 in lock poker avoid thread by tower flower
Message to some of the participants of the illegal operation Lock Poker: Liezl Tengco, Shane Bridges, Gerard Poltorak, Eric Lynch, Bryce Geoffrey, Jim Erwood,
Melanie Weisner, Anette Obrestad.
participant = continued to advertise or work for Lock, while it was clear that player funds are misappropriated = ponzi scheme
I have an amicable solution for you(except Larson and Young as legal action already has started):
Lock Poker owe me $127,000 and I have screenshots and email conversation with Geoffrey to prove this.
$127,000 divided with 10(including Larson and Young) = $12,700 per participant.
You have the possibility to give me this amount in Bitcoins until 28th January 2016 and the case is finished for my part:
BTC address: 1CRJyeJv1zJwv12McLnQabedFUcWUgkkuU
Reference: your first name
I am the only one with sufficient proof/info who is going after you and if I stop doing this, the case should be finished for you.
After 28th January 2016, I will initiate legal action against accomplices who did not feel any obligation to compensate my damage. I will be then also so kindly to publicize further info(address, etc.), documents and proof, so other victims can demand their money directly from you and based on the civil laws of the relevant jurisdictions for the next up to 30 years at any time.
I also know that most of you did not declare your income properly and you might be then also held accountable for the criminal offense of tax evasion.
Explanation: I decided to withdraw Young, as I think that someone who spent our money for 5 stars boutique hotels and $500 wine bottles(while some of us urgend needed that money), should not have the possibility to get away for only $12,700.
I am already in the process of initiating criminal proceeding(s) and will update as soon as further details are available, but this can take of course months, like in the case of Larson.
Stay tuned...
How is the above not ------> black·mail
the action, treated as a criminal offense, of demanding money from a person in return for not revealing compromising or injurious information about that person.
Its also after January 28th did you indeed initiate the actions? Or were you bluffing? Off course you can say that you said you were initiating after jan 28th so this could be jan 28 2017 , well played.