A. Cloutier
A. Cloutier
B. Greenstein
He was English, what do you expect?Originally Posted by Dan Druff
100% A) also applied to Devilfish, but Bonomo says "is" rather than "was", and while that could be an attempt to keep people from being sure it's Devilfish, I am getting the vibe that he is talking about someone currently living.
But yeah, Devilfish was a complete scumbag when it came to his treatment of women (and I'm talking about strangers, not women he was dating).
That was one of my points about him when everyone was eulogizing him after his death as such a great guy.
BALLIN'!!
The real stunner is that someone reads his blog.
C:
A) sounds like Mike Mizrachi to me
B) I like Greenstein or Joe Hachem for this one
C) No clue
not naming names -- is a joke. I also am not sure I believe any of this. Bonomo's past behavior proves his word is to be taken with a grain of salt. He could make all this up just to help make points that he is a crusader for women.
I mean -- man or women, who covers up rape -- not once but twice
On second thought, I like Kathy Liebert as the rapist
More gay sexism rants
http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-blog...owing-the-game
BALLIN'!!
The rapist is Jonathan Duhamel.
He was fired by Pokerstars in April after these allegations came to light. This has been known for some time by a number of people.
http://www.pokernews.com/news/2015/0...ways-21311.htm
Pokerstars has never made such a harsh statement of closure about any other departing pro.Although the poker room decided not to share any details about Duhamel's contractual agreements and the reasons that led to the parting of ways, a representative from PokerStars confirmed to PokerNews that they "won't be working together in the future."
Druff,
How does Anteater have 1 post and 10 rep?
It's a disgrace. I vote for a Chicago cop to shoot him 16 times in self defence.
You start at 10, that's how.
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
It's a disgrace. I vote for a Chicago cop to shoot him 16 times in self defence.
Jamie Gold
No way to know for sure, but I have to admit this looks pretty damning.
At the very least we know that something bad happened involving Duhamel's sponsorship with Pokerstars, and it wasn't just a matter of releasing him because he wasn't generating enough return for them.
I wonder if that girl who robbed him was getting some type of revenge.No way to know for sure, but I have to admit this looks pretty damning.
At the very least we know that something bad happened involving Duhamel's sponsorship with Pokerstars, and it wasn't just a matter of releasing him because he wasn't generating enough return for them.
A. Could be any number of pigs. Unfortunately there are probably 1 or 2 of these lowlives in every poker room the world over. Even more on the east coast. The only thing that distinguishes "Pro A" is that "Pro A" can somehow beat poker, unlike the 99% of men impulsive/dumb enough to engage in this behavior.
B. Daniel before Choice Center. I don't know details, but this is likely the least blameworthy of the three by a wide margin. It's so easy to imagine Daniel thinking he's being friendly or flirty when in fact he's crossing someone's lines and unknowingly causing her grave offense (though "repeatedly" is troubling). Perhaps these allegations are part of what made Daniel seek out and stick with Choice Center, which seems to work for him (even if I think it's cultish). Also of these three, Daniel is most likely to have learned from his mistakes and changed his attitudes and behavior for the better. That is, if Pro B is Daniel (I really think it is).
C. Definitely heard the Duhamel rumor when this blog post dropped. However, I've seen no evidence other than hearing it independently from another poker pro and subsequently from Anteater above. They could be repeating the same untrue rumor (hell, they could be the same person), beats me. Just seems like way too little to jump to such a grave conclusion. Also, not sure if too much is being read into the seeming harshness of Pokerstars saying "we won't be working together in the future." Is there a big difference between this statement and statements issues when pros get cut for other reasons, such as simply not being worth the money? Seems like a giant leap from "we won't be working together in the future" to "we won't be working together in the future because of rape allegations."
Pro A- Disgusting and Gropey...Devilfish or Gus Hansen
Pro B- A former PokerStars sponsored pro who repeatedly was accused of sexual harassment...Humberto Brenes
Pro C- A former PokerStars sponsored pro that Justin was surprised would be accused of rape allegations...Jonathan Duhamel
Remember Justin Bonomo was a sponsored PokerStars pro for awhile and used to hangout with other PokerStars pros all the time.
So Bonomo's blog creates a guessing game on which one of the top 100 poker players is a serial rapist?
That cruelly leaves dozens of people hanging. It's actually pretty fucking sick.
Put up or shut up, twat.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
