Rand Paul
Christie
Trump
Hilary
Bernie
Carson
Cruz
Rubio
Bush
Kasich
Elizabeth Warren is god... Liberals love her. She can play dirty and she is much more intelligent than Trump. It would not go well for him.Originally Posted by blake
not so sure about this one..... the only person bernie sanders' supporters like more than sanders is elizabeth warren. picking her might help solidify the democratic base. warren saying last night that she is ready to serve as commander in chief was telling
We pray for understanding as we all occasionally request back door action by accident, when we tried to call an electrician. It happens, it simply happens.
honestly, every single bernie sanders supporter absolutely loves warren. any hope that trump had of taking bernie voters would probably end if she was the VP pick, although i imagine picking someone from ohio or florida would make sense too
The precedent - not president, case for this was when Al Gore supporters manipulated the SEO algorithm on Google so that if you typed in 'Geroge Bush', you would get all kinds of negative shit for the entire first page. The name for this is a Google Bomb.
The way I see it, Google is sometimes taking steps to modify, if not mollify results that may or may not have been artificially manipulated.. or not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb
http://www.searchenginepeople.com/bl...gle-bombs.html
Elizabeth Warren is god... Liberals love her. She can play dirty and she is much more intelligent than Trump. It would not go well for him.
Betting you $5 that if Warren somehow gets involved, Trump verbally wipes his ass with her, and leaves her in a ditch.
4Dragons: shows true colors of supporting a woman who faked being native american to get into a better school
if this is all you have on her id say she is doing pretty well.
Unless you have more of course?
It doesn't matter because no matter what you will think Trump is winning. He could call her a "poop face" and you would get an erection.
Betting you $5 that if Warren somehow gets involved, Trump verbally wipes his ass with her, and leaves her in a ditch.
We pray for understanding as we all occasionally request back door action by accident, when we tried to call an electrician. It happens, it simply happens.
It doesn't matter because no matter what you will think Trump is winning. He could call her a "poop face" and you would get an erection.
That looks like another OPINION you just typed. "NO MATTER WHAT I THINK TRUMP IS WINNING"
Did I say that? Or are you GUESSING and pulling shit out of your ass again?
plz explain to us all how you would determine if trump "verbally wipes his ass with her, and leaves her in a ditch."
That looks like another OPINION you just typed. "NO MATTER WHAT I THINK TRUMP IS WINNING"
Did I say that? Or are you GUESSING and pulling shit out of your ass again?
what facts would you use to determine a winner for this wager? oh your personal opinion? you dont say.
jesus you are a fucking mong
Some more on this from Julian Assange
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-34780998.html
Google works closely with Hillary Clinton to promote presidential campaign
Newsflash, Hillary is a snakeinthegrass.Assange appeared via video link from the Ecuadorian embassy in London as part of the 'New Era of Journalism: Farewell to Mainstream international media' forum in Moscow.
He said: "Google is directly engaged with Hillary Clinton’s campaign" and claimed the technology giant used the US State Department on a "a quid pro quo" basis.
"Of course when she is in power… she is a problem for freedom of speech. We know what she is going to do. And she made the chart for the destruction of Libya, she was involved in the process of taking the Libyan armoury and sending it to Syria."
Assange reiterated his claims that Clinton is a "war hawk" that "seemingly" wants to start wars.
"What we have with Clinton is someone who is a hawk but who has the tools of legal interventionism, a rhetorical cover to start wars, and someone who seemingly wants to start them… From WikiLeaks’ perspective Hillary Clinton is a problem in terms of war and peace."
He also pointed out that former Google CEO Eric Schmidt is now heading the Pentagon innovation board.
"Google is heavily integrated with Washington power, at personal level and at business level. Google, which has increasing control over the distribution channels,… is intensely allying itself with the US exceptionalism.
"It [Google] shows the will to use that at different levels. It will inevitably influence its audience."
The founder and editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks added: "Google is an intensely Washington, DC-aligned company. I see a Google exit from China… It seems much more to do with Google's feeling that it is part of ‘family America’ and that it is opposed to the Chinese."
Fortune reported last year that researchers had found that "Google search rankings could potentially decide the outcome of an election".
"Through five experiments in two countries... biased rankings in search results can shift the opinions of undecided voters by 20% or more, sometimes even reaching as high as 80% in some demographic groups.
"If Google tweaks its algorithm to show more positive search results for a candidate, the researchers say, the searcher may form a more positive opinion of him or her."
Assange also claimed that the US government can put pressure on social media site Facebook.
"The US apparatus can squeeze Facebook, Facebook squeezes your capital, you don't want to risk losing your capital so you start to adjust reportage as an individual, you start to adjust the things you say."
During the video conference Assange said that the US National Security Agency is now '80 percent privatised'.
"There is a merger between the corporate organisations and state… 80 percent of the National Security Agency budget is privatised. The NSA is the core of the US deep state… There has been a smoothing out between the government and the corporations."
Assange has been staying at London's Ecuadorian embassy since August 2012.
He is wanted for questioning in Sweden over a sex allegation, which he denies, but believes he will be extradited to the United States to be quizzed about the activities of WikiLeaks if he travels there.
In February a United Nations working group decided that he is being unlawfully detained. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention said the Swedish and British authorities should end Assange's "deprivation of liberty" and respect his physical integrity and freedom of movement.
Melinda Taylor, part of Assange's legal team, said the UN report made clear that the WikiLeaks founder was neither a fugitive from justice, nor could he just walk out of the embassy.
She called it a "damning indictment" of the way Mr Assange has been treated.
How might Google influence opinion?
Based on research by Dr. Robert Epstein & Ronald E. Robertson webpagefx.com examined how the tech giant might influence opinion through its search results. The findings are summarised in a series of graphics below.
Apparently, this is just getting started..
'If this is true, it is a disgrace': Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google's search is biased
http://www.businessinsider.com/donal...h-viceo-2016-6
Big article with pics and shit with an explanation by Matt Cutts, a guy I love and despise. So go read the rest here:Donald Trump took aim at Google on Friday afternoon after a viral video claimed to show the web giant's autocomplete search function manipulated results to favor Hillary Clinton.
"If this is true, it is a disgrace that Google would do that," Trump wrote in a statement sent to Business Insider by his campaign. "Very, very dishonest."
"They should let it float and allow people [to] see how crooked she really is," he continued.
The , created by SourceFed, showed multiple autocomplete search results for "Hillary Clinton" that it claimed proved that Google "has been actively altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton's campaign."
The video had been viewed more than 14 million times on Facebook since Thursday.
In a statement on Friday, Google emphatically rejected that its autocomplete function was biased toward any candidate. Rather, each site simply uses a different algorithm from the others.
A Google representative wrote in a statement:
Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause. Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person's name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms.
In one example from the video, SourceFed showed the autocomplete results for "Hillary Clinton cri" that included "Hillary Clinton crime reform," "Hillary Clinton crisis," and "Hillary Clinton crime bill 1994."
The results did not include anything about "crimes," "criminal," or "criminal investigation," which SourceFed showed were, by comparison, among the first results to appear on Yahoo's and Bing's autocomplete search functions.
A similar result happened when "Hillary Clinton ind" was typed into the Google search bar. Results including "Indiana," "India," "independent voters," and "Indiana campaign" all appeared. But "indictment" did not. On Yahoo and Bing, on the other hand, "indictment" was included on all of the top results for "Hillary Clinton ind."
SourceFed also found, however, that results for "Donald Trump rac" and "Bernie Sanders soc" revealed autocomplete results that contained "racist" - with additional wording or context - and "socialist," matching the results on Yahoo and Bing.
Google's autocomplete function automatically filters a small set of terms the company deems offensive or inappropriate. One of those words is "crime," which is filtered when associated with anybody's name. Vox conducted an experiment on that involving Bernie Madoff, the infamous financier who defrauded many of his clients. For the search "Bernie Madoff cri," the first response is "cricket."
Business Insider attempted SourceFed's experiment and found very similar results. But Business Insider also found similar results for other politicians, such as President George W. Bush. Searching "George w bush co" on Google, Yahoo, and Bing, respectively, revealed the following:
http://www.businessinsider.com/donal...h-viceo-2016-6
A few days ago I was looking for the Hillary/Ghadaffi vid and some other Hillary stuff and something seemed off. For a brief millisecond the thought of Google skewing the results crossed my mind. Google would never do that and there really are people who like Hillary is what i thought about it.
First I had my vote suppressed and now this, what the fuck is going on.
Is this video debunked or did Google really skew for Hillary?
Last edited by FPS_Russia; 06-10-2016 at 06:57 PM.
Like Brownie with FEMA under W. Money has completely corrupted American politics.http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clint...ry?id=39710624
How Clinton Donor Got on Sensitive Intelligence Board
Newly released State Department emails help reveal how a major Clinton Foundation donor was placed on a sensitive government intelligence advisory board even though he had no obvious experience in the field, a decision that appeared to baffle the department’s professional staff.
Uploaded Oct. 2013 Wow
Despite questionable credibility this is interesting to say the least. Pretty sure this guy was indeed a political operative for Bill Clinton in the 80's n 90's..
haha oh I remember brownie... he did a great job!Like Brownie with FEMA under W. Money has completely corrupted American politics.http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clint...ry?id=39710624
How Clinton Donor Got on Sensitive Intelligence Board
Newly released State Department emails help reveal how a major Clinton Foundation donor was placed on a sensitive government intelligence advisory board even though he had no obvious experience in the field, a decision that appeared to baffle the department’s professional staff.
No... he did a heckuva job.haha oh I remember brownie... he did a great job!
Annnnd instantly debunked as desperate spinsmoke from a campaign that can barely find rails to jump off.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
in other news..
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ad5bb...2e872dfbc60c3c
" A jury on Friday found Alabama House Speaker Mike Hubbard guilty on 12 counts of public corruption — agreeing with prosecutors' assertions that the powerful Republican used the influence and prestige of his political office to benefit his companies and clients."
That's illegal? Using the influence and prestige of his political office to benefit his companies and clients sounds like an accurate job description of damn near every politician ever.
Not debunked imo 10 more examples w pictures. Google 'Hillary Clinton croo' right now for yourself.
Annnnd instantly debunked as desperate spinsmoke from a campaign that can barely find rails to jump off.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/here-...le-to-hillary/
Hillary Clinton cross stitch
Last edited by FPS_Russia; 06-10-2016 at 11:20 PM.
"Winning is the most important thing in my life, after breathing. Breathing first, winning next."
George Steinbrenner
Not quite, I think she's too passive, a pushover and will never be presidential. So stop it with all this Warren BS. The financial crooks and their shills probably got emails to each other to "act scared of Elizabeth Warren, maybe we can trick em into picking her" insert evil laugh.
Russ Feingold's the man for the job. He's polling 5% or so ahead of some dipshit Republican in the Wisconsin Senate race. After he wins there I expect him to pick up all the Bernie voters and take the White House in 2020.
Like Bernie he's the real deal so the establishment in both parties prefer to ignore him. Russ needs your support.
If there wasn't voter fraud and an incredibly rigged system in place for Hillary. Bernie would of kicked her and her ringer Trump's ass with moderate ease. Who invites total strangers to their wedding? Chelsea and Ivanka were BFF. Both big players in NY. That Rense vid has me thinking Trump may be a Clinton ringer just like Perot and Dole. Be looking for trump to intentionally blow it in the general. Clinton Modus Operandi.
EVERYONE knows the FBI has enough to indict Hillary for mishandling classified info. They need to quit stalling and let us sort out this Biden or Bernie mess, however unlikely.
Feingold 2020
Last edited by FPS_Russia; 06-11-2016 at 07:47 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote