Rand Paul
Christie
Trump
Hilary
Bernie
Carson
Cruz
Rubio
Bush
Kasich
You don't actually think he has enough knowledge of the economy to do this do you?Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Fucking Fox. Here's the link:
It appears Trump understands he is beat with Obama & Yellen's recent game plan for the rest of the year.
Trump rallied "Yuge" while we were tanking Dec-March. Not so much now.
It doesn't surprise me the "Massive Recession" story got no traction. Most people have no clue what a recession is.
Trump is making a mistake by implying that he can "trade" his way out of it. The economy waxes and wanes. It ebbs and flows. Bubbles form and they deflate. We're gonna suffer for a while but we can get back to some kind of responsible policy.
His message should just be simply to tell the truth from the point of view of an experienced billionaire investor and businessman. Reveal what the Fed is doing to average Americans.
Point out the fraudulent economic numbers. GDP & unemployment. Point out how numbers are always revised downward months later (unnoticed & under the radar) by the same crew who cook them up in the first place.
Just stay on point Donald if that is fucking possible. Ball is in his court.
No, Pooh.
He binked the truth and then he kept talking. Cringed in embarrassment.
I wish he had a guy. A team.
Look he ain't a crook like Hillary. He's just dumb.
I guess bribing public officials, union officials, and mob bosses to build every project in NY, NJ, that he ever built isn't really a crime, but your right he's really dumb for bragging about it
You're right, we should go back to the upstanding men of the good old days like Andrew Carnegie and the Homestead Strike.I guess bribing public officials, union officials, and mob bosses to build every project in NY, NJ, that he ever built isn't really a crime, but your right he's really dumb for bragging about it
Ever seen the doc "men who built america? If not you should it's v good.You're right, we should go back to the upstanding men of the good old days like Andrew Carnegie and the Homestead Strike.
http://www.history.com/shows/men-who-built-america
I have it on DVD. So yeah, I know.Ever seen the doc "men who built america? If not you should it's v good.
http://www.history.com/shows/men-who-built-america
CNBC host nearly shits his pants when a veteran Wall Street mover and shaker tells whom he think is the best candidate for the presidency. (Giggle!)
_____________________________________________
People who know, know that liberals are better for the economy, including for the rich, than conservatives.
Correct. The rich like liberal ethos because it keeps people working for nothing and gives away cash and prizes to those who can't so they don't riot. Much better than the conservative approach where you don't take their hard earned money with taxation in the first place, let the consumer (taxpayer) make their own decisions on whether or not to spend for anything other than roads and the military and live a life of freedom instead of freebies that even our grandchildren can't pay for... oh... that they didn't vote for either because they're not born yet. Because of democrat policies, we are ensured to be wage slaves to our bank note holders for the rest of time, or until we decide to kill our multinational creditors in war.People who know, know that liberals are better for the economy, including for the rich, than conservatives.
Of course, that could never happen here, that's preposterous http://www.history.com/topics/french-revolution
Oh crap
https://twitter.com/twt/status/719159990834081794
Colorado GOP deletes #nevertrump tweet, pledges investigation
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...p-tweet-221766
Cruz Campaign Outmuscles Trump in 34-Delegate Colorado Sweep
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ar...rado-delegates
Ted Cruz swept the Republican National Convention delegate selection process in Colorado, displaying a strong grassroots organizational effort and greater popularity among the western state’s most committed party activists.
The showing from the junior senator from Texas highlighted Donald Trump’s lack of a robust national political organization, a problem that could doom the Republican front-runner and political novice at the party’s national convention in July.
Delegates backing Cruz won all of the slots for participation at the national convention in Cleveland, with the final 13 being selected at the end of a day-long convention Saturday in Colorado Springs. That gave Cruz 34 delegates in the state.
“You all have been a part of something incredible that has happened over the last three weeks,” Cruz told more than 5,000 party activists at the convention earlier on Saturday as he reflected on recent victories in Utah and Wisconsin as well as Colorado.
The state convention selections followed 21 delegates who were picked at previously held congressional district conventions. Three Colorado party leaders will also attend the national convention as unpledged delegates.
So if you're a Colorado Republican, you don't get to vote on the Primary...
Colorado GOP blundered on 2016 presidential caucus
Republicans made big mistake in abandoning presidential tally
The Colorado Republican Party's decision last summer to jettison a presidential poll at its caucus on Tuesday looks worse with every passing day.
Except for the actual delegates to July's national convention, Colorado Republicans who want to have a say in the future of their party have mostly been stripped of a role in the most interesting and surprising nominating struggle in decades.
They'll stand on the sidelines on Super Tuesday while other states determine whether Donald Trump continues his march toward a possible nomination or whether his rivals can slow him down.
Meanwhile, local airwaves have been featuring ads on behalf of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, since the Democrats are still holding a traditional caucus at which participants get to signal their support for a candidate. It's known as democracy. The Colorado Republican executive committee needs to reacquaint itself with the concept.
GOP leaders have never provided a satisfactory reason for forgoing a presidential preference poll, although party chairman Steve House suggested on radio at one point that too many Republicans would otherwise flock to their local caucus.
Imagine that: party officials fearing that an interesting race might propel thousands of additional citizens to participate. But of course that might dilute the influence of elites and insiders. You can see why that could upset the faint-hearted.
By contrast, far-sighted party leaders should have welcomed the extra attention to their caucus and the potential activism on the party's behalf it would have spawned.
Admittedly, one thing has changed since the GOP executive committee made its decision on a preference poll: It appears somewhat more likely today that no candidate will have wrapped up the nomination by convention time. But even if that ends up being the case, it will be no great boon to Colorado's uncommitted delegates. If no candidate has enough votes on the first ballot to secure the nomination, delegates will be free to vote for anyone they like anyway.
It's bad enough the two parties in Colorado don't have presidential primaries in which many more voters would participate. The caucuses already limit participation to a narrow slice of the electorate. But the fact that the Republican leadership then took matters a step further and deprived even that narrow slice of voters a voice in one of the most competitive, consequential political nominations in memory - and perhaps in history - is mindboggling.
It's likely that some Republicans who show up Tuesday will be surprised to learn their presidential preference is of no consequence. Perhaps someone should be on hand to explain to them why party democracy is apparently too disruptive and unpredictable to be trusted.
http://www.denverpost.com/editorials...dential-caucus
I expected this, but not before breakfast. Goodbye GOP, it's been fun.
What's with the single note that sounds like it's from a kid's synthesizer at 1:03?
This is an interesting video from 1980.
Trump was wise beyond his years.
It confirms the present day Trump isn't some shtick. He's been thinking about this stuff for decades.
Anyone who isn't a sellout
AWIAS 2016
The mail ding from his AOL account?What's with the single note that sounds like it's from a kid's synthesizer at 1:03?
Is that what it sounds like? Never used AOL.The mail ding from his AOL account?
More of a dig on how old he is that he probably never left AOL, but I remember it being a guy that said:Is that what it sounds like? Never used AOL.
I always preferred Letterman's "You've got veal!"More of a dig on how old he is that he probably never left AOL, but I remember it being a guy that said:
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote
