JimmyG_415 figures out Republicans tend to be older, the study doesn't even say they died of covid, just that more old people who are Republican died, lol nice science
Printable View
'Criminal'
https://twitter.com/UpwardNewsHQ/sta...053850626?s=20
'Philanthropist'
https://twitter.com/Stand_Australia/...739799556?s=20
:facepalm
Professor Arne Burkhardt shows that they are finding spike proteins being produced all over the body after mRNA vaccination, including the testicles.
(All the brown dots are spike proteins in the prostate)
Adams is basically the king of the retards…
https://twitter.com/dr_logicai/statu...6nuNQQDMFC-VFg
He finally recognizes basic reality but is still wrong on why he was (and still is) so stupid. I actually feel sorry for him.
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pr...2_012_126.html
sieht nicht gut aus
Sad to watch the purge occur irt.
Friend fully vaxxed and boosted has come down with entire body psoriasis. Treatment is prednisone which has caused her diabetes to go off the charts. Sad thing is when pred is done, condition will return and I am sure worse things to come.
Her daughter has had 4 miscarriages and is currently preg with last of 5 eggs they had to have procured due to her husbands low sperm count.
She gets very upset when talking about the vaccine….
They literally have zero sense of agency.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku2Fv7xnL1o
Mortality rates in 2022 compare to 2019 at different ages
2022, mortality, 7.8% higher for ages 20-44
In the UK, the second half of 2022
26,300 excess deaths
compared to 4,700 in the first half of 2022
The number of deaths registered in England & Wales in week 1 of 2023
30% more deaths (3,437) than expected (2023 versus 2019)
https://www.smh.com.au/national/farc...27-gdgnyo.html
An article titled ‘Farce mask: it’s safe for only 20 minutes’ published by the Sydney Morning Herald in 2003 explained how, “Retailers who cash in on community fears about SARS by exaggerating the health benefits of surgical masks could face fines of up to $110,000.”
The article quotes a public health experts who said that face masks are largely useless at stopping the spread of viruses and could even worsen the situation.
“Those masks are only effective so long as they are dry,” said Professor Yvonne Cossart of the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Sydney.
“As soon as they become saturated with the moisture in your breath they stop doing their job and pass on the droplets.”
Professor Cossart said that the masks would need to be changed every 15-20 minutes to be in any way effective.
Her sentiments were echoed by John Bell from the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, who said that masks only offered “marginal benefit” and were largely psychological in their level of protection.
"I'm sure everyone would agree that it is un-Australian to profiteer from people's fears and anxieties," Ms Meagher said.
"We were told you need 16 layers on your mask for it to offer 95 per cent protection," Ms Taylor said.
As we previously highlighted, authorities in Melbourne used high-tech surveillance drones to catch people outside not wearing masks.
At the height of the hysteria, there were numerous instances of police in Australia physically attacking people for not adhering to mask wearing rules, including one incident when a woman was placed in a chokehold by a male police officer.
Another video showed an elderly woman being arrested for not wearing a mask while sitting on a park bench.
Yet another clip showed police pepper spraying pre-teen children for not wearing face masks.
Another clip showed an elderly man suffering a suspected heart attack after he was arrested by police for not wearing a mask outside while exercising.
During the early months of the COVID pandemic, health authorities advised against wearing masks, only to subsequently do a 180
Biden and his team want the ability to enforce mandates at their choosing, even after everyone paying attention has seen how pointless and ineffective they are.
So while it’s hard to say for certain if they would bring back mandates, it’s certainly fair to say that they might.
:lol2
:noose
https://twitter.com/profnfenton/stat...339196930?s=20
the entire point of my piece was to inject a more accurate count of the unvaccinated into the ONS data that was using a 2011 census to vastly undercount them and thereby rig apparent VE by ascribing "unvaxxed deaths" to too small a denominator.
i did that using the data that ONS themselves cited as "best data" when they were retracting their previous data (that you cite) as "unfit for purpose"
(see here: https://wherearethenumbers.substack....utm_medium=web )
you can find that data here:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...cination-rates
they were playing serious games with the unvaxxed base rate by using much too small a cohort by taking dated population figures and subtracting "known vaxxed" from it. this makes their whole analysis junk.
i used a VERY charitable set of assumptions to get to those figures.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/u...ll-cause-death
and as can be seen, when one actually puts even the ONS's own ASMR data into an actual probabilistic stack that accounts for the full experience of getting to "boosted" (and mitigates the bad outcome shifting definitional game they play by ascribing the first 21 days to "other" categories you can see that it actually comes out worse than my prior est.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/a...ause-mortality
pay particular attention to how badly the double dosed fare. that's another of the denominator games they play to make "boosted" look good.
the point of my inquiry was to correct these failings.
i get how you're getting to your numbers, but i think you're ill advised to take their data at face value. (especially now that ONS themselves have repudiated it for just the failings i was trying to correct)
one could perhaps argue that even trying to use this ONS data at all is possibly pointless, but as the data once denominator adjusted or places in proper bayesian structure aligns pretty well with the current (and highly unexpected) excess deaths figures in UK on a pop weighted basis, i suspect my figures are in a pretty reasonable ballpark.
this would certainly be a lot easier of some of these agencies would open up their raw patient level data to allow definitive analysis, but we do the best we can with what we have.