More stupidity out of Florida: 18-year-old high school girl arrested/charged for consensual relationship with "underage" student

Kaitlyn Hunt was a 17-year-old lesbian high school student, and got involved with another girl, who was 14 at the time.

She lives in Florida. Here's 2 pictures of her:

http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim2/20...UE_540x405.jpg

http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim2/20...ER_540x405.jpg

If you want to gawk at 15 other pictures of her, go to this link: http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10016885.html

Anyway,

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_1...attorney-says/

The younger girl's parents were unhappy about this relationship. It is unclear if it's because it was a lesbian relationship, or because of the age difference, but I'm guessing the former. They waited until Kaitlyn turned 18, then reported her to the police.

Kaitlyn was arrested and charged with two counts of lewd and lascivious battery of a child 12 to 16 years of age as a result of the relationship. The prosecutor's office will not drop the charges.

Ignoring the lesbian aspect of this (which is what's getting everyone's attention), I always felt that laws like this were really stupid. California, for example, makes it a felony for two teenagers one day apart in age to have sex if the "older" one is 18 today and the "younger" one turns 18 tomorrow. This is obviously not the spirit of the law, but it's the one on the books.

Florida's law makes it a crime for anyone over 18 to have a sexual relationship with anyone under 17, meaning an 18-year-old senior in high school would be committing a crime by having sex with a 16-year-old junior.

Again, laws that criminalize sex with minors should only target older (or at least somewhat older adults), and should always take into account the age difference between the two parties. If the age difference is reasonable to where it could be considered a normal relationship between teens, there should be no crime.

Some states have a "4-year-rule", where it is not a crime to have sex with a minor if the minor is at least 14 and not more than four years younger than their partner. I support this law, as it essentially protects all high school students from statutory rape charges when dating one another, and is allows reasonable relationships such as a 17-year-old dating a 20-year-old. At the same time, it punishes older perverts who prey upon teenagers.

Nevada actually has an age of consent of 16, which I think is wrong. I don't think guys my age should be allowed to legally have sex with minors under any circumstances, but Nevada allows it, while at the same time, criminalizing a relationship between an 18-year-old and a 15-year-old.

I think all of these laws need to be updated.

Unfortunately, this most important aspect of the story is getting drowned out by the "OMG gay persecution" screams and the "wow, look at the hot 18-year-old girl getting arrested for lesbian sex" gawking.

It's like any law. 99% it protects, 1% it fails. Most of the 1% it fails can get out of it if they have good attorneys.

If you did not have laws like this, 30 something guys would be hanging out at high school parking lots with drugs, alcohol and cigs.

This is an extreme example. I agree with the law. A couple people each year might get burned, but that is life.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bottomset_69

It's like any law. 99% it protects, 1% it fails. Most of the 1% it fails can get out of it if they have good attorneys.

If you did not have laws like this, 30 something guys would be hanging out at high school parking lots with drugs, alcohol and cigs.

This is an extreme example. I agree with the law. A couple people each year might get burned, but that is life.

---

You didn't read my entire post, then.

If they changed the law to a 4-year-rule, 30-year-old guys would still be committing the same crime by having sex with teenagers.

I don't need to gawk at any more pictures of this girl as one was more then enough.

The laws are stupid if the sex is consensual and between teens it's hard to put an age limit on that.

When teens hit puberty their hormones are going wild. As long as nobody gets raped if they screw around then they shouldn't be punished but hopefully they will use protection. That goes for straight people but for parents of kids who are homosexual or bi-sexual it's hard for them to stomach the fact their kid isn't straight. The parents feel their "out" is blaming the other teen for brainwashing their kid when a lot of times that isn't the case.

Parents get involved and things go crazy attempting to punish a teen too strongly for something which if it wasn't rape or another form of molestation should have no merit for a legal case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bottomset_69

It's like any law. 99% it protects, 1% it fails. Most of the 1% it fails can get out of it if they have good attorneys.

If you did not have laws like this, 30 something guys would be hanging out at high school parking lots with drugs, alcohol and cigs.

This is an extreme example. I agree with the law. A couple people each year might get burned, but that is life.

---

You didn't read my entire post, then.

If they changed the law to a 4-year-rule, 30-year-old guys would still be committing the same crime by having sex with teenagers.

---

Still the same issue though. A 22 year old guy could be hanging around parking lots swearing the 14 year old told him she was 18.

The law should be anyone in HS can date, and if you graduate you accept what you get if parents turn on you.

I used to know a dude that would go back from college at age 21 and bang his 16 year old girlfriend. That was fucking creepy. She had twin kids at age 20 and divorced at age 22. No idea where either went but it was a fucking mess.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bottomset_69

It's like any law. 99% it protects, 1% it fails. Most of the 1% it fails can get out of it if they have good attorneys.

If you did not have laws like this, 408Mike would be hanging out at high school parking lots with drugs, alcohol and cigs.

This is an extreme example. I agree with the law. A couple people each year might get burned, but that is life.

---

FYP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker

I don't need to gawk at any more pictures of this girl as one was more then enough.

The laws are stupid if the sex is consensual and between teens it's hard to put an age limit on that.

When teens hit puberty their hormones are going wild. As long as nobody gets raped if they screw around then they shouldn't be punished but hopefully they will use protection. That goes for straight people but for parents of kids who are homosexual or bi-sexual it's hard for them to stomach the fact their kid isn't straight. The parents feel their "out" is blaming the other teen for brainwashing their kid when a lot of times that isn't the case.

Parents get involved and things go crazy attempting to punish a teen too strongly for something which if it wasn't rape or another form of molestation should have no merit for a legal case.

---

I do think it's LOL that the local Florida CBS station put 17 pictures of this girl on their website, in slideshow format.

You know they did it because they knew there would be a ton of middle-aged pervs reading the story just for the 18-year-old lesbian content, and they wanted to increase their hits.

Let's say the person arrested was an 18-year-old guy in a heterosexual relationship. Do you think the CBS station would have put up 17 different pictures of him?

Druff how did you know the exact count on the # of extra pictures?

95% of this board would say go check out more pics here, but you specifically say 15.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by simpdog

Druff how did you know the exact count on the # of extra pictures?

95% of this board would say go check out more pics here, but you specifically say 15.

---

Because I am one of those middle-aged pervs.

That, and the slide show says "1 of 17".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker

I don't need to gawk at any more pictures of this girl as one was more then enough.

The laws are stupid if the sex is consensual and between teens it's hard to put an age limit on that.

When teens hit puberty their hormones are going wild. As long as nobody gets raped if they screw around then they shouldn't be punished but hopefully they will use protection. That goes for straight people but for parents of kids who are homosexual or bi-sexual it's hard for them to stomach the fact their kid isn't straight. The parents feel their "out" is blaming the other teen for brainwashing their kid when a lot of times that isn't the case.

Parents get involved and things go crazy attempting to punish a teen too strongly for something which if it wasn't rape or another form of molestation should have no merit for a legal case.

---

I do think it's LOL that the local Florida CBS station put 17 pictures of this girl on their website, in slideshow format.

You know they did it because they knew there would be a ton of middle-aged pervs reading the story just for the 18-year-old lesbian content, and they wanted to increase their hits.

Let's say the person arrested was an 18-year-old guy in a heterosexual relationship. Do you think the CBS station would have put up 17 different pictures of him?

---

They would never put even close to that many pictures up of a guy. It seems to me people would be more likely to read about this story regardless since it was a girl since most cases it's involving a boy.

I'm sure some pervs might want to look at this girl but she has a weird looking face to me. That could change when she gets older but in a non-pervert kind of way their are a lot of girls you can tell they will be very pretty when they get older but with this girl at least to me I just don't see it. She looks like she would be the type who will bake her skin five days a week at a tanning booth and age quickly from that.

I didn't notice at first the tattoo so I wonder how old she was when she got that and if her parents approved?

no one would have cared about Jodi Arias either if she was a fat black girl, or a dude.

Jodi Arias, Casey Anthony, and Amanda Knox need to meet up and film a 3-way lesbian porn. They could sell that shit for an easy $10 million.

Ridiculous incidents like this destroy the credibility of the sex offender registry. Here's a few other offenses that can land you on the list:

* Public urination

* Taking a sexual self-portrait (as a minor)

* Being naked in your own house and seen by trespassing minors

I'm not surprised that Bottomset, with his 5-month old girlfriend, supports this kind of bullshit. Less stigma for him being on the registry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker

I don't need to gawk at any more pictures of this girl as one was more then enough.

The laws are stupid if the sex is consensual and between teens it's hard to put an age limit on that.

When teens hit puberty their hormones are going wild. As long as nobody gets raped if they screw around then they shouldn't be punished but hopefully they will use protection. That goes for straight people but for parents of kids who are homosexual or bi-sexual it's hard for them to stomach the fact their kid isn't straight. The parents feel their "out" is blaming the other teen for brainwashing their kid when a lot of times that isn't the case.

Parents get involved and things go crazy attempting to punish a teen too strongly for something which if it wasn't rape or another form of molestation should have no merit for a legal case.

---

I do think it's LOL that the local Florida CBS station put 17 pictures of this girl on their website, in slideshow format.

You know they did it because they knew there would be a ton of middle-aged pervs reading the story just for the 18-year-old lesbian content, and they wanted to increase their hits.

Let's say the person arrested was an 18-year-old guy in a heterosexual relationship. Do you think the CBS station would have put up 17 different pictures of him?

---

This is another example of druff finding any story to slam florida, Druff can you explain why you love to slam the great state of florida?? California is the real shit hole with all the crime and you never slam them

come on dude, it's Florida........seriously, Florida

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bottomset_69

It's like any law. 99% it protects, 1% it fails. Most of the 1% it fails can get out of it if they have good attorneys.

If you did not have laws like this, 30 something guys would be hanging out at high school parking lots with drugs, alcohol and cigs.

This is an extreme example. I agree with the law. A couple people each year might get burned, but that is life.

---

http://rulehibernia.com/wp-content/u...er-retard1.jpg

This is going to sound weird but as a parent of a teen who's hormones are just beginning to rage, I would personally be grateful as hell if her sexual exploration was with another girl, instead of a boy. The outcomes would be so much less damaging for her life.

These parents are total idiots imo. Their daughter could be knocked up instead.

^such a hippy vwls

Hof related story on news here yesterday

http://mobile.news.com.au/national-n...-1226647620919

Cliffs:
dude sets up video camera to record paranormal activity but disovers his 28 year old gf banging his 16 year old son.
What a dumb ass instead of high 5ing son and possible spit roast action he called the cops. And she got unlucky every other state in Australia the age of consent is 16 but was17 where this hhappened.

Also just googled world age consent laws.
Colombia is 12 and japan 13
:yes

So when are they charging bottomset for fancying five month olds'?